AMD Radeon PRO W7600 vs Intel Arc Pro B370 Comparison

Where Each One Wins

The benchmark database places these two processors in entirely different performance classes. The AMD Radeon PRO W7600 holds a 93rd percentile ranking across all GPUs, while the Intel Arc Pro B370 sits at the 50th percentile. The AMD card delivers an average benchmark score of 87,108, whereas the Intel part has no recorded benchmark scores in the database, leaving its average at zero.

The AMD Radeon PRO W7600 wins decisively on raw compute throughput. Its FP32 performance of 19.99 TFLOPS more than triples the Intel Arc Pro B370's 6.144 TFLOPS. The AMD card also produces 312.3 GTexel/s of texture fill rate versus 96.00 GTexel/s on the Intel part, and 156.2 GPixel/s of pixel fill rate versus 48.00 GPixel/s. These gaps indicate the AMD card is built for sustained rendering workloads, while the Intel part is designed for efficiency in constrained environments.

The Intel Arc Pro B370 wins on power consumption and physical footprint. Its 25 W TDP is dramatically lower than the AMD card's 130 W. The Intel part is an integrated graphics processor (IGP) with no power connectors, no slot width requirement, and no suggested PSU rating. The AMD card requires a single-slot cooler, a 6-pin power connector, and a 300 W suggested PSU. For systems where space and thermal limits are the primary constraints, the Intel part has a clear advantage.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different manufacturing philosophies. The AMD Radeon PRO W7600 uses the Navi 33 chip built on TSMC's 6 nm process, packing 13,300 million transistors into a 204 mm² die. The transistor density works out to 65.2 million transistors per square millimeter. The Intel Arc Pro B370 uses the Panther Lake chip built on Intel's 3 nm process, though the transistor count, die size, and density are listed as unknown in the database.

Architecturally, AMD employs RDNA 3.0 with the codename Hotpink Bonefish, while Intel uses Xe3-LPG. The AMD card belongs to the Radeon Pro Navi generation, and the Intel part belongs to the Arc Graphics-WM generation. The Intel card's predecessor is listed as HD Graphics-WM, while the AMD card's predecessor is Radeon Pro Vega.

The compute configurations differ substantially. AMD's implementation includes 2,048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, 64 raster operations units, and 32 ray tracing cores. Intel's configuration is smaller across every category: 1,280 shading units, 40 TMUs, 20 ROPs, and 10 ray tracing cores. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, so API feature coverage is matched.

Memory architecture presents the starkest divergence. The AMD Radeon PRO W7600 carries 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, delivering 288.0 GB/s of bandwidth. Memory clocks run at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective speed. The Intel Arc Pro B370 uses system-shared memory, meaning its memory size, type, bus width, and bandwidth are all dependent on the host system. The database lists bandwidth as "System Dependent" and memory clocks as "System Shared." The AMD card's dedicated memory provides predictable performance, while the Intel part's performance depends entirely on the platform it is installed into.

Clock behavior also differs. The AMD card runs at a 1720 MHz base clock and boosts to 2440 MHz. The Intel part has a 300 MHz base clock and boosts to 2400 MHz. The AMD card's higher base clock indicates it maintains substantial performance under sustained load, whereas the Intel part's low base clock suggests aggressive power management.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more raw shading power?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO W7600 has 2,048 shading units versus 1,280 on the Intel Arc Pro B370, and it delivers 19.99 TFLOPS of FP32 compute versus 6.144 TFLOPS on the Intel part.

Q: Does the Intel Arc Pro B370 have dedicated video memory?

A: No. The Intel Arc Pro B370 uses system-shared memory, with size, type, bus width, and bandwidth all listed as system dependent. The AMD Radeon PRO W7600 has 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus with 288.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: How do the power requirements compare?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO W7600 has a 130 W TDP, requires a single-slot cooler, one 6-pin power connector, and a 300 W suggested PSU. The Intel Arc Pro B370 has a 25 W TDP, is an integrated graphics processor, and needs no power connectors or separate PSU rating.

Q: What is the performance percentile for each part?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO W7600 ranks in the 93rd percentile of all GPUs in the database. The Intel Arc Pro B370 ranks in the 50th percentile.

Q: Which process node does each manufacturer use?

A: AMD uses TSMC's 6 nm process for the Navi 33 chip. Intel uses its own 3 nm process for the Panther Lake chip.

Q: Are the API feature sets different?

A: No. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Specification Differences

The database records the following differences between the two processors:

• Process node: AMD uses 6 nm, Intel uses 3 nm
• Foundry: AMD uses TSMC, Intel uses its own fabrication
• Transistors: AMD has 13,300 million, Intel is unknown
• Die size: AMD is 204 mm², Intel is unknown
• Transistor density: AMD is 65.2 million per mm², Intel is not listed
• Base clock: AMD is 1720 MHz, Intel is 300 MHz
• Boost clock: AMD is 2440 MHz, Intel is 2400 MHz
• Memory clock: AMD is 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective, Intel is system shared
• Memory size: AMD is 8 GB GDDR6, Intel is system shared
• Memory bus width: AMD is 128 bit, Intel is system shared
• Memory bandwidth: AMD is 288.0 GB/s, Intel is system dependent
• Shading units: AMD has 2,048, Intel has 1,280
• Texture mapping units: AMD has 128, Intel has 40
• Raster operations units: AMD has 64, Intel has 20
• Ray tracing cores: AMD has 32, Intel has 10
• Pixel rate: AMD is 156.2 GPixel/s, Intel is 48.00 GPixel/s
• Texture rate: AMD is 312.3 GTexel/s, Intel is 96.00 GTexel/s
• FP32 performance: AMD is 19.99 TFLOPS, Intel is 6.144 TFLOPS
• FP16 performance: AMD is 39.98 TFLOPS (2:1), Intel is 12.29 TFLOPS (2:1)
• TDP: AMD is 130 W, Intel is 25 W
• Slot width: AMD is single-slot, Intel is IGP
• Power connectors: AMD is 1x 6-pin, Intel is none
• Suggested PSU: AMD is 300 W, Intel is not listed
• Bus interface: AMD is PCIe 4.0 x8, Intel is IGP
• Display outputs: AMD is 4x DisplayPort 2.1, Intel is portable device dependent
• Dimensions: AMD is 241 mm length and 115 mm height, Intel has no recorded dimensions
• Release date: AMD launched on 2023-08-02, Intel launches on 2026-01-26
• Launch MSRP: AMD is 599 USD, Intel has no listed MSRP

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark results between these two processors. The wins columns show zero for both sides. However, the recorded individual benchmark scores and the percentile data allow for meaningful comparison.

The AMD Radeon PRO W7600 has two recorded benchmark scores. In Geekbench OpenCL, it scores 81,528. In Geekbench Vulkan, it scores 92,688. The average of these two results is 87,108, which matches the database's average benchmark score for the card. The Intel Arc Pro B370 has no recorded benchmark scores in the database, with an average benchmark score of zero.

The AMD card's nearest rivals in the database provide context for its standing. The NVIDIA Quadro GP100 averages 87,445, which is 0.4 percent higher than the AMD card's average. The NVIDIA CMP 40HX averages 85,637, which is 1.7 percent lower than the AMD card. The NVIDIA RTX A4500 Mobile averages 91,134, putting it 4.4 percent ahead of the AMD card. The NVIDIA RTX A4500 averages 91,671, which is 5 percent ahead. These rivals show that the AMD Radeon PRO W7600 sits in a competitive band of professional workstation GPUs, slightly behind the RTX A4500 family but ahead of the CMP 40HX.

The Intel Arc Pro B370 has no nearest rivals recorded in the database, which reflects its lack of benchmark data. Its 50th percentile ranking places it at the median of all GPUs in the database, but without benchmark scores to support a quantitative comparison, its relative standing remains provisional. The 50th percentile ranking does indicate that half of the GPUs in the database perform below this part, but the absence of measured scores makes a precise comparison impossible.

The performance gap between the two parts is most clearly expressed through the FP32 compute figures. The AMD card's 19.99 TFLOPS is roughly 3.25 times the Intel part's 6.144 TFLOPS. The texture rate gap is similar: 312.3 GTexel/s versus 96.00 GTexel/s, a factor of roughly 3.25. The pixel rate gap is larger: 156.2 GPixel/s versus 48.00 GPixel/s, a factor of roughly 3.25 as well. These ratios are consistent across the three main fill rate metrics, indicating the AMD card's advantage scales uniformly across its compute pipeline.

The ray tracing core counts also differ by a factor of 3.2: 32 ray tracing cores on the AMD card versus 10 on the Intel part. The shading unit ratio is 1.6 to 1, and the texture mapping unit ratio is 3.2 to 1. The ROP ratio is also 3.2 to 1. These consistent ratios suggest the AMD card is not just a scaled-up version of the Intel part, but a fundamentally more capable architecture per unit of silicon.

The Verdict

The data points to two distinct use cases. The AMD Radeon PRO W7600 is a dedicated workstation graphics card for systems that need sustained, high-throughput rendering. Its 8 GB of dedicated GDDR6 memory with 288.0 GB/s bandwidth, its 19.99 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, and its 93rd percentile ranking all support this role. The card's 130 W TDP and single-slot form factor are reasonable for a desktop workstation, and its 4x DisplayPort 2.1 outputs provide multi-monitor capability. The launch MSRP of 599 USD places it in the professional graphics segment.

The Intel Arc Pro B370 is an integrated graphics processor for portable devices. Its 25 W TDP, lack of power connectors, and system-shared memory indicate it is designed for platforms where power efficiency takes priority over raw performance. The 3 nm process node from Intel suggests a modern manufacturing approach, but the absence of recorded benchmark scores means the database cannot yet confirm its real-world performance. The 50th percentile ranking places it at the median of all GPUs, which is a reasonable expectation for an integrated part.

Users who need predictable, dedicated graphics performance should select the AMD Radeon PRO W7600. Users who require minimal power draw in a compact, integrated form factor should select the Intel Arc Pro B370. The AMD card's measured scores and established position among workstation rivals make it a proven quantity. The Intel part's lack of benchmark data means its performance claims remain unverified in the database.

The choice ultimately rests on the target platform. For a workstation with a PCIe slot, dedicated power delivery, and cooling capacity, the AMD card is the clear performer. For a thin-and-light portable device where every watt matters, the Intel part is the appropriate fit. The database records no head-to-head tests between these two parts, so any direct comparison relies on the individual benchmark scores and architectural specifications. Based on the recorded data, the AMD Radeon PRO W7600 is the faster processor by a wide margin, while the Intel Arc Pro B370 is the more efficient processor by a wide margin.