Intel Arc A310E vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data contains no direct head-to-head benchmark results between the Intel Arc A310E and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER. The database shows zero wins for either product in direct comparison tests. This absence of direct measurement data means the comparison relies entirely on the specification sheets, architectural details, and the single benchmark score recorded for the NVIDIA part.

For the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER, the database lists one benchmark result: a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 6269.5. The average benchmark score across all recorded runs for this card is 6270. This places the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER at the 36th percentile among all GPUs in the database. The nearest rivals in the database for this card show tight clustering: the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 scores exactly 6270, a 0% delta. The NVIDIA Quadro K620 scores 6282, which is 0.2% higher. The AMD FirePro W600 scores 6223, which is 0.8% lower. The AMD Radeon R7 M350 scores 6327, which is 0.9% higher. These deltas indicate the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER performs within a narrow band of these comparison points, with the R7 M350 being the strongest relative competitor in this specific test.

The Intel Arc A310E has no recorded benchmark scores, no percentile ranking beyond a generic 50th percentile placeholder, and no nearest rivals listed. Consequently, no quantitative performance comparison can be made between the two cards from the measured data. The wins count remains 0 for both sides, accurately reflecting the lack of head-to-head results.

FAQ

Q: What is the single benchmark score recorded for the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER?

A: The database records a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 6269.5, with an average benchmark score of 6270 across runs.

Q: How does the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER compare to its nearest rivals in the database?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER scores within 0.9% of all four listed rivals. The AMD Radeon R7 M350 is 0.9% higher, the NVIDIA Quadro K620 is 0.2% higher, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 is equal at 0% delta, and the AMD FirePro W600 is 0.8% lower.

Q: Does the Intel Arc A310E have any benchmark scores in the database?

A: No benchmark scores are recorded for the Intel Arc A310E. The database shows an average benchmark score of 0 and no nearest rivals.

Q: What is the memory configuration difference between the two cards?

A: The Intel Arc A310E uses 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus with 124.0 GB/s bandwidth. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER uses 16 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 256-bit bus with 896.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: What are the TDP ratings for each card?

A: The Intel Arc A310E has a TDP of 75 W with no power connectors and a suggested PSU of 250 W. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has a TDP of 350 W with a single 16-pin power connector and no suggested PSU listed.

Q: Which card has more shading units and texture mapping units?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has 8960 shading units and 280 TMUs. The Intel Arc A310E has 768 shading units and 32 TMUs.

Architecture Differences

The two cards belong to entirely different architectural generations. The Intel Arc A310E is built on the Xe-HPG architecture, specifically the DG2-128 chip, and is part of the Alchemist (Arc 3) generation. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER uses the Blackwell 2.0 architecture with the GB203 chip, part of the GeForce 50 series.

The manufacturing process differs significantly. Intel uses a 6 nm process from TSMC for the A310E, while NVIDIA uses a 5 nm process, also from TSMC. The transistor counts reflect the scale difference: the Intel chip contains 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die, while the NVIDIA chip contains 45,600 million transistors on a 378 mm² die. Transistor density for Intel is 45.9 million per mm², versus 120.6 million per mm² for NVIDIA.

Ray tracing hardware differs. The Intel A310E has 6 RT cores. The NVIDIA card has 70 RT cores. NVIDIA also includes 280 tensor cores, while the Intel card lists no tensor cores at all. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER therefore carries dedicated AI acceleration hardware, whereas the A310E does not.

The memory subsystem architecture is fundamentally different. Intel uses GDDR6 memory with a 64-bit bus. NVIDIA uses GDDR7 with a 256-bit bus. This yields a massive bandwidth difference: 124.0 GB/s for Intel versus 896.0 GB/s for NVIDIA. The shader and texture throughput also diverge sharply: Intel delivers 768 shading units and 32 TMUs, while NVIDIA delivers 8960 shading units and 280 TMUs. Pixel rate for Intel is 32.00 GPixel/s versus 235.4 GPixel/s for NVIDIA. Texture rate for Intel is 64.00 GTexel/s versus 686.6 GTexel/s for NVIDIA.

Compute performance in FP32 is 3.072 TFLOPS for Intel versus 43.94 TFLOPS for NVIDIA. The FP16 figures are 6.144 TFLOPS for Intel with a 2:1 ratio, versus 43.94 TFLOPS for NVIDIA at a 1:1 ratio. The 1:1 FP16 ratio on the NVIDIA card indicates full-rate FP16 execution without the 2:1 penalty seen on the Intel part.

The bus interface differs as well. Intel uses PCIe 4.0 x8, while NVIDIA uses PCIe 5.0 x16. Display outputs also differ: Intel provides 4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0, while NVIDIA provides 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Specification Differences

The physical dimensions illustrate the size gap. The Intel Arc A310E measures 168 mm in length, 69 mm in height, and 20 mm in width. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER measures 304 mm in length, 137 mm in height, and 48 mm in width. Slot width differs: Intel is single-slot, NVIDIA is dual-slot.

Clock speeds show the NVIDIA card running higher. The Intel A310E has a base and boost clock of 2000 MHz. The NVIDIA card has a base clock of 2295 MHz and a boost clock of 2452 MHz. Memory clocks also differ: Intel runs at 1937 MHz (15.5 Gbps effective), while NVIDIA runs at 1750 MHz (28 Gbps effective).

The power requirements are starkly contrasted. Intel has a 75 W TDP, no power connectors, and a suggested PSU of 250 W. NVIDIA has a 350 W TDP, a single 16-pin power connector, and no suggested PSU listed in the database.

Memory capacity and type differ completely. Intel offers 4 GB GDDR6. NVIDIA offers 16 GB GDDR7. The bus width is 64-bit for Intel versus 256-bit for NVIDIA. Bandwidth is 124.0 GB/s versus 896.0 GB/s.

Raster operation units differ: Intel has 16 ROPs, NVIDIA has 96 ROPs. The RT core count is 6 versus 70. The tensor core count is absent for Intel versus 280 for NVIDIA. Shading units are 768 versus 8960. TMUs are 32 versus 280.

Pixel rate, texture rate, FP32, and FP16 all favor the NVIDIA card by large margins. The production status also differs: Intel is end-of-life, while NVIDIA is active. The release dates are 2024-03-31 for Intel and 2025-12-31 for NVIDIA. The Intel card has a predecessor listed as Xe Graphics and a successor as Battlemage, while the NVIDIA card lists neither. The launch MSRP for the NVIDIA card is 749 USD, stated once here as the recorded launch price.

Where Each One Wins

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER wins on every recorded performance metric. The FP32 compute of 43.94 TFLOPS versus 3.072 TFLOPS is a 14.3x advantage. The FP16 throughput of 43.94 TFLOPS versus 6.144 TFLOPS is a 7.2x advantage. The texture rate of 686.6 GTexel/s versus 64.00 GTexel/s is a 10.7x advantage. The pixel rate of 235.4 GPixel/s versus 32.00 GPixel/s is a 7.4x advantage.

Memory bandwidth heavily favors NVIDIA at 896.0 GB/s versus 124.0 GB/s, a 7.2x difference. Memory capacity is 16 GB versus 4 GB, a 4x difference. The RT core count of 70 versus 6 gives NVIDIA a 11.7x advantage in ray tracing hardware. The tensor cores, present only on NVIDIA at 280, provide AI acceleration that the Intel card lacks entirely.

The NVIDIA card also wins on interface and connectivity. PCIe 5.0 x16 provides more bandwidth than PCIe 4.0 x8. The display output configuration includes HDMI 2.1b, which the Intel card does not offer. The higher boost clock of 2452 MHz versus 2000 MHz indicates a faster execution rate.

The Intel Arc A310E wins on power efficiency and physical footprint. The 75 W TDP versus 350 W TDP means the Intel card draws substantially less power. The single-slot design at 168 mm length versus the dual-slot 304 mm length makes the Intel card far easier to install in compact systems. The Intel card requires no power connectors, simplifying installation. The suggested PSU of 250 W versus the NVIDIA card's unspecified requirement indicates a lower system power demand.

The Intel card also wins on display output count, offering 4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0 versus the NVIDIA card's 4 outputs (1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort). Both support the same API levels for DirectX, OpenGL, and Vulkan.

The Verdict

The data presents a clear performance hierarchy. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER dominates every computational and memory metric. The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 6269.5, while only recorded for the NVIDIA card, places it at the 36th percentile among all GPUs in the database, with its nearest rivals all within 0.9% of its average score of 6270. This indicates the card sits in a competitive performance band, though the percentile ranking suggests other GPUs score higher.

The Intel Arc A310E has no recorded benchmark results, making its performance position unmeasurable from the database. The specification sheet shows a low-power, compact, single-slot card with modest compute resources. The 3.072 TFLOPS FP32 and 124.0 GB/s bandwidth position it as a basic rendering solution, suitable for light workloads.

For a builder seeking maximum graphics performance, the NVIDIA card is the only choice supported by the data. The 14.3x FP32 advantage, 7.2x memory bandwidth advantage, and 4x memory capacity advantage leave no ambiguity. The tensor cores enable AI workloads that the Intel card cannot handle. The 70 RT cores versus 6 provide a substantial ray tracing capability gap.

For a builder prioritizing low power consumption, compact size, and minimal system requirements, the Intel Arc A310E fits that niche. The 75 W TDP, single-slot profile, and 168 mm length make it viable for small form factor builds. The lack of power connectors and 250 W suggested PSU simplify integration. The 50th percentile placeholder in the database offers no performance validation, so the Intel card's real-world standing remains unknown.

The production status tells a story: Intel is end-of-life, NVIDIA is active. The release dates confirm this, with Intel launching in March 2024 and NVIDIA in December 2025. The NVIDIA card is the current product, while the Intel card has been superseded by Battlemage. The 749 USD launch MSRP for the NVIDIA card reflects its high-end positioning, while the Intel card has no recorded launch price.

The verdict from the data is straightforward. For any task involving rendering, ray tracing, AI acceleration, or high-resolution textures, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER delivers the necessary resources. For a low-power, compact, no-frills display output solution, the Intel Arc A310E serves a narrow use case. The absence of benchmark data for the Intel card means its performance cannot be quantified, which is a significant limitation for any comparative assessment. The database records 0 wins for each card, accurately reflecting the lack of direct measurement evidence.