Intel Arc Pro A60 vs Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA Comparison

FAQ

Q: How do the two GPUs compare in average benchmark scores?

A: The Intel Arc Pro A60 has an average benchmark score of 60,326, placing it in the 88th percentile of all GPUs. The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA has no recorded benchmark scores in the database, giving it an average score of 0 and a 50th percentile ranking.

Q: What memory configurations do these cards use?

A: The Intel Arc Pro A60 uses 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, delivering 384.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA uses 24 GB of GDDR6 memory also on a 192-bit bus, but with higher bandwidth at 432.0 GB/s.

Q: Which card has higher compute throughput?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA delivers 24.58 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 49.15 TFLOPS of FP16 performance. The Intel Arc Pro A60 delivers 8.397 TFLOPS of FP32 and 16.79 TFLOPS of FP16.

Q: What are the power requirements for each card?

A: The Intel Arc Pro A60 has a TDP of 130 W and requires a 300 W suggested power supply. The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA has a TDP of 225 W and requires a 550 W suggested power supply.

Q: Do both cards support DirectX 12 Ultimate?

A: Yes, both cards support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan. The Intel Arc Pro A60 supports Vulkan 1.4, while the Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA supports Vulkan 1.3.

Q: How does the Intel Arc Pro A60 compare to nearby rivals in the database?

A: The Intel Arc Pro A60 sits within 0.3% of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 in average score, is 0.3% ahead of the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48, trails the AMD Radeon Pro W6600M by 2.5%, and leads the AMD Radeon PRO V710 by 2.8%.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Arc Pro A60 wins in the measured benchmark domain. The database records two benchmark results for this card: a Geekbench OpenCL score of 63,485 and a Geekbench Vulkan score of 57,166. These results place it in the 88th percentile of all GPUs, and its average benchmark score of 60,326 puts it in direct competition with high-end cards like the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090, which averages 60,347, and the AMD Radeon Pro W6600M, which averages 61,896.

The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA has no recorded benchmark scores in the database. Its 50th percentile ranking reflects an absence of measured data rather than a specific performance level. However, the specification sheet indicates that the LX ULTRA is designed for workloads that demand large memory capacity and raw compute throughput. Its 24 GB memory pool doubles the Arc Pro A60's 12 GB, and its FP32 output of 24.58 TFLOPS is roughly three times the Arc Pro A60's 8.397 TFLOPS. For tasks that scale with memory capacity or shader throughput, the LX ULTRA has the theoretical advantage, but there is no benchmark data to confirm real-world results.

The Arc Pro A60 wins in the connectivity and API compatibility segment. It outputs through 4x DisplayPort 2.0, while the LX ULTRA uses 4x DisplayPort 1.4a. The Arc Pro A60 also supports Vulkan 1.4, one revision ahead of the LX ULTRA's Vulkan 1.3. In efficiency-oriented deployments, the Arc Pro A60's 130 W TDP and 300 W suggested power supply make it the lighter power draw option compared to the LX ULTRA's 225 W TDP and 550 W suggested power supply.

For physical installation, the Arc Pro A60 occupies a single slot, whereas the LX ULTRA is a dual-slot card measuring 268 mm in length, 112 mm in height, and 40 mm in width. The Arc Pro A60's smaller footprint suits space-constrained systems, while the LX ULTRA's larger cooler surface aligns with its higher thermal envelope.

Architecture Differences

The Intel Arc Pro A60 uses the DG2-256 chip built on the Xe-HPG architecture, part of the Alchemist Pro Series generation. It is fabricated by TSMC on a 6 nm process with 11,500 million transistors on a 269 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 42.8 million per mm². The architecture includes 16 dedicated ray tracing cores, which the Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA does not list in its specifications.

The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA uses the 7G105 chip built on an architecture called TrueGPU, part of the 7G100 generation. It is also fabricated by TSMC on a 6 nm process, but the database does not record transistor count, die size, or transistor density for this chip. The LX ULTRA does not list ray tracing cores or tensor cores in its specifications.

The shading engine configurations differ substantially. The Arc Pro A60 has 2,048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, and 64 render output units. The LX ULTRA has 6,144 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 96 render output units. This gives the LX ULTRA three times the shader count, 1.5 times the TMUs, and 1.5 times the ROPs of the Arc Pro A60.

Pixel and texture throughput reflect these differences. The LX ULTRA reaches 192.0 GPixel/s and 384.0 GTexel/s, while the Arc Pro A60 reaches 131.2 GPixel/s and 262.4 GTexel/s. The LX ULTRA's higher ROP count drives its pixel rate advantage, and its higher TMU count drives the texture rate advantage.

Clock behavior differs in the database records. The Arc Pro A60 has a base clock of 900 MHz and a boost clock of 2050 MHz. The LX ULTRA has no base or boost clock listed. Memory clocks are recorded differently as well: the Arc Pro A60 runs its memory at 2000 MHz with 16 Gbps effective speed, while the LX ULTRA runs at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective speed.

Specification Differences

The most immediate difference is memory capacity. The Arc Pro A60 ships with 12 GB of GDDR6, and the LX ULTRA ships with 24 GB of GDDR6. Both use a 192-bit memory bus, but the LX ULTRA's higher memory clock of 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective) versus the Arc Pro A60's 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) results in 432.0 GB/s versus 384.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Compute resources differ across every unit class. The LX ULTRA has 6,144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs. The Arc Pro A60 has 2,048 shading units, 128 TMUs, and 64 ROPs. The LX ULTRA lists no ray tracing cores, while the Arc Pro A60 includes 16.

Power and cooling specifications separate the two clearly. The Arc Pro A60 has a 130 W TDP, a single-slot form factor, and a 300 W suggested power supply. The LX ULTRA has a 225 W TDP, a dual-slot form factor, a 1x 16-pin power connector, and a 550 W suggested power supply.

Display output standards differ. The Arc Pro A60 provides 4x DisplayPort 2.0 connectors. The LX ULTRA provides 4x DisplayPort 1.4a connectors. Both use PCIe 4.0 x16 for the bus interface.

API support is nearly identical, with both cards supporting DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. The Vulkan version differs: the Arc Pro A60 supports Vulkan 1.4, and the LX ULTRA supports Vulkan 1.3.

Physical dimensions are only recorded for the LX ULTRA: 268 mm length, 112 mm height, and 40 mm width. The database does not list dimensions for the Arc Pro A60.

The release dates place these cards in different periods. The Intel Arc Pro A60 was released on June 5, 2023. The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA has a release date of March 16, 2026. Both cards are listed as Active in production status.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark results between the Intel Arc Pro A60 and the Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA. The head-to-head comparison table is empty, and neither card is listed as a rival to the other. The wins counter shows 0 for both cards.

The Intel Arc Pro A60 has its own measured results, however. In Geekbench OpenCL, it scores 63,485, and in Geekbench Vulkan, it scores 57,166. These two results produce an average benchmark score of 60,326. The card's nearest rivals in the database provide context for this score. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 averages 60,347, essentially identical with a 0% delta. The AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 averages 60,140, which the Arc Pro A60 edges by 0.3%. The AMD Radeon Pro W6600M averages 61,896, putting it 2.5% ahead of the Arc Pro A60. The AMD Radeon PRO V710 averages 58,657, which the Arc Pro A60 leads by 2.8%.

The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA has no benchmark entries, no nearest rivals, and an average benchmark score of 0. Its 50th percentile ranking places it below the Arc Pro A60's 88th percentile, but this ranking is based on the absence of data rather than a measured performance deficit. The specification sheet suggests the LX ULTRA could outperform the Arc Pro A60 in raw throughput if the hardware delivers on its theoretical numbers, but the database cannot confirm this without recorded test results.

The Arc Pro A60's Vulkan score of 57,166 trails its own OpenCL score of 63,485 by roughly 11%, indicating that the card performs better under OpenCL workloads in the recorded data. No equivalent comparison exists for the LX ULTRA.

For users comparing these cards, the Arc Pro A60 offers verified performance data and a strong position relative to established GPUs. The LX ULTRA offers a larger memory pool, higher bandwidth, and significantly more compute throughput on paper, but it lacks any measured benchmark evidence in the database. The recorded data supports the Arc Pro A60 as the card with demonstrated performance, while the LX ULTRA remains an unverified specification sheet with substantial theoretical capability.