AMD Radeon PRO W7700 vs Intel Arc Pro B370 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data for these two GPUs is asymmetrical. The AMD Radeon PRO W7700 has two benchmark entries in the database: a Geekbench OpenCL score of 108245 and a Geekbench Vulkan score of 129706. The Intel Arc Pro B370 has no benchmark entries recorded, and its average benchmark score is listed as 0. Consequently, no direct head-to-head benchmark results exist between these two products.

The AMD Radeon PRO W7700's average benchmark score is 118976, placing it at the 95th percentile against all GPUs tracked in the database. The Intel Arc Pro B370 shows an average benchmark score of 0 and sits at the 50th percentile.

The Radeon PRO W7700's nearest rivals in the database, based on average score, are: the NVIDIA GB10 at 117393, which is 1.3% behind the W7700; the NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation at 117088, 1.6% behind; the NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB at 114395, 4% behind; and the NVIDIA RTX A5500 Mobile at 113944, 4.4% behind. These figures indicate that the W7700 leads its closest competitors by a narrow but consistent margin.

In the Geekbench OpenCL test, the W7700 scored 108245. In the Geekbench Vulkan test, it scored 129706. The Vulkan result is higher than the OpenCL result for this card, which suggests the architecture responds well to that API's workload patterns.

The Intel Arc Pro B370, by contrast, appears in the database without any benchmark records. Its compute specifications are present, but its measured performance profile is empty. The lack of data means its practical performance cannot be compared numerically to the W7700 or any other product in the database.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Radeon PRO W7700 wins in all recorded benchmark categories because it is the only one of the two with benchmark entries. Its Geekbench Vulkan score of 129706 exceeds its Geekbench OpenCL score of 108245 by a substantial margin, indicating that Vulkan-based workloads are where the card shows its strongest measured results.

The W7700 also wins on the basis of having a complete performance profile. Its average benchmark score of 118976 is supported by two individual test results, and its 95th percentile ranking places it among the higher-performing GPUs in the database. The nearest rival comparison reinforces this: the W7700 outperforms the NVIDIA GB10 by 1.3%, the NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation by 1.6%, the NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB by 4%, and the NVIDIA RTX A5500 Mobile by 4.4%.

The Intel Arc Pro B370 has no recorded wins in any benchmark category. Its database entry shows no test scores, no average benchmark score, and no nearest rivals. This is not a statement about its potential performance; it is a statement about the absence of recorded data. The only comparative advantage visible in the facts is its low power envelope, which is not a benchmark win but a specification difference.

The use-case split is therefore straightforward. For any workload measured by the database, the W7700 has demonstrable results. For the B370, no measured results exist. The W7700's Vulkan score being higher than its OpenCL score suggests that Vulkan-capable applications may extract more from the hardware, but this inference is limited to the two data points available.

FAQ

Q: What is the average benchmark score for the AMD Radeon PRO W7700?

A: The average benchmark score for the AMD Radeon PRO W7700 is 118976.

Q: Does the Intel Arc Pro B370 have any benchmark results in the database?

A: No. The Intel Arc Pro B370 has an empty benchmarks array, an average benchmark score of 0, and no nearest rivals listed.

Q: How does the AMD Radeon PRO W7700 compare to its nearest rival, the NVIDIA GB10?

A: The NVIDIA GB10 has an average score of 117393, which is 1.3% lower than the W7700's average score of 118976.

Q: What is the percentile ranking of each GPU?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO W7700 ranks at the 95th percentile against all GPUs. The Intel Arc Pro B370 ranks at the 50th percentile.

Q: Which GPU has a higher Geekbench Vulkan score?

A: Only the AMD Radeon PRO W7700 has a Geekbench Vulkan score in the database, at 129706. The Intel Arc Pro B370 has no Vulkan score recorded.

Q: What is the power consumption difference between the two cards?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO W7700 has a TDP of 190 W, while the Intel Arc Pro B370 has a TDP of 25 W.

Specification Differences

The two GPUs differ across nearly every recorded specification field.

The AMD Radeon PRO W7700 uses the Navi 32 chip, built on TSMC's 5 nm process. It has 28,100 million transistors on a 346 mm² die, with a transistor density of 81.2 million per square millimeter. The Intel Arc Pro B370 uses the Panther Lake chip, built on Intel's 3 nm process. Its transistor count and die size are listed as unknown, and its transistor density is null.

Clock speeds differ sharply. The W7700 has a base clock of 1900 MHz and a boost clock of 2600 MHz, with a memory clock of 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective). The B370 has a base clock of 300 MHz and a boost clock of 2400 MHz, with system shared memory.

Memory specifications are entirely different. The W7700 has 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, with 576.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The B370 uses system shared memory, with a system dependent bus width and bandwidth.

Compute unit counts differ. The W7700 has 3072 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, 96 ROPs, and 48 ray tracing cores. The B370 has 1280 shading units, 40 TMUs, 20 ROPs, and 10 ray tracing cores.

Rates and throughput differ accordingly. The W7700 delivers 249.6 GPixel/s pixel rate, 499.2 GTexel/s texture rate, 31.95 TFLOPS FP32, and 63.90 TFLOPS FP16. The B370 delivers 48.00 GPixel/s, 96.00 GTexel/s, 6.144 TFLOPS FP32, and 12.29 TFLOPS FP16.

Power and physical configuration differ. The W7700 has a TDP of 190 W, is dual-slot, uses a single 8-pin power connector, and suggests a 450 W power supply. The B370 has a TDP of 25 W, is an IGP, uses no power connectors, and has no suggested PSU.

The bus interface differs: the W7700 uses PCIe 4.0 x16, while the B370 uses IGP. Display outputs differ: the W7700 has 4x DisplayPort 2.1, while the B370's outputs are portable device dependent. Dimensions differ: the W7700 is 241 mm (9.5 inches) long and 111 mm (4.4 inches) high, while the B370 has no recorded dimensions.

Production status differs: the W7700 has no production status listed, while the B370 is listed as active. Release dates differ: the W7700 was released on 2023-11-12, the B370 on 2026-01-26. The W7700 has a launch MSRP of 999 USD; the B370 has no launch MSRP recorded.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Radeon PRO W7700 uses the RDNA 3.0 architecture, with the codename Wheat Nas, and belongs to the Radeon Pro Navi generation (Navi III Series). Its predecessor is the Radeon Pro Vega. It is a discrete add-in board.

The Intel Arc Pro B370 uses the Xe3-LPG architecture, with no codename recorded, and belongs to the Arc Graphics-WM generation (Panther Lake). Its predecessor is HD Graphics-WM. It is an integrated graphics processor.

The process nodes differ: TSMC 5 nm for the W7700, Intel 3 nm for the B370. The foundries differ: TSMC for AMD, Intel for Intel.

The memory architecture is fundamentally different. The W7700 has dedicated GDDR6 memory with a fixed bus width and bandwidth. The B370 relies on system shared memory, with bandwidth described as system dependent. This is a structural difference, not just a numerical one.

The API support is identical: both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

The transistor density figure of 81.2 million per square millimeter is recorded only for the W7700. The B370's transistor count and die size are unknown.

The W7700's ray tracing core count of 48 is substantially higher than the B370's 10. The W7700's shading unit count of 3072 is more than double the B370's 1280.

The B370 is listed as an IGP, meaning it is integrated into a processor package. The W7700 is a standalone card with its own power connector, cooling solution, and dimensions.

The Verdict

The data supports a clear conclusion for database purposes. The AMD Radeon PRO W7700 is a fully characterized product with two benchmark scores, an average benchmark score of 118976, a 95th percentile ranking, and four nearest rivals with known deltas. Its Geekbench Vulkan score of 129706 and Geekbench OpenCL score of 108245 provide concrete reference points.

The Intel Arc Pro B370 is a product without recorded benchmark data. Its average benchmark score is 0, its benchmarks array is empty, and it has no nearest rivals. Its specifications are recorded, including a 25 W TDP, 1280 shading units, and a 3 nm process, but no performance measurements exist in the database.

For users selecting based on measured performance, the W7700 is the only option with evidence. It leads its nearest rivals by margins from 1.3% to 4.4%. Its Vulkan result is notably higher than its OpenCL result.

For users selecting based on the specifications that are recorded, the B370 offers a much lower power envelope at 25 W versus 190 W, a newer process node at 3 nm versus 5 nm, and integrated form factor. However, without benchmark data, its actual performance relative to the W7700 cannot be quantified.

The verdict from the data is straightforward: the W7700 has the measured performance profile, and the B370 does not. Any choice between them must account for the fact that one card has two benchmark results and the other has none.