NVIDIA B300 SXM6 AC vs NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data for these two accelerators contains a single benchmark result for the NVIDIA B300 SXM6 AC and no benchmark results for the NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation. The B300 SXM6 AC achieves a Geekbench OpenCL score of 369,831, which places it at the 100th percentile among all GPUs in the database. The RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation sits at the 50th percentile with an average benchmark score of zero, indicating no recorded performance data is available for comparison.

The B300 SXM6 AC's score positions it clearly ahead of its nearest rivals. The database shows the NVIDIA B200 with an average score of 345,482, which is 7% behind the B300 SXM6 AC. The NVIDIA H200 NVL records 334,891, a 10.4% deficit. The AMD Instinct MI300X scores 317,994, trailing by 16.3%, and the NVIDIA L40S reaches 295,763, a 25% gap. These deltas confirm that the B300 SXM6 AC delivers the highest OpenCL performance among the accelerators listed in its immediate competitive set.

Because the head-to-head benchmark table between these two specific products is empty, the only quantitative comparison available is the percentile ranking. The B300 SXM6 AC's 100th percentile ranking against all GPUs contrasts sharply with the RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation's 50th percentile. This disparity in measured data means the B300 SXM6 AC stands as the only one of the two with verified performance results in the database.

The RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation's lack of benchmark entries does not imply inferior capability, but it does mean the database cannot confirm any performance relationship between these two products. The data indicates the B300 SXM6 AC is a dominant force in OpenCL workloads based on its score and rival deltas, while the RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation remains unmeasured in this metric.

FAQ

Q: What is the Geekbench OpenCL score difference between the two products?

A: The NVIDIA B300 SXM6 AC records a score of 369,831, while the NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation has no benchmark score recorded in the database. The B300 SXM6 AC holds the 100th percentile, and the RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation holds the 50th percentile with an average score of zero.

Q: How does the B300 SXM6 AC compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The B300 SXM6 AC leads the NVIDIA B200 by 7%, the NVIDIA H200 NVL by 10.4%, the AMD Instinct MI300X by 16.3%, and the NVIDIA L40S by 25%, based on average scores of 345,482, 334,891, 317,994, and 295,763 respectively.

Q: Which product has more memory capacity?

A: The B300 SXM6 AC carries 288 GB of HBM3e memory with a 8192-bit bus and 8.19 TB/s bandwidth. The RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation carries 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus with 576.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: What are the FP32 performance figures for each?

A: The B300 SXM6 AC delivers 76.99 TFLOPS of FP32 performance. The RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation delivers 32.69 TFLOPS of FP32 performance.

Q: Do both products support the same API feature levels?

A: No. The RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The B300 SXM6 AC lists N/A for DirectX, OpenGL, and Vulkan, reflecting its server-oriented design with no display outputs.

Q: What are the power consumption figures?

A: The B300 SXM6 AC has a TDP of 1100 W and a suggested PSU of 1500 W. The RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation has a TDP of 120 W and no suggested PSU listed.

Where Each One Wins

The B300 SXM6 AC wins in raw compute throughput. Its FP32 performance of 76.99 TFLOPS more than doubles the RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation's 32.69 TFLOPS. Texture rate also favors the B300 SXM6 AC at 1,202.9 GTexel/s versus 510.7 GTexel/s for the RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation. Shading units number 18,944 versus 9,728, and TMUs stand at 592 versus 304. The B300 SXM6 AC's memory subsystem is categorically larger, with 288 GB versus 16 GB, and bandwidth of 8.19 TB/s versus 576.0 GB/s. These figures point to the B300 SXM6 AC as the choice for massive parallel workloads, large model training, or high-throughput inference where memory capacity and bandwidth dominate.

The RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation wins in pixel throughput. Its pixel rate of 188.2 GPixel/s is nearly four times the B300 SXM6 AC's 48.77 GPixel/s. It has 112 ROPs compared to 24, and it includes 76 RT cores, which the B300 SXM6 AC does not list. The RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation also supports a full API stack with DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, while the B300 SXM6 AC lists no API support. Display outputs are present on the RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation as "Portable Device Dependent," while the B300 SXM6 AC has no outputs. The RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation's power profile is dramatically lower at 120 W versus 1100 W, making it viable for embedded or mobile contexts where the B300 SXM6 AC's SXM module form factor and power demands are impractical.

The bus interface differs as well. The B300 SXM6 AC uses PCIe 6.0 x16, while the RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation uses PCIe 4.0 x16. This reflects the B300 SXM6 AC's data-center orientation and the RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation's integration into portable devices.

Specification Differences

Memory configuration shows the largest gap. The B300 SXM6 AC uses 288 GB of HBM3e on an 8192-bit bus with 8.19 TB/s bandwidth. The RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation uses 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus with 576.0 GB/s bandwidth. Clock speeds differ: the B300 SXM6 AC runs at 1665 MHz base and 2032 MHz boost, while the RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation runs at 930 MHz base and 1680 MHz boost. Memory clocks are 2000 MHz (8 Gbps effective) versus 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective).

Compute resources vary significantly. The B300 SXM6 AC has 18,944 shading units, 592 TMUs, and 24 ROPs. The RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation has 9,728 shading units, 304 TMUs, and 112 ROPs. Tensor cores number 592 for the B300 SXM6 AC and 304 for the RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation. The RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation includes 76 RT cores; the B300 SXM6 AC has no RT core count listed.

Power and form factor differ completely. The B300 SXM6 AC has a TDP of 1100 W with a suggested PSU of 1500 W and uses an SXM Module slot width. The RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation has a TDP of 120 W, no power connectors, and uses an IGP slot width. The B300 SXM6 AC has no display outputs, while the RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation has outputs described as "Portable Device Dependent." The B300 SXM6 AC uses PCIe 6.0 x16, and the RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation uses PCIe 4.0 x16.

Release dates place these products far apart. The B300 SXM6 AC was released on 2025-09-10, and the RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation was released on 2023-03-20. Both are marked as Active in production status.

Architecture Differences

The B300 SXM6 AC uses the GB110 chip built on the Blackwell Ultra architecture, part of the Server Blackwell (Bxx) generation. The RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation uses the AD103 chip built on the Ada Lovelace architecture, part of the Ada-MW generation. Both use a 5 nm process from TSMC, but transistor counts diverge: the B300 SXM6 AC has 208,000 million transistors on a 1628 mm² die, while the RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation has 45,900 million transistors on a 379 mm² die. Transistor density is slightly higher on the B300 SXM6 AC at 127.8M per mm² versus 121.1M per mm².

The Blackwell Ultra architecture targets server-scale compute with no display outputs and no consumer API support, as reflected in the N/A entries for DirectX, OpenGL, and Vulkan. The Ada Lovelace architecture in the RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation is designed for embedded and mobile environments, with full API support and display output capability tied to the portable device. The B300 SXM6 AC's predecessor is Server Hopper, and its successor is Server Rubin. The RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation's predecessor is Ampere-MW, and its successor is Blackwell-MW.

The B300 SXM6 AC's memory type, HBM3e, aligns with high-bandwidth data-center workloads, while the RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation's GDDR6 memory suits lower-power embedded use. The B300 SXM6 AC has no RT cores listed, whereas the RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation includes 76 RT cores, indicating a focus on graphics and ray-traced workloads in the latter. The B300 SXM6 AC's FP16 performance matches its FP32 at 76.99 TFLOPS (1:1), and the RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation similarly matches FP16 to FP32 at 32.69 TFLOPS (1:1), though at a lower absolute level.

The B300 SXM6 AC's PCIe 6.0 interface doubles the generation of the RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation's PCIe 4.0, supporting faster host communication in server racks. The RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation's slot width of IGP and lack of power connectors make it suitable for solder-down or compact module designs, while the B300 SXM6 AC's SXM Module form factor requires a dedicated server chassis.

The Verdict

The data points to two distinct deployment profiles. The NVIDIA B300 SXM6 AC is the clear choice for compute-heavy environments where the OpenCL score of 369,831 and 100th percentile ranking matter. Its 288 GB memory, 8.19 TB/s bandwidth, and 76.99 TFLOPS FP32 performance dwarf the RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation's 16 GB memory, 576.0 GB/s bandwidth, and 32.69 TFLOPS. The B300 SXM6 AC outperforms its nearest rivals by 7% to 25%, confirming its position as a top-tier server accelerator. The 1100 W TDP and 1500 W suggested PSU indicate a data-center power budget, and the PCIe 6.0 interface matches modern server platforms.

The NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation is the only option with verified graphics-oriented features. Its 188.2 GPixel/s pixel rate, 112 ROPs, and 76 RT cores enable rendering tasks that the B300 SXM6 AC cannot handle due to its lack of display outputs and API support. The 120 W TDP and IGP form factor make it suitable for portable or embedded systems where power and space are constrained. Its DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4 support provide a complete graphics stack, while the B300 SXM6 AC lists no APIs.

The database records no benchmark results for the RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation, so its compute performance relative to the B300 SXM6 AC remains unquantified. The B300 SXM6 AC's recorded score and rival deltas establish it as a leader in measured OpenCL performance. The RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation's strengths lie in its feature set rather than recorded benchmark data. Users with compute-centric workloads should select the B300 SXM6 AC based on its verified performance and memory capacity. Users with graphics, ray tracing, or embedded requirements should select the RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation based on its RT cores, pixel rate, API support, and low power draw. The two products do not compete in the same usage context; the data confirms they serve separate markets.