AMD Radeon PRO W7600 vs Lisuan Tech LX MAX Comparison

The Verdict

The AMD Radeon PRO W7600 is a professional workstation card aimed at established software ecosystems. The Lisuan Tech LX MAX is a newer, higher-specification contender with a much larger memory pool and wider bus. The data shows the W7600 is a known quantity, with an average benchmark score of 87108, placing it in the 93rd percentile of all GPUs. The LX MAX, however, has no recorded benchmark scores, an average score of 0, and sits in the 50th percentile, meaning its real-world performance is unverified.

For users needing a proven, immediately deployable card for professional applications, the W7600 is the safer choice based on its recorded performance data. Its nearest rivals, such as the NVIDIA RTX A4500 with an average score of 91671, show the W7600 trails by 5%, while it leads the NVIDIA CMP 40HX by 1.7%. This places it in a competitive mid-range professional segment.

The LX MAX, with its 12 GB memory, 192-bit bus, and 24.58 TFLOPS FP32 compute, presents impressive paper specifications. However, without any benchmark results, its actual performance cannot be confirmed. The card is for users who prioritize hardware specifications over validated performance, such as those targeting specific compute workloads that benefit from raw FP32 throughput and a larger memory capacity.

Architecture Differences

The two cards share a 6 nm manufacturing process at TSMC, but their internal architectures diverge significantly. The AMD Radeon PRO W7600 uses the Navi 33 chip with the RDNA 3.0 architecture, codenamed Hotpink Bonefish. It belongs to the Radeon Pro Navi (Navi III Series) generation. The Lisuan Tech LX MAX uses a chip designated 7G106 with the TrueGPU architecture, from the 7G100 generation.

The W7600 has a transistor count of 13,300 million on a 204 mm² die, resulting in a transistor density of 65.2M per mm². The LX MAX does not have recorded data for transistor count or die size. The LX MAX is built around raw throughput, featuring 6144 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 96 render output units. The W7600 has fewer units, with 2048 shading units, 128 TMUs, and 64 ROPs. The LX MAX also lacks dedicated ray tracing cores, while the W7600 includes 32.

The memory subsystems differ in capacity and bandwidth. The LX MAX uses 12 GB of GDDR6 across a 192-bit bus, delivering a bandwidth of 432.0 GB/s. The W7600 offers 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, providing 288.0 GB/s. Both operate at the same memory clock of 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective speed. The LX MAX supports a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, while the W7600 uses PCIe 4.0 x8.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark results between these two cards. The W7600 has two recorded benchmark scores: a Geekbench OpenCL score of 81528 and a Geekbench Vulkan score of 92688, for an average of 87108. The LX MAX has no benchmark entries, so a direct performance comparison is impossible from the recorded data.

Performance can be inferred from specifications. The LX MAX delivers 24.58 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 49.15 TFLOPS of FP16 (2:1). The W7600 provides 19.99 TFLOPS FP32 and 39.98 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1). The pixel rate for the LX MAX is 192.0 GPixel/s versus 156.2 GPixel/s for the W7600. Texture rate also favors the LX MAX at 384.0 GTexel/s compared to 312.3 GTexel/s.

The W7600 has a proven performance baseline relative to its rivals. It is 0.4% behind the NVIDIA Quadro GP100, 1.7% ahead of the NVIDIA CMP 40HX, and trails the NVIDIA RTX A4500 Mobile by 4.4% and the RTX A4500 by 5%. This data confirms the W7600 performs consistently within an expected professional range. The LX MAX lacks such data, so its performance cannot be contextualized.

FAQ

Q: Which card has more VRAM?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX MAX has 12 GB of GDDR6 memory, while the AMD Radeon PRO W7600 has 8 GB.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth difference?

A: The LX MAX provides 432.0 GB/s across a 192-bit bus. The W7600 provides 288.0 GB/s across a 128-bit bus.

Q: Which card has a higher FP32 compute rating?

A: The LX MAX is rated at 24.58 TFLOPS, while the W7600 is rated at 19.99 TFLOPS.

Q: Does either card have ray tracing cores?

A: The W7600 includes 32 ray tracing cores. The LX MAX has no record of ray tracing cores.

Q: What is the power requirement for each?

A: The W7600 has a TDP of 130 W and recommends a 300 W PSU with a single 6-pin connector. The LX MAX has a TDP of 225 W and recommends a 550 W PSU with a single 16-pin connector.

Q: What benchmark scores are recorded for the LX MAX?

A: The database records no benchmark scores for the LX MAX, giving it an average benchmark score of 0.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Radeon PRO W7600 wins in validated performance and professional compatibility. Its recorded average benchmark score of 87108 and 93rd percentile ranking demonstrate consistent operation. It supports the latest API standards, including DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The W7600 also features four DisplayPort 2.1 outputs, which is a newer display standard than the LX MAX's DisplayPort 1.4a. Its single-slot design and lower power draw, 130 W versus 225 W, make it easier to integrate into dense workstation builds. The card has a launch MSRP of 599 USD.

The Lisuan Tech LX MAX wins on raw hardware specifications. Its 12 GB memory capacity and 432.0 GB/s bandwidth are substantially higher, which benefits large dataset workloads and higher-resolution textures. The 192-bit bus provides a wider data path. Its compute throughput, 24.58 TFLOPS FP32, is about 23% higher than the W7600. The LX MAX also has a wider PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, which can be beneficial for data transfer in compute tasks. The card's 6144 shading units and 96 ROPs suggest higher fill rates, confirmed by its 192.0 GPixel/s pixel rate and 384.0 GTexel/s texture rate.

For users working with very large models or memory-intensive rendering, the LX MAX's hardware is more capable on paper. For users requiring a proven card that works immediately with known performance characteristics, the W7600 is the better documented option. The LX MAX is a high-specification card with no performance verification, while the W7600 is a verified performer with a lower specification ceiling.

Specification Differences

The following specifications differ between the two cards:

• Chip: Navi 33 (W7600) versus 7G106 (LX MAX)
• Architecture: RDNA 3.0 (W7600) versus TrueGPU (LX MAX)
• Codename: Hotpink Bonefish (W7600) versus not specified (LX MAX)
• Generation: Radeon Pro Navi (Navi III Series) (W7600) versus 7G100 (LX MAX)
• Transistors: 13,300 million (W7600) versus unknown (LX MAX)
• Die Size: 204 mm² (W7600) versus unknown (LX MAX)
• Transistor Density: 65.2M / mm² (W7600) versus not specified (LX MAX)
• Base Clock: 1720 MHz (W7600) versus none recorded (LX MAX)
• Boost Clock: 2440 MHz (W7600) versus none recorded (LX MAX)
• Memory Size: 8 GB (W7600) versus 12 GB (LX MAX)
• Memory Bus Width: 128 bit (W7600) versus 192 bit (LX MAX)
• Memory Bandwidth: 288.0 GB/s (W7600) versus 432.0 GB/s (LX MAX)
• Shading Units: 2048 (W7600) versus 6144 (LX MAX)
• Texture Mapping Units: 128 (W7600) versus 192 (LX MAX)
• Render Output Units: 64 (W7600) versus 96 (LX MAX)
• Ray Tracing Cores: 32 (W7600) versus none recorded (LX MAX)
• Pixel Rate: 156.2 GPixel/s (W7600) versus 192.0 GPixel/s (LX MAX)
• Texture Rate: 312.3 GTexel/s (W7600) versus 384.0 GTexel/s (LX MAX)
• FP32 Performance: 19.99 TFLOPS (W7600) versus 24.58 TFLOPS (LX MAX)
• FP16 Performance: 39.98 TFLOPS (W7600) versus 49.15 TFLOPS (LX MAX)
• TDP: 130 W (W7600) versus 225 W (LX MAX)
• Slot Width: Single-slot (W7600) versus Dual-slot (LX MAX)
• Power Connectors: 1x 6-pin (W7600) versus 1x 16-pin (LX MAX)
• Suggested PSU: 300 W (W7600) versus 550 W (LX MAX)
• Bus Interface: PCIe 4.0 x8 (W7600) versus PCIe 4.0 x16 (LX MAX)
• Display Outputs: 4x DisplayPort 2.1 (W7600) versus 4x DisplayPort 1.4a (LX MAX)
• Vulkan Version: 1.4 (W7600) versus 1.3 (LX MAX)
• Dimensions: 241 mm length, 115 mm height (W7600) versus 248 mm length, 118 mm height, 48 mm width (LX MAX)
• Release Date: 2023-08-02 (W7600) versus 2026-03-16 (LX MAX)
• Launch MSRP: 599 USD (W7600) versus none recorded (LX MAX)
• Average Benchmark Score: 87108 (W7600) versus 0 (LX MAX)
• Percentile vs All GPUs: 93 (W7600) versus 50 (LX MAX)