Intel Arc Pro B50 vs Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA Comparison
Intel Arc Pro B50
Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA
PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS
Analysis: Intel Arc Pro B50 vs Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA
FAQ
Q: What is the Intel Arc Pro B50?
A: The Intel Arc Pro B50 is a Battlemage generation professional GPU, built on the Xe2-HPG architecture using the BMG-G21 chip at a 5 nm TSMC process node. It was released on September 4, 2025, and carries a launch MSRP of 349 USD.
Q: What is the Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA?
A: The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA is a 7G100 generation GPU based on the TrueGPU architecture, using the 7G105 chip on a 6 nm TSMC process node. Its release date is March 16, 2026, and its manufacturer is listed as Unknown.
Q: How much memory does each card have?
A: The Intel Arc Pro B50 has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, delivering 224.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA has 24 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, delivering 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth.
Q: What is the average benchmark score for each GPU?
A: The Intel Arc Pro B50 has an average benchmark score of 2660 across its recorded tests. The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA has no recorded benchmarks, so its average benchmark score is listed as 0.
Q: What API levels do the two cards support?
A: Both cards support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. The Intel Arc Pro B50 supports Vulkan 1.4, while the Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA supports Vulkan 1.3.
Q: What are the power requirements for each card?
A: The Intel Arc Pro B50 has a TDP of 70 W and requires no power connectors, with a suggested PSU of 250 W. The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA has a TDP of 225 W, uses a single 16-pin power connector, and requires a suggested PSU of 550 W.
Architecture Differences
The two GPUs represent fundamentally different design approaches. The Intel Arc Pro B50 uses the Xe2-HPG architecture, a modern gaming and professional graphics architecture from Intel, fabricated on a 5 nm TSMC process. It integrates 19,600 million transistors on a 272 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 72.1M per mm². The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA uses the TrueGPU architecture on a 6 nm TSMC process, though its transistor count and die size are not recorded in the database.
Compute resources differ sharply. The Intel card has 2048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, 16 ROPs, and 16 ray tracing cores. The Lisuan card has 6144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs, but no dedicated ray tracing core count is recorded. The Intel card's FP32 throughput is 10.65 TFLOPS, while the Lisuan card reaches 24.58 TFLOPS, more than double. FP16 performance follows the same ratio, with the Lisuan card at 49.15 TFLOPS versus 21.30 TFLOPS for the Intel card.
Memory architecture is another major divergence. The Intel Arc Pro B50 uses a 128-bit memory bus with 16 GB of GDDR6 at 14 Gbps effective, yielding 224.0 GB/s bandwidth. The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA uses a 192-bit bus with 24 GB of GDDR6 at 18 Gbps effective, yielding 432.0 GB/s, nearly double the bandwidth. The Lisuan card also has a higher pixel rate of 192.0 GPixel/s versus 41.60 GPixel/s on the Intel card, and a higher texture rate of 384.0 GTexel/s versus 332.8 GTexel/s.
Interface and connectivity differ as well. The Intel card uses PCIe 5.0 x8 and outputs 4x mini-DisplayPort 2.1. The Lisuan card uses PCIe 4.0 x16 and outputs 4x DisplayPort 1.4a. The Intel card is compact at 167 mm length, 69 mm height, and 40 mm width. The Lisuan card is much larger at 268 mm length, 112 mm height, and 40 mm width. Both are dual-slot cards.
Power delivery reflects the performance gap. The Intel Arc Pro B50 draws only 70 W with no external power connectors, suggesting a 250 W PSU. The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA draws 225 W, requires a single 16-pin connector, and suggests a 550 W PSU.
Head-to-Head Benchmarks
Direct benchmark comparison is limited because the Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA has no recorded benchmark scores in the database, while the Intel Arc Pro B50 has a full set of test results. The Intel card's recorded data shows an average benchmark score of 2660, placing it at the 17th percentile of all GPUs.
The Intel Arc Pro B50's individual benchmark results show a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1604, a Passmark G3D score of 12553, and a Passmark GPU Compute score of 6037. Its Passmark DirectX scores are 58 for DX10, 100 for DX11, 64 for DX12, and 144 for DX9. The Passmark G2D score is 717.
The nearest rivals in the database for the Intel Arc Pro B50, based on average score, are close calls. The NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 has an average score of 2662, a delta of -0.1% from the Intel card. The NVIDIA Quadro K1100M scores 2664, a delta of -0.2%. The NVIDIA GeForce GT 440 scores 2645, a delta of 0.6%. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER scores 2690, a delta of -1.1%. These results indicate the Intel card sits within roughly one percent of four very different GPUs, from an entry-level desktop card to a modern high-end model.
Because the Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA has no benchmark entries, the database records zero wins for both cards in head-to-head comparisons. The Lisuan card's percentile ranking of 50 is derived from its hardware specifications, not from measured performance. The Intel card's percentile of 17 comes directly from its tested scores.
The absence of Lisuan benchmark data means all comparative statements must rely on specification-derived metrics. The Lisuan card's FP32 throughput of 24.58 TFLOPS is 2.3 times the Intel card's 10.65 TFLOPS. Its memory bandwidth of 432.0 GB/s is 1.93 times the Intel card's 224.0 GB/s. Its pixel rate of 192.0 GPixel/s is 4.6 times the Intel card's 41.60 GPixel/s. Its texture rate of 384.0 GTexel/s is 1.15 times the Intel card's 332.8 GTexel/s.
These specification advantages suggest the Lisuan card would dominate in raw compute and fill-rate workloads, but without measured scores, the database cannot confirm real-world performance. The Intel card's tested results provide concrete data points for comparison against established GPUs.
Specification Differences
| Specification | Intel Arc Pro B50 | Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture | Xe2-HPG | TrueGPU |
| Generation | Battlemage (Pro Series) | 7G100 |
| Chip | BMG-G21 | 7G105 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 6 nm |
| Transistors | 19,600 million | unknown |
| Die Size | 272 mm² | unknown |
| Transistor Density | 72.1M / mm² | null |
| Base Clock | 1700 MHz | null |
| Boost Clock | 2600 MHz | null |
| Memory Clock | 1750 MHz 14 Gbps effective | 2250 MHz 18 Gbps effective |
| Memory Size | 16 GB | 24 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bus Width | 128 bit | 192 bit |
| Memory Bandwidth | 224.0 GB/s | 432.0 GB/s |
| Shading Units | 2048 | 6144 |
| TMUs | 128 | 192 |
| ROPs | 16 | 96 |
| RT Cores | 16 | null |
| Pixel Rate | 41.60 GPixel/s | 192.0 GPixel/s |
| Texture Rate | 332.8 GTexel/s | 384.0 GTexel/s |
| FP32 | 10.65 TFLOPS | 24.58 TFLOPS |
| FP16 | 21.30 TFLOPS (2:1) | 49.15 TFLOPS (2:1) |
| TDP | 70 W | 225 W |
| Power Connectors | None | 1x 16-pin |
| Suggested PSU | 250 W | 550 W |
| Bus Interface | PCIe 5.0 x8 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Display Outputs | 4x mini-DisplayPort 2.1 | 4x DisplayPort 1.4a |
| Vulkan Version | 1.4 | 1.3 |
| Length | 167 mm 6.6 inches | 268 mm 10.6 inches |
| Height | 69 mm 2.7 inches | 112 mm 4.4 inches |
| Width | 40 mm 1.6 inches | 40 mm 1.6 inches |
| Release Date | 2025-09-04 | 2026-03-16 |
| Launch MSRP | 349 USD | null |
| Avg Benchmark Score | 2660 | 0 |
| Percentile | 17 | 50 |
Where Each One Wins
The Intel Arc Pro B50 wins in power efficiency and physical footprint. Its 70 W TDP requires no external power connectors, and its 250 W suggested PSU makes it suitable for systems with modest power budgets. Its compact dimensions of 167 mm length allow installation in smaller chassis. The card supports PCIe 5.0 x8 and DisplayPort 2.1, providing modern connectivity for professional displays. Its Vulkan 1.4 support is ahead of the Lisuan card's Vulkan 1.3.
The Intel card also wins on measured performance data. It has a complete set of benchmark scores, including a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1604 and a Passmark G3D score of 12553. Its average benchmark score of 2660 is within one percent of four rival GPUs in the database, including the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER, which scores 2690, a delta of -1.1%. This places the Intel card in a known performance envelope.
The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA wins on raw compute specifications. Its FP32 throughput of 24.58 TFLOPS is more than double the Intel card's 10.65 TFLOPS. Its FP16 throughput of 49.15 TFLOPS likewise doubles the Intel card's 21.30 TFLOPS. The Lisuan card's memory bandwidth of 432.0 GB/s is nearly double, and its 24 GB capacity exceeds the Intel card's 16 GB. The Lisuan card's pixel rate of 192.0 GPixel/s is over four times higher, and its 96 ROPs are six times the Intel card's 16.
The Lisuan card also wins on memory bus width, with 192 bits versus 128 bits, and on memory clock, with 2250 MHz versus 1750 MHz. Its 6144 shading units are three times the Intel card's 2048. Its 192 TMUs exceed the Intel card's 128. The Lisuan card uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, which provides more lanes than the Intel card's PCIe 5.0 x8, though the Intel interface has higher per-lane bandwidth.
The Verdict
The database presents two cards with very different profiles. The Intel Arc Pro B50 is a tested, validated product with a complete benchmark record. Its average score of 2660 and 17th percentile ranking show it performs at a level comparable to the NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030, the NVIDIA Quadro K1100M, the NVIDIA GeForce GT 440, and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER, all within roughly one percent in either direction. Its 70 W power draw and lack of external power connectors make it a low-power option suitable for compact systems, and its DisplayPort 2.1 outputs support modern high-resolution displays.
The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA presents a specification-driven case. With 24.58 TFLOPS FP32, 432.0 GB/s memory bandwidth, and 24 GB of VRAM, it offers substantially higher theoretical compute and memory capacity than the Intel card. Its 50th percentile ranking reflects these specifications, though its average benchmark score of 0 confirms no measured data exists. The card requires 225 W, a 16-pin connector, and a 550 W PSU, indicating a higher power draw and larger physical footprint at 268 mm length.
Choosing between them depends on what the data supports. The Intel Arc Pro B50 is the only card with verified performance results, making it the safe choice for workloads where measured behavior matters. Its compact size and low power requirements suit small-form-factor builds and systems with limited power delivery. The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA offers higher raw specifications on paper, but the absence of benchmark scores means its real-world performance remains unverified in the database. Its larger memory pool and bandwidth could benefit memory-intensive tasks, but no measured evidence confirms this advantage. The Intel card's launch MSRP of 349 USD provides a known cost reference, while the Lisuan card has no listed MSRP. The data favors the Intel card for immediate, verified use, and the Lisuan card for those willing to accept unmeasured specifications as the basis for a purchasing decision.