AMD Radeon PRO V710 vs AMD Radeon PRO W7400 Comparison

FAQ

Q: What is the average benchmark score for the AMD Radeon PRO V710?

A: The database records an average benchmark score of 58657 for the AMD Radeon PRO V710, placing it in the 88th percentile among all GPUs.

Q: How many benchmark results are listed for the AMD Radeon PRO W7400?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO W7400 has no recorded benchmark scores in the database. Its average benchmark score is 0, and its percentile versus all GPUs is 50.

Q: What process nodes do the two cards use?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO V710 is built on TSMC's 5 nm process, while the AMD Radeon PRO W7400 uses TSMC's 6 nm process. Both are fabricated by TSMC.

Q: Do both cards support the same graphics APIs?

A: Yes, both cards support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Q: What is the memory bus width difference between the two?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO V710 has a 224-bit memory bus, whereas the AMD Radeon PRO W7400 has a 128-bit memory bus.

Q: Which card has display outputs?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO W7400 has 4x DisplayPort 2.1 outputs. The AMD Radeon PRO V710 lists no display outputs.

Architecture Differences

Both cards belong to the Radeon Pro Navi (Navi III Series) generation and share the RDNA 3.0 architecture, yet they diverge significantly in their physical implementations. The AMD Radeon PRO V710 uses the Navi 32 chip with the codename "Wheat Nas," while the AMD Radeon PRO W7400 uses the smaller Navi 33 chip with the codename "Hotpink Bonefish."

The manufacturing process separates them clearly. The V710 is produced on a 5 nm node at TSMC, whereas the W7400 uses a 6 nm node at the same foundry. This difference correlates with transistor counts: the V710 packs 28,100 million transistors on a 346 mm² die, achieving a transistor density of 81.2 million per square millimeter. The W7400 contains 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die, resulting in a density of 65.2 million per square millimeter.

Compute resources follow the same pattern. The V710 features 3456 shading units, 216 texture mapping units, and 96 render output units. The W7400 provides 1792 shading units, 112 TMUs, and 64 ROPs. Ray tracing hardware also differs, with the V710 including 54 RT cores versus 28 RT cores on the W7400.

Clock behavior presents an interesting contrast. The V710 has a base clock of 1900 MHz and a boost clock of 2000 MHz. The W7400, by contrast, has a much lower base clock of 330 MHz but reaches 1100 MHz at boost. This wide gap in base clocks suggests different power management strategies, though the database does not record game clocks for either.

Memory architecture reinforces the performance hierarchy. The V710 carries 28 GB of GDDR6 on a 224-bit bus, with memory clocks at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective) delivering 504.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The W7400 offers 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, with memory at 1350 MHz (10.8 Gbps effective) producing 172.8 GB/s. The V710's bandwidth advantage is substantial.

Power delivery and physical design also differ. The V710 has a TDP of 158 W, requires a single 8-pin power connector, and a suggested PSU of 450 W. The W7400 has a TDP of 55 W, draws power entirely from the PCIe slot with no power connectors, and requires only a 250 W PSU. Both are single-slot cards. The W7400 has recorded dimensions of 168 mm in length, 69 mm in height, and 20 mm in width. The V710 has no recorded dimensions. The W7400 connects via PCIe 4.0 x8, while the V710 uses PCIe 4.0 x16.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

Direct head-to-head benchmark results between these two cards are absent from the database. The headToHeadBenchmarks array is empty, meaning no common test scores exist for both products. However, the available data for the AMD Radeon PRO V710 allows for comparison against its nearest rivals, which provides context for its performance tier.

The V710 has two recorded benchmark scores. In 3DMark Steel Nomad (DX12), it scores 853. In Geekbench OpenCL, it scores 116460. The W7400 has no recorded scores in any benchmark, so no numerical comparison between the two is possible from the database.

The V710's average benchmark score of 58657 places it near several other GPUs. The NVIDIA P102-100 averages 58528, a delta of 0.2% behind the V710. The AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT averages 58392, a delta of 0.5% behind. The Intel Arc A570M averages 58239, a delta of 0.7% behind. The AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM averages 58085, a delta of 1% behind. These deltas indicate the V710 sits within a tight performance cluster, leading the group by a narrow margin.

The W7400's average benchmark score of 0 and its 50th percentile ranking reflect the absence of recorded measurements. Without any benchmark entries, the database cannot establish its performance relative to the V710 or any other GPU. The data gap is complete for the W7400.

The wins counters confirm this situation: winsA is 0 and winsB is 0. Neither card has a recorded victory in a head-to-head comparison because no such comparison exists in the database.

The Verdict

The recorded data supports a clear distinction between these two cards, but only for the V710. The AMD Radeon PRO V710 demonstrates measurable performance in two benchmarks and holds an 88th percentile ranking across all GPUs. Its nearest rivals trail by less than one percent, placing it at the top of a tight pack. The W7400 shows no benchmark scores, no average score, and no rival comparisons, so the database provides zero evidence of its computing performance.

For users requiring large memory capacity, the V710's 28 GB of GDDR6 with 504.0 GB/s bandwidth stands out. The W7400's 8 GB with 172.8 GB/s is far more limited. For compute-intensive workloads, the V710's 27.65 TFLOPS of FP32 throughput dwarfs the W7400's 7.885 TFLOPS. The V710 also offers more shading units, TMUs, ROPs, and RT cores.

The W7400 does retain advantages in specific areas. It outputs video through 4x DisplayPort 2.1, while the V710 lists no outputs. It draws only 55 W with no external power connectors, making it suitable for systems with limited power delivery. Its physical dimensions are recorded, which aids compatibility planning. Its production status is listed as active, whereas the V710 has no recorded production status.

The data suggests the V710 is the compute-oriented card, while the W7400 is the display-oriented, low-power option. The V710 leads in every measured performance metric. The W7400 leads in power efficiency, display connectivity, and physical compactness. Without benchmark data for the W7400, no performance verdict can be reached beyond the raw specifications.

Specification Differences

The following fields differ between the AMD Radeon PRO V710 and the AMD Radeon PRO W7400:

• Chip: Navi 32 versus Navi 33
• Codename: Wheat Nas versus Hotpink Bonefish
• Process Node: 5 nm versus 6 nm
• Transistors: 28,100 million versus 13,300 million
• Die Size: 346 mm² versus 204 mm²
• Transistor Density: 81.2M / mm² versus 65.2M / mm²
• Base Clock: 1900 MHz versus 330 MHz
• Boost Clock: 2000 MHz versus 1100 MHz
• Memory Clock: 2250 MHz 18 Gbps effective versus 1350 MHz 10.8 Gbps effective
• Memory Size: 28 GB versus 8 GB
• Memory Bus Width: 224 bit versus 128 bit
• Memory Bandwidth: 504.0 GB/s versus 172.8 GB/s
• Shading Units: 3456 versus 1792
• TMUs: 216 versus 112
• ROPs: 96 versus 64
• RT Cores: 54 versus 28
• Pixel Rate: 192.0 GPixel/s versus 70.40 GPixel/s
• Texture Rate: 432.0 GTexel/s versus 123.2 GTexel/s
• FP32: 27.65 TFLOPS versus 7.885 TFLOPS
• FP16: 27.65 TFLOPS (1:1) versus 7.885 TFLOPS (1:1)
• TDP: 158 W versus 55 W
• Power Connectors: 1x 8-pin versus None
• Suggested PSU: 450 W versus 250 W
• Bus Interface: PCIe 4.0 x16 versus PCIe 4.0 x8
• Display Outputs: No outputs versus 4x DisplayPort 2.1
• Dimensions: Not recorded versus 168 mm 6.6 inches length, 69 mm 2.7 inches height, 20 mm 0.8 inches width
• Production Status: Not recorded versus Active
• Release Date: 2024-10-02 versus 2025-08-02
• Percentile Vs All GPUs: 88 versus 50
• Average Benchmark Score: 58657 versus 0
• Nearest Rivals: Four entries versus none

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Radeon PRO V710 wins in every computational category recorded. Its FP32 throughput of 27.65 TFLOPS is 3.5 times the W7400's 7.885 TFLOPS. Its texture rate of 432.0 GTexel/s is 3.5 times the W7400's 123.2 GTexel/s. Its pixel rate of 192.0 GPixel/s is 2.7 times the W7400's 70.40 GPixel/s. Its memory bandwidth of 504.0 GB/s is 2.9 times the W7400's 172.8 GB/s.

The V710's 28 GB memory capacity is 3.5 times the W7400's 8 GB. It holds a 224-bit bus versus 128-bit. It has 3456 shading units versus 1792, 216 TMUs versus 112, 96 ROPs versus 64, and 54 RT cores versus 28. Its 5 nm process packs more than twice the transistors on a larger die. Its 88th percentile ranking and recorded benchmarks give it a measurable performance presence in the database.

The AMD Radeon PRO W7400 wins in power and display integration. Its 55 W TDP is less than half the V710's 158 W. It requires no external power connectors, while the V710 needs a 1x 8-pin. Its suggested PSU of 250 W is lower than the V710's 450 W. It provides 4x DisplayPort 2.1 outputs, enabling direct display connections, while the V710 lists none. Its recorded dimensions allow precise physical planning. Its production status is active, indicating current availability in the database.

The W7400 also wins on the PCIe interface width, using x8 rather than x16, which can simplify integration into systems with limited lanes. Its 6 nm process, while less dense than the V710's 5 nm, still delivers RDNA 3.0 architecture with DirectX 12 Ultimate support. The W7400's base clock of 330 MHz versus the V710's 1900 MHz suggests a design tuned for low idle power, though the database does not record idle measurements.

The release dates place the V710 earlier at October 2024, with the W7400 following in August 2025. Both share the same predecessor, the Radeon Pro Vega, and neither has a recorded successor. The V710's nearest rivals all sit within one percent of its average score, indicating it competes in a dense field. The W7400 has no rival data, leaving its competitive position undefined.