AMD Radeon PRO V710 vs Intel Arc A550M Comparison

The AMD Radeon PRO V710 and Intel Arc A550M occupy different corners of the GPU landscape, and the benchmark data reflects a decisive performance gap. In the only direct head-to-head benchmark available, the Geekbench OpenCL test, the AMD Radeon PRO V710 scores 116,460, which is a 133.4% advantage over the Intel Arc A550M's 49,894. This is not a close contest; the V710 delivers more than double the raw compute throughput in this workload. The data positions the V710 in the 88th percentile of all GPUs, while the A550M sits at the 86th percentile, but the raw score delta is far more substantial than that percentile gap suggests, as the V710's average benchmark score of 58,657 dwarfs the A550M's 49,737.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The head-to-head results are unambiguous, with AMD winning the single benchmark where both products were tested. The Geekbench OpenCL test shows the V710 at 116,460 against the A550M's 49,894, a delta of 133.4% in favor of AMD. This is a massive margin that indicates a fundamental difference in compute capability, not a minor architectural tweak. For context, the V710's nearest rivals in the overall database include the NVIDIA P102-100 (average score 58,528, delta 0.2%) and the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT (average score 58,392, delta 0.5%), meaning the V710's overall average of 58,657 is just barely ahead of those high-end desktop parts. The A550M, by contrast, sits near the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti (average score 49,957, delta -0.4%) and AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 (average score 50,001, delta -0.5%), which shows it is competing in a lower performance tier despite its decent percentile ranking.

The V710 also holds a second benchmark result, a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 853, though no comparable A550M score exists for that test. Looking at the raw FP32 throughput, the V710 outputs 27.65 TFLOPS while the A550M manages only 8.397 TFLOPS, a 3.3x difference that explains the OpenCL result. The A550M does have a counter in FP16, where its 16.79 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio) approaches the V710's 27.65 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio), but that advantage is narrow and does not appear in the direct benchmarks. The wins tally is 1-0 in favor of AMD, and the data shows no scenario where the Intel part closes the gap.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs are built on fundamentally different architectures and process nodes. The AMD Radeon PRO V710 uses the RDNA 3.0 architecture with the Navi 32 chip, manufactured on a 5 nm process at TSMC. The Intel Arc A550M uses Xe-HPG architecture with the DG2-512 chip, built on a 6 nm process at the same foundry. The V710's die is 346 mm² with 28,100 million transistors, giving a transistor density of 81.2 million per mm². The A550M's die is larger at 406 mm² but packs fewer transistors at 21,700 million, resulting in a lower density of 53.4 million per mm². This means the V710 achieves more compute in a smaller physical area, which is a direct result of the more advanced 5 nm node.

The memory subsystem is another major divide. The V710 offers 28 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 224-bit bus, delivering 504.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The A550M has only 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, yielding 224.0 GB/s. That is a 2.25x bandwidth advantage for AMD, which matters for large datasets and high-resolution textures. The V710's memory clock is 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective) versus the A550M's 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective). Core configurations follow the same pattern: the V710 has 3,456 shading units, 216 texture mapping units, and 96 ROPs, while the A550M has 2,048 shaders, 128 TMUs, and 64 ROPs. Ray tracing hardware also differs, with 54 RT cores on the V710 versus 16 on the A550M. The V710's pixel rate is 192.0 GPixel/s and texture rate is 432.0 GTexel/s, both well above the A550M's 131.2 GPixel/s and 262.4 GTexel/s.

Clock speeds tell a nuanced story. The V710 has a higher base clock at 1900 MHz versus 900 MHz, but the A550M's boost clock of 2050 MHz slightly exceeds the V710's 2000 MHz. However, that small boost advantage cannot compensate for the A550M's far lower core count and memory bandwidth. The V710 also carries a 158 W TDP with a single 8-pin power connector and a suggested 450 W PSU, while the A550M is rated at just 60 W and is an IGP (integrated graphics processor) with no power connectors listed. The V710 is a single-slot card with no display outputs, indicating a compute-focused accelerator, while the A550M's display outputs are listed as "Portable Device Dependent," confirming its mobile integration role. Both support PCIe 4.0 x16, DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

The Verdict

The data is clear: the AMD Radeon PRO V710 is the superior performer in every measurable benchmark category. It wins the sole head-to-head test by 133.4%, offers 3.3x the FP32 throughput, 2.25x the memory bandwidth, and 3.4x the RT cores. The V710's average benchmark score of 58,657 places it alongside desktop flagships like the RX 6950 XT, while the A550M's 49,737 average is closer to mid-range desktop parts. The V710's 88th percentile ranking versus the A550M's 86th percentile understates the gap because the V710's nearest rivals are all within 1% of its score, while the A550M's rivals include the RTX 5070 Ti and RX Vega 64, which are lower-tier performers.

The Intel Arc A550M is not without merit, but its strengths are limited to power efficiency and portability. At 60 W TDP versus 158 W, it draws far less power and is designed as an IGP for portable devices. The A550M also has a higher boost clock (2050 MHz vs 2000 MHz) and a better FP16 ratio (2:1 vs 1:1), which could help in specific mixed-precision workloads. However, the benchmarks show no scenario where the A550M wins. The V710's production status is unlisted, while the A550M is marked as end-of-life, which suggests the Intel part is already legacy hardware. For any application requiring raw compute, memory capacity, or bandwidth, the V710 is the definitive choice based on this data.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has a higher Geekbench OpenCL score?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO V710 scores 116,460, which is 133.4% higher than the Intel Arc A550M's 49,894.

Q: What is the memory capacity difference between the two?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO V710 has 28 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 224-bit bus, while the Intel Arc A550M has 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus.

Q: How do their power requirements compare?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO V710 has a 158 W TDP with a single 8-pin power connector and a suggested 450 W PSU, whereas the Intel Arc A550M is rated at 60 W with no power connectors, functioning as an IGP.

Q: Which GPU has more ray tracing cores?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO V710 has 54 RT cores, while the Intel Arc A550M has 16 RT cores.

Q: Are both GPUs compatible with the same APIs?

A: Yes, both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, and both use a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface.

Q: What is the average benchmark score for each GPU?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO V710 has an average benchmark score of 58,657, while the Intel Arc A550M has an average of 49,737.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Radeon PRO V710 wins in every direct performance metric. It dominates in FP32 compute (27.65 TFLOPS vs 8.397 TFLOPS), memory bandwidth (504.0 GB/s vs 224.0 GB/s), and pixel/texture rates (192.0 GPixel/s and 432.0 GTexel/s vs 131.2 GPixel/s and 262.4 GTexel/s). The V710's 28 GB memory capacity is a clear advantage for workloads that need large working sets, such as machine learning inference or high-resolution rendering. Its 88th percentile ranking and proximity to the RX 6950 XT (delta 0.5%) confirm it is a high-end compute part. The V710 also has a higher transistor density (81.2M / mm²) and a smaller die (346 mm²), indicating a more efficient design.

The Intel Arc A550M wins only in specific niche areas. It has a lower TDP (60 W vs 158 W), making it suitable for power-constrained portable devices. Its boost clock is slightly higher (2050 MHz vs 2000 MHz), and its FP16 output of 16.79 TFLOPS at a 2:1 ratio is closer to the V710's 27.65 TFLOPS than the FP32 gap suggests. The A550M's 406 mm² die is larger, but that is not a performance win. The A550M also holds a Vulkan benchmark score of 49,580, which is not available for the V710, but that single result is in line with its OpenCL score and does not indicate a competitive threat. The A550M's production status is end-of-life, while the V710's release date is October 2, 2024, making the AMD part a more current product.

Specification Differences

• Process Node: AMD Radeon PRO V710 uses 5 nm; Intel Arc A550M uses 6 nm.
• Transistors: V710 has 28,100 million; A550M has 21,700 million.
• Die Size: V710 is 346 mm²; A550M is 406 mm².
• Base Clock: V710 runs at 1900 MHz; A550M at 900 MHz.
• Boost Clock: V710 boosts to 2000 MHz; A550M to 2050 MHz.
• Memory Clock: V710 is 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective); A550M is 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective).
• Memory Size: V710 has 28 GB; A550M has 8 GB.
• Memory Bus Width: V710 is 224-bit; A550M is 128-bit.
• Memory Bandwidth: V710 delivers 504.0 GB/s; A550M delivers 224.0 GB/s.
• Shading Units: V710 has 3,456; A550M has 2,048.
• TMUs: V710 has 216; A550M has 128.
• ROPs: V710 has 96; A550M has 64.
• RT Cores: V710 has 54; A550M has 16.
• Pixel Rate: V710 is 192.0 GPixel/s; A550M is 131.2 GPixel/s.
• Texture Rate: V710 is 432.0 GTexel/s; A550M is 262.4 GTexel/s.
• FP32 Performance: V710 is 27.65 TFLOPS; A550M is 8.397 TFLOPS.
• FP16 Performance: V710 is 27.65 TFLOPS (1:1); A550M is 16.79 TFLOPS (2:1).
• TDP: V710 is 158 W; A550M is 60 W.
• Slot Width: V710 is single-slot; A550M is IGP.
• Power Connectors: V710 has 1x 8-pin; A550M has none.
• Suggested PSU: V710 lists 450 W; A550M has no listing.
• Display Outputs: V710 has none; A550M is portable device dependent.
• Production Status: V710 is unlisted; A550M is end-of-life.
• Release Date: V710 is 2024-10-02; A550M has no date listed.