NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER vs NVIDIA Quadro P1000 Comparison

The comparison between the NVIDIA Quadro P1000 and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER presents a stark contrast in design philosophy and performance era. The data shows two GPUs separated by nearly a decade of architectural evolution, with the Quadro P1000 serving as an end-of-life professional workstation part and the RTX 5080 SUPER representing an active, high-end consumer Blackwell product. While the average benchmark scores place them in a surprisingly close range, the underlying specifications and benchmark characteristics reveal fundamentally different performance profiles.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark comparison between these two GPUs is unconventional because the available data tests different workloads. The NVIDIA Quadro P1000 has a comprehensive set of nine benchmark scores, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER has only a single score from a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test. The average benchmark score for the Quadro P1000 is 3163, while the RTX 5080 SUPER’s average score is 3075. This places the RTX 5080 SUPER 2.9% behind the Quadro P1000 in the Quadro’s nearest rivals list, and the Quadro P1000 is listed as 2.8% ahead of the RTX 5080 SUPER in the reverse comparison. However, this near-parity is misleading due to the different benchmark suites involved.

Looking at the Quadro P1000’s individual scores, its strongest showing is in Geekbench OpenCL with a score of 13584, and it scores 7739 in Geekbench Vulkan. Its Passmark G3D score is 4512, with a GPU compute score of 1891. The DirectX scores are notably low: 79 in DirectX 9, 31 in DirectX 11, 21 in DirectX 10, and 19 in DirectX 12. The G2D score is 589. These figures suggest the Quadro P1000 is optimized for compute and older API workloads rather than modern gaming-centric DirectX 12 paths. In contrast, the RTX 5080 SUPER’s single 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3075 represents a modern, demanding DX12 test, which is a workload the Quadro P1000 was never designed to handle efficiently, evidenced by its paltry 19 in Passmark DirectX 12.

The percentile rankings are also telling. The Quadro P1000 sits at the 20th percentile among all GPUs, while the RTX 5080 SUPER sits at the 19th percentile. This indicates that despite the massive specification differences, both cards are positioned in the lower quartile of the overall GPU performance distribution, likely due to the RTX 5080 SUPER’s single benchmark result not capturing its full potential or the Quadro’s age. When examining the nearest rivals, the Quadro P1000’s closest competitor is the Intel Arc Pro B60 with an average score of 3182 (a 0.6% difference), and the NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 at 3210 (1.5% difference). The RTX 5080 SUPER’s rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce 820A at 2983 (3.1% higher) and the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M at 2967 (3.6% higher), indicating that in this limited dataset, the RTX 5080 SUPER only marginally outperforms much older mobile GPUs.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The NVIDIA Quadro P1000 has a higher average benchmark score of 3163, compared to 3075 for the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER.

Q: How do the two cards compare in DirectX 12 performance?

A: The Quadro P1000 scores only 19 in Passmark DirectX 12, while the RTX 5080 SUPER’s sole benchmark is a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test with a score of 3075. The Quadro’s DirectX 12 score is exceptionally low, indicating it is not suited for modern DX12 workloads.

Q: What is the difference in their GPU compute benchmarks?

A: The Quadro P1000 has a Passmark GPU compute score of 1891, and it also achieves 13584 in Geekbench OpenCL. The RTX 5080 SUPER does not have a comparable compute benchmark in the data, only the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 result.

Q: Are these two GPUs considered close competitors?

A: According to the nearest rivals data, they are listed as rivals for each other, with a deltaPct of 2.9% (RTX 5080 SUPER behind) from the Quadro’s perspective and -2.8% (Quadro ahead) from the RTX’s perspective. However, this is based on a single benchmark for the RTX 5080 SUPER, making the comparison limited.

Q: What is the production status of each GPU?

A: The NVIDIA Quadro P1000 is listed as end-of-life, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER is listed as active.

Q: Which GPU has a higher percentile ranking?

A: The Quadro P1000 is at the 20th percentile, while the RTX 5080 SUPER is at the 19th percentile, making the Quadro slightly higher in percentile ranking despite its older architecture.

Architecture Differences

The architectural divide between these two GPUs is immense. The Quadro P1000 is built on the Pascal architecture, specifically using the GP107 chip manufactured on a 14 nm process at Samsung. This chip contains 3,300 million transistors on a die size of 132 mm², resulting in a transistor density of 25.0M per mm². In contrast, the RTX 5080 SUPER utilizes the Blackwell 2.0 architecture with the GB203 chip, manufactured on a 5 nm process at TSMC. The GB203 packs 45,600 million transistors into a 378 mm² die, achieving a transistor density of 120.6M per mm². This represents a massive jump in both raw transistor count and density.

The Quadro P1000 features 640 shading units, 40 texture mapping units, and 32 ROPs. It has no dedicated ray tracing cores or tensor cores. The RTX 5080 SUPER, however, is equipped with 10752 shading units, 336 TMUs, and 112 ROPs. It includes 84 ray tracing cores and 336 tensor cores, marking a fundamental shift towards hybrid rendering and AI-accelerated workloads. The API support also differs, with the Quadro supporting DirectX 12 (12_1) while the RTX 5080 SUPER supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), reflecting a full feature set for modern games. Both cards support OpenGL 4.6 and Vulkan 1.4.

The compute capabilities are starkly different. The Quadro P1000 delivers 1.894 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and only 29.60 GFLOPS of FP16 (at a 1:64 ratio), indicating that half-precision compute is heavily de-emphasized. The RTX 5080 SUPER delivers 56.28 TFLOPS of FP32 and 56.28 TFLOPS of FP16 (at a 1:1 ratio), showing a balanced and vastly superior compute throughput. The pixel rate for the Quadro is 47.36 GPixel/s with a texture rate of 59.20 GTexel/s, whereas the RTX 5080 SUPER achieves a pixel rate of 293.1 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 879.3 GTexel/s, representing a roughly 6x and 15x improvement respectively.

Specification Differences

The specification differences between the two GPUs are extensive, covering nearly every aspect of the hardware. The memory configuration is a major differentiator. The Quadro P1000 has 4 GB of GDDR5 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 80.19 GB/s with a memory clock of 1253 MHz (5 Gbps effective). The RTX 5080 SUPER has 24 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering a bandwidth of 1.02 TB/s with a memory clock of 2000 MHz (32 Gbps effective). This is a 6x increase in capacity and a 12.7x increase in bandwidth.

Clock speeds also differ significantly. The Quadro P1000 has a base clock of 1266 MHz and a boost clock of 1480 MHz. The RTX 5080 SUPER has a base clock of 2295 MHz and a boost clock of 2617 MHz. Power consumption is a major factor, with the Quadro P1000 drawing only 47 W TDP and the RTX 5080 SUPER drawing 415 W TDP, a nearly 9x difference. The slot width is single-slot for the Quadro and dual-slot for the RTX. The Quadro has no power connectors, while the RTX requires a single 16-pin connector. The suggested PSU for the Quadro is 200 W, while no suggested PSU is listed for the RTX.

The physical dimensions are also distinct. The Quadro P1000 is 150 mm (5.9 inches) in length and 69 mm (2.7 inches) in height. The RTX 5080 SUPER is much larger at 304 mm (12 inches) in length, 137 mm (5.4 inches) in height, and 40 mm (1.6 inches) in width. The bus interface is PCIe 3.0 x16 for the Quadro, while the RTX uses PCIe 5.0 x16. Display outputs differ, with the Quadro offering 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a and the RTX offering 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b. The release dates are far apart, with the Quadro launching on 2017-02-06 and the RTX on 2025-12-31. The launch MSRP for the RTX 5080 SUPER is 999 USD, while no MSRP is listed for the Quadro P1000.

Where Each One Wins

Based on the benchmark data, the NVIDIA Quadro P1000 wins in several specific areas. It has a higher average benchmark score (3163 vs 3075), a higher percentile ranking (20th vs 19th), and it performs strongly in Geekbench OpenCL (13584) and Vulkan (7739) tests. These scores suggest a card that is well-suited for legacy compute tasks and applications that rely on OpenCL or Vulkan compute paths. Its low TDP of 47 W and single-slot design with no power connectors make it suitable for low-power, space-constrained systems. The Quadro P1000 also has a higher G2D score of 589, indicating better 2D desktop performance in this dataset.

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER wins based on its modern feature set and raw specification superiority. Its single 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3075, while lower than the Quadro’s average, represents a workload that the Quadro cannot run effectively (its DirectX 12 score is a mere 19). The RTX 5080 SUPER’s massive advantages in memory (24 GB vs 4 GB), bandwidth (1.02 TB/s vs 80.19 GB/s), shading units (10752 vs 640), and the presence of ray tracing and tensor cores make it the clear winner for modern gaming and AI workloads. Its FP32 performance of 56.28 TFLOPS is nearly 30 times higher than the Quadro’s 1.894 TFLOPS. The RTX also has a much higher boost clock of 2617 MHz and supports the latest PCIe 5.0 interface.

The Verdict

The data presents a clear split in use cases. For users with legacy professional applications that rely on OpenCL or Vulkan compute, the NVIDIA Quadro P1000 shows competitive raw scores in those specific benchmarks (13584 and 7739) and a higher average benchmark score overall. Its low power draw of 47 W and compact single-slot footprint make it a practical choice for dense workstation environments where space and thermal output are limited. The Quadro’s performance percentile of 20, while low, is still higher than the RTX 5080 SUPER’s 19th percentile, indicating that in this specific dataset, it is not categorically outclassed.

However, for any modern workload, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER is the only logical choice from a performance standpoint. Its 24 GB of GDDR7 memory, 1.02 TB/s bandwidth, 10752 shading units, and dedicated ray tracing and tensor cores are in a different league entirely. The RTX 5080 SUPER’s single benchmark result in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 reflects its capability in demanding DirectX 12 titles, a domain where the Quadro P1000 is virtually non-functional with a Passmark DirectX 12 score of 19. The RTX’s FP32 and FP16 compute throughput of 56.28 TFLOPS dwarfs the Quadro’s 1.894 TFLOPS FP32 and 29.60 GFLOPS FP16. The RTX 5080 SUPER is an active product with a launch MSRP of 999 USD, while the Quadro P1000 is end-of-life.

The verdict hinges on the benchmark type. If the analysis is purely based on the average of available benchmarks, the Quadro P1000 edges out the RTX 5080 SUPER. But this is an artifact of the limited test data for the RTX. The specification sheet tells a decisive story: the RTX 5080 SUPER is a modern high-performance GPU designed for the future, while the Quadro P1000 is a legacy part for legacy tasks. Users seeking performance in modern DirectX 12 games or compute-heavy applications should choose the RTX 5080 SUPER. Users maintaining legacy systems with specific OpenCL/Vulkan requirements and strict power limits might find the Quadro P1000’s profile acceptable, but its end-of-life status and architectural limitations make it a questionable investment. The data indicates that the RTX 5080 SUPER, despite its lower average score, is the superior hardware for any contemporary application.