Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350 vs NVIDIA B300 SXM6 AC Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark results for the Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350 against the NVIDIA B300 SXM6 AC. The Intel part has no benchmark entries, an average benchmark score of zero, and no nearest rival data. The NVIDIA accelerator, by contrast, holds a single recorded Geekbench OpenCL score of 369,831, placing it at the 100th percentile among all GPUs in the database.

Without a shared workload, the comparison must rely on the B300's measured performance relative to its documented nearest rivals, and on the architectural specifications of the Intel part. The B300 SXM6 AC leads the NVIDIA B200 by 7 percent, the NVIDIA H200 NVL by 10.4 percent, the AMD Instinct MI300X by 16.3 percent, and the NVIDIA L40S by 25 percent. These deltas are derived from average scores: the B200 sits at 345,482, the H200 NVL at 334,891, the MI300X at 317,994, and the L40S at 295,763.

The Intel Max 1350 provides no comparable measurement, so its standing in the database rests on the 50th percentile mark, which reflects its position across all GPUs based on the available data, and that percentile is shared with many other parts. The B300's 100th percentile indicates that no GPU in the database records a higher average benchmark score, a position the Intel part cannot challenge with its empty benchmark field.

Where Each One Wins

The NVIDIA B300 SXM6 AC wins on every measurable benchmark dimension in the database. Its Geekbench OpenCL score of 369,831 is the sole recorded performance figure, and it outperforms all four nearest rivals by margins from 7 percent to 25 percent. The B300 also carries higher raw compute capabilities: its FP32 throughput of 76.99 TFLOPS and FP16 throughput of 76.99 TFLOPS (1:1) exceed the Intel part's 44.44 TFLOPS in both formats. Its memory bandwidth of 8.19 TB/s from 288 GB of HBM3e dwarfs the Intel card's 2.46 TB/s from 96 GB of HBM2e.

The Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350 wins in specific architectural counts, but not in measured outcomes. It has 896 texture mapping units versus the B300's 592, and 112 ray tracing cores where the B300 lists none. Its texture rate of 1,388.8 GTexel/s surpasses the B300's 1,202.9 GTexel/s. These are specification advantages, not benchmark victories.

The B300's pixel rate of 48.77 GPixel/s and its 24 ROPs, compared to the Intel part's 0 MPixel/s and 0 ROPs, give it a clear edge in rasterization output, though neither card has display outputs. The B300's base clock of 1665 MHz and boost clock of 2032 MHz both exceed the Intel card's 750 MHz base and 1550 MHz boost.

Architecture Differences

The two accelerators come from different manufacturers, fabs, and design generations. The Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350 uses the Ponte Vecchio chip built on Intel's 10 nm process, with 100,000 million transistors on a 1280 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 78.1 million per square millimeter. The NVIDIA B300 SXM6 AC uses the GB110 chip on TSMC's 5 nm process, packing 208,000 million transistors onto a 1628 mm² die for a density of 127.8 million per square millimeter. The NVIDIA part thus doubles the transistor count while using a smaller process node and a larger die.

The Intel architecture is Generation 12.5 from the Data Center GPU (Ponte Vecchio) generation. The NVIDIA architecture is Blackwell Ultra from the Server Blackwell (Bxx) generation. The B300's predecessor is listed as Server Hopper, and its successor is Server Rubin. The Intel part's successor is listed as H3C Graphics.

Memory systems diverge sharply. The Intel card uses 96 GB of HBM2e on an 8192-bit bus, achieving 2.46 TB/s bandwidth. The B300 uses 288 GB of HBM3e on the same 8192-bit bus width, achieving 8.19 TB/s. The B300's memory clock is 2000 MHz with 8 Gbps effective speed, while the Intel card runs at 1200 MHz with 2.4 Gbps effective.

Compute units differ in type and count. The Intel part has 14,336 shading units, 896 TMUs, 0 ROPs, and 112 ray tracing cores, with no tensor core count listed. The B300 has 18,944 shading units, 592 TMUs, 24 ROPs, and 592 tensor cores, with no ray tracing core count listed. The B300's FP32 and FP16 performance are identical at 76.99 TFLOPS (1:1), as are the Intel part's at 44.44 TFLOPS (1:1).

Power and interface specifications show a generation gap. The Intel card has a 450 W TDP with a suggested power supply of 850 W, uses a PCIe 5.0 x16 bus, and mounts as an OAM Module. The B300 has a 1100 W TDP with a suggested power supply of 1500 W, uses a PCIe 6.0 x16 bus, and mounts as an SXM Module. Neither card has display outputs, and neither lists power connectors.

API support differs. The Intel part supports DirectX 12 (12_1), OpenGL 4.6, and no listed Vulkan. The B300 lists N/A for DirectX, OpenGL, and Vulkan, reflecting its server-oriented compute focus.

FAQ

Q: Which accelerator has a higher recorded benchmark score?

A: The NVIDIA B300 SXM6 AC has a Geekbench OpenCL score of 369,831. The Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350 has no benchmark entries and an average score of zero.

Q: How does the B300 compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The B300 leads the NVIDIA B200 by 7 percent, the NVIDIA H200 NVL by 10.4 percent, the AMD Instinct MI300X by 16.3 percent, and the NVIDIA L40S by 25 percent.

Q: What is the memory capacity difference?

A: The B300 has 288 GB of HBM3e with 8.19 TB/s bandwidth. The Intel card has 96 GB of HBM2e with 2.46 TB/s bandwidth.

Q: Which part has more shading units?

A: The B300 has 18,944 shading units. The Intel Max 1350 has 14,336 shading units.

Q: What are the TDP requirements?

A: The B300 has a 1100 W TDP and suggests a 1500 W power supply. The Intel card has a 450 W TDP and suggests an 850 W power supply.

Q: Which card has ray tracing cores?

A: The Intel Max 1350 has 112 ray tracing cores. The B300 lists no ray tracing cores.

The Verdict

The database shows a clear performance hierarchy. The NVIDIA B300 SXM6 AC sits at the 100th percentile with a measured OpenCL score of 369,831, while the Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350 holds the 50th percentile with no recorded benchmarks. Anyone selecting between these two parts based on the recorded data would choose the B300 for any compute workload where raw throughput, memory bandwidth, or measured performance matters.

The B300 delivers 76.99 TFLOPS FP32 and FP16, 8.19 TB/s memory bandwidth, and 288 GB of HBM3e. The Intel card delivers 44.44 TFLOPS FP32 and FP16, 2.46 TB/s memory bandwidth, and 96 GB of HBM2e. The B300's transistor count of 208,000 million on a 1628 mm² die, its 18,944 shading units, and its 592 tensor cores provide a wider compute foundation. The Intel part's advantages in texture units (896 versus 592), texture rate (1,388.8 GTexel/s versus 1,202.9 GTexel/s), and ray tracing cores (112 versus none) do not offset the B300's dominance in measured workloads, compute throughput, memory capacity, and bandwidth.

The B300's 1100 W TDP and 1500 W suggested power supply reflect its higher performance ceiling. The Intel card's 450 W TDP and 850 W suggested power supply indicate a lower power envelope, but the data does not include any efficiency measurements. The B300 also uses a newer PCIe 6.0 x16 interface, while the Intel card uses PCIe 5.0 x16.

For users who require the highest recorded OpenCL score, the largest memory pool, and the greatest FP32 and FP16 throughput, the B300 is the only choice supported by the data. The Intel Max 1350 lacks any benchmark evidence in the database to justify selection for performance-critical roles. The B300's release date of 2025-09-10 also places it after the Intel card's 2023-01-09 release, and its predecessor and successor lineage (Server Hopper to Server Rubin) shows an active product roadmap. The Intel part's successor, H3C Graphics, similarly shows continued development, but the current generation's measured results remain absent.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350 | NVIDIA B300 SXM6 AC |

|---|---|---|

| Chip | Ponte Vecchio | GB110 |

| Architecture | Generation 12.5 | Blackwell Ultra |

| Process Node | 10 nm | 5 nm |

| Foundry | Intel | TSMC |

| Transistors | 100,000 million | 208,000 million |

| Die Size | 1280 mm² | 1628 mm² |

| Transistor Density | 78.1M / mm² | 127.8M / mm² |

| Base Clock | 750 MHz | 1665 MHz |

| Boost Clock | 1550 MHz | 2032 MHz |

| Memory Size | 96 GB | 288 GB |

| Memory Type | HBM2e | HBM3e |

| Memory Bus Width | 8192 bit | 8192 bit |

| Memory Bandwidth | 2.46 TB/s | 8.19 TB/s |

| Memory Clock | 1200 MHz, 2.4 Gbps effective | 2000 MHz, 8 Gbps effective |

| Shading Units | 14336 | 18944 |

| TMUs | 896 | 592 |

| ROPs | 0 | 24 |

| RT Cores | 112 | None listed |

| Tensor Cores | None listed | 592 |

| Pixel Rate | 0 MPixel/s | 48.77 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 1,388.8 GTexel/s | 1,202.9 GTexel/s |

| FP32 | 44.44 TFLOPS | 76.99 TFLOPS |

| FP16 | 44.44 TFLOPS (1:1) | 76.99 TFLOPS (1:1) |

| TDP | 450 W | 1100 W |

| Slot Width | OAM Module | SXM Module |

| Suggested PSU | 850 W | 1500 W |

| Bus Interface | PCIe 5.0 x16 | PCIe 6.0 x16 |

| Display Outputs | No outputs | No outputs |

| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | N/A |

| OpenGL | 4.6 | N/A |

| Vulkan | None listed | N/A |

| Release Date | 2023-01-09 | 2025-09-10 |

| Predecessor | None listed | Server Hopper |

| Successor | H3C Graphics | Server Rubin |

| Production Status | Active | Active |

| Percentile vs All GPUs | 50 | 100 |

| Avg Benchmark Score | 0 | 369831 |