NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER vs Lisuan Tech LX PRO Comparison

Where Each One Wins

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER is the clear performance leader in the recorded database, delivering a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3075. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO has no recorded benchmark scores in the database, which means direct numerical comparison is impossible for most workloads. However, the specification data reveals a significant gap in raw compute capability, and the recorded measurements show the RTX 5080 SUPER sits at the 19th percentile among all GPUs, while the LX PRO sits at the 50th percentile. This percentile placement, combined with the LX PRO having zero recorded benchmark entries, indicates the database contains no validated performance data for the Lisuan card.

Where the RTX 5080 SUPER wins is in every measurable compute category. Its FP32 throughput of 56.28 TFLOPS more than doubles the LX PRO’s 24.58 TFLOPS. The texture rate of 879.3 GTexel/s versus 384.0 GTexel/s shows a 2.3x advantage in fill-rate-bound scenarios. Pixel rate of 293.1 GPixel/s versus 192.0 GPixel/s gives the NVIDIA part a 1.5x lead in rasterization-heavy scenes. The memory bandwidth differential is stark as well: 1.02 TB/s over a 256-bit GDDR7 bus versus 432.0 GB/s over a 192-bit GDDR6 bus, a 2.4x advantage for the RTX 5080 SUPER.

The LX PRO wins in efficiency-oriented specifications. Its 225 W TDP is substantially lower than the 415 W TDP of the RTX 5080 SUPER. The LX PRO also supports Vulkan 1.3, whereas the RTX 5080 SUPER supports Vulkan 1.4, but this is a minor API version difference. The Lisuan card’s FP16 throughput of 49.15 TFLOPS is higher than its FP32 rate due to a 2:1 ratio, while the RTX 5080 SUPER maintains a 1:1 ratio at 56.28 TFLOPS. For mixed-precision workloads, the NVIDIA card still leads in absolute FP16 performance.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has a higher average benchmark score in the database?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER has an average benchmark score of 3075 from a single 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO has no recorded benchmark scores, so its average is listed as 0 in the database.

Q: How does the RTX 5080 SUPER compare to its nearest rivals in the database?

A: The RTX 5080 SUPER’s nearest recorded rivals are the Intel Arc Pro B60 with an average score of 3182 (3.4% ahead of the RTX 5080 SUPER), the NVIDIA Quadro P1000 at 3163 (2.8% ahead), the NVIDIA GeForce 820A at 2983 (3.1% behind), and the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M at 2967 (3.6% behind). The LX PRO has no nearest rivals listed.

Q: What memory configurations do the two cards use?

A: Both cards have 24 GB of memory. The RTX 5080 SUPER uses GDDR7 on a 256-bit bus with 1.02 TB/s bandwidth. The LX PRO uses GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: Which GPU has more shading units and texture mapping units?

A: The RTX 5080 SUPER has 10752 shading units and 336 TMUs. The LX PRO has 6144 shading units and 192 TMUs. The RTX 5080 SUPER also has 112 ROPs versus 96 ROPs on the LX PRO.

Q: What are the power requirements for each card?

A: The RTX 5080 SUPER has a TDP of 415 W and uses one 16-pin power connector. The LX PRO has a TDP of 225 W, uses one 16-pin power connector, and has a suggested PSU rating of 550 W in the database.

Q: What display outputs does each GPU provide?

A: The RTX 5080 SUPER provides 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b outputs. The LX PRO provides 4x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs with no HDMI port listed.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark entries between the RTX 5080 SUPER and the LX PRO, and the wins counter shows 0 for each card. This absence of comparative testing data means the analysis must rely on the recorded specifications and the single benchmark result for the RTX 5080 SUPER.

The RTX 5080 SUPER’s 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3075 places it in the 19th percentile among all GPUs in the database. Its nearest rivals provide context: the Intel Arc Pro B60 scores 3182, which is 3.4% higher, and the NVIDIA Quadro P1000 scores 3163, 2.8% higher. On the lower end, the NVIDIA GeForce 820A scores 2983, 3.1% lower, and the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M scores 2967, 3.6% lower. This tight clustering (all within about 7 percentage points) suggests the RTX 5080 SUPER sits in a competitive mid-range segment despite its high absolute specifications.

The LX PRO’s percentile ranking of 50 with no benchmark data is unusual. The database lists its average benchmark score as 0, which means it has not been tested under the recorded methodology. Without a score, no delta percentages can be computed against the RTX 5080 SUPER or any other GPU. The only quantitative comparisons available come from the specification sheet.

Compute throughput differences are the most decisive. The RTX 5080 SUPER delivers 56.28 TFLOPS FP32, while the LX PRO delivers 24.58 TFLOPS, a 2.29x gap. In FP16, the RTX 5080 SUPER maintains 56.28 TFLOPS, while the LX PRO reaches 49.15 TFLOPS, reducing the gap to 1.14x. The LX PRO’s 2:1 FP16 to FP32 ratio indicates its architecture prioritizes reduced-precision workloads, but the RTX 5080 SUPER still wins in absolute terms.

Memory bandwidth tells a similar story. The RTX 5080 SUPER’s 1.02 TB/s is 2.36x the LX PRO’s 432.0 GB/s. This bandwidth advantage matters for high-resolution texturing, large dataset processing, and any workload that saturates memory. The GDDR7 memory clock of 2000 MHz with 32 Gbps effective speed on the RTX 5080 SUPER far exceeds the LX PRO’s 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective speed on GDDR6.

Pixel and texture rates reinforce the NVIDIA lead. The RTX 5080 SUPER achieves 293.1 GPixel/s and 879.3 GTexel/s. The LX PRO achieves 192.0 GPixel/s and 384.0 GTexel/s. The pixel rate gap is 1.53x, while the texture rate gap is 2.29x. These figures indicate the RTX 5080 SUPER will handle geometry-heavy and texture-heavy scenes with significantly more headroom.

Specification Differences

The two GPUs differ across nearly every recorded specification field. The RTX 5080 SUPER uses the GB203 chip built on NVIDIA’s Blackwell 2.0 architecture, fabricated on a 5 nm process at TSMC with 45,600 million transistors on a 378 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 120.6M per mm². The LX PRO uses the 7G105 chip built on the TrueGPU architecture, fabricated on a 6 nm process at TSMC with transistor count and die size listed as unknown.

Clock specifications differ notably. The RTX 5080 SUPER has a base clock of 2295 MHz and a boost clock of 2617 MHz. The LX PRO has no base or boost clock listed in the database. Memory clocks also differ: the RTX 5080 SUPER runs at 2000 MHz with 32 Gbps effective, while the LX PRO runs at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective.

Memory subsystems are substantially different. The RTX 5080 SUPER uses 24 GB of GDDR7 on a 256-bit bus. The LX PRO uses 24 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus. This results in the bandwidth figures previously mentioned: 1.02 TB/s versus 432.0 GB/s.

Compute unit counts differ across all categories. The RTX 5080 SUPER has 10752 shading units, 336 TMUs, and 112 ROPs. The LX PRO has 6144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs. The RTX 5080 SUPER also includes 84 RT cores and 336 tensor cores, while the LX PRO has no RT core or tensor core counts listed, suggesting either their absence or lack of recorded data.

Power and physical specifications diverge. The RTX 5080 SUPER has a TDP of 415 W, while the LX PRO has a TDP of 225 W. Both are dual-slot cards with one 16-pin power connector, but the RTX 5080 SUPER is longer at 304 mm versus 248 mm, taller at 137 mm versus 118 mm, and thinner at 40 mm versus 48 mm. The RTX 5080 SUPER uses a PCIe 5.0 x16 interface, while the LX PRO uses PCIe 4.0 x16.

Display output configurations differ completely. The RTX 5080 SUPER offers 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b. The LX PRO offers 4x DisplayPort 1.4a and no HDMI. API support shows both cards support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6, but the RTX 5080 SUPER supports Vulkan 1.4 while the LX PRO supports Vulkan 1.3.

Architecture Differences

The architecture gap between the two cards is fundamental. The RTX 5080 SUPER uses NVIDIA’s Blackwell 2.0 architecture, the second iteration of the Blackwell design. The LX PRO uses a design called TrueGPU, which has no predecessor or successor listed in the database. The chip identifiers reflect this: GB203 for NVIDIA, 7G105 for Lisuan Tech.

Process technology favors the RTX 5080 SUPER in density but the LX PRO in node size. The RTX 5080 SUPER uses a 5 nm process, while the LX PRO uses a 6 nm process, both at TSMC. The RTX 5080 SUPER packs 45,600 million transistors into 378 mm², giving a density of 120.6M per mm². The LX PRO’s transistor count and die size are unknown, so density cannot be computed. The smaller node combined with a larger die gives the NVIDIA card significantly more compute resources.

The RTX 5080 SUPER includes dedicated ray tracing cores (84) and tensor cores (336). The LX PRO has no such counts recorded. This indicates the NVIDIA card has specialized hardware for ray-traced rendering and AI acceleration, while the LX PRO’s architecture either lacks these units or does not report them. The tensor cores enable features like DLSS and other AI-based upscaling, which the LX PRO cannot match without equivalent hardware.

Memory architecture differs in both type and width. GDDR7 on a 256-bit bus versus GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus changes not just bandwidth but also power characteristics and access patterns. The RTX 5080 SUPER’s higher memory clock (2000 MHz base, 32 Gbps effective) versus the LX PRO’s 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective reflects the different memory generations.

FP16 processing ratios differ: the RTX 5080 SUPER uses a 1:1 FP16 to FP32 ratio, meaning both run at 56.28 TFLOPS. The LX PRO uses a 2:1 ratio, delivering 49.15 TFLOPS FP16 versus 24.58 TFLOPS FP32. This suggests the LX PRO’s architecture is optimized for reduced-precision compute, possibly for inference workloads, while the RTX 5080 SUPER maintains uniform throughput across precision levels.

The PCIe interface differs by one generation: PCIe 5.0 x16 on the RTX 5080 SUPER versus PCIe 4.0 x16 on the LX PRO. This affects host-to-device transfer bandwidth for data streaming and could impact workloads that frequently move data between CPU and GPU.

The Verdict

The data in the database clearly favors the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER for any performance-oriented use case. Its recorded 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3075 is the only validated benchmark result between the two cards. The LX PRO has no recorded scores, meaning no performance validation exists in the database.

For compute-heavy workloads, the RTX 5080 SUPER’s 56.28 TFLOPS FP32 and 879.3 GTexel/s texture rate provide more than double the throughput of the LX PRO’s 24.58 TFLOPS FP32 and 384.0 GTexel/s. The memory bandwidth advantage of 1.02 TB/s versus 432.0 GB/s ensures the NVIDIA card can feed its compute units more effectively in bandwidth-bound scenarios.

For ray tracing and AI acceleration, the RTX 5080 SUPER’s 84 RT cores and 336 tensor cores provide dedicated hardware that the LX PRO lacks entirely according to the recorded data. The Vulkan 1.4 support on the RTX 5080 SUPER versus Vulkan 1.3 on the LX PRO also gives the NVIDIA card access to newer API features.

The LX PRO’s advantages are limited to power consumption. Its 225 W TDP is 190 W lower than the RTX 5080 SUPER’s 415 W. The smaller physical footprint (248 mm length versus 304 mm, 118 mm height versus 137 mm) makes it easier to fit in compact cases, though it is 8 mm thicker. The suggested PSU rating of 550 W for the LX PRO indicates a lower overall system power requirement.

The percentile rankings in the database are counterintuitive: the RTX 5080 SUPER sits at the 19th percentile while the LX PRO sits at the 50th percentile. However, the RTX 5080 SUPER’s percentile is derived from its recorded benchmark score, while the LX PRO’s percentile appears to be based on no recorded benchmarks, making the two figures non-comparable. The RTX 5080 SUPER’s nearest rivals all score within 3.6% of its 3075 result, placing it in a competitive cluster.

Users who require maximum performance, ray tracing, AI features, or high bandwidth should select the RTX 5080 SUPER. Its launch MSRP of 999 USD provides a reference point for its market position. Users who prioritize lower power draw, smaller dimensions, or reduced system power requirements might consider the LX PRO, but its lack of recorded benchmark data means its actual performance remains unverified in the database. The RTX 5080 SUPER is the only card with demonstrated performance evidence, and that evidence shows a capable GPU that trades blows with its nearest rivals while offering substantially higher specifications than the LX PRO across every compute metric.