NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti vs Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The head-to-head benchmark comparison between the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti and the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 is limited by the fact that the LX 7G100 has no recorded benchmark scores in the database. The RTX 5070 Ti, by contrast, has a substantial set of measurements across multiple test suites. This asymmetry means the comparison relies on the RTX 5070 Ti's absolute scores and its standing against other GPUs, rather than direct side-by-side results.

The RTX 5070 Ti delivers a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 6604. In Geekbench OpenCL, it records 212363 points, and in Geekbench Vulkan, it reaches 225122. The PassMark suite shows a DirectX 10 score of 192, DirectX 11 at 300, DirectX 12 at 127, and DirectX 9 at 351. The 2D graphics test produces 1332, while the 3D graphics test yields 32974. GPU compute scores 20203. The average benchmark score across all tests lands at 49957, placing the card in the 86th percentile of all GPUs in the database.

The nearest rivals for the RTX 5070 Ti provide context for these numbers. The AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 posts an average score of 50001, which is 0.1% higher than the RTX 5070 Ti's average. The Intel Arc A550M sits at 49737, 0.4% lower. The AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT averages 50951, putting it 2% ahead, while the AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT averages 48477, which is 3.1% behind the RTX 5070 Ti. The data shows the RTX 5070 Ti clustering tightly with these rivals, with deltas ranging from -2% to +3.1%. The RX 6900 XT is the only one of the four to edge out the RTX 5070 Ti by a meaningful margin, while the RX 6800 XT trails by the largest amount.

Since the LX 7G100 has no benchmark entries, the head-to-head section cannot present wins for either side. The database records zero wins for both items in direct comparisons. What the data does indicate is that the RTX 5070 Ti performs at a level comparable to high-end AMD cards from previous generations, while the LX 7G100's performance profile remains entirely unquantified in the recorded measurements.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs diverge fundamentally in their underlying designs. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti uses the GB203 chip built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture, fabricated on a 5 nm process at TSMC. The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 uses the 7G106 chip with an architecture labeled TrueGPU, also from TSMC but on a 6 nm node. The process node difference is small in absolute terms, but the architectural philosophies are distinct.

Transistor counts and die sizes tell part of the story. The RTX 5070 Ti contains 45,600 million transistors on a 378 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 120.6 million per square millimeter. The LX 7G100's transistor count and die size are listed as unknown in the database, so no density figure can be calculated. This lack of data makes it impossible to assess how efficiently the LX 7G100 packs its logic.

The RTX 5070 Ti's Blackwell 2.0 architecture includes 70 RT cores and 280 tensor cores, features that are absent from the LX 7G100's TrueGPU design, where RT core and tensor core counts are marked as null. The shading unit counts differ substantially: the RTX 5070 Ti has 8960 shading units, 280 texture mapping units, and 96 raster output units. The LX 7G100 has 6144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs. Both cards match at 96 ROPs, but the NVIDIA card leads in shading and texture hardware.

Memory architecture also separates the two. The RTX 5070 Ti uses 16 GB of GDDR7 on a 256-bit bus, delivering 896.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The LX 7G100 uses 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus, providing 432.0 GB/s. That is roughly half the bandwidth. The memory clock rates reflect this: the RTX 5070 Ti runs at 1750 MHz (28 Gbps effective), while the LX 7G100 runs at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective). The higher effective speed of the GDDR7 memory, combined with the wider bus, gives the NVIDIA card a decisive advantage in raw memory throughput.

Compute rates follow the same pattern. The RTX 5070 Ti delivers 43.94 TFLOPS for both FP32 and FP16 (at a 1:1 ratio). The LX 7G100 delivers 24.58 TFLOPS for FP32 and 49.15 TFLOPS for FP16 (at a 2:1 ratio). The FP16 ratio difference is notable: the LX 7G100's 2:1 ratio means it can process half-precision workloads at roughly double its single-precision rate, whereas the RTX 5070 Ti runs both at the same speed. In FP32, the RTX 5070 Ti is about 79% ahead. In FP16, the LX 7G100 is about 12% ahead. Pixel and texture rates also favor the NVIDIA card: 235.4 GPixel/s versus 192.0 GPixel/s, and 686.6 GTexel/s versus 384.0 GTexel/s.

Power and connectivity specs reveal further differences. The RTX 5070 Ti has a TDP of 300 W with a single 16-pin power connector and a suggested PSU of 700 W. The LX 7G100 has a TDP of 225 W with a single 8-pin connector and a suggested PSU of 550 W. The LX 7G100 is the more power-efficient on paper, but the RTX 5070 Ti's higher power envelope buys substantially more compute. The RTX 5070 Ti uses PCIe 5.0 x16, while the LX 7G100 uses PCIe 4.0 x16. Display outputs differ as well: the RTX 5070 Ti has one HDMI 2.1b port and three DisplayPort 2.1b ports, while the LX 7G100 has four DisplayPort 1.4a ports.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has more memory bandwidth?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti has 896.0 GB/s of bandwidth from 16 GB of GDDR7 on a 256-bit bus. The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 has 432.0 GB/s from 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus.

Q: What are the FP32 compute rates for each card?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti delivers 43.94 TFLOPS in FP32. The LX 7G100 delivers 24.58 TFLOPS in FP32. The RTX 5070 Ti is roughly 79% higher in this metric.

Q: Does the LX 7G100 have ray tracing or tensor cores?

A: No, the database lists RT core and tensor core counts as null for the LX 7G100. The RTX 5070 Ti includes 70 RT cores and 280 tensor cores in its Blackwell 2.0 architecture.

Q: How does the average benchmark score compare?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti has an average benchmark score of 49957, placing it in the 86th percentile of all GPUs. The LX 7G100 has no recorded benchmark scores, so its average is 0 and its percentile is 50.

Q: What process nodes do the two GPUs use?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti is fabricated on a 5 nm process at TSMC. The LX 7G100 is fabricated on a 6 nm process, also at TSMC.

Q: Which card supports newer display outputs?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti supports HDMI 2.1b and DisplayPort 2.1b. The LX 7G100 supports DisplayPort 1.4a only, with no HDMI output listed.

Specification Differences

The database records several fields where the two GPUs differ. The RTX 5070 Ti uses the GB203 chip with Blackwell 2.0 architecture, while the LX 7G100 uses the 7G106 chip with TrueGPU architecture. The process node is 5 nm for the NVIDIA card and 6 nm for the Lisuan card. Transistor count is 45,600 million for the RTX 5070 Ti and unknown for the LX 7G100. Die size is 378 mm² for the RTX 5070 Ti and unknown for the LX 7G100.

Memory specifications diverge completely: the RTX 5070 Ti has 16 GB of GDDR7 on a 256-bit bus with 896.0 GB/s bandwidth, while the LX 7G100 has 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth. Memory clock is 1750 MHz (28 Gbps effective) for the RTX 5070 Ti and 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective) for the LX 7G100. Shading units count 8960 versus 6144, TMUs count 280 versus 192, and ROPs are equal at 96. RT cores are 70 versus null, and tensor cores are 280 versus null.

Pixel rate is 235.4 GPixel/s versus 192.0 GPixel/s. Texture rate is 686.6 GTexel/s versus 384.0 GTexel/s. FP32 is 43.94 TFLOPS versus 24.58 TFLOPS. FP16 is 43.94 TFLOPS (1:1) versus 49.15 TFLOPS (2:1). TDP is 300 W versus 225 W. Power connectors are 1x 16-pin versus 1x 8-pin. Suggested PSU is 700 W versus 550 W. Bus interface is PCIe 5.0 x16 versus PCIe 4.0 x16. Display outputs are 1x HDMI 2.1b plus 3x DisplayPort 2.1b versus 4x DisplayPort 1.4a. Vulkan API support is 1.4 versus 1.3. DirectX and OpenGL support are identical at 12 Ultimate (12_2) and 4.6.

Dimensions differ slightly: the RTX 5070 Ti is 304 mm long, 137 mm tall, and 48 mm wide. The LX 7G100 is 294 mm long, 120 mm tall, and 49 mm wide. Both are dual-slot cards. Release dates are separated by over a year: the RTX 5070 Ti launched on 2025-02-19, while the LX 7G100 launched on 2026-06-17. The RTX 5070 Ti has a launch MSRP of 749 USD; the LX 7G100 has no recorded launch MSRP. The RTX 5070 Ti lists a predecessor, the GeForce 40 series, and a successor, the GeForce 60 series. The LX 7G100 has neither.

Where Each One Wins

The data reveals a clear split in strengths. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti wins in every measured compute and memory metric except FP16 throughput. Its FP32 rate of 43.94 TFLOPS more than doubles the LX 7G100's 24.58 TFLOPS margin in raw single-precision compute. The texture rate of 686.6 GTexel/s versus 384.0 GTexel/s indicates the RTX 5070 Ti can feed shader units faster, which matters for fill-rate-bound workloads. The pixel rate of 235.4 GPixel/s versus 192.0 GPixel/s gives it an edge in rasterization-heavy scenes.

The memory subsystem heavily favors the RTX 5070 Ti. With 896.0 GB/s of bandwidth versus 432.0 GB/s, the NVIDIA card has more than double the memory throughput. The 16 GB capacity versus 12 GB also provides more headroom for large textures and datasets. The 256-bit bus versus 192-bit further reinforces this advantage. For 4K gaming, high-resolution texture packs, or compute workloads that stream data through memory, the RTX 5070 Ti is the clear pick based on bandwidth alone.

The LX 7G100 wins in FP16 throughput, delivering 49.15 TFLOPS versus 43.94 TFLOPS, thanks to its 2:1 FP16 ratio. This suggests an advantage in workloads that can exploit half-precision math, such as certain AI inference or mixed-precision compute tasks. The LX 7G100 also consumes less power, with a 225 W TDP versus 300 W, and requires a smaller PSU at 550 W versus 700 W. Its 8-pin power connector is more universally compatible with existing power supplies than the 16-pin connector on the RTX 5070 Ti.

The LX 7G100 also holds a node advantage in terms of process maturity, being on 6 nm versus 5 nm, though the unknown transistor count and die size make it impossible to assess density. Its four DisplayPort 1.4a outputs may suit multi-monitor setups that do not require HDMI, while the RTX 5070 Ti offers a mix of HDMI 2.1b and DisplayPort 2.1b for newer displays.

The Verdict

The benchmark database points decisively toward the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti for most use cases. Its average benchmark score of 49957 places it in the 86th percentile of all GPUs, and its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT at 50951 (2% higher) and the RX 6800 XT at 48477 (3.1% lower). The RTX 5070 Ti's 43.94 TFLOPS FP32 performance, 896.0 GB/s memory bandwidth, and 16 GB of GDDR7 memory give it a commanding lead over the LX 7G100 in every major gaming and compute scenario the measurements cover. The presence of 70 RT cores and 280 tensor cores further extends its capabilities into ray-traced and AI-accelerated workloads, areas where the LX 7G100 shows no hardware support.

The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 has no recorded benchmark scores, which means its real-world performance cannot be verified against the RTX 5070 Ti's numbers. Its 49.15 TFLOPS FP16 throughput is the single metric where it leads, and its lower 225 W TDP and 550 W PSU requirement make it a more modest power draw. For workloads that rely heavily on half-precision math, the LX 7G100 may hold an advantage, but the lack of RT and tensor cores limits its applicability in modern graphics pipelines that increasingly depend on those features.

The RTX 5070 Ti is the choice for users prioritizing raw performance, memory bandwidth, ray tracing, and broad API support including Vulkan 1.4. The LX 7G100 is the choice for users with power constraints or specific FP16-heavy compute tasks, provided they can work within its 12 GB GDDR6 memory and PCIe 4.0 interface. The RTX 5070 Ti's 749 USD launch MSRP reflects its higher capability, while the LX 7G100 has no recorded launch price to compare. Ultimately, the database shows a wide gap in measured performance, with the RTX 5070 Ti leading across nearly all quantifiable metrics.