NVIDIA RTX 6000D vs Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA Comparison

# FAQ

Q: What is the overall performance positioning of the NVIDIA RTX 6000D?

A: The RTX 6000D sits in the 98th percentile of all GPUs in the database. Its average benchmark score is 195,964, which places it about 0.8% above the NVIDIA Tesla V100S PCIe 32 GB and 6.1% above the NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation.

Q: How does the Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA compare in terms of recorded performance?

A: The LX ULTRA has no recorded benchmark scores in the database. Its average benchmark score is listed as 0, and its percentile versus all GPUs is 50, which is the midpoint of the distribution. No nearest rivals are listed for it.

Q: What are the key memory differences between the two cards?

A: The RTX 6000D uses 84 GB of GDDR7 on a 448-bit bus with 1.40 TB/s bandwidth. The LX ULTRA uses 24 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth. The RTX 6000D has 3.5 times the memory capacity and over three times the bandwidth.

Q: Which card has more shading units and compute throughput?

A: The RTX 6000D has 19,968 shading units and delivers 97.04 TFLOPS FP32. The LX ULTRA has 6,144 shading units and delivers 24.58 TFLOPS FP32. The RTX 6000D provides roughly four times the FP32 throughput.

Q: What are the power requirements for each card?

A: The RTX 6000D has a 600 W TDP and a suggested PSU of 1000 W. The LX ULTRA has a 225 W TDP and a suggested PSU of 550 W.

Q: When did each card release?

A: The RTX 6000D released on 2025-07-13, and the LX ULTRA released on 2026-03-16.

# Architecture Differences

The RTX 6000D uses the GB202 chip built on Blackwell 2.0 architecture, fabricated by TSMC on a 5 nm process. The die measures 750 mm² and contains 92,200 million transistors, giving a transistor density of 122.9M per mm². The LX ULTRA uses the 7G105 chip built on TrueGPU architecture, also fabricated by TSMC but on a 6 nm process. Its transistor count and die size are not recorded in the database.

The RTX 6000D includes 156 ray tracing cores and 624 tensor cores, while the LX ULTRA has no recorded RT or tensor core counts. This indicates a significant feature gap in hardware-accelerated ray tracing and AI workloads. The RTX 6000D also has 624 texture mapping units and 192 raster output units, compared to 192 TMUs and 96 ROPs on the LX ULTRA.

Clock behavior differs sharply. The RTX 6000D has a base clock of 1992 MHz and a boost clock of 2430 MHz. The LX ULTRA has no base or boost clock recorded in the database. Memory clocks also differ: the RTX 6000D runs at 1560 MHz with 25 Gbps effective, while the LX ULTRA runs at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective.

The RTX 6000D supports PCIe 5.0 x16, while the LX ULTRA uses PCIe 4.0 x16. Display outputs also differ: the RTX 6000D has four DisplayPort 2.1b connectors, whereas the LX ULTRA has four DisplayPort 1.4a connectors. Both cards are dual-slot and use a single 16-pin power connector.

API support is nearly identical for DirectX (12 Ultimate, 12_2) and OpenGL (4.6). Vulkan support differs: the RTX 6000D supports Vulkan 1.4, while the LX ULTRA supports Vulkan 1.3.

# Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark entries between the RTX 6000D and the LX ULTRA. However, the RTX 6000D has two recorded benchmark scores: 3,522 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 and 388,405 in Geekbench OpenCL. The LX ULTRA has no recorded scores in any test.

The RTX 6000D's average benchmark score of 195,964 places it in the 98th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rival, the Tesla V100S PCIe 32 GB, scores 194,415, a 0.8% deficit. The A100 SXM4 40 GB scores 187,147, which is 4.7% lower. The RTX 5000 Ada Generation scores 184,664, 6.1% lower. The A100 PCIe 80 GB actually scores higher at 207,124, putting it 5.4% ahead of the RTX 6000D.

Because the LX ULTRA has no benchmark data, the relative performance between these two specific cards cannot be quantified from the database. The LX ULTRA's 50th percentile ranking is a default value, not a measured result. The RTX 6000D's 98th percentile is based on actual recorded scores.

The FP32 compute figures provide a proxy for raw throughput: 97.04 TFLOPS for the RTX 6000D versus 24.58 TFLOPS for the LX ULTRA. The texture rate shows 1,516.3 GTexel/s versus 384.0 GTexel/s, and pixel rates are 466.6 GPixel/s versus 192.0 GPixel/s. These figures indicate the RTX 6000D holds a roughly 4x advantage in shader throughput and a roughly 2.4x advantage in pixel fill rate.

# Specification Differences

| Specification | NVIDIA RTX 6000D | Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA |

|---|---|---|

| Chip | GB202 | 7G105 |

| Architecture | Blackwell 2.0 | TrueGPU |

| Process node | 5 nm | 6 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | TSMC |

| Transistors | 92,200 million | unknown |

| Die size | 750 mm² | unknown |

| Transistor density | 122.9M / mm² | null |

| Base clock | 1992 MHz | null |

| Boost clock | 2430 MHz | null |

| Memory clock | 1560 MHz 25 Gbps effective | 2250 MHz 18 Gbps effective |

| Memory size | 84 GB | 24 GB |

| Memory type | GDDR7 | GDDR6 |

| Memory bus width | 448 bit | 192 bit |

| Memory bandwidth | 1.40 TB/s | 432.0 GB/s |

| Shading units | 19,968 | 6,144 |

| TMUs | 624 | 192 |

| ROPs | 192 | 96 |

| RT cores | 156 | null |

| Tensor cores | 624 | null |

| Pixel rate | 466.6 GPixel/s | 192.0 GPixel/s |

| Texture rate | 1,516.3 GTexel/s | 384.0 GTexel/s |

| FP32 | 97.04 TFLOPS | 24.58 TFLOPS |

| FP16 | 97.04 TFLOPS (1:1) | 49.15 TFLOPS (2:1) |

| TDP | 600 W | 225 W |

| Suggested PSU | 1000 W | 550 W |

| Bus interface | PCIe 5.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |

| Display outputs | 4x DisplayPort 2.1b | 4x DisplayPort 1.4a |

| Vulkan | 1.4 | 1.3 |

| Dimensions | 304 mm x 137 mm x 40 mm | 268 mm x 112 mm x 40 mm |

| Release date | 2025-07-13 | 2026-03-16 |

| Launch MSRP | 8,565 USD | null |

# The Verdict

The recorded data shows a clear performance class separation. The RTX 6000D is a high-end workstation GPU with a measured 98th percentile ranking and an average benchmark score of 195,964. It delivers 97.04 TFLOPS FP32, 1.40 TB/s memory bandwidth, and 84 GB of GDDR7 memory. Its nearest rivals are the Tesla V100S PCIe 32 GB (0.8% behind), the A100 SXM4 40 GB (4.7% behind), and the RTX 5000 Ada Generation (6.1% behind). Only the A100 PCIe 80 GB (5.4% ahead) outperforms it among listed rivals.

The LX ULTRA has no benchmark measurements, no average score, and no nearest rivals in the database. Its specifications show 24.58 TFLOPS FP32, 432.0 GB/s bandwidth, and 24 GB of GDDR6. The 50th percentile figure is a default, not a measured result.

Buyers who require verified high-end compute performance should look to the RTX 6000D. The data confirms it competes at the top tier of workstation GPUs. The LX ULTRA lacks the measured evidence to support any performance claim. Its lower power draw of 225 W versus 600 W is the only clear advantage recorded.

# Where Each One Wins

NVIDIA RTX 6000D wins on:

• Raw compute: 97.04 TFLOPS FP32 versus 24.58 TFLOPS FP32, a 4x advantage.
• Memory capacity: 84 GB versus 24 GB, useful for large datasets.
• Memory bandwidth: 1.40 TB/s versus 432.0 GB/s, a 3.2x advantage.
• Texture throughput: 1,516.3 GTexel/s versus 384.0 GTexel/s.
• Pixel throughput: 466.6 GPixel/s versus 192.0 GPixel/s.
• Ray tracing and tensor hardware: 156 RT cores and 624 tensor cores present, none recorded on the LX ULTRA.
• FP16 compute: 97.04 TFLOPS (1:1) versus 49.15 TFLOPS (2:1), meaning the RTX 6000D maintains full rate at half precision while the LX ULTRA doubles its rate.
• Interface: PCIe 5.0 x16 versus PCIe 4.0 x16.
• Display outputs: DisplayPort 2.1b versus DisplayPort 1.4a.
• Vulkan support: 1.4 versus 1.3.
• Smaller process node: 5 nm versus 6 nm.

Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA wins on:

• Power consumption: 225 W TDP versus 600 W TDP, with a suggested PSU of 550 W versus 1000 W.
• Physical dimensions: 268 mm length versus 304 mm, and 112 mm height versus 137 mm. Both are 40 mm wide.
• Memory clock frequency: 2250 MHz versus 1560 MHz, though the effective rate is lower (18 Gbps versus 25 Gbps).
• Release recency: 2026-03-16 versus 2025-07-13.

The LX ULTRA's lower power and smaller footprint make it suitable for compact builds with modest PSUs. The RTX 6000D's advantages in compute, memory, and connectivity make it the choice for workloads that demand maximum throughput. The absence of benchmark data for the LX ULTRA means its real-world performance remains unverified in the database.