AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700S vs Intel Arc Pro B370 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data contains no direct head-to-head benchmark results for the AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700S versus the Intel Arc Pro B370. Both entries show zero benchmark scores, zero wins in the head-to-head comparison, and an identical 50th percentile ranking among all GPUs in the database. The absence of measured performance data means any direct numerical comparison of application performance cannot be established from the current records.

What the database does provide are the raw compute specifications that define each product's theoretical ceiling. The AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700S delivers 47.84 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, while the Intel Arc Pro B370 delivers 6.144 TFLOPS. That is a 7.8x difference in raw single-precision throughput. In FP16 workloads, the AMD part maintains 47.84 TFLOPS at a 1:1 ratio, whereas the Intel part reaches 12.29 TFLOPS via a 2:1 ratio. The AMD card also shows a substantial lead in pixel throughput at 373.8 GPixel/s versus 48.00 GPixel/s, and in texture throughput at 747.5 GTexel/s versus 96.00 GTexel/s.

The memory subsystem amplifies the separation. The AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700S uses 32 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, yielding 644.6 GB/s of bandwidth. The Intel Arc Pro B370 relies on system shared memory, with bandwidth listed as system dependent. That dependency means the Intel part's effective bandwidth varies with the host platform's memory configuration, and it cannot match a dedicated 256-bit GDDR6 interface in the recorded data.

Clock behavior also differs sharply. The AMD card has a base clock of 1660 MHz and a boost clock of 2920 MHz, with a game clock of 2350 MHz. The Intel part has a base clock of 300 MHz and a boost clock of 2400 MHz. The AMD card's boost clock exceeds the Intel part's boost by 520 MHz, and its base clock is more than five times higher. The Intel part's low base clock suggests aggressive power management, consistent with its 25 W TDP, while the AMD card runs at a 300 W TDP.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs come from different foundries and process nodes. AMD uses TSMC's 4 nm process for the Navi 48 chip, while Intel uses its own 3 nm process for the Panther Lake chip. The AMD chip contains 53,900 million transistors on a 357 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 151.0 million per square millimeter. The Intel chip's transistor count and die size are listed as unknown, so no density figure can be derived.

Architecturally, the AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700S uses RDNA 4.0, while the Intel Arc Pro B370 uses Xe3-LPG. The AMD part belongs to the Radeon Pro Navi (Navi IV Series) generation, and the Intel part belongs to the Arc Graphics-WM (Panther Lake) generation. The predecessor names also differ: the AMD card succeeds the Radeon Pro Vega, and the Intel part succeeds the HD Graphics-WM.

The compute unit counts reflect the architectural gap. The AMD card has 4096 shading units, 256 TMUs, and 128 ROPs. The Intel part has 1280 shading units, 40 TMUs, and 20 ROPs. Ray tracing hardware also differs: the AMD card has 64 RT cores, while the Intel part has 10. Neither product lists tensor cores in the database.

Memory architecture is a fundamental split. The AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700S is a discrete card with dedicated 32 GB GDDR6 memory, a 256-bit bus, and fixed 644.6 GB/s bandwidth. The Intel Arc Pro B370 is an integrated graphics processor (IGP) with system shared memory, no dedicated bus width, and system dependent bandwidth. That distinction affects every memory-bound workload.

Power and physical design reinforce the architectural difference. The AMD card has a 300 W TDP, requires a 700 W suggested power supply, uses a single 16-pin power connector, and occupies a dual-slot form factor with dimensions of 267 mm length, 109 mm height, and 39 mm width. The Intel part has a 25 W TDP, no power connectors, no suggested PSU, and is classified as an IGP with no listed dimensions. The Intel part's display outputs are listed as portable device dependent, while the AMD card provides four DisplayPort 2.1a outputs.

Both products support the same API set: DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The AMD card uses a PCIe 5.0 x16 bus interface, while the Intel part uses an IGP interface. The AMD card's memory clock is listed at 2518 MHz with 20.1 Gbps effective data rate.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700S wins in every category where the database provides a direct numerical comparison. Its FP32 compute of 47.84 TFLOPS is 7.8x higher than the Intel part's 6.144 TFLOPS. Its FP16 throughput of 47.84 TFLOPS is 3.9x higher than the Intel part's 12.29 TFLOPS. Pixel fill rate is 7.8x higher at 373.8 GPixel/s versus 48.00 GPixel/s. Texture fill rate is 7.8x higher at 747.5 GTexel/s versus 96.00 GTexel/s.

The AMD card also wins on memory capacity and bandwidth. It has 32 GB of dedicated GDDR6 with 644.6 GB/s of bandwidth. The Intel part has no dedicated memory, and its bandwidth is system dependent, meaning it shares the host's memory bus with the CPU. For workloads that stream large datasets, such as rendering scenes with high-resolution textures or running inference on large models, the AMD card's dedicated memory pool provides a structural advantage that the Intel IGP cannot match.

The Intel Arc Pro B370 wins on power efficiency in the recorded data. Its 25 W TDP is 275 W lower than the AMD card's 300 W TDP, a 92% reduction. That makes the Intel part suitable for portable or low-power devices, as its display outputs are listed as portable device dependent. The Intel part also has a lower base clock of 300 MHz, which allows it to idle at very low power, though the boost clock of 2400 MHz is still 520 MHz below the AMD card's boost.

The Intel part also wins on physical footprint, since it is an IGP with no separate card dimensions or power connectors. It requires no additional slot width, no power supply upgrade, and no PCIe slot. The AMD card needs a dual-slot space, a 16-pin power connector, and a 700 W suggested power supply.

The release dates differ: the AMD card was released on 2025-12-10, and the Intel part on 2026-01-26. Both are marked as active production status. The AMD card's predecessor is the Radeon Pro Vega, and the Intel part's predecessor is the HD Graphics-WM. Neither product has a successor listed.

The Verdict

The data draws a clear line between a discrete workstation GPU and an integrated graphics processor. The AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700S is built for compute-heavy, memory-intensive tasks. It delivers 47.84 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, 32 GB of dedicated GDDR6 memory, and 64.0 GB/s of bandwidth per RT core (644.6 GB/s divided by 10 RT cores on the Intel part gives no meaningful comparison; the AMD RT core count is 64). Its 300 W TDP and dual-slot design indicate a product intended for desktop workstations with adequate power delivery and cooling.

The Intel Arc Pro B370 is an IGP with 6.144 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, 10 RT cores, and system shared memory. Its 25 W TDP and lack of power connectors place it in portable devices or compact systems where power budget is the primary constraint. Its 2400 MHz boost clock shows it can scale up when needed, but its base clock of 300 MHz and system dependent bandwidth cap its sustained performance.

The choice depends on the workload and platform. For applications that require dedicated graphics memory, high throughput, and sustained compute, the AMD card is the only option in this comparison. For systems that cannot accommodate a discrete card, the Intel part provides a baseline level of RDNA 4.0-class (actually Xe3-LPG) functionality within a 25 W envelope.

The percentile ranking of 50 for both GPUs indicates that neither falls into the top or bottom half of the database distribution, but this ranking is based on the same zero benchmark scores, so it carries no comparative weight. The production status of both parts is active, meaning both are currently available in their respective form factors.

FAQ

Q: What is the FP32 compute difference between the two GPUs?

A: The AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700S delivers 47.84 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, while the Intel Arc Pro B370 delivers 6.144 TFLOPS. The AMD card is 7.8x higher.

Q: How much memory does each GPU have?

A: The AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700S has 32 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus with 644.6 GB/s bandwidth. The Intel Arc Pro B370 uses system shared memory with system dependent bandwidth.

Q: What is the power consumption of each GPU?

A: The AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700S has a 300 W TDP and requires a 700 W suggested power supply. The Intel Arc Pro B370 has a 25 W TDP and requires no power connectors.

Q: Which GPU has more ray tracing cores?

A: The AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700S has 64 RT cores. The Intel Arc Pro B370 has 10 RT cores.

Q: What process nodes are used for each GPU?

A: The AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700S uses TSMC's 4 nm process for the Navi 48 chip. The Intel Arc Pro B370 uses Intel's 3 nm process for the Panther Lake chip.

Q: What is the form factor of each GPU?

A: The AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700S is a dual-slot discrete card measuring 267 mm in length, 109 mm in height, and 39 mm in width, with a PCIe 5.0 x16 interface. The Intel Arc Pro B370 is an IGP with no listed dimensions and an IGP bus interface.