NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER vs NVIDIA Quadro K1100M Comparison

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER and NVIDIA Quadro K1100M are separated by more than a decade of GPU architecture, yet the benchmark data places them in a surprisingly close overall percentile ranking. The RTX 5080 SUPER sits at the 19th percentile of all GPUs, while the Quadro K1100M sits at the 18th percentile. This near-parity in overall standing, however, masks a complete divergence in capability and use case. The RTX 5080 SUPER delivers a single 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3075, while the Quadro K1100M produces results in Geekbench compute tests (Metal, OpenCL, Vulkan) that average 2664. The data indicates these are not competitors in any meaningful sense; they are tools for entirely different jobs, with the RTX 5080 SUPER serving as a high-end desktop rendering powerhouse and the Quadro K1100M functioning as a low-power mobile workstation component.

Where Each One Wins

The RTX 5080 SUPER wins decisively in any metric related to raw graphics throughput and modern API support. Its single benchmark result, 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, is a demanding test that reflects its 56.28 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 1.02 TB/s of memory bandwidth. This score of 3075 places it within a narrow competitive band: it is 2.8% behind the NVIDIA Quadro P1000 (3163) and 3.4% behind the Intel Arc Pro B60 (3182), while leading the NVIDIA GeForce 820A (2983) by 3.1% and the GeForce GTX 860M (2967) by 3.6%. This suggests the RTX 5080 SUPER is a top-tier performer in its benchmark class, despite its percentile ranking being dragged down by the vast number of faster data-center and enthusiast GPUs in the database.

The Quadro K1100M wins in the domain of legacy compatibility and low-power mobile integration. Its benchmark results come from Geekbench Metal (2048), OpenCL (3060), and Vulkan (2884) tests. The OpenCL score of 3060 is its strongest showing, aligning it closely with its nearest rivals: the GeForce GT 1030 (2662, 0.1% behind) and the Intel Arc Pro B50 (2660, 0.2% behind). The data shows the Quadro K1100M is competitive within its own aging peer group, but its wins are relative, not absolute. It does not win any head-to-head benchmark against the RTX 5080 SUPER because no shared test exists; the RTX 5080 SUPER has no Geekbench results, and the Quadro K1100M has no 3DMark results. Therefore, the use-case split is clear: the RTX 5080 SUPER wins for modern DX12 gaming and rendering workloads, while the Quadro K1100M wins for legacy mobile workstation tasks requiring low power draw (45 W TDP) and compatibility with older APIs like Vulkan 1.2.175.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has the higher average benchmark score?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER has an average benchmark score of 3075, which is higher than the NVIDIA Quadro K1100M's average of 2664. This represents a 15.4% advantage for the RTX 5080 SUPER in aggregate compute performance.

Q: Are these two GPUs comparable in performance?

A: No. While their overall percentile rankings are close (19th for the RTX 5080 SUPER vs 18th for the Quadro K1100M), they were tested on entirely different benchmark suites. The RTX 5080 SUPER was tested on 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, while the Quadro K1100M was tested on Geekbench compute tests, making direct performance comparisons impossible.

Q: What is the memory configuration difference?

A: The RTX 5080 SUPER features 24 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 1.02 TB/s of bandwidth. The Quadro K1100M features 2 GB of GDDR5 memory on a 128-bit bus, delivering 44.80 GB/s of bandwidth. The RTX 5080 SUPER has 12 times the memory capacity and roughly 23 times the bandwidth.

Q: Which GPU supports more advanced graphics APIs?

A: The RTX 5080 SUPER supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and Vulkan 1.4, while the Quadro K1100M supports DirectX 12 (11_0) and Vulkan 1.2.175. The RTX 5080 SUPER also has dedicated ray tracing cores (84) and tensor cores (336), which the Quadro K1100M lacks entirely.

Q: What is the production status of each GPU?

A: The RTX 5080 SUPER is marked as "Active" in production, with a release date of 2025-12-31. The Quadro K1100M is marked as "End-of-life," with a release date of 2013-07-22 and a successor named the Quadro Maxwell-M.

Q: How does the RTX 5080 SUPER compare to its nearest rival, the Quadro P1000?

A: The RTX 5080 SUPER scores 3075 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, which is 2.8% lower than the NVIDIA Quadro P1000's average score of 3163. This indicates the P1000 holds a slight edge in this specific benchmark, despite the RTX 5080 SUPER's newer architecture.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

There are no shared head-to-head benchmark results between the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER and the NVIDIA Quadro K1100M. The RTX 5080 SUPER has a single reported benchmark: 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 with a score of 3075. The Quadro K1100M has three reported benchmarks: Geekbench Metal (2048), Geekbench OpenCL (3060), and Geekbench Vulkan (2884). Because the benchmark suites do not overlap, a direct score comparison is not possible from the data. However, examining each GPU's position relative to its own nearest rivals provides context. The RTX 5080 SUPER's 3DMark score of 3075 is 3.1% higher than the GeForce 820A's 2983 and 3.6% higher than the GeForce GTX 860M's 2967, but it trails the Quadro P1000 (3163) by 2.8% and the Intel Arc Pro B60 (3182) by 3.4%. This places the RTX 5080 SUPER in a tight cluster of mid-range performers. The Quadro K1100M's best result is its Geekbench OpenCL score of 3060, which is 14.9% higher than its own average (2664). Its Vulkan score of 2884 is 8.3% above its average, while its Metal score of 2048 is 23.1% below its average. In its nearest rival group, the Quadro K1100M's average of 2664 is nearly identical to the GeForce GT 1030 (2662, 0.1% ahead) and the Intel Arc Pro B50 (2660, 0.2% ahead), while trailing the RTX 5070 SUPER (2690) by 1%. The data shows the RTX 5080 SUPER dominates in absolute terms, but the Quadro K1100M holds its own within its legacy compute niche.

Specification Differences

The specification gap between these two GPUs is vast. The RTX 5080 SUPER is built on a 5 nm process at TSMC, with 45,600 million transistors on a 378 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 120.6M per mm². The Quadro K1100M uses a 28 nm process, also at TSMC, with 1,270 million transistors on a 118 mm² die, for a density of 10.8M per mm². Clock speeds differ dramatically: the RTX 5080 SUPER has a base clock of 2295 MHz and a boost clock of 2617 MHz, while the Quadro K1100M is locked at 706 MHz for both base and boost. Memory specifications are equally divergent: the RTX 5080 SUPER has 24 GB of GDDR7 at 2000 MHz (32 Gbps effective) on a 256-bit bus, while the Quadro K1100M has 2 GB of GDDR5 at 700 MHz (2.8 Gbps effective) on a 128-bit bus. The RTX 5080 SUPER has 10752 shading units, 336 TMUs, 112 ROPs, 84 RT cores, and 336 tensor cores. The Quadro K1100M has 384 shading units, 32 TMUs, and 16 ROPs, with no RT or tensor cores. Pixel rate is 293.1 GPixel/s for the RTX 5080 SUPER versus 5.648 GPixel/s for the Quadro K1100M; texture rate is 879.3 GTexel/s versus 22.59 GTexel/s; FP32 compute is 56.28 TFLOPS versus 542.2 GFLOPS. Power consumption is 415 W for the RTX 5080 SUPER (dual-slot, 1x 16-pin connector) versus 45 W for the Quadro K1100M (MXM Module, no connectors). The RTX 5080 SUPER uses PCIe 5.0 x16, while the Quadro K1100M uses MXM-A (3.0). Display outputs are 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b for the RTX 5080 SUPER, while the Quadro K1100M is listed as "Portable Device Dependent."

Architecture Differences

The architectural divide is defined by generation and purpose. The RTX 5080 SUPER is based on the GB203 chip using the Blackwell 2.0 architecture, part of the GeForce 50-series generation. It supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, and includes dedicated hardware for ray tracing (84 RT cores) and AI acceleration (336 tensor cores). Its FP16 performance matches its FP32 at 56.28 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio), indicating a unified compute pipeline. The Quadro K1100M is based on the GK107 chip using the Kepler architecture, from the Quadro Kepler-M (Kx100M) generation. It supports DirectX 12 (11_0), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.2.175, but has no RT cores or tensor cores, and no reported FP16 capability. The RTX 5080 SUPER features 24 GB of GDDR7 memory, which is a significant architectural leap over the Quadro K1100M's 2 GB of GDDR5. The RTX 5080 SUPER's process node (5 nm vs 28 nm) allows for a 35.9 times higher transistor count (45,600 million vs 1,270 million) on a die that is only 3.2 times larger. The RTX 5080 SUPER's active production status contrasts with the Quadro K1100M's end-of-life status, which has a predecessor (Quadro Fermi-M) and successor (Quadro Maxwell-M) listed, whereas the RTX 5080 SUPER has neither.

The Verdict

The data dictates a clear verdict: the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER is the only choice for any modern, performance-critical workload. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3075, while narrowly trailing the Quadro P1000 by 2.8%, represents a level of graphics capability that the Quadro K1100M cannot approach. The RTX 5080 SUPER's 24 GB of GDDR7 memory, 84 RT cores, and 336 tensor cores enable features like ray tracing and DLSS that are entirely absent from the Quadro K1100M. Its 56.28 TFLOPS of FP32 compute is 103.8 times higher than the Quadro K1100M's 542.2 GFLOPS. For gamers, content creators, or professionals running DX12 or Vulkan 1.4 applications, the RTX 5080 SUPER is the definitive pick, with a launch MSRP of 999 USD.

The NVIDIA Quadro K1100M, however, is not without a purpose. Its 45 W TDP and MXM Module form factor make it suitable for legacy mobile workstations where power efficiency is paramount and software is limited to older APIs. Its Geekbench OpenCL score of 3060 shows it remains functional for basic compute tasks, and its average score of 2664 is competitive with its immediate peers like the GeForce GT 1030 (2662). But its 2 GB memory capacity, 128-bit bus, and lack of modern features like tensor cores make it obsolete for any current-generation workload. The verdict is unambiguous: choose the RTX 5080 SUPER for performance, and only consider the Quadro K1100M if constrained to a legacy mobile platform with minimal power and thermal headroom.