NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER vs Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data shows a significant performance disparity between the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER and the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100, though direct head-to-head testing returns no shared benchmark entries. The NVIDIA card carries an average benchmark score of 31087 across ten recorded tests, while the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 has no recorded benchmark scores, leaving its average at zero. This absence of comparative data means the two cards cannot be measured against each other through identical workloads in the database, but the available specifications and standalone results still offer a basis for analysis.

The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER demonstrates its strongest results in the PassMark G3D test with a score of 31811, placing it in the 76th percentile among all GPUs tracked. Its Geekbench OpenCL result reaches 199267, while the Vulkan score stands at 53683. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test returns 5569. The PassMark suite shows a broader spread: DirectX 9 scores 360, DirectX 11 scores 278, DirectX 10 scores 181, and DirectX 12 scores 119. Compute-oriented workloads produce a PassMark GPU Compute score of 18372, and the 2D graphics test yields 1225.

The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER's nearest rivals in the database include the NVIDIA Quadro M5000 with an average score of 31206, which is 0.4% higher, and the NVIDIA GRID M60-1Q at 31220, also 0.4% higher. The NVIDIA RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell averages 31532, a 1.4% advantage, while the NVIDIA TITAN RTX leads with 31676, 1.9% above the 4070 Ti SUPER. These narrow margins indicate that the 4070 Ti SUPER sits competitively within its immediate performance cluster, despite its relatively low percentile ranking of 76.

For the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100, the absence of benchmark entries means its percentile ranking of 50 reflects no measured performance data, and it has no nearest rivals listed in the database. The card's theoretical compute capabilities, based on its listed specifications, would suggest peak FP32 throughput of 24.58 TFLOPS compared to the 4070 Ti SUPER's 44.10 TFLOPS, but without recorded test scores, these figures cannot be validated against real-world workloads.

FAQ

Q: Does the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 have any recorded benchmark results?

A: No. The database lists zero benchmarks for the LX 7G100, with an average benchmark score of 0 and a percentile ranking of 50. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER, by contrast, has ten recorded benchmark entries and an average score of 31087.

Q: How does the memory configuration differ between the two cards?

A: The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER uses 16 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 256-bit bus with 672.3 GB/s bandwidth. The LX 7G100 uses 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: What are the clock speed specifications for each card?

A: The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER has a base clock of 2340 MHz and a boost clock of 2610 MHz, with memory running at 1313 MHz (21 Gbps effective). The LX 7G100 lists no base or boost clock values, only a memory clock of 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective).

Q: Which card has higher shading unit and texture unit counts?

A: The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER has 8448 shading units and 264 texture mapping units. The LX 7G100 has 6144 shading units and 192 texture mapping units. Both cards have 96 raster output units.

Q: What are the power requirements for each card?

A: The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER has a TDP of 285 W with a suggested PSU of 600 W and a single 16-pin power connector. The LX 7G100 has a TDP of 225 W with a suggested PSU of 550 W and a single 8-pin connector.

Q: How do the API support levels compare?

A: Both cards support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER supports Vulkan 1.4, while the LX 7G100 supports Vulkan 1.3.

Architecture Differences

The two cards diverge fundamentally in their underlying architectures. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER uses the AD103 chip built on NVIDIA's Ada Lovelace architecture, fabricated on a 5 nm process at TSMC. The chip contains 45,900 million transistors across a die size of 379 mm², yielding a transistor density of 121.1 million per square millimeter. The LX 7G100 uses the 7G106 chip based on an architecture called TrueGPU, fabricated on a 6 nm process, also at TSMC. Its transistor count and die size are listed as unknown, and no transistor density figure is recorded.

The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER includes dedicated hardware features absent from the LX 7G100's specification sheet: 66 ray tracing cores and 264 tensor cores. The LX 7G100 lists no RT core or tensor core counts, suggesting either their absence or a lack of disclosed data. The compute ratio also differs: the 4070 Ti SUPER delivers FP32 and FP16 performance at a 1:1 ratio (both 44.10 TFLOPS), while the LX 7G100 provides FP32 at 24.58 TFLOPS and FP16 at 49.15 TFLOPS, a 2:1 ratio favoring FP16.

Pixel and texture throughput reveal additional gaps. The 4070 Ti SUPER achieves 250.6 GPixel/s and 689.0 GTexel/s, while the LX 7G100 reaches 192.0 GPixel/s and 384.0 GTexel/s. The memory subsystems also use different technologies: GDDR6X for the NVIDIA card versus GDDR6 for the Lisuan card.

The production status and lifecycle differ sharply. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is end-of-life, released on 2024-01-23, with a predecessor in GeForce 30 and a successor in GeForce 50. The LX 7G100 is listed as active production, released on 2026-06-17, with no predecessor or successor recorded. The NVIDIA card carries a launch MSRP of 799 USD; no launch MSRP is recorded for the LX 7G100.

The Verdict

The recorded data indicates that the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is the only one of the two cards with measured performance evidence. Its average benchmark score of 31087, supported by ten individual test results, establishes a concrete performance baseline. The LX 7G100 has no benchmark data whatsoever, making any performance assessment impossible from the database alone. Its theoretical specifications suggest lower raw compute, memory bandwidth, and pixel throughput than the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER, but these figures remain unvalidated.

The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER's percentile ranking of 76 places it above the majority of GPUs tracked, and its nearest rivals all score within 1.9% of its average, indicating consistent mid-to-high performance. The LX 7G100's percentile of 50 with no scores carries no meaningful interpretation.

For users selecting based on verified performance, the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is the only option with supporting evidence. Its 16 GB memory capacity, higher bandwidth, greater shading unit count, and ray tracing and tensor core support give it a clear specification advantage. The LX 7G100 offers a lower TDP (225 W versus 285 W), a dual-slot form factor, four DisplayPort outputs, and active production status, but these attributes do not compensate for the complete absence of performance data.

The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is end-of-life, which may affect availability, while the LX 7G100 remains in active production. However, from a pure data perspective, the NVIDIA card dominates every measurable specification except power draw, physical width, and number of display outputs.

Specification Differences

The two cards differ across nearly every recorded specification field. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER uses the AD103 chip on Ada Lovelace architecture with a 5 nm process, while the LX 7G100 uses the 7G106 chip on TrueGPU architecture with a 6 nm process. Transistor count is 45,900 million for NVIDIA versus unknown for Lisuan; die size is 379 mm² versus unknown; transistor density is 121.1M per mm² versus null.

Clock speeds: the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER lists base 2340 MHz and boost 2610 MHz, while the LX 7G100 lists no base or boost clocks. Memory clocks are 1313 MHz (21 Gbps effective) versus 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective). Memory capacity is 16 GB GDDR6X versus 12 GB GDDR6. Bus width is 256-bit versus 192-bit. Bandwidth is 672.3 GB/s versus 432.0 GB/s.

Shading units: 8448 versus 6144. TMUs: 264 versus 192. ROPs are equal at 96. RT cores: 66 versus null. Tensor cores: 264 versus null. Pixel rate: 250.6 GPixel/s versus 192.0 GPixel/s. Texture rate: 689.0 GTexel/s versus 384.0 GTexel/s. FP32: 44.10 TFLOPS versus 24.58 TFLOPS. FP16: 44.10 TFLOPS (1:1) versus 49.15 TFLOPS (2:1).

TDP: 285 W versus 225 W. Slot width: triple-slot versus dual-slot. Power connectors: 1x 16-pin versus 1x 8-pin. Suggested PSU: 600 W versus 550 W. Display outputs: 1x HDMI 2.1 plus 3x DisplayPort 1.4a versus 4x DisplayPort 1.4a. Vulkan support: 1.4 versus 1.3. Dimensions: 310 mm length, 140 mm height, 61 mm width versus 294 mm length, 120 mm height, 49 mm width. Production status: end-of-life versus active. Release date: 2024-01-23 versus 2026-06-17. Launch MSRP: 799 USD versus none recorded.

Where Each One Wins

The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER wins in every measured performance category. Its benchmark scores, though not directly comparable to the LX 7G100 due to missing data, establish a verified performance envelope. The card's higher FP32 throughput (44.10 TFLOPS versus 24.58 TFLOPS) indicates stronger general compute workloads. Its larger memory capacity (16 GB versus 12 GB) and higher bandwidth (672.3 GB/s versus 432.0 GB/s) benefit texture-heavy and high-resolution workloads. The presence of 66 RT cores and 264 tensor cores provides dedicated hardware for ray-traced rendering and AI acceleration that the LX 7G100 does not list.

The LX 7G100 wins in efficiency-oriented and physical attributes. Its TDP of 225 W is 60 W lower than the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER's 285 W, and its suggested PSU of 550 W is 50 W lower. The dual-slot design occupies less expansion space than the triple-slot NVIDIA card. Its dimensions are smaller in all three axes: 294 mm versus 310 mm length, 120 mm versus 140 mm height, and 49 mm versus 61 mm width. It offers four DisplayPort outputs compared to three DisplayPort plus one HDMI on the NVIDIA card. The FP16 performance of 49.15 TFLOPS exceeds the 4070 Ti SUPER's 44.10 TFLOPS, though this advantage applies only to workloads using half-precision arithmetic. The LX 7G100 also has active production status, while the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is end-of-life.

The data supports a clear split: the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER for any workload requiring verified performance, ray tracing, AI features, or higher memory bandwidth; the LX 7G100 for installations prioritizing lower power draw, compact physical footprint, multiple DisplayPort outputs, or half-precision compute throughput.