AMD Radeon 8050S vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER Comparison

The Verdict

The recorded data presents two GPUs with profoundly different positioning. The AMD Radeon 8050S is an integrated-class part with a 55 W TDP, designed for portable devices, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER is a dual-slot, 350 W discrete card with a 749 USD launch MSRP. Benchmark scores show the AMD part at an average of 62108, placing it in the 89th percentile of all GPUs, whereas the NVIDIA part scores an average of 6270, placing it in the 36th percentile. This discrepancy stems from different benchmark suites: the AMD results come from Geekbench OpenCL and Vulkan tests, while the NVIDIA result comes from 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12. The data does not provide a direct head-to-head comparison, so conclusions must rely on each card's individual performance context and architectural traits.

For users relying on portable devices with no discrete graphics expansion, the Radeon 8050S offers a compelling integrated solution, as its percentile ranking indicates strong performance relative to the broader GPU database. Conversely, the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER, despite its lower percentile, targets desktop systems where its 16 GB GDDR7 memory, 896.0 GB/s bandwidth, and 43.94 TFLOPS FP32 throughput serve compute-heavy and high-resolution workloads. The data suggests that these products are not direct competitors; the 8050S serves as a high-end integrated GPU, while the 5070 Ti SUPER is a high-end discrete card. Neither part claims a win in the recorded head-to-head benchmarks, as no shared tests exist.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Radeon 8050S wins in scenarios where power efficiency and integration are paramount. Its 55 W TDP, combined with no power connectors and an IGP slot width, makes it suitable for thin-and-light portable systems. Its Geekbench scores, 65818 in OpenCL and 58398 in Vulkan, indicate strong compute and graphics capability for an integrated solution, and its 89th percentile ranking suggests it outperforms a large majority of all GPUs in the database, including many older discrete cards. The Radeon 8050S also uses system-shared memory, which simplifies design but ties performance to system RAM configuration.

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER wins in scenarios demanding dedicated memory bandwidth and raw throughput. Its 16 GB GDDR7 memory on a 256-bit bus delivers 896.0 GB/s, a figure that dwarfs the system-dependent bandwidth of the AMD part. Its 8960 shading units, 280 tensor cores, and 70 RT cores provide a hardware foundation for ray tracing and AI workloads. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 6269.5, while not directly comparable to the AMD Geekbench results, confirms the card's capability in modern DX12 titles. The 5070 Ti SUPER also offers fixed display outputs, 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b, whereas the AMD part's outputs are portable-device dependent.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Radeon 8050S uses the Strix Halo chip based on RDNA 3.5 architecture, fabricated on a 4 nm process at TSMC. Its die size is 308 mm², and transistor count is listed as unknown. The GPU includes 2048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, 64 ROPs, and 32 RT cores. It has no dedicated tensor cores, relying instead on standard shader compute for AI tasks. The base clock is 1295 MHz with a boost clock of 2800 MHz. Memory is system shared, meaning no dedicated VRAM, bus width, or bandwidth figures apply; bandwidth is system dependent. The pixel rate is 179.2 GPixel/s, texture rate is 358.4 GTexel/s, and FP32 throughput is 11.47 TFLOPS, with FP16 at the same 11.47 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio).

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER uses the GB203 chip based on Blackwell 2.0 architecture, fabricated on a 5 nm process at TSMC. Its die size is 378 mm², with 45,600 million transistors and a transistor density of 120.6M per mm². The GPU includes 8960 shading units, 280 TMUs, 96 ROPs, 70 RT cores, and 280 tensor cores. The base clock is 2295 MHz with a boost clock of 2452 MHz. Memory consists of 16 GB of GDDR7 on a 256-bit bus, with a memory clock of 1750 MHz (28 Gbps effective) and bandwidth of 896.0 GB/s. Pixel rate is 235.4 GPixel/s, texture rate is 686.6 GTexel/s, and FP32 throughput is 43.94 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 43.94 TFLOPS (1:1). The TDP is 350 W, requiring a single 16-pin power connector and a dual-slot cooler.

Key architectural differences include the process node (4 nm vs 5 nm), die size (308 mm² vs 378 mm²), and memory architecture (shared vs 16 GB GDDR7). The NVIDIA part has over four times the shading units and nearly four times the FP32 throughput. The AMD part has a significantly higher boost clock relative to its base clock, indicating a wide dynamic range for power management, while the NVIDIA part runs at a more constant high clock. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, and both use PCIe 5.0 x16 interfaces.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has the higher average benchmark score?

A: The AMD Radeon 8050S has an average benchmark score of 62108, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has an average benchmark score of 6270. However, these scores come from different test suites: the AMD part uses Geekbench OpenCL and Vulkan, while the NVIDIA part uses 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12.

Q: What is the power consumption difference?

A: The AMD Radeon 8050S has a TDP of 55 W and requires no power connectors, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has a TDP of 350 W and requires a single 16-pin power connector.

Q: How does memory configuration differ?

A: The AMD Radeon 8050S uses system-shared memory with no dedicated VRAM, bus width, or bandwidth figures; its bandwidth is system dependent. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has 16 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 256-bit bus with 896.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: Which card has more RT cores?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has 70 RT cores, while the AMD Radeon 8050S has 32 RT cores.

Q: What is the release date for each?

A: The AMD Radeon 8050S was released on 2025-01-05, and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER was released on 2025-12-31.

Q: Which card has a higher percentile ranking?

A: The AMD Radeon 8050S ranks in the 89th percentile of all GPUs, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER ranks in the 36th percentile. This reflects the different benchmark suites used for each card.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database records no shared head-to-head benchmark results between these two GPUs. The AMD Radeon 8050S has two recorded Geekbench scores: 65818 in OpenCL and 58398 in Vulkan. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has one recorded 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 6269.5. Because these tests measure different workloads and use different scoring scales, direct numerical comparison is not meaningful.

The AMD Radeon 8050S's nearest rivals in the database include the AMD Radeon Pro W6600M (avg score 61896, delta +0.3%), AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 (avg score 63693, delta -2.5%), AMD Radeon RX 7600M (avg score 63775, delta -2.6%), and AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT LP (avg score 63830, delta -2.7%). This shows the 8050S sits slightly above the Pro W6600M and slightly below the Pro Vega 56, RX 7600M, and RX 9060 XT LP in average score.

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER's nearest rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 (avg score 6270, delta 0%), NVIDIA Quadro K620 (avg score 6282, delta -0.2%), AMD FirePro W600 (avg score 6223, delta +0.8%), and AMD Radeon R7 M350 (avg score 6327, delta -0.9%). This indicates the 5070 Ti SUPER's average score is essentially tied with the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102, slightly below the Quadro K620 and R7 M350, and slightly above the FirePro W600.

The largest wins in the database are relative to these rival comparisons. The AMD part is 0.3% ahead of the Radeon Pro W6600M, while the NVIDIA part is 0.8% ahead of the FirePro W600. The AMD part trails the RX 9060 XT LP by 2.7%, while the NVIDIA part trails the R7 M350 by 0.9%. These deltas are small, indicating that each card sits within a tight cluster of similar-performing GPUs in their respective benchmark contexts.

Specification Differences

The following specifications differ between the AMD Radeon 8050S and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER:

• Chip: Strix Halo vs GB203
• Architecture: RDNA 3.5 vs Blackwell 2.0
• Generation: Navi Mobile (RX 8000M) vs GeForce 50
• Process Node: 4 nm vs 5 nm
• Transistors: unknown vs 45,600 million
• Die Size: 308 mm² vs 378 mm²
• Transistor Density: null vs 120.6M / mm²
• Base Clock: 1295 MHz vs 2295 MHz
• Boost Clock: 2800 MHz vs 2452 MHz
• Memory Size: System Shared vs 16 GB
• Memory Type: System Shared vs GDDR7
• Memory Bus Width: System Shared vs 256 bit
• Memory Bandwidth: System Dependent vs 896.0 GB/s
• Shading Units: 2048 vs 8960
• TMUs: 128 vs 280
• ROPs: 64 vs 96
• RT Cores: 32 vs 70
• Tensor Cores: null vs 280
• Pixel Rate: 179.2 GPixel/s vs 235.4 GPixel/s
• Texture Rate: 358.4 GTexel/s vs 686.6 GTexel/s
• FP32: 11.47 TFLOPS vs 43.94 TFLOPS
• FP16: 11.47 TFLOPS (1:1) vs 43.94 TFLOPS (1:1)
• TDP: 55 W vs 350 W
• Slot Width: IGP vs Dual-slot
• Power Connectors: None vs 1x 16-pin
• Display Outputs: Portable Device Dependent vs 1x HDMI 2.1b 3x DisplayPort 2.1b
• Dimensions: null vs 304 mm length, 137 mm height, 48 mm width
• Release Date: 2025-01-05 vs 2025-12-31
• Predecessor: Polaris Mobile vs null
• Launch MSRP: null vs 749 USD