AMD Radeon 8050S vs Lisuan Tech LX PRO Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark results between the AMD Radeon 8050S and the Lisuan Tech LX PRO. The head-to-head comparison field is empty, with zero wins recorded for either side. This absence of direct comparison data means the analysis must rely on the individual benchmark scores and architectural specifications that are present in the database.

The AMD Radeon 8050S has two recorded benchmark results. In Geekbench OpenCL, it scores 65818 points. In Geekbench Vulkan, it scores 58398 points. These results produce an average benchmark score of 62108, placing the 8050S in the 89th percentile among all GPUs in the database. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO, by contrast, has no benchmark entries in the database. Its average benchmark score is recorded as 0, and its percentile rank sits at 50. The LX PRO also has no nearest rivals listed, while the 8050S has four comparable GPUs for context.

Looking at the 8050S against its nearest rivals provides useful calibration. The AMD Radeon Pro W6600M averages 61896 points, which places it 0.3% behind the 8050S. The AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 averages 63693 points, 2.5% ahead of the 8050S. The AMD Radeon RX 7600M averages 63775 points, 2.6% ahead. The AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT LP averages 63830 points, 2.7% ahead. These deltas are narrow, indicating the 8050S sits in a competitive cluster where a few percentage points separate adjacent GPUs.

The LX PRO’s lack of benchmark data is itself a significant finding. A GPU with no recorded scores cannot be positioned against the 8050S or any other product in the database. The 50th percentile figure appears to be a default placeholder rather than a measured rank, as it conflicts with the zero average score. The database shows no evidence of the LX PRO’s real-world performance, which limits any quantitative comparison to specification-based analysis.

The FP32 compute figures offer one point of comparison, though these are theoretical peak rates rather than measured results. The 8050S delivers 11.47 TFLOPS, while the LX PRO delivers 24.58 TFLOPS. The LX PRO also shows higher texture and pixel throughput: 384.0 GTexel/s versus 358.4 GTexel/s, and 192.0 GPixel/s versus 179.2 GPixel/s. Memory bandwidth differs substantially, with the LX PRO providing 432.0 GB/s over a 192-bit bus, while the 8050S uses system shared memory with bandwidth described as system dependent.

FAQ

Q: How does the AMD Radeon 8050S compare to its nearest rivals in the database?

A: The 8050S scores 65818 in Geekbench OpenCL and 58398 in Geekbench Vulkan, for an average of 62108. The AMD Radeon Pro W6600M trails by 0.3%, the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 leads by 2.5%, the AMD Radeon RX 7600M leads by 2.6%, and the AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT LP leads by 2.7%.

Q: Does the Lisuan Tech LX PRO have any benchmark results in the database?

A: No. The LX PRO has an empty benchmark list, an average score of 0, and no nearest rivals. Its percentile rank of 50 appears to be a placeholder, as no measured scores support it.

Q: What is the memory configuration of each GPU?

A: The LX PRO has 24 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth. The 8050S uses system shared memory, with a system shared bus width and system dependent bandwidth.

Q: What are the FP32 compute figures for both GPUs?

A: The 8050S delivers 11.47 TFLOPS FP32. The LX PRO delivers 24.58 TFLOPS FP32, which is more than double the 8050S figure.

Q: How do the power requirements differ?

A: The 8050S has a TDP of 55 W and uses no power connectors, fitting an integrated graphics package. The LX PRO has a TDP of 225 W, uses a single 16-pin connector, and requires a 550 W suggested power supply.

Q: What API support does each GPU provide?

A: Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. The 8050S supports Vulkan 1.4, while the LX PRO supports Vulkan 1.3.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Radeon 8050S wins in efficiency and integration. Its 55 W TDP requires no external power connectors, and its integrated graphics package (IGP) slot width means it does not occupy a discrete card slot. The 8050S uses a PCIe 5.0 x16 bus interface, the newer standard of the two. Its Vulkan 1.4 support is a full revision ahead of the LX PRO’s Vulkan 1.3. The 8050S also has a recorded Geekbench OpenCL score of 65818, a measured data point the LX PRO lacks entirely. Its 89th percentile rank among all GPUs indicates strong positioning relative to the database’s broader population.

The Lisuan Tech LX PRO wins on raw compute and memory specifications. Its FP32 throughput of 24.58 TFLOPS is more than double the 8050S’s 11.47 TFLOPS. FP16 performance stands at 49.15 TFLOPS with a 2:1 ratio, while the 8050S manages 11.47 TFLOPS with a 1:1 ratio. The LX PRO’s 24 GB of GDDR6 memory with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth is a dedicated, high-speed configuration, whereas the 8050S relies on system shared memory with system dependent bandwidth. The LX PRO also has more shading units (6144 versus 2048), more texture mapping units (192 versus 128), and more render output units (96 versus 64). Its texture rate of 384.0 GTexel/s and pixel rate of 192.0 GPixel/s exceed the 8050S’s 358.4 GTexel/s and 179.2 GPixel/s.

The LX PRO’s display output configuration is explicit: 4x DisplayPort 1.4a. The 8050S lists display outputs as portable device dependent. The LX PRO is a dual-slot card with dimensions of 248 mm length, 118 mm height, and 48 mm width. The 8050S has no recorded dimensions, consistent with an integrated package where physical size depends on the host device.

For workloads that fit within the 8050S’s compute envelope, its measured OpenCL performance and low power draw make it suitable for portable or power-constrained systems. For workloads that demand maximum FP32 throughput, dedicated memory bandwidth, and large frame buffer capacity, the LX PRO’s specifications point to higher peak capability. The absence of LX PRO benchmark data, however, means these specification advantages cannot be confirmed with measured results.

Specification Differences

The two GPUs differ across nearly every recorded specification field. The 8050S uses a 4 nm process node, while the LX PRO uses 6 nm. Both come from TSMC. The 8050S chip is Strix Halo with RDNA 3.5 architecture, part of the Navi Mobile (RX 8000M) generation. The LX PRO chip is 7G105 with TrueGPU architecture, part of the 7G100 generation.

Clock behavior differs. The 8050S has a base clock of 1295 MHz and a boost clock of 2800 MHz. The LX PRO has no base or boost clock recorded, but its memory runs at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective. The 8050S memory clock is listed as system shared.

Memory configuration is a major divide. The LX PRO has 24 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth. The 8050S has system shared memory in all three fields: size, type, and bus width, with bandwidth marked system dependent.

Compute unit counts differ substantially. The LX PRO has 6144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs. The 8050S has 2048 shading units, 128 TMUs, and 64 ROPs. The 8050S includes 32 ray tracing cores; the LX PRO has no RT core count recorded. Neither GPU lists tensor cores.

Power and physical configuration are opposite. The 8050S draws 55 W and fits an IGP slot width with no power connectors. The LX PRO draws 225 W, occupies a dual-slot width, uses a 1x 16-pin power connector, and lists a 550 W suggested power supply. The bus interface is PCIe 5.0 x16 for the 8050S and PCIe 4.0 x16 for the LX PRO.

Display outputs and dimensions also differ. The LX PRO provides 4x DisplayPort 1.4a and measures 248 mm by 118 mm by 48 mm. The 8050S display outputs are portable device dependent with no dimensions recorded. API support is close but not identical: both offer DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6, while the 8050S supports Vulkan 1.4 and the LX PRO supports Vulkan 1.3.

Release dates differ as well. The 8050S was released on 2025-01-05, while the LX PRO has a release date of 2026-03-16. The 8050S lists Polaris Mobile as its predecessor; the LX PRO has no predecessor recorded. Neither has a successor. The 8050S manufacturer is AMD; the LX PRO manufacturer is listed as unknown.

Architecture Differences

The architectures represent fundamentally different design approaches. The 8050S uses RDNA 3.5, AMD’s graphics architecture, built on a 4 nm TSMC process with a die size of 308 mm². The transistor count is unknown. The LX PRO uses an architecture called TrueGPU, built on a 6 nm TSMC process, with both die size and transistor count unknown.

RDNA 3.5 is a graphics-first design. The 8050S integrates 2048 shading units, 128 TMUs, 64 ROPs, and 32 dedicated ray tracing cores. Its FP16 performance matches FP32 at 11.47 TFLOPS with a 1:1 ratio, indicating no dedicated FP16 acceleration advantage. The architecture belongs to the Navi Mobile generation, which places it in AMD’s mobile GPU line, and the chip name Strix Halo suggests an integrated processor design, consistent with the IGP slot width and system shared memory.

The TrueGPU architecture in the LX PRO presents a different profile. It has 6144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs, but no ray tracing core count is recorded. Its FP16 performance of 49.15 TFLOPS is exactly double its FP32 figure of 24.58 TFLOPS, showing a 2:1 FP16 ratio that indicates hardware support for packed math operations. This ratio suggests a compute-oriented design where FP16 throughput is a priority. The absence of RT core data leaves ray tracing capability unquantified in the database.

The 4 nm versus 6 nm process difference affects transistor density and power efficiency, though the database records no density figures. The 8050S’s 55 W TDP with a 308 mm² die suggests a power-efficient integrated design. The LX PRO’s 225 W TDP with an unknown die size suggests a discrete, performance-oriented card. The LX PRO’s dedicated 24 GB GDDR6 memory with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth is architecturally distinct from the 8050S’s reliance on system shared memory, which makes the 8050S’s memory performance dependent on the host system’s RAM configuration.

The production status for both is listed as active. The 8050S’s Vulkan 1.4 support is newer than the LX PRO’s Vulkan 1.3. Both support the same DirectX and OpenGL versions. The 8050S’s PCIe 5.0 x16 interface provides double the bandwidth of the LX PRO’s PCIe 4.0 x16, though the practical impact depends on system integration and workload behavior.

The Verdict

The database presents an incomplete comparison. The AMD Radeon 8050S has measured benchmark results: 65818 in Geekbench OpenCL, 58398 in Geekbench Vulkan, and an average of 62108, ranking in the 89th percentile. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO has no benchmark results, an average score of 0, and no rival comparisons. Any verdict must acknowledge this asymmetry.

For measured performance, the 8050S is the only option with data. Its scores place it close to several AMD workstation and mobile GPUs, within a range of 0.3% to 2.7% of its nearest rivals. Users seeking a GPU with confirmed benchmark results in the database would choose the 8050S.

For peak specification performance, the LX PRO claims higher numbers across compute, memory, and throughput. Its 24.58 TFLOPS FP32 and 49.15 TFLOPS FP16 are more than double the 8050S’s 11.47 TFLOPS in both modes. Its 24 GB GDDR6 memory with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth is a dedicated, high-bandwidth configuration. Its shading unit count of 6144 is three times the 8050S’s 2048. These figures suggest the LX PRO is designed for higher absolute workload capacity, but without benchmark scores, the database cannot confirm how these specifications translate into real performance.

For power-constrained and integrated systems, the 8050S is clearly positioned. Its 55 W TDP, no power connectors, IGP slot width, and portable device dependent display outputs describe a chip designed for laptops or compact devices. The LX PRO’s 225 W TDP, dual-slot width, 16-pin connector, and 550 W suggested power supply describe a desktop discrete card.

The release dates also separate the products by over a year. The 8050S arrived on 2025-01-05; the LX PRO is dated 2026-03-16. The 8050S has a predecessor (Polaris Mobile) and belongs to an established AMD generation. The LX PRO has no predecessor and its manufacturer is listed as unknown. The LX PRO’s TrueGPU architecture and 7G100 generation are distinct from any AMD naming scheme.

The choice depends on what the database can substantiate. The 8050S delivers proven, measured performance in the 89th percentile with high efficiency. The LX PRO offers higher specification ceilings but no recorded evidence of achieving them. The data supports the 8050S for validated performance and low power operation; it supports the LX PRO only for theoretical compute capacity and memory bandwidth, with the caveat that its benchmark scores remain unrecorded.