AMD Radeon 8060S vs AMD Radeon PRO W7400 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data shows no direct head-to-head benchmark comparisons between the AMD Radeon 8060S and the AMD Radeon PRO W7400. The 8060S has three benchmark entries: a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2162, a Geekbench OpenCL score of 84626, and a Geekbench Vulkan score of 80483. The PRO W7400 has no recorded benchmark scores in the database. Therefore, direct performance deltas between these two specific cards cannot be calculated from the available measurements.

The Radeon 8060S sits in the 87th percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 55757. Its nearest rivals in the database include the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB, which scores 55698 (a 0.1% delta), the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 at 56083 (a -0.6% delta), the AMD Radeon Pro W5700X at 54828 (a 1.7% delta), and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 at 54247 (a 2.8% delta). These figures indicate the 8060S performs within a narrow band around these established desktop and professional cards, slightly trailing the RTX 5080 while edging out the RTX 4080 and the Pro W5700X. The PRO W7400, by contrast, holds the 50th percentile with no average score, placing it well below the 8060S in overall standing.

The 8060S derives its benchmark strength from substantial raw compute resources. Its FP32 throughput of 14.85 TFLOPS is nearly double the PRO W7400's 7.885 TFLOPS. Pixel fill rate on the 8060S reaches 185.6 GPixel/s versus 70.40 GPixel/s on the PRO W7400, and texture rate hits 464.0 GTexel/s versus 123.2 GTexel/s. These differences translate into a clear performance hierarchy where the 8060S dominates in every measured throughput category.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs belong to different architectural generations and process nodes. The Radeon 8060S uses the Strix Halo chip built on RDNA 3.5, fabricated on a 4 nm TSMC process with a die size of 308 mm². The Radeon PRO W7400 uses the Navi 33 chip with RDNA 3.0 architecture, codenamed Hotpink Bonefish, manufactured on a 6 nm TSMC process with a die size of 204 mm² and a transistor count of 13,300 million. The 8060S does not disclose its transistor count, while the PRO W7400 has a transistor density of 65.2M per mm².

The 8060S features 2560 shading units, 160 texture mapping units, 64 ROPs, and 40 ray tracing cores. The PRO W7400 has 1792 shading units, 112 TMUs, 64 ROPs, and 28 ray tracing cores. Neither card lists tensor cores. The memory architecture differs fundamentally: the 8060S uses system shared memory with a system dependent bus width and bandwidth, whereas the PRO W7400 has 8 GB of dedicated GDDR6 memory on a 128 bit bus delivering 172.8 GB/s bandwidth. The 8060S memory clock is listed as system shared, while the PRO W7400 runs at 1350 MHz with 10.8 Gbps effective speed.

Both cards operate at a 55 W TDP and use no power connectors. The 8060S is an integrated graphics processor (IGP) with a slot width of IGP, while the PRO W7400 is a single-slot card measuring 168 mm in length, 69 mm in height, and 20 mm in width. The PRO W7400 suggests a 250 W power supply, whereas the 8060S has no suggested PSU listed. The bus interface differs as well: the 8060S uses PCIe 5.0 x16, and the PRO W7400 uses PCIe 4.0 x8. Display outputs on the PRO W7400 include 4x DisplayPort 2.1, while the 8060S outputs are portable device dependent.

Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The release dates differ: the 8060S launched on 2025-01-05, and the PRO W7400 on 2025-08-02. The 8060S predecessor is Polaris Mobile, while the PRO W7400 predecessor is Radeon Pro Vega. The 8060S generation is Navi Mobile (RX 8000M), and the PRO W7400 generation is Radeon Pro Navi (Navi III Series).

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has higher raw compute throughput?

A: The Radeon 8060S delivers 14.85 TFLOPS FP32, exactly double the PRO W7400's 7.885 TFLOPS. Both cards maintain a 1:1 FP16 to FP32 ratio, so the 8060S also doubles FP16 performance.

Q: How do the memory systems compare?

A: The PRO W7400 has 8 GB of dedicated GDDR6 memory on a 128 bit bus with 172.8 GB/s bandwidth. The 8060S uses system shared memory with system dependent bandwidth, meaning its effective memory performance depends on the host platform.

Q: Are these cards suitable for the same physical form factors?

A: No. The 8060S is an integrated GPU with no slot width and no power connectors, designed for portable devices. The PRO W7400 is a single-slot, 168 mm long add-in card requiring a 250 W suggested power supply, with 4x DisplayPort 2.1 outputs.

Q: Which architecture is newer?

A: The 8060S uses RDNA 3.5 on a 4 nm process, while the PRO W7400 uses RDNA 3.0 on a 6 nm process. Both are TSMC fabricated, but the 8060S has the smaller node and larger die at 308 mm² versus 204 mm².

Q: What is the percentile ranking difference?

A: The 8060S ranks in the 87th percentile of all GPUs with an average benchmark score of 55757. The PRO W7400 ranks in the 50th percentile with no recorded average score, indicating a substantial gap in measured performance standing.

Q: Do both support the same graphics APIs?

A: Yes, both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The ray tracing capabilities differ in hardware count, with the 8060S having 40 RT cores versus 28 on the PRO W7400.

The Verdict

The data clearly favors the Radeon 8060S for raw performance. Its FP32 throughput, pixel rate, texture rate, and ray tracing core count all exceed the PRO W7400 by significant margins. The 8060S achieves an 87th percentile ranking with an average score of 55757, placing it alongside high-end desktop GPUs like the RTX 4080 and RX 6750 GRE. The PRO W7400 holds a 50th percentile with no benchmark data, leaving it without measurable performance evidence in the database.

The choice between these two depends on form factor and memory requirements. The 8060S is an integrated GPU with system shared memory, making it exclusive to portable device implementations. The PRO W7400 is a discrete single-slot card with 8 GB of dedicated GDDR6 memory and a 128 bit bus, suitable for desktop workstations requiring fixed memory allocation. Neither card has a launch MSRP listed in the database.

The 8060S also carries a newer architecture (RDNA 3.5 versus RDNA 3.0), a smaller process node (4 nm versus 6 nm), and a faster bus interface (PCIe 5.0 x16 versus PCIe 4.0 x8). The PRO W7400 offers dedicated memory, a compact single-slot form factor, and four DisplayPort 2.1 outputs, which the 8060S cannot match given its portable device dependent display configuration.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Radeon 8060S | AMD Radeon PRO W7400 |

|---|---|---|

| Architecture | RDNA 3.5 | RDNA 3.0 |

| Process Node | 4 nm | 6 nm |

| Die Size | 308 mm² | 204 mm² |

| Transistors | unknown | 13,300 million |

| Transistor Density | null | 65.2M / mm² |

| Base Clock | 1295 MHz | 330 MHz |

| Boost Clock | 2900 MHz | 1100 MHz |

| Memory Size | System Shared | 8 GB |

| Memory Type | System Shared | GDDR6 |

| Memory Bus Width | System Shared | 128 bit |

| Memory Bandwidth | System Dependent | 172.8 GB/s |

| Shading Units | 2560 | 1792 |

| TMUs | 160 | 112 |

| ROPs | 64 | 64 |

| RT Cores | 40 | 28 |

| FP32 | 14.85 TFLOPS | 7.885 TFLOPS |

| FP16 | 14.85 TFLOPS (1:1) | 7.885 TFLOPS (1:1) |

| Pixel Rate | 185.6 GPixel/s | 70.40 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 464.0 GTexel/s | 123.2 GTexel/s |

| Slot Width | IGP | Single-slot |

| Power Connectors | None | None |

| Suggested PSU | null | 250 W |

| Bus Interface | PCIe 5.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x8 |

| Display Outputs | Portable Device Dependent | 4x DisplayPort 2.1 |

| Dimensions | null | 168 mm x 69 mm x 20 mm |

| Release Date | 2025-01-05 | 2025-08-02 |

| Predecessor | Polaris Mobile | Radeon Pro Vega |

| Percentile | 87 | 50 |

| Average Benchmark Score | 55757 | 0 |

Where Each One Wins

The Radeon 8060S wins decisively in compute-oriented workloads. Its FP32 performance of 14.85 TFLOPS doubles the PRO W7400, and its texture rate of 464.0 GTexel/s outpaces the PRO W7400's 123.2 GTexel/s by nearly four times. Pixel fill rate of 185.6 GPixel/s versus 70.40 GPixel/s gives the 8060S a clear edge in resolutions and screen-fill operations. The 40 RT cores versus 28 also positions the 8060S better for ray tracing tasks. Its 87th percentile ranking and average score of 55757, with a 2.8% delta over the RTX 4080 and 1.7% over the Pro W5700X, confirm strong standing among high-end GPUs.

The Radeon PRO W7400 wins in fixed-memory and workstation integration scenarios. Its 8 GB of dedicated GDDR6 on a 128 bit bus with 172.8 GB/s bandwidth provides predictable memory performance independent of host system RAM. The single-slot, 168 mm length design with 4x DisplayPort 2.1 outputs suits multi-display professional setups. The 250 W suggested PSU requirement is modest, and the PCIe 4.0 x8 interface allows installation in a wider range of motherboards. Its release date of 2025-08-02 makes it the more recent product, and its Radeon Pro Vega predecessor indicates a workstation lineage.

For portable devices requiring integrated graphics with maximum compute, the 8060S is the only option. For desktop workstations needing discrete, dedicated memory and multiple DisplayPort outputs, the PRO W7400 fits that role. The 8060S wins every available benchmark and throughput metric; the PRO W7400 wins on memory determinism, physical configurability, and display connectivity.