GPU Comparison

AMD

RADEON

AMD Radeon 890M

CORE STATE Strix Point

VRAM System Shared

CLOCK SPEED 2900 MHz

TDP 15 W

BUS WIDTH System Shared

ARCHITECTURE RDNA 3.5

PROCESS 4 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2024

NVIDIA

GEFORCE

GeForce RTX 4010

CORE STATE GA107

VRAM 4 GB

CLOCK SPEED 1762 MHz

TDP 50 W

BUS WIDTH 64 bit

ARCHITECTURE Ampere

PROCESS 8 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2024

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12

590

2,893

geekbench_opencl

37,254

N/A

geekbench_vulkan

40,808

N/A

passmark_directx_10

N/A

passmark_directx_11

N/A

passmark_directx_12

N/A

passmark_directx_9

N/A

passmark_g2d

979

N/A

passmark_g3d

8,076

N/A

passmark_gpu_compute

4,157

N/A

Analysis: AMD Radeon 890M vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010

If gaming capability is remarkably evenly matched, the comparison between AMD Radeon 890M (AMD) and GeForce RTX 4010 becomes particularly nuanced. Each GPUs exchange blows in multiple scenarios. This aggregate picture is one of surprising balance. Not one stands as a definite victor. The selection depends on specific needs.

Looking at a engineering angle, AMD Radeon 890M (AMD) and GeForce RTX 4010 feature comparable capabilities. Memory capacity, compute count, and bandwidth width are closely aligned. The hardware equivalence explains the comparable benchmark results. Not one has a notable technical advantage. This playing field is fair.

In the end, consumers might decide based on specific requirements instead of benchmark scores only. Either AMD Radeon 890M (AMD) and GeForce RTX 4010 provide excellent rendering performance for their given price points. This choice rests on individual preferences. Any option is valid. You can't go astray with either.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION

890M

RTX 4010

Core Specs

Shading Units

1,024

768 -25.0%

Shaders

1,024

768 -25.0%

TMUs

24 -62.5%

ROPs

16 -50.0%

Compute Units

—

SM Count

—

Clocks

Base Clock

400 MHz

1417 MHz

Boost Clock

2900 MHz

1762 MHz

Memory Clock

System Shared

1500 MHz 12 Gbps effective

Memory

Memory Size

System Shared

4 GB

VRAM (MB)

—

4,096

Memory Type

System Shared

GDDR6

Memory Bus

System Shared

64 bit

Bandwidth

System Dependent

96.00 GB/s

Cache

L1 Cache

128 KB per Array

128 KB (per SM)

L2 Cache

2 MB

L0 Cache

32 KB per WGP

—

Performance

Pixel Rate

92.80 GPixel/s

28.19 GPixel/s

Texture Rate

185.6 GTexel/s

42.29 GTexel/s

FP32 (TFLOPS)

5.939 TFLOPS

2.706 TFLOPS

FP64 (TFLOPS)

371.2 GFLOPS (1:16)

42.29 GFLOPS (1:64)

FP16 (TFLOPS)

5.939 TFLOPS (1:1)

2.706 TFLOPS (1:1)

AI/RT

RT Cores

6 -62.5%

Tensor Cores

—

Power

TDP

15 W

50 W

TDP (W)

50 +233.3%

Suggested PSU

—

250 W

Power Connectors

None

Architecture

RDNA 3.5

Ampere

GPU Name

Strix Point

GA107

Generation

Navi III IGP (Strix Point Mobile)

GeForce 40

Process Size

4 nm

8 nm

Transistors

34,000 million

8,700 million

Die Size

233 mm²

200 mm²

Foundry

TSMC

Samsung

Density

145.9M / mm²

43.5M / mm²

API Support

DirectX

12 Ultimate (12_2)

OpenGL

4.6

Vulkan

1.4

OpenCL

2.1

3.0

CUDA

—

8.6

Shader Model

6.8

6.9

Physical

Slot Width

IGP

Single-slot

Length

—

163 mm 6.4 inches

Height

—

69 mm 2.7 inches

Outputs

Portable Device Dependent

4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a

Bus Interface

PCIe 4.0 x8

Other

Production

Active

Predecessor

Navi II IGP

GeForce 30

Successor

—

GeForce 50

View Radeon 890M Details View GeForce RTX 4010 Details

GPU Comparison

AMD Radeon 890M

GeForce RTX 4010

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

Analysis: AMD Radeon 890M vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

Related Graphics Cards

Related Comparisons