Lisuan Tech LX PRO vs Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA Comparison

FAQ

Q: What are the main differences between the Lisuan Tech LX PRO and the Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA?

A: Both cards share the same 7G105 chip, TrueGPU architecture, 6 nm TSMC process, 24 GB GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, 6144 shading units, and a 225 W TDP. The only recorded differences are physical dimensions: the LX PRO measures 248 mm in length, 118 mm in height, and 48 mm in width, while the LX ULTRA is longer at 268 mm, shorter at 112 mm, and thinner at 40 mm.

Q: Which card has higher raw compute performance?

A: The recorded data shows identical compute specifications. Both deliver 24.58 TFLOPS FP32, 49.15 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1), 192.0 GPixel/s pixel rate, and 384.0 GTexel/s texture rate. Neither card has a benchmark score advantage in the database.

Q: Do the cards differ in memory bandwidth or capacity?

A: No. Both use 24 GB of GDDR6 at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective) with a 192-bit bus, resulting in 432.0 GB/s bandwidth. The memory subsystem is identical.

Q: Are there differences in power requirements?

A: The power specifications are identical. Both cards have a 225 W TDP, use a single 16-pin power connector, and recommend a 550 W power supply.

Q: Which card fits in a smaller case?

A: The LX PRO is shorter (248 mm vs 268 mm) and taller (118 mm vs 112 mm), but thicker (48 mm vs 40 mm). The LX ULTRA is longer but slimmer. The choice depends on case clearance dimensions.

Q: Do the cards support different display outputs or API levels?

A: No. Both feature 4x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs, DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.3. They also share the same PCIe 4.0 x16 bus interface.

Architecture Differences

The database records no architectural differences between the Lisuan Tech LX PRO and the Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA. Both use the identical 7G105 chip built on the TrueGPU architecture, produced on TSMC's 6 nm process node as part of the 7G100 generation. The transistor count and die size are not recorded, so no comparison can be made there.

The shading array is exactly the same: 6144 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 96 render output units. No ray tracing cores or tensor cores are listed for either card. The compute throughput is identical, with FP32 at 24.58 TFLOPS and FP16 at 49.15 TFLOPS at a 2:1 ratio. Pixel fill rate matches at 192.0 GPixel/s, and texture fill rate matches at 384.0 GTexel/s.

Memory architecture is also identical. Both cards use 24 GB of GDDR6 memory clocked at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective) across a 192-bit bus, delivering 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory clock is the only clock speed recorded for either card; base and boost clocks are not listed.

API support is the same on both: DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.3. Display output is limited to 4x DisplayPort 1.4a on both cards. The bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x16 for both.

The only architectural difference recorded in the database is physical packaging. The LX PRO is 248 mm long, 118 mm tall, and 48 mm wide. The LX ULTRA is 268 mm long, 112 mm tall, and 40 mm wide. The ULTRA is 20 mm longer but 6 mm shorter and 8 mm thinner. Both are dual-slot cards.

Both cards share the same release date, 2026-03-16, and both are listed as Active in production status. Neither has a predecessor or successor recorded. The launch MSRP is not listed for either card.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no recorded benchmark results for either card. Both the LX PRO and the LX ULTRA have an empty benchmarks array, an average benchmark score of 0, and a percentile ranking of 50 against all GPUs. The head-to-head benchmark array is also empty, and the wins count for each card is 0.

Without recorded performance data, the comparison rests entirely on the physical and specification fields. The compute capabilities are numerically identical, so there are no wins to attribute to either card in raw throughput, memory bandwidth, or fill rates.

The only measurable differences are dimensional. The LX PRO is shorter by 20 mm (248 mm vs 268 mm), while the LX ULTRA is thinner by 8 mm (40 mm vs 48 mm) and shorter in height by 6 mm (112 mm vs 118 mm). These differences do not translate into performance advantages in the recorded data.

In the absence of benchmark scores, the database shows both cards occupying the same percentile position at 50, which indicates they sit at the median of all GPUs in the database. This is a positional ranking, not a performance measurement, and it is identical for both.

Specification Differences

The following table lists only the fields where the two cards differ:

| Field | Lisuan Tech LX PRO | Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA |

|-------|--------------------|-----------------------|

| Length | 248 mm (9.8 inches) | 268 mm (10.6 inches) |

| Height | 118 mm (4.6 inches) | 112 mm (4.4 inches) |

| Width | 48 mm (1.9 inches) | 40 mm (1.6 inches) |

All other recorded specifications are identical between the two cards. This includes the chip (7G105), architecture (TrueGPU), generation (7G100), process node (6 nm), foundry (TSMC), memory size (24 GB), memory type (GDDR6), bus width (192 bit), bandwidth (432.0 GB/s), shading units (6144), TMUs (192), ROPs (96), pixel rate (192.0 GPixel/s), texture rate (384.0 GTexel/s), FP32 (24.58 TFLOPS), FP16 (49.15 TFLOPS), TDP (225 W), slot width (Dual-slot), power connector (1x 16-pin), suggested PSU (550 W), bus interface (PCIe 4.0 x16), display outputs (4x DisplayPort 1.4a), API support, production status (Active), and release date (2026-03-16).

The launch MSRP is not recorded for either card, so no price comparison is possible. The transistor count and die size are unknown for both, and no base or boost clock speeds are listed.

Where Each One Wins

Based strictly on the recorded data, neither card wins any performance category. The compute specifications are identical, the memory subsystem is identical, and the power requirements are identical. The benchmark arrays are empty, so there is no evidence of a performance gap in either direction.

The LX PRO wins on physical length. At 248 mm, it is 20 mm shorter than the LX ULTRA, which matters for cases with limited depth clearance. The LX PRO is also taller at 118 mm, which is relevant for cases with limited vertical clearance above the PCIe slot.

The LX ULTRA wins on thickness and height. At 40 mm wide, it is 8 mm thinner than the LX PRO, which helps in tight multi-card setups or cases with limited slot spacing. The LX ULTRA is also 6 mm shorter in height at 112 mm, which can ease installation in low-profile chassis.

In practical terms, the choice comes down to physical fit. The LX PRO suits deeper cases with generous vertical space but constrained length. The LX ULTRA suits cases where width and height are at a premium, but length is less of an issue.

Neither card has a recorded advantage in thermal performance, noise, or power draw, as those metrics are not present in the database. The dual-slot design and single 16-pin connector are the same on both.

The Verdict

The data shows that the Lisuan Tech LX PRO and the Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA are the same graphics card in different physical packages. Every performance-relevant specification is identical: the 7G105 chip, 6 nm TSMC process, 6144 shading units, 24.58 TFLOPS FP32, 24 GB GDDR6 at 432.0 GB/s, 225 W TDP, and the same API and display support.

The only recorded differences are dimensions. The LX PRO is 248 mm long, 118 mm tall, and 48 mm wide. The LX ULTRA is 268 mm long, 112 mm tall, and 40 mm wide. The LX PRO is the shorter card, while the LX ULTRA is the thinner and lower-profile card.

There are no benchmark scores in the database for either card, so no performance ranking can be established. Both sit at the 50th percentile among all GPUs, but this is a positional marker, not a measured result. With identical compute and memory specifications, any performance difference would have to come from cooling or power delivery, and the database records no data on those aspects.

For a PC builder, the selection should be based on case compatibility. The LX PRO fits where length is constrained. The LX ULTRA fits where width and height are constrained. Beyond that, the recorded data gives no reason to prefer one over the other.

The launch MSRP is not recorded for either card, so no cost-based judgment can be made. Both cards share the same release date of 2026-03-16 and are currently in Active production.

In summary, the database indicates these are two variants of the same product. The LX PRO and LX ULTRA deliver identical recorded specifications, and the choice is purely a matter of physical dimensions.