AMD Radeon PRO V710 vs Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA Comparison
AMD Radeon PRO V710
Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA
PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS
Analysis: AMD Radeon PRO V710 vs Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA
Head-to-Head Benchmarks
The benchmark database contains direct measurements for the AMD Radeon PRO V710, while the Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA has no recorded benchmark scores. This makes a traditional head-to-head comparison impossible. Instead, the analysis must rely on the architectural specifications and the Radeon PRO V710's position relative to other known GPUs.
The Radeon PRO V710 achieves an average benchmark score of 58,657 across all recorded tests. This places it in the 88th percentile of all GPUs in the database. Its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA P102-100 with an average score of 58,528, a delta of 0.2 percent, and the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT at 58,392, a delta of 0.5 percent. The Intel Arc A570M trails at 58,239 with a 0.7 percent delta, and the AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM sits at 58,085 with a 1 percent delta. The data indicates the Radeon PRO V710 sits marginally ahead of all four nearby competitors, with the largest advantage being just 1 percent over the RX 5600 OEM.
In specific tests, the Radeon PRO V710 records a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 853 and a Geekbench OpenCL score of 116,460. These figures anchor its overall standing. The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA, by contrast, shows no recorded scores, no average benchmark score, and no nearest rivals in the database. Its percentile ranking is 50, which reflects a default position rather than measured performance.
Because the LX ULTRA lacks benchmark data, the head-to-head section must rely on theoretical specifications. The Radeon PRO V710 delivers 27.65 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, while the LX ULTRA delivers 24.58 TFLOPS. In FP16 workloads, the Radeon PRO V710 maintains a 1:1 ratio at 27.65 TFLOPS, whereas the LX ULTRA operates at a 2:1 ratio, reaching 49.15 TFLOPS. The Radeon PRO V710 leads in texture rate at 432.0 GTexel/s versus 384.0 GTexel/s for the LX ULTRA. Both cards match at 192.0 GPixel/s pixel rate.
Memory bandwidth favors the Radeon PRO V710 at 504.0 GB/s compared to 432.0 GB/s for the LX ULTRA. Both use GDDR6 memory at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective speed, but the Radeon PRO V710 uses a 224-bit bus with 28 GB capacity, while the LX ULTRA uses a 192-bit bus with 24 GB capacity. The Radeon PRO V710's shading unit count is 3,456, whereas the LX ULTRA lists 6,144 shading units, a substantial structural difference despite the FP32 deficit.
Where Each One Wins
The Radeon PRO V710 wins in raw FP32 compute, texture throughput, memory bandwidth, and memory capacity. Its 28 GB frame buffer exceeds the LX ULTRA's 24 GB by 4 GB, which matters for large dataset workloads in scientific computing or machine learning inference. The 504.0 GB/s bandwidth provides a 14.3 percent advantage over the LX ULTRA's 432.0 GB/s, directly benefiting memory-bound applications.
The LX ULTRA wins in FP16 throughput by a significant margin. Its 49.15 TFLOPS FP16 performance is 77.8 percent higher than the Radeon PRO V710's 27.65 TFLOPS. This makes the LX ULTRA the stronger choice for workloads that leverage FP16 precision, such as certain AI inference tasks or mixed-precision rendering pipelines. The LX ULTRA also has a higher shading unit count at 6,144 versus 3,456, which could benefit certain shader-heavy workloads despite the lower FP32 ceiling.
The LX ULTRA includes four DisplayPort 1.4a outputs, while the Radeon PRO V710 has no display outputs at all. Any use case requiring direct monitor connection favors the LX ULTRA. The Radeon PRO V710 requires a single 8-pin power connector and a 450 W suggested power supply, while the LX ULTRA needs a 16-pin connector and a 550 W suggested power supply. The Radeon PRO V710 fits in a single-slot form factor, while the LX ULTRA occupies a dual-slot design.
For Vulkan API support, the Radeon PRO V710 lists Vulkan 1.4, while the LX ULTRA lists Vulkan 1.3. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. The Radeon PRO V710 has 54 ray tracing cores, while the LX ULTRA lists none in the database, making the Radeon PRO V710 the clear choice for ray-traced workloads.
Architecture Differences
The Radeon PRO V710 uses the Navi 32 chip built on TSMC's 5 nm process with RDNA 3.0 architecture and the codename Wheat Nas. It belongs to the Radeon Pro Navi (Navi III Series) generation. The LX ULTRA uses the 7G105 chip on TSMC's 6 nm process with TrueGPU architecture and belongs to the 7G100 generation. The process node difference, 5 nm versus 6 nm, gives the Radeon PRO V710 a manufacturing advantage in transistor density.
The Radeon PRO V710 packs 28,100 million transistors on a 346 mm² die, yielding a density of 81.2 million transistors per square millimeter. The LX ULTRA's transistor count and die size are listed as unknown in the database. The Radeon PRO V710's predecessor is the Radeon Pro Vega, and it was released on October 2, 2024. The LX ULTRA has no recorded predecessor and carries a release date of March 16, 2026, with an active production status.
Clock speeds differ notably. The Radeon PRO V710 has a base clock of 1900 MHz and a boost clock of 2000 MHz. The LX ULTRA lists no base or boost clock in the database. Both share the same memory clock of 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective speed. The Radeon PRO V710's power draw is 158 W, while the LX ULTRA draws 225 W, a 67 W difference. The Radeon PRO V710's slot width is single-slot versus dual-slot for the LX ULTRA. Physical dimensions for the LX ULTRA are recorded as 268 mm in length, 112 mm in height, and 40 mm in width; the Radeon PRO V710's dimensions are not listed.
The Radeon PRO V710's shading units operate within an RDNA 3.0 design that emphasizes efficiency per clock. The LX ULTRA's TrueGPU architecture doubles the shading unit count but delivers lower FP32 throughput, indicating a different design philosophy focused on parallel throughput in FP16 rather than raw FP32 density. The Radeon PRO V710's ray tracing cores, 54 of them, represent a dedicated hardware path that the LX ULTRA lacks in the recorded data.
The Verdict
The data supports different picks depending on workload priorities. For FP32 compute, texture-heavy rendering, or memory-bound tasks, the Radeon PRO V710 is the stronger card. It delivers 27.65 TFLOPS FP32, 432.0 GTexel/s, 504.0 GB/s bandwidth, and 28 GB of VRAM. Its 54 ray tracing cores and Vulkan 1.4 support also position it for modern graphics workloads that use hardware ray tracing or the latest API features.
For FP16-heavy workloads or tasks that can exploit a 2:1 FP16 ratio, the LX ULTRA offers 49.15 TFLOPS, which is substantially higher than the Radeon PRO V710's 27.65 TFLOPS. The LX ULTRA also provides display outputs, making it usable in workstation configurations that require direct monitor connections, whereas the Radeon PRO V710 is a compute-only card with no outputs.
The Radeon PRO V710's measured performance places it in the 88th percentile of all GPUs, with an average score of 58,657. Its nearest rivals all fall within 1 percent of its score, indicating the Radeon PRO V710 sits at the top of a very tight performance cluster. The LX ULTRA has no measured scores, so its real-world standing cannot be verified from the database.
The Radeon PRO V710's lower power draw of 158 W versus 225 W, single-slot design, and smaller suggested power supply of 450 W versus 550 W make it the more practical choice for dense server or workstation environments. The LX ULTRA's dual-slot footprint and higher power requirements demand more physical and thermal headroom.
FAQ
Q: Which GPU has higher FP32 compute performance?
A: The AMD Radeon PRO V710 delivers 27.65 TFLOPS of FP32, while the Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA delivers 24.58 TFLOPS. The Radeon PRO V710 leads by approximately 12.5 percent.
Q: Which GPU has more memory and bandwidth?
A: The Radeon PRO V710 has 28 GB of GDDR6 on a 224-bit bus with 504.0 GB/s bandwidth. The LX ULTRA has 24 GB on a 192-bit bus with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth.
Q: Does either GPU support display outputs?
A: The LX ULTRA includes 4x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs. The Radeon PRO V710 has no display outputs and is compute-only.
Q: What is the power consumption difference?
A: The Radeon PRO V710 has a TDP of 158 W with a suggested power supply of 450 W. The LX ULTRA has a TDP of 225 W with a suggested power supply of 550 W.
Q: Which GPU has ray tracing cores?
A: The Radeon PRO V710 has 54 ray tracing cores. The LX ULTRA lists no ray tracing cores in the database.
Q: How does the Radeon PRO V710 compare to its nearest rivals?
A: The Radeon PRO V710 scores 58,657 on average, placing it 0.2 percent ahead of the NVIDIA P102-100, 0.5 percent ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT, 0.7 percent ahead of the Intel Arc A570M, and 1 percent ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM.
Specification Differences
| Specification | AMD Radeon PRO V710 | Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA |
|---|---|---|
| Chip | Navi 32 | 7G105 |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | TrueGPU |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 6 nm |
| Transistors | 28,100 million | unknown |
| Die Size | 346 mm² | unknown |
| Base Clock | 1900 MHz | not listed |
| Boost Clock | 2000 MHz | not listed |
| Memory Size | 28 GB | 24 GB |
| Memory Bus Width | 224 bit | 192 bit |
| Memory Bandwidth | 504.0 GB/s | 432.0 GB/s |
| Shading Units | 3456 | 6144 |
| Texture Mapping Units | 216 | 192 |
| Render Output Units | 96 | 96 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 54 | not listed |
| Pixel Rate | 192.0 GPixel/s | 192.0 GPixel/s |
| Texture Rate | 432.0 GTexel/s | 384.0 GTexel/s |
| FP32 Performance | 27.65 TFLOPS | 24.58 TFLOPS |
| FP16 Performance | 27.65 TFLOPS (1:1) | 49.15 TFLOPS (2:1) |
| TDP | 158 W | 225 W |
| Slot Width | Single-slot | Dual-slot |
| Power Connectors | 1x 8-pin | 1x 16-pin |
| Suggested PSU | 450 W | 550 W |
| Display Outputs | No outputs | 4x DisplayPort 1.4a |
| Vulkan Support | 1.4 | 1.3 |
| Release Date | 2024-10-02 | 2026-03-16 |
| Production Status | not listed | Active |
| Dimensions | not listed | 268 mm x 112 mm x 40 mm |