NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile vs Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA Comparison
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile
Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA
PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS
Analysis: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile vs Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA
Where Each One Wins
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile and the Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA occupy different positions in the benchmark database. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile has a complete set of recorded benchmark scores, while the LX ULTRA currently has no benchmark entries. This makes direct comparison of measured performance impossible; instead, the analysis must rely on architectural specifications and the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile's position relative to its nearest rivals.
The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile sits in the 80th percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 35,435. Its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA Quadro GV100 (average score 35,520, delta -0.2%), the AMD Radeon Pro Duo (average score 35,860, delta -1.2%), the NVIDIA A2 (average score 34,690, delta +2.1%), and the NVIDIA T1000 (average score 36,289, delta -2.4%). The data indicates that the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile is effectively within a narrow band of these competitors, trailing the closest rival by only 0.2% and leading the lowest-scoring rival by 2.1%.
The LX ULTRA, with no recorded benchmarks, cannot claim wins in any measured test. Its 50th percentile ranking is a placeholder derived from its specification profile rather than from test results. The database shows zero wins for either part in head-to-head comparisons, reflecting the absence of matching benchmark data.
Where the LX ULTRA would theoretically win is in raw specification counts. It carries 6,144 shading units versus 5,888 for the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile, 192 texture mapping units versus 184, and 96 render output units versus 80. Its FP32 throughput of 24.58 TFLOPS exceeds the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile's 17.04 TFLOPS. The LX ULTRA also doubles memory capacity with 24 GB versus 12 GB, and its FP16 rate of 49.15 TFLOPS (2:1) is more than twice the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile's 17.04 TFLOPS (1:1).
The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile wins in memory bandwidth, delivering 672.0 GB/s through GDDR7 on a 192-bit bus, while the LX ULTRA offers 432.0 GB/s through GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus. The RTX part also carries dedicated ray tracing cores (46) and tensor cores (184); the LX ULTRA lists no such hardware.
Architecture Differences
The two GPUs come from fundamentally different design lineages. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile uses NVIDIA's Blackwell 2.0 architecture on the GB205 chip, fabricated on a 5 nm process at TSMC. The transistor count is 31,100 million on a 263 mm² die, yielding a density of 118.3M per mm². The LX ULTRA uses the 7G105 chip with a "TrueGPU" architecture, fabricated on a 6 nm process, also at TSMC. Its transistor count and die size are not recorded in the database.
Clock behavior differs significantly. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile has recorded base and boost clocks of 847 MHz and 1447 MHz respectively. The LX ULTRA has no base or boost clock entries, only a memory clock of 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective). The RTX part's memory clock is 1750 MHz (28 Gbps effective), which explains its higher bandwidth despite using GDDR7.
The memory subsystems diverge in type and capacity. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile uses 12 GB of GDDR7, while the LX ULTRA uses 24 GB of GDDR6. Both use a 192-bit bus, but the RTX part's faster GDDR7 memory produces 672.0 GB/s versus 432.0 GB/s for the LX ULTRA.
Feature support differs in the API stack. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile supports Vulkan 1.4, while the LX ULTRA lists Vulkan 1.3. The RTX part includes 46 ray tracing cores and 184 tensor cores; the LX ULTRA has no ray tracing or tensor core entries, indicating their absence or lack of documentation.
Power and physical design are starkly different. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile has a 60 W TDP, is an integrated graphics package (IGP) with no power connectors, and its display outputs are described as "Portable Device Dependent." The LX ULTRA has a 225 W TDP, is a dual-slot card measuring 268 mm by 112 mm by 40 mm, requires a 16-pin power connector, and suggests a 550 W power supply. It outputs through 4x DisplayPort 1.4a. The bus interfaces also differ: PCIe 5.0 x16 for the RTX part, PCIe 4.0 x16 for the LX ULTRA.
Release timing shows the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile launched on 2025-02-28, while the LX ULTRA launched on 2026-03-16. The RTX part's predecessor is the GeForce 40 Mobile series; the LX ULTRA has no recorded predecessor or successor.
FAQ
Q: Which GPU has higher memory bandwidth?
A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile delivers 672.0 GB/s using GDDR7 on a 192-bit bus, while the Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA provides 432.0 GB/s using GDDR6 on the same 192-bit bus width.
Q: Does the LX ULTRA have ray tracing hardware?
A: The database lists no ray tracing cores for the LX ULTRA. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile includes 46 dedicated ray tracing cores and 184 tensor cores.
Q: What is the power consumption difference?
A: The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile has a 60 W TDP and no power connectors, while the LX ULTRA has a 225 W TDP, requires a 16-pin power connector, and suggests a 550 W power supply.
Q: How do their compute throughputs compare?
A: The LX ULTRA reaches 24.58 TFLOPS FP32 and 49.15 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1 ratio). The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile delivers 17.04 TFLOPS FP32 and 17.04 TFLOPS FP16 (1:1 ratio).
Q: Which GPU has more memory capacity?
A: The LX ULTRA has 24 GB of GDDR6, exactly double the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile's 12 GB of GDDR7.
Q: Why does the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile have benchmark scores while the LX ULTRA does not?
A: The database contains nine benchmark scores for the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile, including Geekbench OpenCL (143,870) and Vulkan (139,213), plus Passmark tests. The LX ULTRA has no recorded benchmark entries, and its average benchmark score is 0.
Specification Differences
| Specification | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile | Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA |
|---|---|---|
| Chip | GB205 | 7G105 |
| Architecture | Blackwell 2.0 | TrueGPU |
| Process node | 5 nm | 6 nm |
| Transistors | 31,100 million | unknown |
| Die size | 263 mm² | unknown |
| Base clock | 847 MHz | none recorded |
| Boost clock | 1447 MHz | none recorded |
| Memory clock | 1750 MHz (28 Gbps effective) | 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective) |
| Memory size | 12 GB | 24 GB |
| Memory type | GDDR7 | GDDR6 |
| Memory bus | 192 bit | 192 bit |
| Memory bandwidth | 672.0 GB/s | 432.0 GB/s |
| Shading units | 5888 | 6144 |
| TMUs | 184 | 192 |
| ROPs | 80 | 96 |
| RT cores | 46 | none recorded |
| Tensor cores | 184 | none recorded |
| Pixel rate | 115.8 GPixel/s | 192.0 GPixel/s |
| Texture rate | 266.2 GTexel/s | 384.0 GTexel/s |
| FP32 | 17.04 TFLOPS | 24.58 TFLOPS |
| FP16 | 17.04 TFLOPS (1:1) | 49.15 TFLOPS (2:1) |
| TDP | 60 W | 225 W |
| Slot width | IGP | Dual-slot |
| Power connectors | None | 1x 16-pin |
| Suggested PSU | none recorded | 550 W |
| Bus interface | PCIe 5.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Display outputs | Portable Device Dependent | 4x DisplayPort 1.4a |
| Vulkan | 1.4 | 1.3 |
| Release date | 2025-02-28 | 2026-03-16 |
| Predecessor | GeForce 40 Mobile | none recorded |
Head-to-Head Benchmarks
The database records no head-to-head benchmark results between the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile and the LX ULTRA. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile has nine individual scores, and the LX ULTRA has none. Therefore, a direct numerical comparison cannot be made from measured data.
What can be analyzed is the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile's performance profile relative to its nearest rivals, which provides context for what the LX ULTRA would need to surpass. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile's Geekbench OpenCL score is 143,870, and its Vulkan score is 139,213. In Passmark tests, it scores 24,004 in G3D, 10,101 in GPU Compute, 981 in G2D, 259 in DirectX 9, 237 in DirectX 11, 151 in DirectX 10, and 102 in DirectX 12. Its average benchmark score is 35,435.
Against its nearest rivals, the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile trails the NVIDIA T1000 by 2.4% (35,435 versus 36,289), trails the AMD Radeon Pro Duo by 1.2% (35,435 versus 35,860), trails the NVIDIA Quadro GV100 by 0.2% (35,435 versus 35,520), and leads the NVIDIA A2 by 2.1% (35,435 versus 34,690). This narrow spread, within a range of roughly 1,800 points across all four rivals, places the RTX part in a tightly contested performance tier.
The LX ULTRA's specification advantage in raw throughput does not translate to recorded benchmark wins. Its 24.58 TFLOPS FP32 is 44% higher than the RTX part's 17.04 TFLOPS, and its pixel rate of 192.0 GPixel/s is 66% higher than 115.8 GPixel/s. Its texture rate of 384.0 GTexel/s is 44% higher than 266.2 GTexel/s. These are theoretical maximums, not measured results.
The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile counters with a bandwidth advantage of 672.0 GB/s versus 432.0 GB/s, a 56% lead. It also has a more advanced memory type (GDDR7 versus GDDR6), a newer PCIe interface (5.0 versus 4.0), and a more recent Vulkan version (1.4 versus 1.3). The RTX part's 46 RT cores and 184 tensor cores provide hardware acceleration for ray tracing and AI workloads that the LX ULTRA cannot match on paper.
The power envelope reveals a fundamental design philosophy difference. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile operates within a 60 W TDP as an integrated package, whereas the LX ULTRA draws 225 W as a dual-slot discrete card. The RTX part achieves its bandwidth and feature set at less than a third of the power budget. The LX ULTRA's higher throughput comes with a 550 W suggested power supply requirement.
The database's percentile rankings reflect this split. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile sits in the 80th percentile of all GPUs based on actual benchmark data. The LX ULTRA sits in the 50th percentile, a value that the database assigns without any supporting benchmark scores. The lack of measured results for the LX ULTRA means its percentile is not evidence of performance, but rather a neutral midpoint pending data collection.
In the absence of head-to-head measurements, the recorded data shows two different product philosophies. One part, the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile, is a validated, benchmarked mobile GPU with a complete performance profile and a clear position among established rivals. The other, the LX ULTRA, is a higher-specification, higher-power discrete card whose real-world performance has yet to be quantified in the database. Any conclusion about which part wins must await benchmark results for the LX ULTRA.