GPU Comparison

AMD
RADEON

AMD Radeon 890M

CORE STATE Strix Point
VRAM System Shared
CLOCK SPEED 2900 MHz
TDP 15 W
BUS WIDTH System Shared
ARCHITECTURE RDNA 3.5
nm
PROCESS 4 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2024
VS
NVIDIA
GEFORCE

RTX A2000 Mobile

CORE STATE GA107
VRAM 4 GB
CLOCK SPEED 1687 MHz
TDP 95 W
BUS WIDTH 128 bit
ARCHITECTURE Ampere
nm
PROCESS 8 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2021

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12
590
N/A
geekbench_opencl
37,254
56,518
geekbench_vulkan
40,808
53,146
passmark_directx_10
33
57
passmark_directx_11
73
68
passmark_directx_12
37
47
passmark_directx_9
97
115
passmark_g2d
979
491
passmark_g3d
8,076
9,611
passmark_gpu_compute
4,157
4,334

Analysis: AMD Radeon 890M vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile

Rendering performance comparisons between the NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile and GeForce AMD Radeon 890M demonstrate a decisive champion. the NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile offers notably superior FPS throughout contemporary AAA releases. This memory edge and design enhancements lead into visibly improved gaming performance. Score results demonstrates this assessment. Players seeking top-tier performance might factor this in.

When it comes to ray tracing, the NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile leaps even more beyond of GeForce AMD Radeon 890M. Its specialized hardware process heavy reflection computations significantly more efficiently. Players wanting next-gen effects might certainly favor the NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile. The hardware RT performance is significant. Modern releases increasingly leverage real-time ray tracing features.

Game performance tests over different resolutions steadily support the NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile. From esports genres to AAA games, the NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile preserves its lead. The performance steadiness throughout multiple games proves inherent architectural advantages. Enthusiasts will expect capable frame rates no matter of scenario. The versatility is remarkable.

GeForce AMD Radeon 890M cannot be ignored entirely, though its performance difference relative to the NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile is challenging to overlook. In price-aware builders, GeForce AMD Radeon 890M might yet be value if the lower MSRP compensates for its lesser capabilities. However, for pure graphics power, the NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile represents the definite winner. The conclusion is obvious. Performance chasers would lean toward the NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
890M
RTX A2000 Mobile
Core Specs
Shading Units
1,024
2,560 +150.0%
Shaders
1,024
2,560 +150.0%
TMUs
64
80 +25.0%
ROPs
32
48 +50.0%
Compute Units
16
SM Count
20
Clocks
Base Clock
400 MHz
1215 MHz
Boost Clock
2900 MHz
1687 MHz
Memory Clock
System Shared
1500 MHz 12 Gbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
System Shared
4 GB
VRAM (MB)
4,096
Memory Type
System Shared
GDDR6
Memory Bus
System Shared
128 bit
Bandwidth
System Dependent
192.0 GB/s
Cache
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
128 KB (per SM)
L2 Cache
2 MB
2 MB
L0 Cache
32 KB per WGP
Performance
Pixel Rate
92.80 GPixel/s
80.98 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
185.6 GTexel/s
135.0 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
5.939 TFLOPS
8.637 TFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
371.2 GFLOPS (1:16)
135.0 GFLOPS (1:64)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
5.939 TFLOPS (1:1)
8.637 TFLOPS (1:1)
AI/RT
RT Cores
16
20 +25.0%
Tensor Cores
80
Power
TDP
15 W
95 W
TDP (W)
15
95 +533.3%
Power Connectors
None
None
Architecture
Architecture
RDNA 3.5
Ampere
GPU Name
Strix Point
GA107
Generation
Navi III IGP (Strix Point Mobile)
Ampere-MW (Ax000)
Process Size
4 nm
8 nm
Transistors
34,000 million
8,700 million
Die Size
233 mm²
200 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
Samsung
Density
145.9M / mm²
43.5M / mm²
API Support
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Vulkan
1.4
1.4
OpenCL
2.1
3.0
CUDA
8.6
Shader Model
6.8
6.8
Physical
Slot Width
IGP
IGP
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
Portable Device Dependent
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
PCIe 4.0 x16
Other
Production
Active
End-of-life
Predecessor
Navi II IGP
Quadro Turing-M
Successor
Ada-MW
View Radeon 890M Details View RTX A2000 Mobile Details