AMD Radeon PRO W7400 vs Intel Arc B570 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The Intel Arc B570 holds a clear performance advantage in the recorded benchmark data, though the comparison is limited by the absence of direct head-to-head test results. The database includes ten benchmark scores for the Intel Arc B570, while the AMD Radeon PRO W7400 has no recorded benchmark entries. This asymmetry means the analysis relies on the Intel card's absolute scores and its position relative to other GPUs in the database.

The Arc B570's average benchmark score of 20556 places it in the 65th percentile of all GPUs tracked by the database. Its nearest rivals show how tightly clustered the competition is at this performance level. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile scores 20534, a delta of 0.1 percent, meaning the Arc B570 is effectively tied with that mobile GPU. The Intel Arc A750 scores 20582, a delta of -0.1 percent, so the B570 trails its older sibling by a hair. The NVIDIA Quadro M4000M sits at 20480, a 0.4 percent gap, and the AMD Radeon R9 M390X reaches 20662, putting the B570 0.5 percent behind that older part.

Looking at individual benchmark categories, the Arc B570 shows its strongest results in Geekbench Vulkan with a score of 96844, followed by Geekbench OpenCL at 83514. These compute-oriented tests indicate strong general-purpose GPU performance. In Passmark's suite, the G3D score of 14195 represents the primary gaming-oriented metric, while the G2D score of 661 covers 2D acceleration workloads. The GPU compute score of 7281 reflects parallel processing throughput.

The DirectX legacy tests reveal an interesting pattern. The Passmark DirectX 9 score of 164 is the highest among the DirectX tests, while DirectX 11 scores 118, DirectX 12 scores 72, and DirectX 10 scores 65. This suggests the architecture handles older API workloads with relative ease, while newer APIs show lower raw scores in these specific Passmark subtests. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test returns a score of 2649, which serves as a modern DirectX 12 benchmark point.

Because the Radeon PRO W7400 has no benchmark scores in the database, the head-to-head comparison cannot produce win counts for either card. The winsA and winsB fields both read zero, confirming the absence of paired test data. What the database does show is that the Arc B570, with its 65th percentile ranking, sits comfortably above the median GPU in the database, which the W7400's 50th percentile ranking suggests it would occupy a middle-ground position if it had recorded scores.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs come from fundamentally different design philosophies. The AMD Radeon PRO W7400 uses the Navi 33 chip built on RDNA 3.0 architecture, with the codename Hotpink Bonefish. It belongs to the Radeon Pro Navi generation and is fabricated on a 6 nm process at TSMC. The Intel Arc B570 uses the BMG-G21 chip based on Xe2-HPG architecture, belonging to the Battlemage generation under the Arc 5 series. It is built on a 5 nm process, also at TSMC.

The transistor counts show a significant scale difference. The AMD chip packs 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 65.2 million per square millimeter. The Intel chip contains 19,600 million transistors on a 272 mm² die, for a density of 72.1 million per square millimeter. The Intel GPU is both larger in physical size and denser in transistor packing.

Clock speeds diverge sharply between the two. The Radeon PRO W7400 runs at a base clock of 330 MHz with a boost clock of 1100 MHz, which are remarkably low figures, likely reflecting power optimization for professional workloads. The Arc B570 operates at a flat 2500 MHz for both base and boost clocks, more than double the AMD card's boost speed. Memory clocks tell a similar story: the W7400's memory runs at 1350 MHz with 10.8 Gbps effective data rate, while the B570's memory runs at 2375 MHz with 19 Gbps effective.

Memory configurations differ in capacity and bandwidth. The AMD card offers 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, delivering 172.8 GB/s of bandwidth. The Intel card provides 10 GB of GDDR6 on a 160-bit bus, achieving 380.0 GB/s. The B570 has more than double the memory bandwidth, which directly impacts texture streaming and high-resolution workloads.

Compute resources favor the Intel card on raw counts. The Arc B570 has 2304 shading units, 144 texture mapping units, and 80 render output units. The Radeon PRO W7400 has 1792 shading units, 112 TMUs, and 64 ROPs. The Intel card leads in every category of execution resource. Ray tracing cores differ in the opposite direction: AMD lists 28 RT cores, while Intel lists 18. Neither card includes dedicated tensor cores in the database record.

Theoretical throughput numbers follow the resource counts. The Arc B570 delivers 11.52 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 23.04 TFLOPS of FP16 with a 2:1 ratio. The Radeon PRO W7400 produces 7.885 TFLOPS for both FP32 and FP16, indicating a 1:1 ratio where FP16 offers no throughput advantage. Pixel and texture rates also favor Intel: 200.0 GPixel/s and 360.0 GTexel/s for the B570 versus 70.40 GPixel/s and 123.2 GTexel/s for the W7400.

Power and physical specifications show the professional versus consumer split. The Radeon PRO W7400 draws a 55 W TDP, fits in a single slot, requires no power connectors, and needs only a 250 W suggested power supply. Its dimensions are compact at 168 mm length, 69 mm height, and 20 mm width. The Arc B570 draws 150 W TDP, occupies a dual-slot design, requires a single 8-pin connector, and suggests a 450 W power supply. It measures 272 mm in length and 115 mm in height.

Both cards use PCIe 4.0 x8 interfaces. Display outputs differ: the AMD card provides four DisplayPort 2.1 connections, while the Intel card offers one HDMI 2.1a port and three DisplayPort 2.1 ports. API support is identical, with both listing DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Arc B570 wins in every measured performance category in the database, since the AMD Radeon PRO W7400 has no recorded benchmark scores. The B570's strengths are most pronounced in compute-heavy workloads. Its Geekbench Vulkan score of 96844 and OpenCL score of 83514 indicate robust performance for general-purpose GPU computing, which suits applications that leverage OpenCL for scientific, engineering, or rendering tasks.

The Arc B570's memory bandwidth of 380.0 GB/s gives it an advantage in bandwidth-sensitive scenarios. With 10 GB of VRAM, it can hold larger datasets and textures than the W7400's 8 GB. The 160-bit bus width and 19 Gbps effective memory speed support high-resolution textures and complex scenes without hitting memory bottlenecks as quickly.

The Radeon PRO W7400's advantages are architectural rather than measured. Its 55 W TDP means it can operate in systems with minimal power delivery requirements, as evidenced by the lack of power connectors and the 250 W suggested PSU. The single-slot design and compact dimensions (168 mm length, 69 mm height) allow installation in space-constrained chassis. The 28 ray tracing cores, while lower in count than the Intel card's shading resources, may provide dedicated RT throughput for specific workloads.

The AMD card's 1:1 FP16 ratio means it does not accelerate half-precision workloads relative to FP32. The Intel card's 2:1 ratio doubles FP16 throughput, which benefits machine learning inference and certain compute tasks that use half precision. The B570's four DisplayPort 2.1 outputs plus HDMI support multi-monitor configurations, while the W7400 offers four DisplayPort 2.1 outputs without HDMI.

The Verdict

The recorded data clearly favors the Intel Arc B570 for performance. Its average benchmark score of 20556 places it in the 65th percentile of all GPUs, and its nearest rivals show it trading blows with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile and Intel Arc A750 within a 0.5 percent margin. The AMD Radeon PRO W7400's 50th percentile ranking and zero benchmark scores mean it cannot match the B570 in any measured comparison.

The Arc B570 is the choice for users who prioritize raw compute throughput, memory bandwidth, and modern API performance. Its 11.52 TFLOPS FP32, 380.0 GB/s bandwidth, and 10 GB VRAM make it suitable for demanding graphics and compute workloads. The 150 W TDP and dual-slot design require a more substantial power supply, but the performance payoff is evident in the benchmark results.

The Radeon PRO W7400 serves a different purpose based on its specifications. The 55 W TDP, single-slot form factor, and absence of power connectors indicate a low-power professional card designed for dense installations or systems with strict power budgets. Its 7.885 TFLOPS FP32 and 172.8 GB/s bandwidth are modest by comparison, but the efficiency profile may suit professional environments where multiple cards operate simultaneously.

The release dates show the B570 arrived on 2025-01-15, while the W7400 followed on 2025-08-02. The Intel card carries a launch MSRP of 219 USD, which the database records as a single factual data point. The AMD card has no recorded launch MSRP. Both remain in active production status, and each succeeds a prior generation: the B570 follows Alchemist, while the W7400 follows Radeon Pro Vega.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The Intel Arc B570 has an average benchmark score of 20556, placing it in the 65th percentile of all GPUs. The AMD Radeon PRO W7400 has no recorded benchmark scores and sits at the 50th percentile.

Q: How does the Intel Arc B570 compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The B570 scores 20556, which is 0.1 percent ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile (20534), 0.1 percent behind the Intel Arc A750 (20582), 0.4 percent ahead of the NVIDIA Quadro M4000M (20480), and 0.5 percent behind the AMD Radeon R9 M390X (20662).

Q: What are the memory specifications of each card?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO W7400 has 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus with 172.8 GB/s bandwidth. The Intel Arc B570 has 10 GB of GDDR6 on a 160-bit bus with 380.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: Which card has higher clock speeds?

A: The Intel Arc B570 runs at 2500 MHz for both base and boost clocks. The AMD Radeon PRO W7400 has a 330 MHz base clock and 1100 MHz boost clock. The B570 also has a faster memory clock at 2375 MHz versus 1350 MHz.

Q: What are the power requirements for each GPU?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO W7400 has a 55 W TDP, requires no power connectors, and suggests a 250 W power supply. The Intel Arc B570 has a 150 W TDP, uses one 8-pin connector, and suggests a 450 W power supply.

Q: Do both cards support the same graphics APIs?

A: Yes, both the AMD Radeon PRO W7400 and Intel Arc B570 support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. Both also use a PCIe 4.0 x8 bus interface.