AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 vs Intel Arc Pro B370 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark comparisons between the AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 and the Intel Arc Pro B370. The head-to-head benchmark array is empty, and the win counters for both sides are zero. This means the two products have never been measured against each other in the same test session, so any comparison must rely on the individual benchmark scores and specifications recorded for each item.

The AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 has a full set of benchmark results in the database. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 7006. In Geekbench, it records 118202 for OpenCL and 63550 for Vulkan. Passmark results include 155 for DirectX 10, 272 for DirectX 11, 83 for DirectX 12, 363 for DirectX 9, 1236 for G2D, 26979 for G3D, and 15300 for GPU compute. The average benchmark score across all recorded tests is 23315, placing it at the 69th percentile among all GPUs in the database.

The Intel Arc Pro B370 has no benchmark scores recorded. Its average benchmark score is 0, and its percentile rank is 50. The benchmark array for this item is empty, meaning the database contains no measured performance data for the Intel part. Any performance comparison between the two is therefore impossible from the recorded measurements alone.

The nearest rivals for the AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 provide context for its average score. The AMD Radeon R9 M290X averages 23276, a delta of 0.2% from the R9700. The AMD Radeon RX 6600M averages 23273, also a delta of 0.2%. The AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16 averages 23250, a delta of 0.3%. The NVIDIA P106-100 averages 23249, a delta of 0.3%. These rival scores are all within 0.3% of the R9700's average, indicating that the R9700 sits in a tightly packed cluster of GPUs with nearly identical average performance in the database.

The Intel Arc Pro B370 has no nearest rivals listed, consistent with its lack of benchmark data.

FAQ

Q: What is the average benchmark score for the AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700?

A: The database records an average benchmark score of 23315 for the AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700, placing it at the 69th percentile among all GPUs in the database.

Q: Does the Intel Arc Pro B370 have any benchmark scores in the database?

A: No. The Intel Arc Pro B370 has an empty benchmark array, an average benchmark score of 0, and a percentile rank of 50. No measured performance data exists for this product in the database.

Q: How close are the AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700's nearest rivals in average score?

A: The nearest rivals are all within 0.3% of the R9700's average score. The AMD Radeon R9 M290X and AMD Radeon RX 6600M each sit at 0.2% delta, while the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16 and NVIDIA P106-100 each sit at 0.3% delta.

Q: What is the memory configuration of the AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700?

A: The AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 uses 32 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 644.6 GB/s and a memory clock of 2518 MHz, or 20.1 Gbps effective.

Q: What is the memory configuration of the Intel Arc Pro B370?

A: The Intel Arc Pro B370 uses system shared memory, with the bus width listed as system shared and bandwidth described as system dependent. Its memory clock is listed as system shared.

Q: What are the launch dates for these two products?

A: The AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 has a release date of 2025-07-22, while the Intel Arc Pro B370 has a release date of 2026-01-26.

The Verdict

The data in the database does not support a performance verdict between these two products. The AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 has a complete set of benchmark results, an average score of 23315, and a 69th percentile ranking. The Intel Arc Pro B370 has no recorded benchmarks, an average score of 0, and a 50th percentile ranking that is not derived from any measured performance data.

The AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 is the only one of the two with measurable performance in the database. Its average score of 23315 places it at the 69th percentile of all GPUs, and its nearest rivals all sit within 0.3% of that average. The Intel Arc Pro B370 cannot be compared on performance grounds because no scores exist for it.

The AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 is a discrete, dual-slot card with a 300 W TDP and a 16-pin power connector, requiring a 700 W suggested power supply. The Intel Arc Pro B370 is an integrated graphics processor with a 25 W TDP, no power connectors, and no suggested PSU. These are fundamentally different product categories, and the database reflects that difference in their specifications, but not in benchmarks.

Buyers who require measured performance data should note that only the AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 has any in the database. The Intel Arc Pro B370 has no benchmark records at all, so its performance characteristics remain unquantified in this dataset.

Specification Differences

The two products differ across nearly every recorded specification field.

The AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 uses a Navi 48 chip on RDNA 4.0 architecture, fabricated on a 4 nm process at TSMC, with 53,900 million transistors on a 357 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 151.0M per mm². The Intel Arc Pro B370 uses a Panther Lake chip on Xe3-LPG architecture, fabricated on a 3 nm process at Intel, with transistor count and die size both listed as unknown.

Clock speeds differ substantially. The AMD card has a base clock of 1660 MHz, a boost clock of 2920 MHz, a game clock of 2350 MHz, and a memory clock of 2518 MHz, or 20.1 Gbps effective. The Intel part has a base clock of 300 MHz, a boost clock of 2400 MHz, no game clock, and a memory clock listed as system shared.

Memory configurations are entirely different. The AMD card has 32 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus with 644.6 GB/s bandwidth. The Intel part uses system shared memory with system dependent bandwidth.

Compute resources differ by a factor of roughly three to eight. The AMD card has 4096 shading units, 256 TMUs, 128 ROPs, and 64 RT cores. The Intel part has 1280 shading units, 40 TMUs, 20 ROPs, and 10 RT cores.

Rates and throughput differ accordingly. The AMD card records a pixel rate of 373.8 GPixel/s, a texture rate of 747.5 GTexel/s, FP32 of 47.84 TFLOPS, and FP16 of 47.84 TFLOPS at a 1:1 ratio. The Intel part records a pixel rate of 48.00 GPixel/s, a texture rate of 96.00 GTexel/s, FP32 of 6.144 TFLOPS, and FP16 of 12.29 TFLOPS at a 2:1 ratio.

Power and physical specifications are also distinct. The AMD card has a TDP of 300 W, a dual-slot width, one 16-pin power connector, a 700 W suggested PSU, and dimensions of 267 mm length, 111 mm height, and 40 mm width. The Intel part has a TDP of 25 W, an IGP slot width, no power connectors, no suggested PSU, and no recorded dimensions.

The bus interface differs as well. The AMD card uses PCIe 5.0 x16, while the Intel part uses IGP. Display outputs also differ: the AMD card has 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1a, while the Intel part lists portable device dependent outputs.

The AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 has a launch MSRP of 1,299 USD. The Intel Arc Pro B370 has no launch MSRP recorded.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 is built on RDNA 4.0 architecture with a Navi 48 chip, belonging to the Radeon Pro Navi generation, specifically the Navi IV Series. It is fabricated on a 4 nm process at TSMC with 53,900 million transistors on a 357 mm² die. Its predecessor is listed as the Radeon Pro Vega, and its production status is active.

The Intel Arc Pro B370 is built on Xe3-LPG architecture with a Panther Lake chip, belonging to the Arc Graphics-WM generation, specifically the Panther Lake line. It is fabricated on a 3 nm process at Intel, with transistor count and die size listed as unknown. Its predecessor is listed as HD Graphics-WM, and its production status is active.

The AMD card uses dedicated GDDR6 memory with a 256-bit bus and 644.6 GB/s bandwidth, while the Intel part relies on system shared memory with system dependent bandwidth. This indicates a fundamental architectural difference: the AMD card is a discrete solution with its own memory subsystem, while the Intel part is an integrated solution that shares system memory.

The AMD card has 4096 shading units, 256 TMUs, 128 ROPs, and 64 RT cores, with FP32 and FP16 both at 47.84 TFLOPS in a 1:1 ratio. The Intel part has 1280 shading units, 40 TMUs, 20 ROPs, and 10 RT cores, with FP32 at 6.144 TFLOPS and FP16 at 12.29 TFLOPS in a 2:1 ratio. The FP16-to-FP32 ratio difference indicates a different compute strategy: the AMD card processes both precisions at the same rate, while the Intel part doubles FP16 throughput relative to FP32.

Both products support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. Neither has tensor cores listed in the database.

The AMD card uses a 16-pin power connector and requires a 700 W suggested PSU, consistent with its 300 W TDP. The Intel part has no power connectors and no suggested PSU, consistent with its 25 W TDP and integrated design.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 is the only product in this comparison with recorded benchmark data. Its average score of 23315 and 69th percentile ranking indicate it holds a measurable position in the database's GPU performance distribution. Its nearest rivals, all within 0.3% of its average, suggest it sits in a dense performance cluster rather than standing out from its immediate peers.

The Intel Arc Pro B370 has no recorded wins in any benchmark category because it has no recorded benchmarks. Its 50th percentile rank exists without supporting score data, meaning the database assigns it a median position by default rather than by measurement.

For any workload that requires a discrete GPU with dedicated memory, the AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 is the only option with supporting data. Its 32 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus with 644.6 GB/s bandwidth provides an independent memory subsystem, while its 4096 shading units and 64 RT cores give it substantial compute resources. The Intel Arc Pro B370, as an integrated processor with system shared memory, has no such dedicated resources.

For workloads that require low power consumption or integrated graphics, the Intel Arc Pro B370 has the specification advantage. Its 25 W TDP and lack of power connectors make it suitable for portable devices, as indicated by its portable device dependent display outputs. The AMD card's 300 W TDP, 16-pin connector, and 700 W suggested PSU place it firmly in the discrete desktop segment.

The AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 wins on every measured performance metric in the database because it is the only product with measured metrics. The Intel Arc Pro B370 wins on power efficiency and integration, based solely on its recorded specifications. The database contains no head-to-head benchmarks, so no direct comparative wins can be assigned to either product.