NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 vs Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 Comparison

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 and the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 are two actively produced graphics cards that occupy very different positions in the hardware landscape. The RTX 5060 is a mainstream desktop GPU from NVIDIA’s GeForce 50-series, built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture with a 5 nm process node from TSMC. The LX 7G100 is an unusual offering from Lisuan Tech, using a proprietary TrueGPU architecture on a 6 nm TSMC node, with a larger memory pool and a different performance profile. The database records an average benchmark score of 26331 for the RTX 5060, placing it in the 72nd percentile among all GPUs, while the LX 7G100 has no recorded benchmark scores and sits at the 50th percentile with an average score of zero. The following analysis compares these two cards across architecture, benchmark results, and specification differences, using only recorded data.

FAQ

Q: What is the process node for each GPU?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 uses a 5 nm process node, while the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 uses a 6 nm process node. Both are fabricated by TSMC.

Q: How much memory does each card have and what type?

A: The RTX 5060 has 8 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 128-bit bus, delivering 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The LX 7G100 has 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, delivering 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: What are the shading unit counts for the two cards?

A: The RTX 5060 has 3840 shading units, while the LX 7G100 has 6144 shading units. The LX 7G100 also has more texture mapping units (192 vs 120) and more render output units (96 vs 48).

Q: Which card has a higher FP32 performance figure?

A: The LX 7G100 records 24.58 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, which is higher than the RTX 5060’s 19.18 TFLOPS. The LX 7G100 also achieves 49.15 TFLOPS of FP16 performance with a 2:1 ratio, while the RTX 5060 delivers 19.18 TFLOPS of FP16 at a 1:1 ratio.

Q: What is the power draw for each card?

A: The RTX 5060 has a TDP of 145 W with a suggested PSU of 300 W. The LX 7G100 has a TDP of 225 W with a suggested PSU of 550 W.

Q: Do both cards support the same DirectX version?

A: Yes, both the RTX 5060 and the LX 7G100 support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. The RTX 5060 supports Vulkan 1.4, while the LX 7G100 supports Vulkan 1.3.

Architecture Differences

The RTX 5060 is built on NVIDIA’s Blackwell 2.0 architecture, using the GB206 chip with 21,900 million transistors on a 181 mm² die. That works out to a transistor density of 121.0M per mm². The architecture includes dedicated RT cores and tensor cores, with 30 RT cores and 120 tensor cores present on the chip. The card supports PCIe 5.0 x8 for its bus interface. It features a base clock of 2280 MHz and a boost clock of 2497 MHz, with memory running at 1750 MHz, which translates to 28 Gbps effective. The display outputs include one HDMI 2.1b port and three DisplayPort 2.1b ports. The RTX 5060 was released in May 2025, with its predecessor being the GeForce 40 series and its successor the GeForce 60 series.

The LX 7G100 uses a completely different approach. Its architecture is called TrueGPU, and the chip is designated as 7G106. The transistor count and die size are unknown, so no density figure is recorded. The card has no base or boost clock figures in the database, and it lacks any RT cores or tensor cores. Its memory operates at 2250 MHz, giving 18 Gbps effective. The bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x16, which differs from the RTX 5060’s PCIe 5.0 x8. Display outputs are four DisplayPort 1.4a ports, with no HDMI option. The LX 7G100 was released in June 2026, and it has no recorded predecessor or successor. It also has no launch MSRP in the database.

The process nodes differ, with the RTX 5060 on 5 nm and the LX 7G100 on 6 nm. The RTX 5060 uses GDDR7 memory, while the LX 7G100 uses GDDR6. The RTX 5060 has ray tracing and tensor core hardware, which the LX 7G100 lacks entirely. The LX 7G100 compensates with a much higher raw compute configuration, with 6144 shading units versus 3840, 192 TMUs versus 120, and 96 ROPs versus 48. The architecture also differs in FP16 handling: the RTX 5060 runs FP16 at a 1:1 ratio with FP32, while the LX 7G100 runs FP16 at a 2:1 ratio, doubling its FP16 throughput.

Where Each One Wins

The RTX 5060 wins in memory bandwidth efficiency and feature support. Its 448.0 GB/s bandwidth exceeds the LX 7G100’s 432.0 GB/s, even though the LX 7G100 has a wider 192-bit bus and more memory. The RTX 5060 also uses newer GDDR7 memory, which likely contributes to that bandwidth lead. In terms of software and API support, the RTX 5060 supports Vulkan 1.4, while the LX 7G100 is limited to Vulkan 1.3. The RTX 5060 also has ray tracing cores and tensor cores, which are absent from the LX 7G100, making it the only card of the two that can handle hardware-accelerated ray tracing and AI workloads such as DLSS-style processing. Its smaller physical footprint, with a length of 241 mm versus 294 mm, and lower TDP of 145 W versus 225 W, make it better suited for compact builds and systems with lower PSU requirements.

The LX 7G100 wins in raw compute throughput and memory capacity. Its FP32 figure of 24.58 TFLOPS is higher than the RTX 5060’s 19.18 TFLOPS. Its FP16 performance of 49.15 TFLOPS is more than double the RTX 5060’s 19.18 TFLOPS, which could benefit workloads that use FP16 arithmetic heavily. The card has 12 GB of memory versus 8 GB, which allows for larger textures and datasets. Its pixel rate of 192.0 GPixel/s and texture rate of 384.0 GTexel/s both exceed the RTX 5060’s figures of 119.9 GPixel/s and 299.6 GTexel/s, respectively. The LX 7G100 also has a wider PCIe 4.0 x16 interface compared to the RTX 5060’s PCIe 5.0 x8, though the newer PCIe standard on the RTX 5060 may offer comparable or higher transfer rates per lane.

For gaming and general use, the RTX 5060 has recorded benchmark scores that demonstrate its real-world performance, while the LX 7G100 has no benchmark data in the database. The RTX 5060’s support for DirectX 12 Ultimate and its ray tracing hardware give it an advantage in modern games that use those features. The LX 7G100’s higher compute throughput could make it more attractive for compute-oriented tasks, but the lack of benchmark scores and RT/tensor cores limits its applicability in graphics-heavy scenarios.

Specification Differences

The two cards differ in nearly every major specification category. The process node is 5 nm for the RTX 5060 and 6 nm for the LX 7G100. The RTX 5060 has 21,900 million transistors on a 181 mm² die, while the LX 7G100’s transistor count and die size are unknown. The memory configuration differs: 8 GB GDDR7 with a 128-bit bus for the RTX 5060, versus 12 GB GDDR6 with a 192-bit bus for the LX 7G100. Bandwidth is 448.0 GB/s versus 432.0 GB/s. Clock speeds are recorded for the RTX 5060 (base 2280 MHz, boost 2497 MHz), but the LX 7G100 has no base or boost clock data. Memory clock differs as well: 1750 MHz (28 Gbps effective) for the RTX 5060, and 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective) for the LX 7G100.

Compute units show a clear split. The RTX 5060 has 3840 shading units, 120 TMUs, 48 ROPs, 30 RT cores, and 120 tensor cores. The LX 7G100 has 6144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs, but no RT cores or tensor cores. Pixel rate is 119.9 GPixel/s for the RTX 5060 and 192.0 GPixel/s for the LX 7G100. Texture rate is 299.6 GTexel/s versus 384.0 GTexel/s. FP32 is 19.18 TFLOPS versus 24.58 TFLOPS. FP16 is 19.18 TFLOPS (1:1) versus 49.15 TFLOPS (2:1). TDP is 145 W versus 225 W, with suggested PSUs of 300 W versus 550 W. Both are dual-slot cards, and both use a single 8-pin power connector.

The bus interface is PCIe 5.0 x8 for the RTX 5060 and PCIe 4.0 x16 for the LX 7G100. Display outputs: the RTX 5060 has 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b, while the LX 7G100 has 4x DisplayPort 1.4a. API support is identical for DirectX (12 Ultimate) and OpenGL (4.6), but Vulkan differs: 1.4 for the RTX 5060, 1.3 for the LX 7G100. Physical dimensions are smaller for the RTX 5060 (241 mm length, 111 mm height, 40 mm width) versus the LX 7G100 (294 mm length, 120 mm height, 49 mm width). The RTX 5060 has a launch MSRP of 299 USD, while the LX 7G100 has no launch MSRP recorded. Release dates are May 2025 for the RTX 5060 and June 2026 for the LX 7G100.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark comparisons between the RTX 5060 and the LX 7G100. The head-to-head benchmark array is empty, and the win counts for each card are both zero. This means no recorded test pits the two cards against each other directly. However, the RTX 5060 has a full set of individual benchmark scores, while the LX 7G100 has none. The RTX 5060’s scores span multiple test suites. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, it scores 3628. In Geekbench OpenCL, it scores 112787, and in Geekbench Vulkan, it scores 113321. Passmark tests show a DirectX 10 score of 127, DirectX 11 score of 200, DirectX 12 score of 77, and DirectX 9 score of 225. The Passmark G2D score is 1154, and the G3D score is 20891. The Passmark GPU Compute score is 10899. These results produce an average benchmark score of 26331 for the RTX 5060, with a percentile rank of 72 among all GPUs.

The LX 7G100 has no recorded benchmark scores, giving it an average benchmark score of zero and a 50th percentile rank. With no scores to compare, the only quantitative comparison available is via the RTX 5060’s nearest rivals in the database. Those rivals include the AMD Radeon 860M with an average score of 26401 and a delta of -0.3%, the NVIDIA GeForce MX550 with an average score of 26421 and a delta of -0.3%, the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary with an average score of 26553 and a delta of -0.8%, and the AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT with an average score of 26011 and a delta of 1.2%. These deltas indicate the RTX 5060 is roughly on par with those cards, slightly behind the first three and slightly ahead of the RX 6750 XT.

Given the absence of LX 7G100 benchmark data, the RTX 5060’s scores serve as the only measurable performance reference. The LX 7G100’s higher theoretical FP32 and FP16 throughput, along with its larger memory pool, suggest it could outperform the RTX 5060 in compute-heavy tasks, but no recorded data confirms this. The RTX 5060’s real-world results in DirectX 12 and Vulkan tests, combined with its ray tracing and tensor core hardware, give it a demonstrated edge in graphics workloads. The LX 7G100’s lack of RT and tensor cores, plus its older Vulkan support, point to limitations in modern API usage. Until benchmark scores for the LX 7G100 are recorded, the RTX 5060 remains the only card of the two with verified performance data, and its 72nd percentile standing among all GPUs provides a concrete reference point that the LX 7G100 cannot match in the current database.