NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER vs Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 Comparison
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER
Lisuan Tech LX 7G100
PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS
Analysis: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER vs Lisuan Tech LX 7G100
Head-to-Head Benchmarks
The recorded database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark comparisons between the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER and the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100. The headToHeadBenchmarks array is empty, and the wins counters for both products stand at zero. Consequently, any performance differentiation must be derived from the individual benchmark scores and architectural specifications listed for each card.
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has a single recorded benchmark entry: 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, with a score of 6269.5. Its average benchmark score is 6270. The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 has no benchmark scores recorded in the database, with an average benchmark score of 0. This absence of measured data for the Lisuan card makes a direct numerical comparison impossible from the current dataset.
The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER's nearest rivals in the database include the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 with an average score of 6270 and a delta of 0 percent, indicating identical average performance. The AMD FirePro W600 scores 6223, placing it 0.8 percent behind the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER. The NVIDIA Quadro K620 scores 6282, which is 0.2 percent ahead, and the AMD Radeon R7 M350 scores 6327, 0.9 percent ahead. These deltas are minimal, but they show the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER sits in a tight performance band around the 6270 mark.
The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 holds a 50th percentile ranking among all GPUs, while the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER holds a 36th percentile. This percentile difference does not translate into a score comparison, as the Lisuan card lacks any recorded average score. The percentile for the Lisuan card is higher, but without a benchmark result, the database cannot substantiate what that ranking means in absolute performance terms.
Architecture Differences
The two cards diverge significantly at the architectural level. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER uses the GB203 chip built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture, manufactured on a 5 nm process at TSMC. It contains 45,600 million transistors on a 378 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 120.6 million per square millimeter. The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 uses the 7G106 chip under the TrueGPU architecture, also fabricated by TSMC but on a 6 nm process node. Its transistor count and die size are listed as unknown in the database.
Memory configurations differ markedly. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER carries 16 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 256 bit bus, delivering 896.0 GB/s of bandwidth. Its memory clock is 1750 MHz, with 28 Gbps effective speed. The Lisuan card has 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192 bit bus, producing 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth. Its memory clock runs at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective speed. The NVIDIA card offers more capacity, a wider bus, a newer memory type, and more than double the bandwidth.
Compute resources also favor the NVIDIA card. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has 8960 shading units, 280 texture mapping units, and 96 raster operation pipelines. It includes 70 ray tracing cores and 280 tensor cores. The Lisuan card has 6144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs, but no ray tracing or tensor core counts are recorded. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER's FP32 throughput is 43.94 TFLOPS, while the Lisuan card delivers 24.58 TFLOPS. In FP16, the NVIDIA card achieves 43.94 TFLOPS at a 1:1 ratio, whereas the Lisuan card reaches 49.15 TFLOPS at a 2:1 ratio, meaning its FP16 performance is higher than its FP32.
Clock speeds are partially specified. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has a base clock of 2295 MHz and a boost clock of 2452 MHz. The Lisuan card has no base or boost clock values listed. Pixel and texture rates reflect the compute gap: the NVIDIA card outputs 235.4 GPixel/s and 686.6 GTexel/s, while the Lisuan card produces 192.0 GPixel/s and 384.0 GTexel/s.
Power and connectivity specifications also differ. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has a TDP of 350 W, uses a single 16-pin power connector, and supports PCIe 5.0 x16. The Lisuan card has a TDP of 225 W, uses a single 8-pin connector, and supports PCIe 4.0 x16. The Lisuan card lists a suggested PSU of 550 W, while the NVIDIA card does not list one. Display outputs vary as well: the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER offers 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b, while the Lisuan card provides 4x DisplayPort 1.4a. Both cards are dual-slot designs, with the NVIDIA card measuring 304 mm in length, 137 mm in height, and 48 mm in width, and the Lisuan card measuring 294 mm in length, 120 mm in height, and 49 mm in width.
API support is mostly aligned. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. The NVIDIA card supports Vulkan 1.4, while the Lisuan card supports Vulkan 1.3. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER was released on 2025-12-31, while the Lisuan card's release date is 2026-06-17. Both are marked as Active in production status.
Where Each One Wins
Based strictly on recorded specifications, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER wins in nearly every measurable performance category. Its FP32 throughput of 43.94 TFLOPS is roughly 79 percent higher than the Lisuan card's 24.58 TFLOPS. Its memory bandwidth of 896.0 GB/s is more than double the Lisuan card's 432.0 GB/s. The 16 GB GDDR7 memory configuration offers 4 GB more capacity than the 12 GB GDDR6 configuration. The 256 bit memory bus is wider than the 192 bit bus on the Lisuan card. The texture rate of 686.6 GTexel/s exceeds 384.0 GTexel/s, and the pixel rate of 235.4 GPixel/s exceeds 192.0 GPixel/s.
The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 holds advantages in a few specific areas. Its FP16 throughput of 49.15 TFLOPS is higher than the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER's 43.94 TFLOPS, although this comes with a 2:1 ratio versus the NVIDIA card's 1:1 ratio. The Lisuan card also has a lower TDP of 225 W compared to 350 W, which indicates lower power draw. It uses a standard 8-pin power connector rather than the 16-pin connector on the NVIDIA card, and it lists a suggested PSU of 550 W. The Lisuan card supports four DisplayPort 1.4a outputs, one more display output than the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER's combination of one HDMI and three DisplayPorts. Its PCIe 4.0 x16 interface is an older standard than PCIe 5.0 x16, but it remains compatible with a wide range of platforms.
The Lisuan card's higher percentile ranking of 50 versus 36 is notable, but without any recorded benchmark score, this cannot be tied to actual performance in a specific test. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has a concrete benchmark score of 6269.5 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, which gives it an average score of 6270. The Lisuan card has no such data.
The Verdict
The data points to a clear separation in performance capability. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER delivers substantially higher compute throughput, memory bandwidth, and memory capacity. Its recorded benchmark score of 6269.5 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 provides a measurable performance baseline. The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 has no recorded benchmark results, so its real-world performance in the database is unverified.
For workloads that depend on FP32 compute, rasterization rates, or memory bandwidth, the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER is the stronger choice based on the specifications. Its 43.94 TFLOPS FP32 and 896.0 GB/s bandwidth are dominant figures compared to the Lisuan card's 24.58 TFLOPS and 432.0 GB/s. The 16 GB memory capacity also provides more headroom for large datasets.
The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 may be relevant for scenarios where power consumption is a priority. Its 225 W TDP is 125 W lower than the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER's 350 W. Its FP16 performance of 49.15 TFLOPS exceeds the NVIDIA card's FP16 figure, which could matter for workloads that operate in FP16 with a 2:1 ratio. The four DisplayPort outputs may suit multi-display setups that do not require HDMI or DisplayPort 2.1 support.
The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER also has a launch MSRP of 749 USD. The Lisuan card has no launch MSRP listed. The NVIDIA card supports newer standards including PCIe 5.0, DisplayPort 2.1b, and Vulkan 1.4, while the Lisuan card uses PCIe 4.0, DisplayPort 1.4a, and Vulkan 1.3.
Given the absence of Lisuan benchmark data, the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER is the only card in this comparison with verified performance metrics. The Lisuan card's specifications do not close the gap in FP32, bandwidth, or memory capacity. Users requiring ray tracing or tensor core features should note that the Lisuan card has no recorded RT or tensor core counts, while the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER includes 70 RT cores and 280 tensor cores.
FAQ
Q: What is the average benchmark score for each card?
A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has an average benchmark score of 6270, based on its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 result of 6269.5. The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 has an average benchmark score of 0, with no recorded benchmark entries.
Q: Which card has higher FP32 compute performance?
A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER delivers 43.94 TFLOPS FP32, compared to the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100's 24.58 TFLOPS. The NVIDIA card's FP32 output is approximately 79 percent higher.
Q: How do the memory configurations compare?
A: The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER uses 16 GB of GDDR7 on a 256 bit bus with 896.0 GB/s bandwidth. The Lisuan card uses 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192 bit bus with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth. The NVIDIA card has more memory, a wider bus, newer memory type, and more than double the bandwidth.
Q: Which card has higher FP16 performance?
A: The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 has higher FP16 throughput at 49.15 TFLOPS, compared to the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER's 43.94 TFLOPS. However, the Lisuan card achieves this at a 2:1 ratio, while the NVIDIA card operates at a 1:1 ratio.
Q: What are the power consumption figures?
A: The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has a TDP of 350 W and uses a 1x 16-pin power connector. The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 has a TDP of 225 W and uses a 1x 8-pin power connector. The Lisuan card also lists a suggested PSU of 550 W.
Q: What display outputs does each card support?
A: The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER offers 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b. The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 offers 4x DisplayPort 1.4a. The Lisuan card provides one additional display output, but the NVIDIA card supports newer display standards.