Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data contains no direct head-to-head benchmark results between the Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350 and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER. The database shows zero wins for either part in direct comparison tests, and no shared workload scores exist for both products. This absence of overlapping measurements means a conventional side-by-side performance ranking cannot be derived from the available facts.

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER does have one recorded benchmark entry, a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test score of 3075. Its nearest rivals in the database are the NVIDIA Quadro P1000 (average score 3163, delta -2.8 percent), the Intel Arc Pro B60 (average score 3182, delta -3.4 percent), the NVIDIA GeForce 820A (average score 2983, delta 3.1 percent), and the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M (average score 2967, delta 3.6 percent). These deltas show the RTX 5080 SUPER trailing the Quadro P1000 and Arc Pro B60 by roughly 3 percent, while leading the GeForce 820A and GTX 860M by a similar margin. The RTX 5080 SUPER sits at the 19th percentile among all GPUs in the database, indicating that most recorded graphics cards score higher in this particular workload.

The Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350 has no benchmark scores recorded, an average benchmark score of zero, and no nearest rivals listed. Its percentile rank of 50 places it at the median, but this value is not tied to any measured workload. The benchmark absence means no numeric win can be attributed to the Intel part in any test category.

Without head-to-head data, the only quantitative comparisons available come from the RTX 5080 SUPER's single benchmark and its rival deltas. The Intel part cannot be positioned against that score, as no common test exists in the database. The head-to-head section therefore reflects an incomplete record: the RTX 5080 SUPER has measurable performance in one DX12 test, while the Intel accelerator has no recorded benchmark output.

Architecture Differences

The two processors diverge sharply in design intent and silicon construction. The Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350 uses the Ponte Vecchio chip built on Generation 12.5 architecture, fabricated on a 10 nm process at Intel's foundry. It packs 100,000 million transistors across a 1280 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 78.1 million per mm². The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER employs the GB203 chip with Blackwell 2.0 architecture, manufactured on a 5 nm process at TSMC. Its die contains 45,600 million transistors on a 378 mm² area, giving a transistor density of 120.6 million per mm².

Memory configurations highlight the divergent roles. The Intel part carries 96 GB of HBM2e over an 8192-bit bus, delivering 2.46 TB/s of bandwidth. The NVIDIA card uses 24 GB of GDDR7 across a 256-bit bus for 1.02 TB/s. The Intel accelerator's memory bus is 32 times wider, and its bandwidth is more than double, though the NVIDIA part uses faster effective memory at 32 Gbps versus 2.4 Gbps.

Compute resources differ in scale and type. Intel's chip has 14,336 shading units, 896 texture mapping units, zero ROPs, and 112 ray tracing cores. NVIDIA's GB203 has 10,752 shading units, 336 TMUs, 112 ROPs, and 84 RT cores, plus 336 tensor cores, a feature the Intel part lacks. Texture rates show 1,388.8 GTexel/s for Intel versus 879.3 GTexel/s for NVIDIA. Pixel rate is 0 MPixel/s for the Intel accelerator, as it has no ROPs, while NVIDIA reaches 293.1 GPixel/s. FP32 compute is 44.44 TFLOPS for Intel and 56.28 TFLOPS for NVIDIA; both list FP16 at the same 1:1 ratio as their FP32 figures.

Clock speeds favor NVIDIA: 2295 MHz base and 2617 MHz boost for the RTX 5080 SUPER, compared to 750 MHz base and 1550 MHz boost for the Intel Max 1350. Power draw is close, with Intel rated at 450 W and NVIDIA at 415 W. The Intel card uses an OAM Module slot width and has no display outputs, while NVIDIA is a dual-slot card with a 16-pin connector and outputs including 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b. Both use PCIe 5.0 x16.

API support differs: Intel lists DirectX 12 (12_1) and OpenGL 4.6 with no Vulkan version, while NVIDIA supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The Intel part's production status is Active with a release date in January 2023 and a successor named H3C Graphics. NVIDIA's RTX 5080 SUPER is also Active, dated late December 2025, with no successor listed.

The Verdict

The data supports a clear split by workload type. The Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350 is a compute-oriented accelerator with 96 GB of HBM2e, no display outputs, no ROPs, and a pixel rate of zero. It is not designed for rasterized graphics output. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER is a graphics card with 112 ROPs, 293.1 GPixel/s pixel throughput, display outputs, and a 56.28 TFLOPS FP32 rate that exceeds the Intel part's 44.44 TFLOPS.

For graphics rendering tasks, the RTX 5080 SUPER has the measurable advantage, based on its pixel rate, ROP count, DirectX 12 Ultimate support, Vulkan 1.4, and a recorded 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 3075. The Intel accelerator cannot participate in such workloads, given its zero pixel rate and lack of outputs. For memory-bandwidth-bound compute, Intel's 2.46 TB/s versus 1.02 TB/s, together with 96 GB versus 24 GB capacity, points to the Intel part for large datasets, though no benchmark confirms this.

The RTX 5080 SUPER's nearest rivals in the database are all lower-tier GPUs (Quadro P1000, GeForce 820A, Arc Pro B60, GTX 860M), which places its Steel Nomad score in a modest bracket. The Intel part has no benchmark data to establish a percentile or rival ranking. Selecting between them depends on whether the use case requires graphics output and rendering, where NVIDIA is the only option, or massive memory capacity and bandwidth, where Intel holds the specification edge.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has higher FP32 compute?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER delivers 56.28 TFLOPS FP32, while the Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350 provides 44.44 TFLOPS.

Q: How much memory does each card have?

A: The Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350 has 96 GB of HBM2e, and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER has 24 GB of GDDR7.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth difference?

A: Intel's 8192-bit bus produces 2.46 TB/s, while NVIDIA's 256-bit bus yields 1.02 TB/s.

Q: Does the Intel card support display outputs?

A: No, the Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350 has no display outputs, whereas the RTX 5080 SUPER provides 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b.

Q: What is the RTX 5080 SUPER's recorded benchmark score?

A: In the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test, it scores 3075, placing it at the 19th percentile among all GPUs.

Q: Which card has tensor cores?

A: Only the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER lists 336 tensor cores; the Intel part has no tensor core count.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350 wins on memory capacity and bandwidth. Its 96 GB HBM2e pool exceeds NVIDIA's 24 GB by a factor of four, and its 2.46 TB/s bandwidth is more than double the RTX 5080 SUPER's 1.02 TB/s. The Intel part also has more shading units (14,336 versus 10,752), more TMUs (896 versus 336), and more RT cores (112 versus 84). Its texture rate of 1,388.8 GTexel/s outpaces NVIDIA's 879.3 GTexel/s. The Intel chip carries more transistors (100,000 million versus 45,600 million) on a larger die (1280 mm² versus 378 mm²). These advantages point to data-heavy compute scenarios where memory size and throughput dominate.

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER wins on clock speed, rasterization, and software features. Its base clock of 2295 MHz and boost of 2617 MHz are far above Intel's 750 MHz and 1550 MHz. It has 112 ROPs versus zero, a pixel rate of 293.1 GPixel/s versus 0 MPixel/s, and higher FP32 compute at 56.28 TFLOPS versus 44.44 TFLOPS. NVIDIA supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), Vulkan 1.4, and includes 336 tensor cores, while Intel lists only DirectX 12 (12_1) and OpenGL 4.6. The NVIDIA card is a dual-slot design with display connectors and a 16-pin power input; the Intel part is an OAM module without outputs. For any task requiring rendered frames, output to a display, or tensor acceleration, the RTX 5080 SUPER is the functional choice, backed by its single recorded benchmark score of 3075.