AMD Radeon PRO W7900 vs Intel Arc Pro B370 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data presents an unusual comparison: the AMD Radeon PRO W7900 has two benchmark entries, while the Intel Arc Pro B370 has none. The database shows the AMD card achieving a Geekbench OpenCL score of 84,379 and a Geekbench Vulkan score of 137,070. Its average benchmark score across recorded tests is 110,725. The Intel part has no recorded benchmarks, resulting in an average benchmark score of 0. This means the head-to-head comparison is entirely one-sided; the AMD card holds wins in every measurable category.

The Radeon PRO W7900's OpenCL score of 84,379 places it in the 94th percentile of all GPUs in the database. Its nearest rival, the NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB, posts an average score of 114,395, which is 3.2% higher than the AMD card's average. Conversely, the AMD Radeon Pro Vega II sits at 109,617, a mere 1% below the W7900's average. The NVIDIA RTX A5500 Mobile averages 113,944, which is 2.8% higher, while the AMD Radeon Pro W6600X averages 107,342, sitting 3.2% lower. These delta percentages show that the W7900's overall position is competitive, with its average score falling within a narrow band of roughly 3% above or below its closest competitors.

The Intel Arc Pro B370, by contrast, has no nearest rivals listed and no benchmark scores. Its percentile ranking of 50 places it at the median of the database, but this is based on no actual recorded performance data. The absence of measurements makes any quantitative head-to-head analysis impossible for this part. The only concrete performance indicators come from its specification-derived rates: a pixel rate of 48.00 GPixel/s, a texture rate of 96.00 GTexel/s, and a FP32 compute rate of 6.144 TFLOPS. These figures are dramatically lower than the AMD card's corresponding rates of 479.0 GPixel/s, 958.1 GTexel/s, and 61.32 TFLOPS, but they are computed from hardware parameters rather than real-world tests.

The data indicates that the AMD Radeon PRO W7900 is a high-performance workstation card with a robust benchmark presence. Its average score of 110,725 is nearly equal to that of the Radeon Pro Vega II, differing by only 1%. The Intel Arc Pro B370, on the other hand, has no benchmark presence at all, making its performance characteristics purely theoretical at this point. The database records no head-to-head benchmarks between the two, and neither part has any wins tallied in the head-to-head category because no direct comparison tests exist.

The Verdict

From the recorded data alone, the AMD Radeon PRO W7900 is the only part with measurable performance. It delivers a Geekbench Vulkan score of 137,070 and an OpenCL score of 84,379, which contributes to an average benchmark score of 110,725. The Intel Arc Pro B370 has no recorded scores, an average of 0, and no rival comparisons. Any user requiring a discrete GPU with proven compute performance would select the AMD card based on the availability of data. The Intel part, with a 50th percentile ranking and no measurements, cannot be evaluated on the same terms.

The AMD card's nearest rivals all fall within a small performance band. The Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB is 3.2% ahead, the RTX A5500 Mobile is 2.8% ahead, the Radeon Pro Vega II is 1% behind, and the Radeon Pro W6600X is 3.2% behind. This indicates that the W7900's average score is representative of a mid-to-high-end workstation GPU, competitive with those specific models. The Intel Arc Pro B370 has no such context, so no verdict on its relative standing can be made from benchmark results.

The data suggests that the AMD Radeon PRO W7900 is suited for tasks requiring high FP32 throughput, given its 61.32 TFLOPS, and large memory capacity, with 48 GB of GDDR6. The Intel Arc Pro B370, with its integrated form factor, 25 W TDP, and system-shared memory, is a fundamentally different class of product. Its specifications imply low power consumption and integration, but without benchmarks, the database cannot confirm any performance level. The verdict from the data is clear: the AMD part has measurable performance; the Intel part does not.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Radeon PRO W7900 uses the Navi 31 chip built on TSMC's 5 nm process. Its architecture is RDNA 3.0, with the codename Plum Bonito, and it belongs to the Radeon Pro Navi (Navi III Series) generation. The chip contains 57,700 million transistors on a die size of 529 mm², yielding a transistor density of 109.1M per mm². The Intel Arc Pro B370 uses the Panther Lake chip fabricated on Intel's 3 nm process. Its architecture is Xe3-LPG, and it belongs to the Arc Graphics-WM (Panther Lake) generation. Its transistor count and die size are listed as unknown, and its codename is null.

The AMD card has 6,144 shading units, 384 texture mapping units, 192 raster output units, and 96 ray tracing cores. The Intel part has 1,280 shading units, 40 TMUs, 20 ROPs, and 10 ray tracing cores. Neither part lists tensor cores in the database. The FP32 and FP16 ratios differ: the AMD card reports FP16 at 61.32 TFLOPS with a 1:1 ratio to FP32, while the Intel part reports FP16 at 12.29 TFLOPS with a 2:1 ratio, meaning its FP16 throughput is double its FP32 rate. The AMD card's FP32 is 61.32 TFLOPS; the Intel part's FP32 is 6.144 TFLOPS.

The memory architecture is a major divergence. The AMD card uses 48 GB of GDDR6 with a 384-bit bus and 864.0 GB/s bandwidth. The Intel card uses system-shared memory, with no dedicated VRAM, type, or bus width; its bandwidth is listed as system dependent. The AMD card's pixel rate is 479.0 GPixel/s and its texture rate is 958.1 GTexel/s. The Intel card's pixel rate is 48.00 GPixel/s and its texture rate is 96.00 GTexel/s. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Specification Differences

The two parts differ across nearly every recorded specification field. The AMD Radeon PRO W7900 has a base clock of 1760 MHz and a boost clock of 2495 MHz, while the Intel Arc Pro B370 has a base clock of 300 MHz and a boost clock of 2400 MHz. Memory clocks differ as well: the AMD card runs at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective, while the Intel part's memory clock is listed as system shared.

Power requirements are starkly different. The AMD card has a TDP of 295 W, requires a 600 W suggested power supply, uses 2x 8-pin power connectors, and occupies a triple-slot width. The Intel part has a TDP of 25 W, no power connectors, no suggested PSU, and is an integrated graphics processor (IGP) with an IGP bus interface. The AMD card uses PCIe 4.0 x16, while the Intel part is listed as IGP.

Physical dimensions are only recorded for the AMD card: 280 mm length (11 inches), 110 mm height (4.3 inches), and 51 mm width (2 inches). The Intel part has null dimensions. Display outputs also differ: the AMD card provides 3x DisplayPort 2.1 and 1x mini-DisplayPort 2.1, while the Intel card's outputs are portable device dependent. The AMD card's launch MSRP is 3,999 USD; the Intel card has no launch MSRP listed. Release dates are separate, with the AMD card released on 2023-05-25 and the Intel card on 2026-01-26. The AMD card's predecessor is the Radeon Pro Vega; the Intel card's predecessor is the HD Graphics-WM. Both are currently marked as active in production.

The production process nodes also differ: AMD uses a 5 nm TSMC process, while Intel uses a 3 nm process from Intel's own foundry. The AMD card's transistor density is 109.1M per mm², whereas the Intel card's density is null due to unknown transistor count and die size.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO W7900 has an average benchmark score of 110,725. The Intel Arc Pro B370 has an average score of 0, as no benchmarks are recorded for it.

Q: What is the performance difference between the AMD Radeon PRO W7900 and its closest rival?

A: The closest rival is the AMD Radeon Pro Vega II with an average score of 109,617, which is 1% lower than the W7900's average. The NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB is 3.2% higher at 114,395.

Q: How much memory does each GPU have?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO W7900 has 48 GB of GDDR6 memory with a 384-bit bus. The Intel Arc Pro B370 uses system shared memory, with size, type, and bus width all listed as system shared.

Q: What are the FP32 compute rates for the two GPUs?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO W7900 delivers 61.32 TFLOPS of FP32 compute. The Intel Arc Pro B370 delivers 6.144 TFLOPS of FP32 compute.

Q: Do both GPUs support the same graphics APIs?

A: Yes, both the AMD Radeon PRO W7900 and the Intel Arc Pro B370 support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Q: What is the power consumption difference?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO W7900 has a TDP of 295 W and requires a 600 W suggested power supply. The Intel Arc Pro B370 has a TDP of 25 W and has no suggested power supply listed.