Intel Arc Pro A60 vs Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 Comparison

The Intel Arc Pro A60 and the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 occupy very different positions in the benchmark database. The Arc Pro A60 is a professional workstation GPU with a full set of recorded benchmark results, while the LX 7G100 is a newer, higher-specification card with no recorded benchmark scores yet. This analysis compares the two based on their documented specifications and the available performance data for the Arc Pro A60.

Where Each One Wins

The Arc Pro A60 wins in the category of measured performance. Its average benchmark score, derived from Geekbench OpenCL and Vulkan tests, is 60,326. The LX 7G100 has no recorded benchmark scores, so there is no direct measured comparison available. The database shows that the Arc Pro A60 sits at the 88th percentile among all GPUs, meaning it outperforms the vast majority of recorded graphics cards.

The LX 7G100 wins in raw computational specifications. It carries 6,144 shading units, three times the 2,048 shading units of the Arc Pro A60. Its FP32 compute throughput is listed at 24.58 TFLOPS, which is nearly three times the 8.397 TFLOPS of the Arc Pro A60. The LX 7G100 also has a higher texture rate at 384.0 GTexel/s versus 262.4 GTexel/s, and a higher pixel rate at 192.0 GPixel/s versus 131.2 GPixel/s. These specifications suggest that, once benchmarked, the LX 7G100 could deliver significantly higher raw performance in compute-heavy workloads.

The Arc Pro A60 wins in the efficiency and form factor categories. It has a 130 W TDP and is a single-slot card, while the LX 7G100 has a 225 W TDP and occupies a dual-slot design. The Arc Pro A60 also requires a suggested 300 W power supply, compared to the 550 W suggested for the LX 7G100. For dense workstation environments where space and power are constrained, the Arc Pro A60 has a clear advantage.

The LX 7G100 wins in memory bandwidth. Its 12 GB of GDDR6 memory runs at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective speed, producing 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The Arc Pro A60's 12 GB GDDR6 memory runs at 2000 MHz with 16 Gbps effective speed, yielding 384.0 GB/s. The LX 7G100's bandwidth is 12.5% higher, which can matter for memory-intensive rendering or data-processing tasks.

The Arc Pro A60 wins in software ecosystem compatibility in one specific area: it supports Vulkan 1.4, while the LX 7G100 supports Vulkan 1.3. Both cards support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6, so those API levels are identical.

Architecture Differences

The two cards are built on fundamentally different architectures. The Arc Pro A60 uses Intel's Xe-HPG architecture, specifically the DG2-256 chip, and belongs to the Alchemist generation of Intel's Pro Series. The LX 7G100 uses a completely different architecture called TrueGPU, built around the 7G106 chip, and belongs to the 7G100 generation.

Both cards are manufactured on a 6 nm process at TSMC, so the underlying transistor manufacturing is the same. However, the Intel chip is documented with 11,500 million transistors on a 269 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 42.8 million per square millimeter. The LX 7G100's transistor count and die size are listed as unknown, so no direct density comparison is possible.

The shading unit organization differs substantially. The Arc Pro A60 has 2,048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, and 64 render output units. The LX 7G100 has 6,144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs. The LX 7G100's larger counts suggest a wider execution architecture, likely designed for parallel throughput rather than the more modest scale of the Arc Pro A60.

Ray tracing support is present on the Arc Pro A60 with 16 dedicated ray tracing cores. The LX 7G100 lists no ray tracing cores in its specifications. This means the Arc Pro A60 has a documented hardware path for ray-traced workloads, while the LX 7G100's ray tracing capability is either absent or not disclosed in the database.

Memory architecture is similar in capacity and bus width: both cards use 12 GB of GDDR6 with a 192-bit bus. The difference lies in clock speed and resulting bandwidth, as noted previously. The LX 7G100 pairs higher memory clocks with its wider compute resources, while the Arc Pro A60 runs its memory at a more conservative speed.

Display outputs differ as well. The Arc Pro A60 provides four DisplayPort 2.0 connections, while the LX 7G100 provides four DisplayPort 1.4a connections. DisplayPort 2.0 offers higher data rates than 1.4a, which could matter for high-resolution or high-refresh-rate multi-monitor setups.

The LX 7G100 includes a single 8-pin power connector, while the Arc Pro A60 lists no power connector specification. The LX 7G100's physical dimensions are fully documented at 294 mm in length, 120 mm in height, and 49 mm in width. The Arc Pro A60's dimensions are not listed in the database.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

There are no recorded head-to-head benchmarks between the Arc Pro A60 and the LX 7G100. The database contains benchmark results only for the Arc Pro A60, with two test scores. The Geekbench OpenCL score is 63,485, and the Geekbench Vulkan score is 57,166. These combine to an average benchmark score of 60,326.

In the absence of direct comparison data, the Arc Pro A60's scores can be contextualized against its nearest rivals. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 has an average score of 60,347, which is essentially identical to the Arc Pro A60's 60,326, with a delta percentage of 0. The AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 scores 60,140, just 0.3% behind the Arc Pro A60. The AMD Radeon Pro W6600M scores 61,896, putting it 2.5% ahead. The AMD Radeon PRO V710 scores 58,657, which is 2.8% behind the Arc Pro A60.

These figures indicate that the Arc Pro A60's measured performance places it in a competitive band with several high-end workstation and consumer GPUs. The LX 7G100 has no such recorded data, so its performance relative to these rivals cannot be assessed from the database.

The LX 7G100's raw specifications suggest a much higher compute ceiling. Its FP32 throughput of 24.58 TFLOPS is roughly 2.93 times that of the Arc Pro A60. Its texture rate of 384.0 GTexel/s is 1.46 times higher, and its pixel rate of 192.0 GPixel/s is 1.46 times higher. If the LX 7G100's real-world performance scales anywhere near its specification advantage, it would likely exceed the Arc Pro A60's scores by a wide margin once benchmarks are run. However, the database currently offers no measured confirmation of this.

FAQ

Q: Which card has higher measured benchmark performance?

A: The Intel Arc Pro A60 has recorded benchmark scores. Its Geekbench OpenCL score is 63,485, its Geekbench Vulkan score is 57,166, and its average benchmark score is 60,326. The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 has no recorded benchmark scores in the database.

Q: How does the LX 7G100 compare in raw compute specifications?

A: The LX 7G100 lists 6,144 shading units, 192 texture units, and 96 render output units, compared to 2,048 shading units, 128 texture units, and 64 render output units on the Arc Pro A60. The LX 7G100 also lists FP32 performance of 24.58 TFLOPS versus 8.397 TFLOPS for the Arc Pro A60.

Q: What are the memory differences between the two cards?

A: Both use 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus. The Arc Pro A60 runs its memory at 2000 MHz with 16 Gbps effective speed, producing 384.0 GB/s bandwidth. The LX 7G100 runs its memory at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective speed, producing 432.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: Do both cards support the same graphics APIs?

A: Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. The Arc Pro A60 supports Vulkan 1.4, while the LX 7G100 supports Vulkan 1.3.

Q: What are the power and physical differences?

A: The Arc Pro A60 has a 130 W TDP, is single-slot, and suggests a 300 W power supply. The LX 7G100 has a 225 W TDP, is dual-slot, uses one 8-pin power connector, and suggests a 550 W power supply. The LX 7G100 measures 294 mm long, 120 mm high, and 49 mm wide, while the Arc Pro A60's dimensions are not listed.

Q: Which card has ray tracing hardware?

A: The Arc Pro A60 includes 16 ray tracing cores. The LX 7G100 lists no ray tracing cores in its specifications.

Q: How does the Arc Pro A60 compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Arc Pro A60's average score of 60,326 is essentially tied with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 at 60,347, 0.3% ahead of the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 at 60,140, 2.5% behind the AMD Radeon Pro W6600M at 61,896, and 2.8% ahead of the AMD Radeon PRO V710 at 58,657.

Specification Differences

The two cards differ in several documented specifications. The Arc Pro A60 uses the DG2-256 chip with Intel's Xe-HPG architecture, while the LX 7G100 uses the 7G106 chip with TrueGPU architecture. The Arc Pro A60 is from the Alchemist generation, while the LX 7G100 is from the 7G100 generation.

The Arc Pro A60 has a documented transistor count of 11,500 million on a 269 mm² die with a density of 42.8 million transistors per square millimeter. The LX 7G100's transistor count and die size are unknown.

Clock speeds differ substantially. The Arc Pro A60 has a base clock of 900 MHz and a boost clock of 2050 MHz. The LX 7G100 has no listed base or boost clock. Memory clocks are 2000 MHz with 16 Gbps effective for the Arc Pro A60, versus 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective for the LX 7G100.

Shading units, texture units, and render output units are all higher on the LX 7G100: 6,144 versus 2,048, 192 versus 128, and 96 versus 64, respectively. The Arc Pro A60 has 16 ray tracing cores, while the LX 7G100 has none listed.

Pixel rate is 131.2 GPixel/s for the Arc Pro A60 versus 192.0 GPixel/s for the LX 7G100. Texture rate is 262.4 GTexel/s versus 384.0 GTexel/s. FP32 performance is 8.397 TFLOPS versus 24.58 TFLOPS. FP16 performance is 16.79 TFLOPS versus 49.15 TFLOPS, both at a 2:1 ratio.

TDP is 130 W for the Arc Pro A60 versus 225 W for the LX 7G100. The Arc Pro A60 is single-slot, while the LX 7G100 is dual-slot. The LX 7G100 has one 8-pin power connector, while the Arc Pro A60 lists none. Suggested power supply is 300 W versus 550 W.

Display outputs are four DisplayPort 2.0 ports on the Arc Pro A60, and four DisplayPort 1.4a ports on the LX 7G100. Vulkan support is version 1.4 on the Arc Pro A60 and version 1.3 on the LX 7G100. The LX 7G100 has documented dimensions of 294 mm by 120 mm by 49 mm, while the Arc Pro A60 has no listed dimensions.

Release dates differ: the Arc Pro A60 was released on June 5, 2023, while the LX 7G100 has a release date of June 17, 2026. Both cards are listed as active in production.

The Verdict

The data presents a clear split. The Intel Arc Pro A60 is the only card with measured performance. Its average benchmark score of 60,326 places it at the 88th percentile of all GPUs, with performance essentially tied to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 and within a few percentage points of several AMD professional cards. It achieves this with a 130 W TDP, a single-slot design, and a 300 W suggested power supply, making it a strong candidate for compact or power-conscious workstation builds. Its 16 ray tracing cores and Vulkan 1.4 support add features that the LX 7G100 does not document.

The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 offers a dramatically higher specification sheet. Its 6,144 shading units, 24.58 TFLOPS FP32 performance, and 432.0 GB/s memory bandwidth indicate a card designed for heavy parallel compute. The 225 W TDP and dual-slot form factor reflect that ambition. However, the database contains no benchmark results for this card, so its real-world performance remains unverified. Its lack of listed ray tracing cores and older Vulkan support are minor drawbacks, but the raw compute advantage is substantial.

For users who need verified performance today, the Arc Pro A60 is the only choice with recorded data. For users who prioritize maximum raw compute specifications and are willing to wait for benchmark confirmation, the LX 7G100's specifications point to a much higher ceiling. The decision rests on whether measured results or stated specifications carry more weight.