AMD Radeon 8060S vs Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 Comparison

The Verdict

The data places the AMD Radeon 8060S and the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 in entirely different competitive tiers. The Radeon 8060S, an integrated graphics processor within AMD's Strix Halo chip, records an average benchmark score of 55,757 and sits in the 87th percentile of all GPUs. The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100, a discrete dual-slot card with 12 GB of dedicated GDDR6 memory, holds a 50th percentile ranking and has no recorded benchmark scores or rivals in the database. The Radeon 8060S delivers measured performance that places it within 0.6% of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 and 2.8% ahead of the RTX 4080, while the LX 7G100 has no comparable data points to validate its position.

For users selecting between these two, the Radeon 8060S is the only option with verified benchmark results. Its 87th percentile ranking and proximity to high-end discrete GPUs indicate it handles demanding workloads despite its 55 W power envelope. The LX 7G100 offers a larger shading unit count (6,144 versus 2,560) and higher FP32 throughput (24.58 TFLOPS versus 14.85 TFLOPS), but the absence of any recorded test scores means its real-world standing remains unquantified. The data does not support a recommendation for the LX 7G100 based on performance evidence, as the database contains no results for it. The Radeon 8060S is the clear choice for anyone relying on measured outcomes.

Where Each One Wins

The Radeon 8060S wins on every measurable benchmark category because the LX 7G100 has no entries in the head-to-head benchmark array. The database records three specific test results for the Radeon 8060S: a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2,162, a Geekbench OpenCL score of 84,626, and a Geekbench Vulkan score of 80,483. These scores contribute to its 87th percentile standing. The LX 7G100 holds a 50th percentile placement with an average benchmark score of zero, meaning it has not completed any recorded tests. In terms of physical design, the LX 7G100 is a dual-slot card measuring 294 mm in length, 120 mm in height, and 49 mm in width, requiring a 550 W power supply and a single 8-pin connector. The Radeon 8060S is an integrated processor with no slot width, no power connectors, and a 55 W TDP, making it suitable for portable devices where space and power are constrained. The LX 7G100 wins on memory specifications, offering 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth, whereas the Radeon 8060S relies on system shared memory with bandwidth described as system dependent. The LX 7G100 also leads in raw compute metrics: 24.58 TFLOPS FP32, 49.15 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1), 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs, against the Radeon's 14.85 TFLOPS FP32, 160 TMUs, and 64 ROPs. However, without benchmark verification, these specifications do not translate into recorded wins.

Architecture Differences

The Radeon 8060S uses AMD's RDNA 3.5 architecture built on a 4 nm TSMC process, with a die size of 308 mm². It belongs to the Navi Mobile (RX 8000M) generation and was released on January 5, 2025. The chip, codenamed Strix Halo, features 2,560 shading units, 160 texture mapping units, 64 raster output pipelines, and 40 ray tracing cores. Its base clock is 1,295 MHz with a boost clock of 2,900 MHz. The FP16 rate matches FP32 at 14.85 TFLOPS (1:1), indicating no half-rate FP16 acceleration. The memory subsystem is entirely system shared, with no dedicated VRAM, bus width, or bandwidth figures. The bus interface is PCIe 5.0 x16, and it supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 uses the TrueGPU architecture on a 6 nm TSMC process, with a die size listed as unknown. Its generation is 7G100, and its release date is June 17, 2026. The chip, designated 7G106, contains 6,144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs, but no ray tracing core count is listed. Clock speeds for base and boost are absent from the data; only the memory clock is specified at 2,250 MHz (18 Gbps effective). It has 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, delivering 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth. FP32 throughput reaches 24.58 TFLOPS, while FP16 doubles to 49.15 TFLOPS (2:1), showing a half-rate FP16 path. The card uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.3, one version behind the Radeon's Vulkan 1.4. The LX 7G100 carries a 225 W TDP, requires a 550 W suggested power supply, and uses one 8-pin power connector. Display outputs are four DisplayPort 1.4a ports, while the Radeon 8060S's display outputs are portable device dependent.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The AMD Radeon 8060S records an average benchmark score of 55,757, while the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 has an average score of zero because no benchmarks are recorded for it.

Q: How does the Radeon 8060S compare to the RTX 4080?

A: The Radeon 8060S is 2.8% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080, which has an average score of 54,247.

Q: What is the memory configuration of the LX 7G100?

A: The LX 7G100 has 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus with a bandwidth of 432.0 GB/s and a memory clock of 2,250 MHz (18 Gbps effective).

Q: Does the Radeon 8060S have dedicated VRAM?

A: No, the Radeon 8060S uses system shared memory for both size and type, with bandwidth described as system dependent.

Q: Which GPU has a higher FP32 throughput?

A: The LX 7G100 has a higher FP32 rating at 24.58 TFLOPS, compared to the Radeon 8060S's 14.85 TFLOPS.

Q: What API support does each GPU provide?

A: Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. The Radeon 8060S supports Vulkan 1.4, while the LX 7G100 supports Vulkan 1.3.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The head-to-head benchmark array contains no entries, so a direct comparison of test scores between the Radeon 8060S and the LX 7G100 is impossible from recorded data. The Radeon 8060S has three standalone results: 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 at 2,162, Geekbench OpenCL at 84,626, and Geekbench Vulkan at 80,483. The LX 7G100 has no benchmark results, no nearest rivals, and no percentile score beyond its 50th placement. The Radeon 8060S's nearest rival comparisons provide context: it is 0.1% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB (average score 55,698), 0.6% behind the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 (average score 56,083), 1.7% ahead of the AMD Radeon Pro W5700X (average score 54,828), and 2.8% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 (average score 54,247). These deltas place the Radeon 8060S in a competitive band with high-end discrete GPUs from both AMD and NVIDIA, despite its integrated nature and 55 W TDP.

The LX 7G100, by contrast, offers no such comparisons. Its 50th percentile ranking suggests a median position among all GPUs, but without scores, this ranking cannot be verified against any specific competitor. The specification sheet shows higher raw compute: 24.58 TFLOPS FP32 versus 14.85 TFLOPS, 6,144 shading units versus 2,560, 192 TMUs versus 160, and 96 ROPs versus 64. The LX 7G100 also has dedicated memory with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth, while the Radeon 8060S shares system memory with dependent bandwidth. Yet these advantages do not appear in any recorded test. The Radeon 8060S's 87th percentile and verified scores across DirectX 12, OpenCL, and Vulkan workloads provide a concrete performance profile. The LX 7G100's 50th percentile with zero scores leaves its actual performance open to question. The database shows one product with measurable results and one without, and that distinction drives the entire analysis. For any workload where benchmark scores matter, the Radeon 8060S is the only option with evidence of performance.