NVIDIA RTX 4000 Mobile Ada Generation vs Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data for both GPUs shows no direct benchmark scores, average benchmark scores of 0, and no head-to-head benchmark results. Both cards sit at the 50th percentile among all GPUs in the database, indicating that without measured performance data, the two occupy the same tier in the ranking structure. Because the benchmark fields are empty, the analysis must rely on the theoretical specifications that determine compute throughput, pixel processing, and texture work.

The FP32 floating-point performance is nearly identical between the two. The NVIDIA RTX 4000 Mobile Ada Generation delivers 24.72 TFLOPS, while the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 delivers 24.58 TFLOPS. This is a difference of 0.14 TFLOPS, roughly 0.6% in favor of the NVIDIA part. In practical terms, this means raw single-precision compute workloads will perform within a rounding error of each other. Texture rate tells a similar story: the NVIDIA card achieves 386.3 GTexel/s against the Lisuan Tech's 384.0 GTexel/s, a margin of 2.3 GTexel/s or about 0.6%. These two metrics are effectively a tie.

The pixel rate is where the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 takes a clear lead. The Lisuan Tech card produces 192.0 GPixel/s, while the NVIDIA RTX 4000 Mobile reaches 133.2 GPixel/s. That is a 58.8 GPixel/s advantage, or roughly 44% more pixel throughput. This difference comes directly from the ROP count: the Lisuan Tech part has 96 ROPs versus 80 ROPs on the NVIDIA card, and the Lisuan Tech card uses a dual-slot desktop-style board with a 225 W TDP, while the NVIDIA part is an integrated mobile GPU with a 110 W TDP. The higher pixel rate suggests the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 will excel in fill-rate-bound scenarios such as high-resolution rendering with heavy overdraw.

The FP16 performance shows a major architectural divergence. The NVIDIA RTX 4000 Mobile Ada Generation offers 24.72 TFLOPS FP16 with a 1:1 ratio to FP32, meaning it processes half-precision at the same rate as full precision. The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 delivers 49.15 TFLOPS FP16 with a 2:1 ratio, meaning it doubles its throughput when switching to half-precision. The Lisuan Tech card is 24.43 TFLOPS ahead in FP16, a 98.8% advantage. This matters for workloads that can use reduced precision, such as AI inference, certain scientific simulations, and some graphics shader effects. The Lisuan Tech card is essentially twice as fast in this domain.

Memory configuration is identical: both cards use 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus, with 2250 MHz memory clock and 18 Gbps effective speed, yielding 432.0 GB/s bandwidth. Neither card gains a memory advantage. The bus interface is the same PCIe 4.0 x16 for both, so no difference in host connectivity.

Architecture Differences

The NVIDIA RTX 4000 Mobile Ada Generation uses the AD104 chip built on TSMC's 5 nm process. It contains 35,800 million transistors on a 294 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 121.8 million per mm². The architecture is Ada Lovelace, part of the GeForce 40-series, with a generation label of Ada-MW. It integrates 7424 shading units, 232 TMUs, 80 ROPs, 58 RT cores, and 232 tensor cores. The RT cores and tensor cores are present, meaning hardware-accelerated ray tracing and tensor-based AI operations are supported. The card is an IGP form factor with no power connectors and a 110 W TDP, designed for mobile integration.

The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 uses the 7G106 chip on TSMC's 6 nm process. Transistor count and die size are listed as unknown in the database. The architecture is labeled TrueGPU, with a generation of 7G100. It has 6144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs. No RT cores or tensor cores are listed, which indicates the design does not include dedicated hardware for those functions. The FP16 throughput of 49.15 TFLOPS at 2:1 ratio suggests a different compute unit design that can pack more half-precision operations into the same execution resources. The card is a dual-slot unit measuring 294 mm in length, 120 mm in height, and 49 mm in width, with a 225 W TDP and a single 8-pin power connector. The suggested PSU is 550 W. Display outputs are 4x DisplayPort 1.4a, while the NVIDIA card's outputs are listed as portable device dependent.

API support differs slightly. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. The NVIDIA card supports Vulkan 1.4, while the Lisuan Tech card supports Vulkan 1.3. The NVIDIA part uses Ada Lovelace with a predecessor of Ampere-MW and successor of Blackwell-MW, while the Lisuan Tech card has no predecessor or successor listed. The NVIDIA card was released on March 20, 2023, while the Lisuan Tech card has a release date of June 17, 2026.

The Verdict

From the recorded data, the choice between these two cards depends entirely on workload type. For FP32 compute, texture-heavy work, and ray tracing, the NVIDIA RTX 4000 Mobile Ada Generation is the safer pick because it has RT cores and tensor cores, a slightly higher FP32 throughput, and a higher texture rate. It also consumes 110 W versus 225 W, making it far more suitable for mobile or power-constrained systems. The NVIDIA card's 1:1 FP16 ratio means half-precision performance equals full-precision performance, which is simpler for developers who do not want to manage precision-specific code paths.

For FP16 compute and pixel-fill workloads, the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 is the clear winner. Its 49.15 TFLOPS FP16 is nearly double the NVIDIA card's 24.72 TFLOPS, and its 192.0 GPixel/s pixel rate is 44% higher. The 96 ROPs give it a structural advantage in rasterization-bound scenes. However, the 225 W TDP, dual-slot cooler, and 550 W suggested PSU mean it is a desktop-oriented card, not a mobile part. The lack of RT cores and tensor cores means ray tracing and AI acceleration must run on shader units, which will be slower than dedicated hardware.

The database shows both cards at the 50th percentile, so neither is positioned as a top-tier performer. The NVIDIA card is a mobile workstation GPU with a complete feature set. The Lisuan Tech card is a power-hungry desktop board with raw throughput in specific areas. Users who need mobility, ray tracing, or tensor operations should choose the NVIDIA card. Users who need maximum half-precision throughput or maximum pixel fill and can supply 550 W of PSU headroom should choose the Lisuan Tech card.

Specification Differences

| Specification | NVIDIA RTX 4000 Mobile Ada Generation | Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 |

|---|---|---|

| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | TrueGPU |

| Process node | 5 nm | 6 nm |

| Chip | AD104 | 7G106 |

| Transistors | 35,800 million | unknown |

| Die size | 294 mm² | unknown |

| Base clock | 1290 MHz | null |

| Boost clock | 1665 MHz | null |

| Shading units | 7424 | 6144 |

| TMUs | 232 | 192 |

| ROPs | 80 | 96 |

| RT cores | 58 | null |

| Tensor cores | 232 | null |

| Pixel rate | 133.2 GPixel/s | 192.0 GPixel/s |

| Texture rate | 386.3 GTexel/s | 384.0 GTexel/s |

| FP32 | 24.72 TFLOPS | 24.58 TFLOPS |

| FP16 | 24.72 TFLOPS (1:1) | 49.15 TFLOPS (2:1) |

| TDP | 110 W | 225 W |

| Slot width | IGP | Dual-slot |

| Power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |

| Suggested PSU | null | 550 W |

| Display outputs | Portable Device Dependent | 4x DisplayPort 1.4a |

| Vulkan | 1.4 | 1.3 |

| Release date | 2023-03-20 | 2026-06-17 |

| Dimensions | null | 294 mm x 120 mm x 49 mm |

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has higher FP32 compute performance?

A: The NVIDIA RTX 4000 Mobile Ada Generation delivers 24.72 TFLOPS, which is 0.14 TFLOPS higher than the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100's 24.58 TFLOPS.

Q: How much faster is the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 in FP16 workloads?

A: The Lisuan Tech card achieves 49.15 TFLOPS FP16 versus the NVIDIA card's 24.72 TFLOPS, a difference of 24.43 TFLOPS. This is a 98.8% advantage.

Q: Do both cards support ray tracing?

A: The NVIDIA RTX 4000 Mobile Ada Generation has 58 RT cores. The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 has no RT cores listed, so hardware ray tracing is not present on that card.

Q: What is the memory configuration of each card?

A: Both cards have 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus, with 2250 MHz memory clock, 18 Gbps effective speed, and 432.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: Which card has more ROPs and what does that mean?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 has 96 ROPs versus 80 ROPs on the NVIDIA card. This gives the Lisuan Tech card a 44% higher pixel rate of 192.0 GPixel/s versus 133.2 GPixel/s.

Q: What are the power requirements for the Lisuan Tech card?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 has a 225 W TDP, uses a single 8-pin power connector, and has a suggested PSU of 550 W. The NVIDIA card has a 110 W TDP and no power connectors.

Where Each One Wins

The NVIDIA RTX 4000 Mobile Ada Generation wins in mobile and low-power scenarios. Its 110 W TDP and IGP slot width make it suitable for laptops or compact systems. It has RT cores and tensor cores, so ray-traced graphics and tensor-based AI workloads have dedicated hardware. Its FP32 performance is marginally ahead, and its texture rate is slightly higher. The 1:1 FP16 ratio means developers do not need separate code paths for half-precision. Vulkan 1.4 support is newer than the Lisuan Tech card's Vulkan 1.3. The NVIDIA card also has a longer track record with a 2023 release date.

The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 wins in raw fill-rate and half-precision throughput. The 192.0 GPixel/s pixel rate is the standout metric, coming from 96 ROPs. This makes it better for high-resolution rendering with heavy overdraw, such as 4K gaming with multiple post-processing passes or large framebuffer effects. Its FP16 performance of 49.15 TFLOPS is nearly double the NVIDIA card, which is a decisive advantage for AI inference, half-precision scientific computing, and any workload that can use 2:1 FP16 throughput. The dual-slot cooler, 8-pin power connector, and 550 W suggested PSU indicate a desktop card that can sustain high clocks under load, though no clock speeds are recorded in the database. The 4x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs give it flexible multi-monitor connectivity, whereas the NVIDIA card's outputs depend on the portable device it is integrated into.

The two cards split cleanly: the NVIDIA part is a feature-complete, power-efficient mobile solution, while the Lisuan Tech part is a high-power desktop board optimized for pixel fill and half-precision math. Both have identical memory, so bandwidth is not a differentiator. The choice comes down to whether the workload is FP32/ray-tracing/mobile or FP16/pixel-fill/desktop.