Intel Arc Pro B50 vs Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data presents an unusual comparison challenge. The Intel Arc Pro B50 has a complete set of benchmark results, while the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 has no recorded benchmark scores in the database. The head-to-head benchmark table is empty, and the win counter shows zero for both products. This does not mean the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 is uncompetitive; rather, it indicates that no direct comparison measurements have been logged for this pairing.

For the Intel Arc Pro B50 alone, the database records an average benchmark score of 2660 across eight tests. The most substantial result is the PassMark G3D score of 12553, which reflects general 3D rendering performance. The PassMark GPU compute score of 6037 indicates compute throughput. In DirectX API tests, the card scores 100 in DirectX 11, 64 in DirectX 12, 58 in DirectX 10, and 144 in DirectX 9. The 2D graphics score is 717. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test yields a score of 1604.

The Arc Pro B50 sits at the 17th percentile among all GPUs in the database. Its nearest rivals, based on average score, are within a narrow band. The NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 averages 2662, which is 0.1% higher. The NVIDIA Quadro K1100M averages 2664, 0.2% higher. The NVIDIA GeForce GT 440 averages 2645, which is 0.6% lower. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER averages 2690, 1.1% higher. This clustering suggests the Arc Pro B50 delivers performance comparable to entry-level discrete GPUs from several generations ago, despite its modern architecture and feature set.

Because the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 has no benchmark entries, the database cannot yet quantify its relative standing. The percentile field for that product, 50, indicates a median placement if scores existed, but the average score field remains at zero. This is a placeholder state rather than a measured outcome. Until benchmark data is recorded for the LX 7G100, any head-to-head numerical comparison remains provisional.

FAQ

Q: What is the average benchmark score for the Intel Arc Pro B50?

A: The database records an average benchmark score of 2660 across all logged tests for the Intel Arc Pro B50.

Q: Does the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 have any recorded benchmark scores?

A: No. The benchmark list for the LX 7G100 is empty, and its average benchmark score is listed as zero.

Q: How does the Intel Arc Pro B50 compare to its nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030?

A: The Arc Pro B50 averages 2660, while the GeForce GT 1030 averages 2662. The GT 1030 is 0.1% ahead in this comparison.

Q: What is the highest individual benchmark score for the Intel Arc Pro B50?

A: The PassMark G3D test produced the highest logged score at 12553.

Q: Which DirectX version yields the highest PassMark score for the Arc Pro B50?

A: DirectX 9 produces the highest PassMark score at 144, followed by DirectX 11 at 100, DirectX 12 at 64, and DirectX 10 at 58.

Q: What percentile does the Intel Arc Pro B50 occupy among all GPUs?

A: The Arc Pro B50 is at the 17th percentile among all GPUs in the database.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Arc Pro B50 wins in all measurable benchmark categories because it is the only product with recorded test data. Its strongest showing is in PassMark G3D at 12553, which indicates solid rasterization performance for its class. The GPU compute score of 6037 shows that the card can handle general-purpose compute workloads. The DirectX 9 score of 144, notably higher than the DirectX 12 score of 64, suggests legacy API performance outpaces modern API performance in PassMark's specific workload.

The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 wins in theoretical specifications that are not yet validated by benchmarks. It carries 6144 shading units versus 2048 for the Arc Pro B50, and its FP32 throughput is 24.58 TFLOPS against 10.65 TFLOPS. The texture rate is 384.0 GTexel/s versus 332.8 GTexel/s. The pixel rate is 192.0 GPixel/s versus 41.60 GPixel/s. Memory bandwidth favors the LX 7G100 at 432.0 GB/s versus 224.0 GB/s. These figures suggest the LX 7G100 has a higher ceiling, but without benchmark scores, the database cannot confirm real-world performance.

For use-case planning, the Arc Pro B50 is the only option with measured evidence. It suits workloads that align with its logged scores, such as 2D graphics work, legacy DirectX applications, and compute tasks that fit within its 16 GB memory capacity. The LX 7G100 remains an unverified candidate for higher-throughput scenarios, but the absence of data prevents any reliable recommendation.

Specification Differences

The two cards diverge on nearly every specification field. The Intel Arc Pro B50 uses a 5 nm process node, while the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 uses a 6 nm node, both from TSMC. Transistor counts differ sharply: the Arc Pro B50 contains 19,600 million transistors on a 272 mm² die, while the LX 7G100 has unknown transistor count and die size.

Clock behavior differs as well. The Arc Pro B50 lists a base clock of 1700 MHz and a boost clock of 2600 MHz. The LX 7G100 lists no base or boost clock. Memory clocks also differ: the Arc Pro B50 runs at 1750 MHz with 14 Gbps effective, while the LX 7G100 runs at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective.

Memory configuration is a major split. The Arc Pro B50 has 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, yielding 224.0 GB/s bandwidth. The LX 7G100 has 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus, yielding 432.0 GB/s bandwidth. The wider bus and higher clock give the LX 7G100 nearly double the bandwidth despite less capacity.

The compute units differ substantially. The Arc Pro B50 has 2048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, and 16 ROPs. The LX 7G100 has 6144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs. The LX 7G100 also has 16 ray tracing cores, while the LX 7G100 lists no RT core count. Neither card lists tensor cores.

Power requirements differ. The Arc Pro B50 has a TDP of 70 W with no power connectors and a suggested PSU of 250 W. The LX 7G100 has a TDP of 225 W with one 8-pin connector and a suggested PSU of 550 W.

Bus interface and display outputs also differ. The Arc Pro B50 uses PCIe 5.0 x8 and has four mini-DisplayPort 2.1 outputs. The LX 7G100 uses PCIe 4.0 x16 and has four DisplayPort 1.4a outputs.

Physical dimensions show a size difference. The Arc Pro B50 is 167 mm long, 69 mm tall, and 40 mm wide. The LX 7G100 is 294 mm long, 120 mm tall, and 49 mm wide. Both are dual-slot cards.

API support is similar but not identical. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. The Arc Pro B50 supports Vulkan 1.4, while the LX 7G100 supports Vulkan 1.3.

Release dates differ. The Arc Pro B50 launched on September 4, 2025, with a launch MSRP of 349 USD. The LX 7G100 launched on June 17, 2026, with no recorded launch MSRP.

Architecture Differences

The architectural split is fundamental. The Intel Arc Pro B50 uses the Xe2-HPG architecture from the Battlemage Pro Series, built on the BMG-G21 chip. The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 uses an architecture labeled TrueGPU with the 7G106 chip, belonging to the 7G100 generation. The names alone suggest different design philosophies, but the database does not provide deeper architectural documentation.

The manufacturing nodes differ by one step: 5 nm for the Arc Pro B50 versus 6 nm for the LX 7G100, both at TSMC. The Arc Pro B50 has a documented transistor count of 19,600 million, while the LX 7G100's count is unknown. This means the density comparison cannot be made for the LX 7G100. The Arc Pro B50 achieves 72.1M transistors per mm².

Cache details are absent for both products. Neither card lists L2 or L3 cache sizes in the database. The RT core situation is asymmetric: the Arc Pro B50 has 16 RT cores, while the LX 7G100 lists none. This could mean the LX 7G100 lacks dedicated ray tracing hardware, or that the field was simply not populated. Given the unknown manufacturer and the TrueGPU architecture label, the absence of RT cores may be intentional.

Feature sets differ in API versioning. The Arc Pro B50 supports Vulkan 1.4, which is a newer specification than the Vulkan 1.3 supported by the LX 7G100. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate, so modern DirectX workloads should run on either card. The display output standard also differs: the Arc Pro B50 uses DisplayPort 2.1, while the LX 7G100 uses the older DisplayPort 1.4a. This affects maximum display resolution and refresh rate capabilities, though the database does not list specific limits.

The power delivery architecture differs. The Arc Pro B50 draws 70 W and requires no external power connector, indicating it is powered entirely through the PCIe slot. The LX 7G100 draws 225 W and requires a single 8-pin connector. The PCIe interface also differs: PCIe 5.0 x8 for the Arc Pro B50 versus PCIe 4.0 x16 for the LX 7G100. The newer PCIe 5.0 standard offers higher per-lane bandwidth, but the x8 width halves the lane count versus the LX 7G100's x16.

The Verdict

The data presents a clear but incomplete picture. The Intel Arc Pro B50 is fully characterized with benchmark scores, a release date, a launch MSRP of 349 USD, and a known position at the 17th percentile among all GPUs. Its average score of 2660 places it in the company of the NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030, Quadro K1100M, GT 440, and RTX 5070 SUPER, all within a 1.1% band. This indicates the Arc Pro B50 delivers entry-level performance in a low-power, slot-powered package with modern API support and 16 GB of memory.

The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 is a specification sheet without measured results. It promises higher raw throughput with 24.58 TFLOPS FP32, 6144 shading units, and 432.0 GB/s bandwidth. Its 50th percentile placement and zero average score suggest the database expects it to perform at a median level, but this has not been verified. The card is larger, draws more power, and requires a 550 W PSU. It also lacks the newer Vulkan 1.4 support and DisplayPort 2.1 outputs of the Arc Pro B50.

For users requiring verified performance, the Arc Pro B50 is the only defensible choice. The recorded benchmarks show it handles DirectX 9 and 11 workloads well, offers decent compute throughput, and does so within a 70 W envelope. For users willing to accept unverified specifications, the LX 7G100 presents a higher theoretical ceiling, but the database contains no evidence that this translates into real-world wins. The verdict, based strictly on recorded data, is that the Arc Pro B50 is the product with proven results, while the LX 7G100 remains an unproven alternative.