Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350 vs Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no recorded benchmark scores for either the Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350 or the Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA. Both products show an average benchmark score of zero, and the head-to-head benchmark table is empty. The percentile ranking for each GPU against all other GPUs in the database is identical at 50, indicating that neither card has been subjected to any standardized performance testing in our measurements. Without benchmark data, no direct performance comparison can be made using recorded results. The only quantitative performance indicators available are the theoretical compute specifications listed in the product data, which serve as the basis for any analytical comparison.

Architecture Differences

The Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350 utilizes the Ponte Vecchio chip, built on Generation 12.5 architecture and manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process node. The die size measures 1280 mm², and the chip contains 100,000 million transistors, resulting in a transistor density of 78.1 million transistors per square millimeter. This is a data center-focused accelerator with an OAM Module slot width, PCIe 5.0 x16 bus interface, and no display outputs. The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA uses the 7G105 chip, based on the TrueGPU architecture with a 7G100 generation designation. It is manufactured by TSMC on a 6 nm process node, with transistor count and die size listed as unknown. The LX ULTRA is a dual-slot consumer or workstation card with PCIe 4.0 x16 interface and four DisplayPort 1.4a outputs.

Memory architectures diverge significantly between the two cards. The Intel GPU Max 1350 features 96 GB of HBM2e memory on an 8192-bit bus, delivering 2.46 TB/s of bandwidth. The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA has 24 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, providing 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory clock for the Intel card is 1200 MHz with 2.4 Gbps effective data rate, while the LX ULTRA runs at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective. The Intel GPU has a base clock of 750 MHz and boost clock of 1550 MHz, whereas the LX ULTRA lists no base or boost clock values, only the memory clock.

Compute resources differ in scale and configuration. The Intel card contains 14,336 shading units, 896 texture mapping units, zero ROPs, and 112 ray tracing cores. Its pixel rate is 0 MPixel/s, and its texture rate reaches 1,388.8 GTexel/s. The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA has 6,144 shading units, 192 TMUs, 96 ROPs, and no ray tracing cores listed. Its pixel rate is 192.0 GPixel/s, and its texture rate is 384.0 GTexel/s. The Intel GPU delivers 44.44 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 44.44 TFLOPS of FP16 performance at a 1:1 ratio. The LX ULTRA delivers 24.58 TFLOPS FP32 and 49.15 TFLOPS FP16 at a 2:1 ratio, meaning the LX ULTRA exceeds the Intel card in FP16 throughput despite having lower FP32 performance.

API support also differs. The Intel GPU Max 1350 supports DirectX 12 (12_1) and OpenGL 4.6, with no Vulkan version listed. The LX ULTRA supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.3. The Intel card has no display outputs, positioning it strictly as a compute accelerator, while the LX ULTRA includes four DisplayPort 1.4a outputs for direct display connectivity. Power requirements show the Intel card at 450 W TDP with a suggested power supply of 850 W, while the LX ULTRA has a 225 W TDP with a 550 W suggested PSU and a single 16-pin power connector. The Intel card lists no power connectors in its specifications.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has higher FP32 compute performance?

A: The Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350 delivers 44.44 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, which is 80.8% higher than the Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA's 24.58 TFLOPS.

Q: Which GPU has higher FP16 performance?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA achieves 49.15 TFLOPS of FP16 performance at a 2:1 ratio, surpassing the Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350's 44.44 TFLOPS at a 1:1 ratio.

Q: What are the memory capacity and bandwidth differences?

A: The Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350 has 96 GB of HBM2e memory with 2.46 TB/s bandwidth on an 8192-bit bus. The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA has 24 GB of GDDR6 memory with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth on a 192-bit bus.

Q: Which GPU has a smaller manufacturing process node?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA is manufactured on TSMC's 6 nm process, which is smaller than Intel's 10 nm node used for the Data Center GPU Max 1350.

Q: Do both GPUs support display outputs?

A: No. The Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350 has no display outputs, while the Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA has four DisplayPort 1.4a outputs.

Q: Which GPU has lower power consumption?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA has a 225 W TDP with a 550 W suggested power supply, compared to the Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350's 450 W TDP and 850 W suggested power supply.

Specification Differences

The two GPUs differ across nearly every recorded specification. The Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350 uses the Ponte Vecchio chip with Generation 12.5 architecture, while the Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA uses the 7G105 chip with TrueGPU architecture. Manufacturing nodes differ: Intel uses 10 nm from its own foundry, while the LX ULTRA uses TSMC's 6 nm process. Transistor count for the Intel card is 100,000 million, while the LX ULTRA's count is unknown. Die size for the Intel card is 1280 mm², while the LX ULTRA's die size is unknown. Transistor density for the Intel card is 78.1 million per mm², and no density is recorded for the LX ULTRA.

Clock specifications diverge: the Intel card has a 750 MHz base clock and 1550 MHz boost clock, while the LX ULTRA records no base or boost clocks. Memory clock differs at 1200 MHz with 2.4 Gbps effective for Intel versus 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective for the LX ULTRA. Memory capacity differs at 96 GB HBM2e versus 24 GB GDDR6. Bus width differs at 8192 bit versus 192 bit. Bandwidth differs at 2.46 TB/s versus 432.0 GB/s.

Shading units: 14,336 versus 6,144. TMUs: 896 versus 192. ROPs: 0 versus 96. Ray tracing cores: 112 versus none listed. Pixel rate: 0 MPixel/s versus 192.0 GPixel/s. Texture rate: 1,388.8 GTexel/s versus 384.0 GTexel/s. FP32: 44.44 TFLOPS versus 24.58 TFLOPS. FP16: 44.44 TFLOPS (1:1) versus 49.15 TFLOPS (2:1). TDP: 450 W versus 225 W. Slot width: OAM Module versus dual-slot. Power connectors: none listed versus one 16-pin. Suggested PSU: 850 W versus 550 W. Bus interface: PCIe 5.0 x16 versus PCIe 4.0 x16. Display outputs: none versus four DisplayPort 1.4a. API support: DirectX 12 (12_1) and OpenGL 4.6 versus DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.3.

Dimensions are recorded only for the LX ULTRA: 268 mm length, 112 mm height, and 40 mm width. Release dates differ: the Intel card was released on January 9, 2023, while the LX ULTRA has a release date of March 16, 2026. The Intel card's successor is listed as H3C Graphics, while the LX ULTRA has no successor. Both cards carry a production status of Active.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350 wins on raw compute density and memory subsystem scale. Its FP32 output of 44.44 TFLOPS positions it for heavy single-precision compute workloads, and the 96 GB HBM2e pool with 2.46 TB/s bandwidth provides a massive memory footprint for large models or datasets. The 8192-bit bus width enables data movement at a scale unmatched by the LX ULTRA's 192-bit interface. The Intel card's 1,388.8 GTexel/s texture rate and 112 ray tracing cores add to its compute versatility, though the lack of ROPs and display outputs confirms its role as a dedicated accelerator for data center tasks such as AI inference, scientific simulation, or rendering farms where display output is unnecessary.

The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA wins on FP16 throughput with 49.15 TFLOPS, exceeding the Intel card's 44.44 TFLOPS in half-precision workloads. Its 6 nm TSMC process node indicates a more modern manufacturing approach, and the 225 W TDP with 550 W suggested PSU demonstrates significantly lower power requirements. The 192.0 GPixel/s pixel rate and 96 ROPs, combined with four DisplayPort 1.4a outputs, make it suitable for graphics rendering or workstation use where display connectivity is required. The LX ULTRA also supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and Vulkan 1.3, offering broader API compatibility for gaming or visualization applications. Its 24 GB GDDR6 memory, while smaller than the Intel card's 96 GB HBM2e, provides adequate capacity for many graphics workloads at a fraction of the power draw.

The recorded data indicates a split between datacenter-oriented compute acceleration and client-oriented graphics processing. The Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350 leverages its generational architecture, PCIe 5.0 interface, and massive memory bandwidth for throughput-driven tasks that prioritize FP32 precision and large memory residency. The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA leverages its dual-slot form factor, display outputs, and higher FP16 throughput for tasks that require graphics output, half-precision computation, or lower power envelopes. The 2:1 FP16 ratio on the LX ULTRA specifically indicates optimized half-precision execution, while the Intel card's 1:1 ratio suggests equal weighting between FP32 and FP16 operations. The absence of benchmark scores in the database means these conclusions derive entirely from specification analysis rather than measured performance.