Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350 vs Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 Comparison

# Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350 vs Lisuan Tech LX 7G100

The Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350 and the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 occupy very different positions in the accelerator landscape. The Intel part is a massive OAM module built for dense compute, while the Lisuan Tech card is a conventional dual-slot PCIe board with display outputs. Both sit at the 50th percentile among all GPUs in the database, but their architectural philosophies diverge sharply. The Intel chip targets raw throughput and enormous memory capacity, whereas the Lisuan Tech part emphasizes efficiency, modern API support, and practical deployment flexibility.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350 wins decisively in raw compute throughput and memory capacity. Its FP32 rating of 44.44 TFLOPS nearly doubles the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100's 24.58 TFLOPS. For FP16 workloads, the Intel part delivers 44.44 TFLOPS with a 1:1 ratio, meaning it sustains the same rate regardless of precision. The Lisuan Tech card reaches 49.15 TFLOPS in FP16, but only at a 2:1 ratio, indicating it uses packed arithmetic to achieve that figure. For workloads that rely on native FP16 processing without packing tricks, the Intel card maintains a clear lead.

Memory capacity is another area of total dominance. The Intel Max 1350 carries 96 GB of HBM2e across an 8192-bit bus, delivering 2.46 TB/s of bandwidth. The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 has 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus, reaching 432.0 GB/s. That is a 8x capacity advantage and roughly 5.7x bandwidth advantage for Intel. Any model or dataset that exceeds 12 GB simply cannot run on the Lisuan Tech part, while the Intel card can hold substantially larger working sets entirely in on-board memory.

The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 wins in areas that matter for workstation and edge deployment. It has a 225 W TDP versus Intel's 450 W, making it far easier to cool and power. It uses a single 8-pin power connector and suggests a 550 W power supply, while the Intel part requires an OAM Module slot and an 850 W suggested power supply. The Lisuan Tech card also provides 4x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs, enabling direct display connection, whereas the Intel Max 1350 has no display outputs at all. For interactive visualization or GPU-accelerated rendering with monitor output, the Lisuan Tech card is the only option of the two.

Architecture Differences

The Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350 uses the Ponte Vecchio chip built on Intel's Generation 12.5 architecture. It is fabricated on a 10 nm process at Intel's own foundry, with 100,000 million transistors packed into a 1280 mm² die. That works out to a transistor density of 78.1M per mm². The chip employs 14,336 shading units, 896 texture mapping units, and 112 ray tracing cores, but zero ROPs, which explains its 0 MPixel/s pixel rate. This makes it a pure compute accelerator with no rasterization pipeline.

The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 uses the 7G106 chip under the "TrueGPU" architecture. It is built by TSMC on a 6 nm process, though transistor count and die size are not recorded in the database. The card has 6,144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs, giving it a 192.0 GPixel/s pixel rate. It also supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.3, making it a fully featured graphics processor. The Intel part only lists DirectX 12 (12_1) and OpenGL 4.6, with no Vulkan support recorded.

The memory subsystems reflect these divergent roles. Intel pairs 96 GB of HBM2e with an 8192-bit bus, achieving 2.46 TB/s. The Lisuan Tech card uses 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus for 432.0 GB/s. Clock behavior also differs: Intel specifies a base clock of 750 MHz and boost up to 1550 MHz, while the Lisuan Tech part has no base or boost clock recorded, only a memory clock of 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective). The Intel card's memory runs at 1200 MHz with 2.4 Gbps effective.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database records no direct head-to-head benchmark results between these two accelerators, and neither part has individual benchmark scores or nearest rival entries. However, the specification data allows for direct comparison of theoretical throughput limits.

In FP32 compute, the Intel Max 1350 delivers 44.44 TFLOPS, which is 80.8% higher than the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100's 24.58 TFLOPS. That advantage comes from more than double the shading units (14,336 versus 6,144) and substantially higher texture rate (1,388.8 GTexel/s versus 384.0 GTexel/s). The Intel part's texture rate is 3.6x higher, reflecting its 896 TMUs against 192 TMUs.

In FP16, the comparison flips depending on methodology. The Intel card sustains 44.44 TFLOPS at a 1:1 ratio, meaning every FP16 operation runs at the same rate as FP32. The Lisuan Tech card achieves 49.15 TFLOPS, but only at a 2:1 ratio, which typically indicates that the hardware processes two FP16 operations per clock cycle using packed FP32 units. If a workload requires true FP16 arithmetic without packing, the Intel card's consistent 44.44 TFLOPS may be the more reliable figure. If the workload can use packed operations, the Lisuan Tech part's 49.15 TFLOPS is 10.6% higher.

Memory bandwidth separates the two decisively. The Intel card's 2.46 TB/s is 5.7x the Lisuan Tech card's 432.0 GB/s. For memory-bound workloads such as large matrix multiplications, sparse embeddings, or multi-stream data processing, this bandwidth advantage can dominate raw compute differences. The Intel card also has an 8192-bit bus, eight times wider than the 192-bit bus on the Lisuan Tech part, which reduces the number of memory transactions needed for large data transfers.

Pixel throughput is a category where the Lisuan Tech card wins outright. Its 192.0 GPixel/s compares to the Intel card's 0 MPixel/s, since the Intel part has no ROPs. This means the Intel Max 1350 cannot rasterize frames or perform traditional graphics output. The Lisuan Tech card, with its 96 ROPs and 4x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs, can drive displays directly and handle conventional rendering workloads.

FAQ

Q: Which card has more memory bandwidth?

A: The Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350 has 2.46 TB/s across an 8192-bit HBM2e interface, versus 432.0 GB/s on a 192-bit GDDR6 bus for the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100.

Q: Can either card output video to a display?

A: Only the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 has display outputs, featuring 4x DisplayPort 1.4a. The Intel Max 1350 has no display outputs and a pixel rate of 0 MPixel/s.

Q: What is the FP16 performance difference?

A: The Intel Max 1350 delivers 44.44 TFLOPS at a 1:1 ratio, while the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 reaches 49.15 TFLOPS at a 2:1 ratio. The Lisuan Tech part's figure relies on packed arithmetic.

Q: How do their power requirements compare?

A: The Intel Max 1350 has a 450 W TDP and suggests an 850 W power supply, while the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 has a 225 W TDP and suggests a 550 W power supply.

Q: Which architecture supports more modern graphics APIs?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.3. The Intel Max 1350 lists DirectX 12 (12_1) and OpenGL 4.6, with no Vulkan support recorded.

Q: What is the memory size difference?

A: The Intel Max 1350 has 96 GB of HBM2e, while the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 has 12 GB of GDDR6, an 8x capacity difference.

The Verdict

The recorded data indicates that the Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350 is the choice for workloads that demand maximum memory capacity, extreme bandwidth, and the highest FP32 throughput. Its 96 GB frame buffer and 2.46 TB/s bandwidth make it suitable for large-scale inference, scientific simulation, or any task where the working set exceeds 12 GB. The 44.44 TFLOPS FP32 rate and 1:1 FP16 performance provide predictable compute scaling without precision trade-offs. The absence of display outputs and rasterization hardware confirms that this is a server-oriented accelerator, not a workstation graphics card.

The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 is the more practical option for environments that need both compute and display capability. Its 225 W TDP, single 8-pin power connector, and 550 W suggested power supply fit into conventional desktop or workstation builds. The 4x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs allow direct monitor connection, and the DirectX 12 Ultimate plus Vulkan 1.3 support covers modern graphics APIs. The 49.15 TFLOPS FP16 figure at 2:1 ratio gives it competitive packed-precision throughput, while its 192.0 GPixel/s pixel rate enables real-time rendering tasks.

The database places both cards at the 50th percentile among all GPUs, indicating they sit at the median of the overall performance distribution. The Intel part achieves that position through raw scale, while the Lisuan Tech card does so with a more balanced feature set. Neither has recorded benchmark scores or nearest rival data, so the analysis relies entirely on architectural specifications and theoretical peak rates.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350 | Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 |

|---------------|-------------------------------|----------------------|

| Chip | Ponte Vecchio | 7G106 |

| Architecture | Generation 12.5 | TrueGPU |

| Process Node | 10 nm | 6 nm |

| Foundry | Intel | TSMC |

| Transistors | 100,000 million | unknown |

| Die Size | 1280 mm² | unknown |

| Base Clock | 750 MHz | null |

| Boost Clock | 1550 MHz | null |

| Memory Clock | 1200 MHz, 2.4 Gbps effective | 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective |

| Memory Size | 96 GB | 12 GB |

| Memory Type | HBM2e | GDDR6 |

| Memory Bus Width | 8192 bit | 192 bit |

| Memory Bandwidth | 2.46 TB/s | 432.0 GB/s |

| Shading Units | 14336 | 6144 |

| TMUs | 896 | 192 |

| ROPs | 0 | 96 |

| RT Cores | 112 | null |

| Pixel Rate | 0 MPixel/s | 192.0 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 1,388.8 GTexel/s | 384.0 GTexel/s |

| FP32 | 44.44 TFLOPS | 24.58 TFLOPS |

| FP16 | 44.44 TFLOPS (1:1) | 49.15 TFLOPS (2:1) |

| TDP | 450 W | 225 W |

| Slot Width | OAM Module | Dual-slot |

| Power Connectors | null | 1x 8-pin |

| Suggested PSU | 850 W | 550 W |

| Bus Interface | PCIe 5.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |

| Display Outputs | No outputs | 4x DisplayPort 1.4a |

| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |

| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |

| Vulkan | null | 1.3 |

| Dimensions | null | 294 mm x 120 mm x 49 mm |

| Release Date | 2023-01-09 | 2026-06-17 |

| Successor | H3C Graphics | null |