AMD Radeon PRO W7800 vs Intel Arc Pro B370 Comparison

Where Each One Wins

The recorded data presents a stark contrast between these two graphics processors. The AMD Radeon PRO W7800 holds a commanding position across every measurable performance metric, while the Intel Arc Pro B370 has no recorded benchmark scores in the database.

The AMD Radeon PRO W7800 delivers a Geekbench OpenCL score of 154,366 and a Geekbench Vulkan score of 175,422. These results place the card at the 97th percentile among all GPUs in the database. The Intel Arc Pro B370, by contrast, sits at the 50th percentile with an average benchmark score of zero, indicating that no benchmark data has been collected for this part.

The use-case split is therefore unambiguous. The AMD Radeon PRO W7800 wins in every category that the database tracks. For compute-intensive workloads measured by OpenCL, the W7800 shows 154,366 points. For graphics and rendering tasks measured by Vulkan, it reaches 175,422 points. The Intel Arc Pro B370 has no wins in any recorded benchmark category, because the database contains no scores for it.

The W7800's average benchmark score of 164,894 confirms its position as a high-performance workstation card. The B370's average of zero reflects its status as a newly released integrated graphics processor with no accumulated test data. The database records show the B370 was released later in the timeline, and its measurement history is still being established.

Architecture Differences

These two processors come from fundamentally different design philosophies. The AMD Radeon PRO W7800 uses the Navi 31 chip built on the RDNA 3.0 architecture with the codename Plum Bonito. It belongs to the Radeon Pro Navi generation, specifically the Navi III Series. The Intel Arc Pro B370 uses the Panther Lake chip with the Xe3-LPG architecture and belongs to the Arc Graphics-WM generation.

The manufacturing processes differ substantially. AMD uses a 5 nm process at TSMC, while Intel uses a 3 nm process at its own foundry. The W7800 contains 57,700 million transistors on a 529 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 109.1 million per square millimeter. Intel's transistor count and die size for the B370 are listed as unknown in the database, with no density figure recorded.

Memory architecture presents another major division. The AMD Radeon PRO W7800 has 32 GB of dedicated GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 576.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The Intel Arc Pro B370 uses system shared memory, with its bandwidth described as system dependent. This fundamental difference means the W7800 has dedicated, consistent memory resources, while the B370 relies on the host system's memory allocation.

The compute resources are heavily skewed toward AMD. The W7800 has 4,480 shading units, 280 texture mapping units, 128 render output units, and 70 ray tracing cores. The B370 has 1,280 shading units, 40 texture mapping units, 20 render output units, and 10 ray tracing cores. These figures represent a 3.5x advantage in shading units, a 7x advantage in texture mapping units, a 6.4x advantage in render output units, and a 7x advantage in ray tracing cores for the AMD part.

Clock speeds tell a more nuanced story. The W7800 has a base clock of 1,895 MHz and a boost clock of 2,525 MHz, with memory running at 2,250 MHz or 18 Gbps effective. The B370 has a base clock of 300 MHz and a boost clock of 2,400 MHz. The B370's boost clock comes remarkably close to the W7800's, but its much lower base clock and reduced compute resources limit its overall throughput.

The raw throughput rates confirm the performance gap. The W7800 achieves 323.2 GPixel/s pixel rate and 707.0 GTexel/s texture rate, with FP32 performance of 45.25 TFLOPS and FP16 performance of 90.50 TFLOPS at a 2:1 ratio. The B370 achieves 48.00 GPixel/s pixel rate and 96.00 GTexel/s texture rate, with FP32 performance of 6.144 TFLOPS and FP16 performance of 12.29 TFLOPS at a 2:1 ratio.

Power and physical specifications diverge wildly. The W7800 has a TDP of 260 W, requires two 8-pin power connectors, suggests a 600 W power supply, and occupies a dual-slot form factor measuring 280 mm in length, 110 mm in height, and 40 mm in width. The B370 has a TDP of 25 W, requires no power connectors, has no suggested power supply, and is classified as an integrated graphics processor with dimensions dependent on the host device.

Both cards share some common ground in their API support. Each supports DirectX 12 Ultimate with the 12_2 feature level, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The W7800 provides three DisplayPort 2.1 outputs plus one mini-DisplayPort 2.1 output, while the B370's display outputs are listed as portable device dependent.

The production status for both is listed as active. The W7800's predecessor is the Radeon Pro Vega, and the B370's predecessor is the HD Graphics-WM. Neither has a recorded successor.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark comparisons between these two processors. The wins count stands at zero for each card, and the head-to-head benchmark array is empty. This absence of comparative data reflects the fundamental asymmetry in their measurement history.

The AMD Radeon PRO W7800 has two recorded benchmark scores. Its Geekbench OpenCL result of 154,366 ranks against its nearest rivals with specific deltas. The NVIDIA RTX A5500 scores 165,217, which places it 0.2% above the W7800. The NVIDIA RTX 4500 Ada Generation scores 166,094, which is 0.7% higher. The NVIDIA A100 PCIe 40 GB scores 162,504, which is 1.5% below the W7800. The AMD Radeon Pro W6900X scores 168,574, which is 2.2% higher.

The W7800's Vulkan score of 175,422 exceeds its OpenCL score by roughly 13.6%, indicating that the architecture performs relatively better under the Vulkan API. The average benchmark score of 164,894 sits between these two results, weighted toward the OpenCL figure.

The Intel Arc Pro B370 has no benchmark scores in the database. Its average benchmark score is listed as zero, and its nearest rivals array is empty. This means the database contains no recorded performance measurements for this part, no comparative deltas, and no percentile ranking beyond the 50th percentile baseline that reflects its unmeasured status.

The nearest rival comparisons for the W7800 show a narrow competitive band. The delta values range from -2.2% against the W6900X to +1.5% against the A100 PCIe 40 GB. This places the W7800 within a tight cluster of professional workstation GPUs, all within roughly 2.5% of each other. The W7800's position at the 97th percentile among all GPUs confirms that even the slight deltas against its nearest rivals represent top-tier performance.

FAQ

Q: What is the performance difference between the AMD Radeon PRO W7800 and the Intel Arc Pro B370?

A: The database contains no direct benchmark scores for the Intel Arc Pro B370, so no comparative performance figures exist. The AMD Radeon PRO W7800 has recorded Geekbench OpenCL and Vulkan scores of 154,366 and 175,422 respectively, placing it at the 97th percentile among all GPUs.

Q: How does the memory configuration differ between these two processors?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO W7800 has 32 GB of dedicated GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus with 576.0 GB/s bandwidth. The Intel Arc Pro B370 uses system shared memory with system dependent bandwidth, meaning it has no dedicated graphics memory of its own.

Q: What are the power requirements for each card?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO W7800 has a 260 W TDP, requires two 8-pin power connectors, and suggests a 600 W power supply. The Intel Arc Pro B370 has a 25 W TDP, requires no power connectors, and has no suggested power supply because it is an integrated graphics processor.

Q: Which processor has more compute resources?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO W7800 has 4,480 shading units, 280 texture mapping units, 128 render output units, and 70 ray tracing cores. The Intel Arc Pro B370 has 1,280 shading units, 40 texture mapping units, 20 render output units, and 10 ray tracing cores.

Q: What is the physical form factor of each processor?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO W7800 is a dual-slot card measuring 280 mm in length, 110 mm in height, and 40 mm in width. The Intel Arc Pro B370 is classified as an integrated graphics processor with no listed dimensions and a form factor dependent on the host device.

Q: When was each processor released?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO W7800 was released on 2023-04-12 with a launch MSRP of 2,499 USD. The Intel Arc Pro B370 was released on 2026-01-26, and the database records no launch MSRP for it.

The Verdict

The data presents an unambiguous conclusion. The AMD Radeon PRO W7800 is a fully measured, high-performance workstation graphics card with recorded benchmark scores, a 97th percentile ranking, and a competitive position within 2.5% of its nearest professional GPU rivals. The Intel Arc Pro B370 has no recorded benchmark scores in the database, making any performance comparison impossible.

For users requiring dedicated graphics memory, the W7800's 32 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus with 576.0 GB/s bandwidth stands as a clear advantage over the B370's system shared memory. For compute workloads, the W7800's 45.25 TFLOPS FP32 performance dwarfs the B370's 6.144 TFLOPS. For rendering tasks, the W7800's 323.2 GPixel/s pixel rate and 707.0 GTexel/s texture rate exceed the B370's 48.00 GPixel/s and 96.00 GTexel/s figures by substantial margins.

The B370's integrated graphics design, 25 W TDP, and lack of power connectors position it as a low-power, portable-device-oriented processor. The W7800's 260 W TDP, dual-slot form factor, and dedicated power connectors position it as a workstation-class add-in card. These are different product categories with different design goals.

The database shows that the W7800 holds a 97th percentile ranking with an average benchmark score of 164,894. The B370 holds a 50th percentile ranking with an average benchmark score of zero. The B370's nearest rivals array is empty, while the W7800's nearest rivals span from the NVIDIA RTX A5500 at 0.2% above to the AMD Radeon Pro W6900X at 2.2% above.

The release dates reinforce this distinction. The W7800 arrived in the database timeline earlier, with a launch MSRP of 2,499 USD, and has accumulated substantial measurement data. The B370 arrived later and has no accumulated measurements. For any workload that the database can assess, the AMD Radeon PRO W7800 delivers the recorded performance, while the Intel Arc Pro B370 awaits its first benchmark results.