NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 vs Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 Comparison

Where Each One Wins

The data presents a stark contrast between these two GPUs. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 is a fully measured product with ten recorded benchmark scores, while the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 has no benchmark entries in the database. This means the recorded data shows zero wins for either side in direct head-to-head testing, as no shared benchmark results exist. The RTX 5080's average benchmark score of 56083 places it in the 87th percentile of all GPUs, while the LX 7G100's percentile sits at 50 with an average score of 0 due to missing measurements.

The RTX 5080's benchmark profile spans multiple API generations. Its strongest relative showing comes from Passmark DirectX 9 at 389 points, followed by DirectX 11 at 324, and DirectX 10 at 208. The DirectX 12 score of 151 is notably lower, which aligns with the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 result of 8637. Compute workloads show substantial capability, with Geekbench OpenCL at 235901, Geekbench Vulkan at 255450, and Passmark GPU Compute at 21789. The Passmark G3D score of 36565 and G2D score of 1415 round out the measured profile.

Since the LX 7G100 has no recorded benchmark data, the database cannot establish a comparative performance profile. The wins distribution is therefore moot in practice. The RTX 5080's nearest rivals, all AMD parts, provide the only meaningful context: the Radeon 8060S trails by 0.6 percent, the RX 6750 GRE 12 GB trails by 0.7 percent, and the Radeon Pro W5700X trails by 2.3 percent. The Radeon RX 9070 GRE leads the RTX 5080 by 2.2 percent, indicating the RTX 5080 sits in a tightly contested performance band among its closest competitors.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs diverge fundamentally in their underlying designs. The RTX 5080 uses the GB203 chip built on NVIDIA's Blackwell 2.0 architecture, fabricated on a 5 nm process at TSMC. The chip contains 45,600 million transistors on a 378 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 120.6 million per square millimeter. The LX 7G100 uses the 7G106 chip with a TrueGPU architecture, fabricated on a 6 nm process, also at TSMC. Its transistor count and die size remain unknown in the database, and no density figure is recorded.

The RTX 5080 deploys 10752 shading units, 336 texture mapping units, and 112 raster output pipelines. It features 84 ray tracing cores and 336 tensor cores, delivering a pixel rate of 293.1 GPixel/s, a texture rate of 879.3 GTexel/s, and FP32 compute of 56.28 TFLOPS. FP16 performance matches FP32 at a 1:1 ratio, also 56.28 TFLOPS. The LX 7G100, by contrast, uses 6144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs. It records no ray tracing core or tensor core counts. Its pixel rate is 192.0 GPixel/s, texture rate is 384.0 GTexel/s, and FP32 compute is 24.58 TFLOPS. FP16 reaches 49.15 TFLOPS at a 2:1 ratio, meaning the LX 7G100 actually delivers nearly double its FP32 throughput in half-precision workloads, unlike the RTX 5080 which maintains a 1:1 ratio.

Memory architecture also separates the two. The RTX 5080 carries 16 GB of GDDR7 on a 256-bit bus, with memory clocked at 1875 MHz (30 Gbps effective) and bandwidth of 960.0 GB/s. The LX 7G100 carries 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus, with memory at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective) and bandwidth of 432.0 GB/s. The RTX 5080's bandwidth advantage is substantial, more than double that of the LX 7G100.

Both cards support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. The RTX 5080 supports Vulkan 1.4, while the LX 7G100 supports Vulkan 1.3. The RTX 5080 uses a PCIe 5.0 x16 interface, whereas the LX 7G100 uses PCIe 4.0 x16. The RTX 5080's display outputs include one HDMI 2.1b and three DisplayPort 2.1b connectors. The LX 7G100 offers four DisplayPort 1.4a outputs. The RTX 5080 requires a 360 W TDP with a 750 W suggested PSU and a single 16-pin power connector. The LX 7G100 draws 225 W with a 550 W suggested PSU and a single 8-pin connector.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 has an average benchmark score of 56083. The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 has an average benchmark score of 0, as no benchmark results are recorded for it in the database.

Q: How does the RTX 5080 compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The RTX 5080's average score of 56083 places it 0.6 percent ahead of the AMD Radeon 8060S, 0.7 percent ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB, and 2.3 percent ahead of the AMD Radeon Pro W5700X. It trails the AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE by 2.2 percent.

Q: What are the memory specifications of each GPU?

A: The RTX 5080 has 16 GB of GDDR7 on a 256-bit bus with 960.0 GB/s bandwidth. The LX 7G100 has 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: Do both GPUs support ray tracing?

A: The RTX 5080 includes 84 ray tracing cores. The LX 7G100's database entry does not list any ray tracing core count, so its ray tracing capability cannot be confirmed from recorded data.

Q: What are the FP16 compute capabilities of each GPU?

A: The RTX 5080 delivers 56.28 TFLOPS FP16 at a 1:1 ratio with FP32. The LX 7G100 delivers 49.15 TFLOPS FP16 at a 2:1 ratio, meaning its half-precision throughput is double its FP32 throughput of 24.58 TFLOPS.

Q: Which GPU has a higher pixel rate?

A: The RTX 5080 has a pixel rate of 293.1 GPixel/s, while the LX 7G100 has a pixel rate of 192.0 GPixel/s.

Specification Differences

The following specifications differ between the two GPUs:

| Specification | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 | Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 |

|---|---|---|

| Chip | GB203 | 7G106 |

| Architecture | Blackwell 2.0 | TrueGPU |

| Generation | GeForce 50 | 7G100 |

| Process node | 5 nm | 6 nm |

| Transistors | 45,600 million | unknown |

| Die size | 378 mm² | unknown |

| Transistor density | 120.6M / mm² | null |

| Memory clock | 1875 MHz, 30 Gbps effective | 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective |

| Memory size | 16 GB | 12 GB |

| Memory type | GDDR7 | GDDR6 |

| Memory bus width | 256 bit | 192 bit |

| Memory bandwidth | 960.0 GB/s | 432.0 GB/s |

| Shading units | 10752 | 6144 |

| TMUs | 336 | 192 |

| ROPs | 112 | 96 |

| RT cores | 84 | null |

| Tensor cores | 336 | null |

| Pixel rate | 293.1 GPixel/s | 192.0 GPixel/s |

| Texture rate | 879.3 GTexel/s | 384.0 GTexel/s |

| FP32 | 56.28 TFLOPS | 24.58 TFLOPS |

| FP16 | 56.28 TFLOPS (1:1) | 49.15 TFLOPS (2:1) |

| TDP | 360 W | 225 W |

| Power connector | 1x 16-pin | 1x 8-pin |

| Suggested PSU | 750 W | 550 W |

| Bus interface | PCIe 5.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |

| Display outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1b | 4x DisplayPort 1.4a |

| Vulkan version | 1.4 | 1.3 |

| Dimensions | 304 mm length, 137 mm height, 40 mm width | 294 mm length, 120 mm height, 49 mm width |

| Release date | 2025-01-29 | 2026-06-17 |

| Launch MSRP | 999 USD | null |

| Predecessor | GeForce 40 | null |

| Successor | GeForce 60 | null |

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

Direct benchmark comparison is limited because the database contains no head-to-head benchmark entries and no recorded benchmark scores for the LX 7G100. The wins counters show 0 for both cards. Consequently, the analysis must rely on the RTX 5080's absolute scores and its rival comparisons to interpret performance.

The RTX 5080's Passmark DirectX 9 score of 389 is its highest API-specific result, suggesting strong legacy DirectX 9 performance relative to its own DirectX 10 and DirectX 11 scores of 208 and 324 respectively. The DirectX 12 score of 151 is the lowest API-specific result, yet the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 8637 indicates modern DX12 workloads still perform considerably. The Passmark G3D score of 36565 demonstrates substantial rasterization throughput, while the GPU Compute score of 21789 confirms significant compute headroom.

Geekbench results show Vulkan performance at 255450, which exceeds the OpenCL score of 235901 by roughly 8 percent. This gap suggests the architecture handles Vulkan workloads more efficiently than OpenCL in synthetic testing. The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 8637 acts as the primary modern DX12 gaming indicator among the recorded measurements.

Comparing the RTX 5080 to its nearest rivals, the average score of 56083 sits only 0.6 percent above the AMD Radeon 8060S and 0.7 percent above the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB. The 2.3 percent lead over the Radeon Pro W5700X is slightly larger, while the 2.2 percent deficit against the Radeon RX 9070 GRE shows the RTX 5080 is not the outright leader in its competitive segment. These margins indicate the RTX 5080 performs within a narrow band around its closest AMD competitors, with no single rival holding a dominant advantage.

The LX 7G100's absence from the benchmark database means no comparative scores can be stated. Its architectural specifications, including 24.58 TFLOPS FP32, 432.0 GB/s memory bandwidth, and 192.0 GPixel/s pixel rate, place it well below the RTX 5080's corresponding figures, but without measured results, the database cannot quantify the actual performance gap. The RTX 5080's 56.28 TFLOPS FP32 is more than double the LX 7G100's figure, and its 960.0 GB/s bandwidth more than doubles the LX 7G100's 432.0 GB/s, but these are specification comparisons rather than benchmark outcomes. The recorded data confirms the RTX 5080 as the fully characterized product, while the LX 7G100 remains an unmeasured entry pending benchmark submissions.