NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 vs Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark results for the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 and the Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA. The `headToHeadBenchmarks` field is empty, and the wins counter for both parts sits at zero. This means no single test pits these two GPUs against each other in the recorded data.

What can be established instead is how the RTX 5060 performs in absolute terms. Its average benchmark score is 26331, placing it at the 72nd percentile among all GPUs. The LX ULTRA has an average benchmark score of 0 and sits at the 50th percentile, which reflects the absence of any recorded benchmark entries for that part. The RTX 5060 delivers a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3628, a Geekbench OpenCL score of 112787, and a Geekbench Vulkan score of 113321. Passmark results include a G3D score of 20891, a GPU compute score of 10899, and DirectX scores of 127 (DX10), 200 (DX11), 77 (DX12), and 225 (DX9). The G2D score is 1154.

The RTX 5060 shows a mixed relationship to its nearest rivals in the database. It trails the AMD Radeon 860M by 0.3% in average score, matches that same 0.3% deficit against the NVIDIA GeForce MX550, and sits 0.8% behind the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary. Against the AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT, the RTX 5060 leads by 1.2%. These deltas are small, indicating the RTX 5060 clusters closely with those four parts in aggregate performance. The LX ULTRA has no nearest rivals listed, so no comparative delta can be computed for it.

Because the LX ULTRA lacks any benchmark scores, the head-to-head comparison is structurally incomplete. The data shows the RTX 5060 as a measured, scored part, while the LX ULTRA is a specification-only entry with no recorded performance output.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs come from different architectural lineages. The RTX 5060 uses the GB206 chip built on Blackwell 2.0 architecture, fabricated on a 5 nm process at TSMC. It integrates 21,900 million transistors on a die size of 181 mm², yielding a transistor density of 121.0 million transistors per mm². The LX ULTRA uses the 7G105 chip built on TrueGPU architecture, also fabricated at TSMC but on a 6 nm process. Its transistor count and die size are listed as unknown, and no transistor density is recorded.

The RTX 5060 operates with a base clock of 2280 MHz and a boost clock of 2497 MHz. The LX ULTRA has no base or boost clock listed in the database. Memory clocks differ as well: the RTX 5060 runs at 1750 MHz with 28 Gbps effective speed, while the LX ULTRA runs at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective speed.

Ray tracing and tensor hardware split the two parts sharply. The RTX 5060 includes 30 RT cores and 120 tensor cores. The LX ULTRA lists neither RT cores nor tensor cores; both fields are null. The RTX 5060 also supports a memory type of GDDR7, whereas the LX ULTRA uses GDDR6.

API support shows a divergence in Vulkan versions. Both cards support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. The RTX 5060 supports Vulkan 1.4, while the LX ULTRA is limited to Vulkan 1.3.

The bus interface differs: the RTX 5060 uses PCIe 5.0 x8, and the LX ULTRA uses PCIe 4.0 x16. Display outputs also differ, with the RTX 5060 offering 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b, while the LX ULTRA offers 4x DisplayPort 1.4a.

Process node, architecture generation, and feature set all point to different design goals. The RTX 5060 is a Blackwell 2.0 part in the GeForce 50 series, while the LX ULTRA is a TrueGPU part in the 7G100 generation. The RTX 5060 has a predecessor (GeForce 40) and a successor (GeForce 60); the LX ULTRA lists neither.

Where Each One Wins

The RTX 5060 wins in every recorded benchmark category because it has recorded benchmarks. Its average score of 26331, percentile of 72, and the full suite of 3DMark, Geekbench, and Passmark results give it a measurable performance profile. The LX ULTRA has no benchmark entries, an average score of 0, and a 50th percentile ranking that derives from absent data rather than tested performance.

In terms of raw compute specifications, the LX ULTRA shows higher theoretical numbers. It delivers 24.58 TFLOPS of FP32 performance versus 19.18 TFLOPS for the RTX 5060. In FP16, the LX ULTRA reaches 49.15 TFLOPS with a 2:1 ratio, while the RTX 5060 offers 19.18 TFLOPS at a 1:1 ratio. The LX ULTRA also has higher pixel rate (192.0 GPixel/s versus 119.9 GPixel/s) and higher texture rate (384.0 GTexel/s versus 299.6 GTexel/s).

Memory capacity favors the LX ULTRA with 24 GB of GDDR6, compared to 8 GB of GDDR7 on the RTX 5060. Bandwidth is close: the LX ULTRA has 432.0 GB/s over a 192 bit bus, while the RTX 5060 has 448.0 GB/s over a 128 bit bus.

The RTX 5060 wins on memory technology, bandwidth, ray tracing hardware, tensor cores, newer PCIe generation, and a more recent Vulkan version. The LX ULTRA wins on shading units (6144 versus 3840), texture mapping units (192 versus 120), render output units (96 versus 48), FP32 throughput, FP16 throughput, memory capacity, and memory bus width.

Specification Differences

| Specification | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 | Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA |

|---|---|---|

| Process node | 5 nm | 6 nm |

| Transistors | 21,900 million | Unknown |

| Die size | 181 mm² | Unknown |

| Transistor density | 121.0M / mm² | None |

| Base clock | 2280 MHz | None |

| Boost clock | 2497 MHz | None |

| Memory clock | 1750 MHz, 28 Gbps effective | 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective |

| Memory size | 8 GB | 24 GB |

| Memory type | GDDR7 | GDDR6 |

| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 192 bit |

| Memory bandwidth | 448.0 GB/s | 432.0 GB/s |

| Shading units | 3840 | 6144 |

| TMUs | 120 | 192 |

| ROPs | 48 | 96 |

| RT cores | 30 | None |

| Tensor cores | 120 | None |

| Pixel rate | 119.9 GPixel/s | 192.0 GPixel/s |

| Texture rate | 299.6 GTexel/s | 384.0 GTexel/s |

| FP32 | 19.18 TFLOPS | 24.58 TFLOPS |

| FP16 | 19.18 TFLOPS (1:1) | 49.15 TFLOPS (2:1) |

| TDP | 145 W | 225 W |

| Power connectors | 1x 8-pin | 1x 16-pin |

| Suggested PSU | 300 W | 550 W |

| Bus interface | PCIe 5.0 x8 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |

| Display outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1b | 4x DisplayPort 1.4a |

| Vulkan version | 1.4 | 1.3 |

| Release date | 2025-05-18 | 2026-03-16 |

| Launch MSRP | 299 USD | None |

The RTX 5060 uses a smaller process node, has a defined transistor count and die size, and includes ray tracing and tensor hardware. The LX ULTRA has a larger process node, unknown transistor and die details, no RT or tensor cores, and higher power requirements. The RTX 5060 launches with a 299 USD MSRP; the LX ULTRA has no launch MSRP recorded.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The RTX 5060 has an average benchmark score of 26331. The LX ULTRA has an average score of 0 because it has no recorded benchmark entries.

Q: Does the LX ULTRA have ray tracing cores?

A: No. The database lists no RT cores for the LX ULTRA. The RTX 5060 includes 30 RT cores.

Q: Which card has more memory?

A: The LX ULTRA has 24 GB of GDDR6 memory. The RTX 5060 has 8 GB of GDDR7 memory.

Q: What is the FP32 throughput difference?

A: The LX ULTRA delivers 24.58 TFLOPS of FP32 performance. The RTX 5060 delivers 19.18 TFLOPS. The LX ULTRA is higher by 5.40 TFLOPS.

Q: Which card supports a newer Vulkan version?

A: The RTX 5060 supports Vulkan 1.4. The LX ULTRA supports Vulkan 1.3.

Q: What is the launch MSRP of the LX ULTRA?

A: The database records no launch MSRP for the LX ULTRA. The RTX 5060 has a launch MSRP of 299 USD.

The Verdict

The data presents two very different cases. The RTX 5060 is a fully measured product with a complete benchmark profile, a 72nd percentile rank, and an average score of 26331. It delivers competitive aggregate performance, sitting within 1% of its nearest rivals in either direction. It also brings ray tracing cores, tensor cores, GDDR7 memory, PCIe 5.0, and Vulkan 1.4 support.

The LX ULTRA is a specification-only entry. It has no benchmarks, no average score, no nearest rivals, and a 50th percentile that reflects missing data rather than tested capability. Its theoretical compute figures are higher in FP32, FP16, pixel rate, texture rate, shading units, and memory capacity. But none of those numbers are validated by recorded performance tests.

For a buyer who needs verified performance, the RTX 5060 is the only option with measured results. For a user who requires maximum VRAM capacity or raw FP32 throughput on paper, the LX ULTRA offers higher specifications, but without benchmark confirmation. The RTX 5060 also provides ray tracing and tensor cores, which the LX ULTRA lacks entirely. Power draw favors the RTX 5060 at 145 W versus 225 W, and the suggested PSU is 300 W versus 550 W.

The verdict from the data is straightforward: the RTX 5060 is the tested, validated GPU with a clear performance record. The LX ULTRA remains an unverified specification sheet with higher theoretical ceilings but no evidence of those numbers translating into actual benchmark scores.