NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile vs Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 Comparison

FAQ

Q: What are the average benchmark scores for the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile and the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100?

A: The RTX 4050 Mobile has an average benchmark score of 19049, while the LX 7G100 has no recorded benchmark scores in the database (average score of 0).

Q: How does the RTX 4050 Mobile compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The RTX 4050 Mobile sits within 0.5% of the AMD Radeon RX 6600 (0.1% ahead), NVIDIA Quadro K6000 (0.1% ahead), and NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation (0.5% ahead), while it trails the NVIDIA Tesla K20m by 0.2%.

Q: What are the memory specifications for each GPU?

A: The RTX 4050 Mobile has 6 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 96-bit bus with 192.0 GB/s bandwidth. The LX 7G100 has 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: What is the power consumption difference between the two cards?

A: The RTX 4050 Mobile has a TDP of 50 W, while the LX 7G100 has a TDP of 225 W and requires a 550 W suggested PSU.

Q: Which GPU has more shading units and what is the FP32 throughput?

A: The LX 7G100 has 6144 shading units and delivers 24.58 TFLOPS FP32, while the RTX 4050 Mobile has 2560 shading units and delivers 8.986 TFLOPS FP32.

Q: What API support does each GPU provide?

A: Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. The RTX 4050 Mobile supports Vulkan 1.4, while the LX 7G100 supports Vulkan 1.3.

Where Each One Wins

The RTX 4050 Mobile wins in every measured benchmark category because the LX 7G100 has no recorded benchmark results in the database. The RTX 4050 Mobile delivers verified scores across nine tests, including Geekbench OpenCL at 74748, Geekbench Vulkan at 75235, and Passmark G3D at 14423. The LX 7G100, despite its higher raw specifications, has zero recorded measurements, placing it at the 50th percentile among all GPUs with no comparative performance data.

For users who need confirmed performance numbers, the RTX 4050 Mobile is the only option with measurable results. The LX 7G100's specifications suggest it could be competitive, but the absence of any benchmark data means its real-world performance cannot be verified from the database.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs represent fundamentally different design philosophies. The RTX 4050 Mobile uses NVIDIA's Ada Lovelace architecture on a 5 nm TSMC process with 18,900 million transistors on a 159 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 118.9M per mm². The LX 7G100 uses a "TrueGPU" architecture on a 6 nm TSMC process, with transistor count and die size listed as unknown in the database.

The RTX 4050 Mobile includes 20 RT cores and 80 tensor cores, providing hardware-accelerated ray tracing and AI workloads. The LX 7G100 lists no RT cores or tensor cores, instead relying on its massive 6144 shading units. The RTX 4050 Mobile has 80 TMUs and 48 ROPs, while the LX 7G100 has 192 TMUs and 96 ROPs.

Clock behavior also differs significantly. The RTX 4050 Mobile has a base clock of 1455 MHz and a boost clock of 1755 MHz. The LX 7G100 has no base or boost clock listed in the database. Memory clocks differ as well: the RTX 4050 Mobile runs at 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective), while the LX 7G100 runs at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective).

The RTX 4050 Mobile is an integrated graphics processor (IGP) with no power connectors, designed for portable devices with display outputs dependent on the host device. The LX 7G100 is a dual-slot discrete card measuring 294 mm by 120 mm by 49 mm, using a single 8-pin power connector and offering four DisplayPort 1.4a outputs. The RTX 4050 Mobile connects via PCIe 4.0 x8, while the LX 7G100 uses PCIe 4.0 x16.

Specification Differences

The memory subsystems differ substantially. The RTX 4050 Mobile offers 6 GB GDDR6 on a 96-bit bus with 192.0 GB/s bandwidth. The LX 7G100 doubles capacity to 12 GB GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth, a 2.25x increase in bandwidth.

Compute resources show a similar gap. The LX 7G100 has 6144 shading units versus 2560 on the RTX 4050 Mobile, a 2.4x difference. TMU counts are 192 versus 80, and ROP counts are 96 versus 48. The LX 7G100 delivers 24.58 TFLOPS FP32 and 49.15 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1 ratio), while the RTX 4050 Mobile delivers 8.986 TFLOPS FP32 and 8.986 TFLOPS FP16 (1:1 ratio).

Pixel and texture rates follow the same pattern. The LX 7G100 achieves 192.0 GPixel/s and 384.0 GTexel/s, compared to 84.24 GPixel/s and 140.4 GTexel/s for the RTX 4050 Mobile.

Power requirements diverge sharply. The RTX 4050 Mobile draws 50 W with no additional power connectors. The LX 7G100 draws 225 W, requires a 1x 8-pin connector, and suggests a 550 W PSU.

Release dates differ by over three years. The RTX 4050 Mobile launched on January 2, 2023, while the LX 7G100 launched on June 17, 2026. The RTX 4050 Mobile has a predecessor in the GeForce 30 Mobile series and a successor in the GeForce 50 Mobile series; the LX 7G100 lists neither.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The head-to-head benchmark comparison contains no recorded data. The database lists zero wins for either GPU in direct competition. The RTX 4050 Mobile has nine individual benchmark scores, while the LX 7G100 has none.

The RTX 4050 Mobile's strongest results come from Geekbench tests: 74748 in OpenCL and 75235 in Vulkan. In Passmark tests, it scores 184 in DirectX 9, 130 in DirectX 11, 79 in DirectX 10, and 61 in DirectX 12. The compute-oriented Passmark GPU compute test yields 5947, while the 2D test yields 633 and the 3D test yields 14423.

The LX 7G100's specifications suggest it would outperform the RTX 4050 Mobile in raw throughput. Its FP32 rate of 24.58 TFLOPS is 2.7x higher, and its texture rate of 384.0 GTexel/s is 2.7x higher. Memory bandwidth of 432.0 GB/s versus 192.0 GB/s would likely benefit high-resolution textures and large datasets.

However, the absence of any benchmark results for the LX 7G100 means the database cannot confirm these theoretical advantages. The RTX 4050 Mobile holds a 63rd percentile ranking among all GPUs, while the LX 7G100 sits at the 50th percentile with an average score of 0.

The Verdict

The data presents a clear split between verified performance and theoretical capability. The RTX 4050 Mobile is the only GPU of the two with any recorded benchmark scores. Its average score of 19049 places it in the 63rd percentile of all GPUs, and its nearest rivals confirm its position: within 0.5% of the AMD Radeon RX 6600, NVIDIA Quadro K6000, NVIDIA Tesla K20m, and NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation.

The LX 7G100 offers specifications that, on paper, exceed the RTX 4050 Mobile in nearly every category. It has more shading units, more memory, wider bus, higher bandwidth, higher pixel fill rate, and higher texture fill rate. Its FP32 throughput is 2.7x higher. Its TDP of 225 W indicates a desktop-class component, whereas the RTX 4050 Mobile's 50 W TDP and IGP form factor target portable devices.

Users who need confirmed, measured performance should choose the RTX 4050 Mobile. The database contains nine verified benchmark scores for it, and its percentile ranking demonstrates where it stands among all GPUs. Users who prioritize raw specification sheets and do not require verified benchmark data might select the LX 7G100, but the lack of any recorded measurements means its actual performance remains unknown.

The RTX 4050 Mobile also offers features the LX 7G100 lacks: 20 RT cores and 80 tensor cores for ray tracing and AI acceleration, plus newer Vulkan 1.4 support versus Vulkan 1.3. The LX 7G100's advantage lies in raw compute resources and memory capacity, but without benchmark data, those advantages cannot be quantified in practice.

For portable systems, the RTX 4050 Mobile is the appropriate choice given its 50 W TDP and IGP design. For desktop systems with 550 W PSUs and dual-slot clearance, the LX 7G100 provides a specification sheet that appears stronger, but the database offers no measurements to validate that impression.