AMD Radeon PRO V710 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER Comparison

The AMD Radeon PRO V710 and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER occupy very different positions in the database, and their recorded benchmark results reflect that gap clearly. The Radeon PRO V710 is a workstation-oriented card built on RDNA 3.0, while the RTX 5080 SUPER is a high-end GeForce 50-series part based on Blackwell 2.0. The data shows a decisive performance gap in the single shared test, but the two cards also differ dramatically in memory capacity, power requirements, and physical design. This analysis walks through the head-to-head results, architecture differences, and what the recorded numbers mean for each card.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The only direct comparison available in the database is the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test. In this test, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER scores 3075, while the AMD Radeon PRO V710 scores 853. The RTX 5080 SUPER wins this test outright, and the delta between the two is 72.3 percent in favor of NVIDIA. That is a large margin, and it indicates that in this particular DirectX 12 workload, the RTX 5080 SUPER delivers roughly 3.6 times the score of the Radeon PRO V710.

The Radeon PRO V710 has additional benchmark data beyond the shared test. It scores 116460 in Geekbench OpenCL and has an average benchmark score of 58657 across all recorded tests. The RTX 5080 SUPER, by contrast, has only the single Steel Nomad result recorded, which also serves as its average benchmark score of 3075. This means the Radeon PRO V710 has a much higher average benchmark score in the database, but that figure is pulled up by its strong OpenCL result. The RTX 5080 SUPER has no OpenCL entry in the database, so a direct comparison in that workload is not possible from the recorded data.

Looking at the percentile ranks, the Radeon PRO V710 sits at the 88th percentile among all GPUs, while the RTX 5080 SUPER sits at the 19th percentile. That percentile difference is striking given the RTX 5080 SUPER's huge win in Steel Nomad. The explanation lies in the number of recorded benchmarks. The Radeon PRO V710 has two test results, one of which is a very strong OpenCL score, while the RTX 5080 SUPER has only one result. The database percentile appears to be based on the available average scores, so the Radeon PRO V710's broader benchmark profile gives it a higher standing despite losing the shared test badly.

The nearest rivals in the database further illustrate the situation. The Radeon PRO V710's closest competitors by average score are the NVIDIA P102-100 (0.2 percent ahead), the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT (0.5 percent behind), the Intel Arc A570M (0.7 percent behind), and the AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM (1 percent behind). These are all within a narrow band around the Radeon PRO V710's average of 58657. The RTX 5080 SUPER's nearest rivals are very different: the NVIDIA Quadro P1000 is 2.8 percent ahead, the Intel Arc Pro B60 is 3.4 percent ahead, the NVIDIA GeForce 820A is 3.1 percent behind, and the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M is 3.6 percent behind. The RTX 5080 SUPER's average score of 3075 places it near much older and lower-end parts in the database, which is a direct consequence of having only one benchmark result recorded.

Architecture Differences

The two cards use fundamentally different architectures. The AMD Radeon PRO V710 is built on RDNA 3.0 with the Navi 32 chip and the codename Wheat Nas. It belongs to the Radeon Pro Navi generation and is manufactured on a 5 nm process at TSMC. The package contains 28,100 million transistors on a die size of 346 mm², which works out to a transistor density of 81.2 million per mm². The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER uses the Blackwell 2.0 architecture with the GB203 chip and belongs to the GeForce 50 generation. It is also built on a 5 nm process at TSMC, but the die is larger at 378 mm² and holds 45,600 million transistors, giving a transistor density of 120.6 million per mm². The RTX 5080 SUPER therefore packs roughly 62 percent more transistors into a die that is only about 9 percent larger.

The compute resources differ substantially. The Radeon PRO V710 has 3456 shading units, 216 texture mapping units, 96 render output units, and 54 ray tracing cores. It has no tensor cores listed in the database. The RTX 5080 SUPER has 10752 shading units, 336 TMUs, 112 ROPs, 84 RT cores, and 336 tensor cores. That is more than three times the shading units and nearly twice the RT core count. The pixel rate for the Radeon PRO V710 is 192.0 GPixel/s, while the RTX 5080 SUPER reaches 293.1 GPixel/s. Texture rate is 432.0 GTexel/s for the AMD card versus 879.3 GTexel/s for the NVIDIA card.

Clock speeds also favor the NVIDIA card. The Radeon PRO V710 has a base clock of 1900 MHz and a boost clock of 2000 MHz. The RTX 5080 SUPER runs at a base clock of 2295 MHz and a boost clock of 2617 MHz. That is a 20.8 percent higher base clock and a 30.9 percent higher boost clock. The FP32 compute figures reflect the combined effect of more cores and higher clocks: the Radeon PRO V710 delivers 27.65 TFLOPS, while the RTX 5080 SUPER delivers 56.28 TFLOPS. Both cards list FP16 at the same 1:1 ratio, so the FP16 numbers are identical to the FP32 numbers for each card.

Memory configurations are a major point of divergence. The Radeon PRO V710 has 28 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 224 bit bus, with a memory clock of 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective) and bandwidth of 504.0 GB/s. The RTX 5080 SUPER has 24 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 256 bit bus, with a memory clock of 2000 MHz (32 Gbps effective) and bandwidth of 1.02 TB/s. The NVIDIA card has a wider bus and much faster memory, giving it more than double the bandwidth despite having 4 GB less capacity. The AMD card's larger capacity could matter for workloads that need more VRAM, but the bandwidth advantage clearly belongs to NVIDIA.

The interface and physical design differ as well. The Radeon PRO V710 uses PCIe 4.0 x16, while the RTX 5080 SUPER uses PCIe 5.0 x16. The AMD card is single-slot with a 1x 8-pin power connector and a TDP of 158 W. The RTX 5080 SUPER is dual-slot with a 1x 16-pin connector and a TDP of 415 W. The NVIDIA card is also much larger physically, measuring 304 mm in length, 137 mm in height, and 40 mm in width. The AMD card has no display outputs listed, while the RTX 5080 SUPER has 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b outputs. The AMD card has a suggested PSU of 450 W, while the RTX 5080 SUPER has no suggested PSU listed.

The Verdict

The data points to a clear performance winner in the shared test. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, the RTX 5080 SUPER scores 3075 versus 853 for the Radeon PRO V710, a 72.3 percent lead. That is a decisive margin, and it aligns with the RTX 5080 SUPER's higher core counts, higher clocks, and more than double the FP32 throughput. The RTX 5080 SUPER also has tensor cores, which the Radeon PRO V710 lacks entirely, and it supports PCIe 5.0, while the AMD card is limited to PCIe 4.0. For any workload that resembles the Steel Nomad test, the RTX 5080 SUPER is the stronger card.

However, the Radeon PRO V710 is not without advantages in the recorded data. Its 28 GB of memory exceeds the RTX 5080 SUPER's 24 GB, and its average benchmark score of 58657 is far higher than the RTX 5080 SUPER's 3075. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 116460 for the Radeon PRO V710 shows strong compute performance in that specific workload. The Radeon PRO V710 also draws far less power at 158 W versus 415 W, and it fits in a single slot, which could matter for dense workstation builds. The RTX 5080 SUPER carries a launch MSRP of 999 USD, while the Radeon PRO V710 has no launch MSRP listed.

The percentile data is unusual. The Radeon PRO V710 sits at the 88th percentile among all GPUs, while the RTX 5080 SUPER sits at the 19th percentile. This appears to be driven by the number of recorded benchmarks. With two results including a very strong OpenCL score, the Radeon PRO V710 has a higher average. The RTX 5080 SUPER has only one result, which drags its percentile down despite the strong Steel Nomad showing. Buyers should interpret the RTX 5080 SUPER's low percentile with caution, as it is based on a single test.

FAQ

Q: Which card wins in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER wins with a score of 3075, while the AMD Radeon PRO V710 scores 853. The RTX 5080 SUPER leads by 72.3 percent.

Q: How much memory does each card have?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO V710 has 28 GB of GDDR6 memory, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER has 24 GB of GDDR7 memory.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth difference?

A: The Radeon PRO V710 has 504.0 GB/s of bandwidth, while the RTX 5080 SUPER has 1.02 TB/s, which is more than double.

Q: Which card has a higher FP32 compute rating?

A: The RTX 5080 SUPER delivers 56.28 TFLOPS, while the Radeon PRO V710 delivers 27.65 TFLOPS.

Q: What are the power requirements?

A: The Radeon PRO V710 has a TDP of 158 W with a suggested PSU of 450 W, while the RTX 5080 SUPER has a TDP of 415 W and no suggested PSU listed.

Q: Does the Radeon PRO V710 have tensor cores?

A: No, the Radeon PRO V710 has no tensor cores listed, while the RTX 5080 SUPER has 336 tensor cores.

Where Each One Wins

The RTX 5080 SUPER wins in the only direct benchmark recorded, 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, with a 72.3 percent advantage. It also wins on raw compute resources, with 10752 shading units versus 3456, 84 RT cores versus 54, and 336 tensor cores versus none. Its FP32 throughput of 56.28 TFLOPS is more than double the Radeon PRO V710's 27.65 TFLOPS. The RTX 5080 SUPER also has higher base and boost clocks, a wider 256 bit memory bus, faster GDDR7 memory, and more than double the memory bandwidth at 1.02 TB/s. It supports PCIe 5.0, has display outputs, and offers a higher pixel rate of 293.1 GPixel/s and texture rate of 879.3 GTexel/s.

The Radeon PRO V710 wins on memory capacity, offering 28 GB versus 24 GB. It also wins on power efficiency, with a TDP of 158 W compared to 415 W, and it occupies a single slot instead of a dual-slot design. Its average benchmark score of 58657 is much higher than the RTX 5080 SUPER's 3075, and its Geekbench OpenCL score of 116460 demonstrates strong compute performance in that test. The Radeon PRO V710 also ranks at the 88th percentile among all GPUs, far above the RTX 5080 SUPER's 19th percentile, though that gap is influenced by the number of recorded benchmarks.

Specification Differences

The two cards differ across nearly every specification category. The Radeon PRO V710 uses the RDNA 3.0 architecture with the Navi 32 chip and the codename Wheat Nas, while the RTX 5080 SUPER uses Blackwell 2.0 with the GB203 chip. The AMD card has 28,100 million transistors on a 346 mm² die, while the NVIDIA card has 45,600 million transistors on a 378 mm² die. Transistor density is 81.2 million per mm² for AMD and 120.6 million per mm² for NVIDIA.

Clock speeds favor NVIDIA: the Radeon PRO V710 runs at 1900 MHz base and 2000 MHz boost, while the RTX 5080 SUPER runs at 2295 MHz base and 2617 MHz boost. The AMD card has 3456 shading units, 216 TMUs, 96 ROPs, and 54 RT cores, while the NVIDIA card has 10752 shading units, 336 TMUs, 112 ROPs, 84 RT cores, and 336 tensor cores. Pixel rate is 192.0 GPixel/s for AMD and 293.1 GPixel/s for NVIDIA. Texture rate is 432.0 GTexel/s for AMD and 879.3 GTexel/s for NVIDIA. FP32 and FP16 are both 27.65 TFLOPS for AMD and 56.28 TFLOPS for NVIDIA.

Memory differs in size, type, bus width, and bandwidth. The Radeon PRO V710 has 28 GB of GDDR6 on a 224 bit bus with 504.0 GB/s bandwidth. The RTX 5080 SUPER has 24 GB of GDDR7 on a 256 bit bus with 1.02 TB/s bandwidth. The memory clocks are 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective) for AMD and 2000 MHz (32 Gbps effective) for NVIDIA. Power and physical specs also differ: the AMD card has a 158 W TDP, single-slot design, 1x 8-pin connector, and a suggested PSU of 450 W, while the NVIDIA card has a 415 W TDP, dual-slot design, 1x 16-pin connector, and no suggested PSU listed. The AMD card uses PCIe 4.0 x16 and has no display outputs, while the NVIDIA card uses PCIe 5.0 x16 and has 1x HDMI 2.1b plus 3x DisplayPort 2.1b outputs. The RTX 5080 SUPER measures 304 mm in length, 137 mm in height, and 40 mm in width, while the AMD card's dimensions are not listed.