Intel Arc Graphics 48EU Mobile vs Lisuan Tech LX PRO Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no recorded benchmark scores for either the Intel Arc Graphics 48EU Mobile or the Lisuan Tech LX PRO. With zero benchmark entries and zero wins recorded for each side, the head-to-head comparison rests entirely on the architectural specifications and performance ceilings indicated by the recorded data. This absence of measured results is itself informative. The Intel part is an integrated graphics solution with a 50th percentile ranking among all GPUs, while the Lisuan Tech LX PRO also holds a 50th percentile ranking, but the two devices occupy vastly different performance classes based on their raw compute and memory specifications.

The Intel Arc Graphics 48EU Mobile delivers 1,382.4 GFLOPS of FP32 compute, while the Lisuan Tech LX PRO delivers 24.58 TFLOPS. That is a difference of roughly 17.8 times in favor of the Lisuan Tech part. Pixel throughput tells a similar story: the Intel IGP achieves 14.40 GPixel/s, whereas the LX PRO achieves 192.0 GPixel/s, a 13.3 times advantage. Texture rate separates them even further, with the LX PRO at 384.0 GTexel/s against the Intel part's 43.20 GTexel/s, an 8.9 times gap. These are not marginal differences; they represent entirely different tiers of rendering capability.

The FP16 data shows the same trend. The Intel Arc Graphics 48EU Mobile lists 2.765 TFLOPS with a 2:1 ratio, while the LX PRO lists 49.15 TFLOPS also with a 2:1 ratio. The Lisuan Tech product carries a 17.8 times FP16 advantage, matching its FP32 lead. The LX PRO also supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), while the Intel IGP supports DirectX 12 (12_1), meaning the LX PRO includes the full DirectX 12 Ultimate feature set. Vulkan support favors Intel slightly with version 1.4 versus the LX PRO's 1.3, while OpenGL is identical at 4.6 on both.

Memory bandwidth is another decisive separator. The Intel part uses system-shared memory with bandwidth listed as system dependent, meaning it has no dedicated VRAM and must share system memory bandwidth. The LX PRO has 24 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus with 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth, a figure that dwarfs what any integrated solution can typically access. The LX PRO also runs its memory at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective speed. For the Intel IGP, memory clock is listed as system shared, reinforcing that its performance is constrained by the host system's memory subsystem.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has a higher pixel rate?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX PRO achieves 192.0 GPixel/s, which is 13.3 times higher than the Intel Arc Graphics 48EU Mobile's 14.40 GPixel/s.

Q: What is the FP32 compute difference between the two?

A: The LX PRO delivers 24.58 TFLOPS, while the Intel IGP delivers 1,382.4 GFLOPS. The LX PRO leads by approximately 17.8 times.

Q: Does the Intel part have dedicated video memory?

A: No, the Intel Arc Graphics 48EU Mobile uses system-shared memory with system-dependent bandwidth and memory type listed as system shared. The LX PRO, by contrast, has 24 GB of dedicated GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus.

Q: Which GPU supports a newer DirectX version?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX PRO supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), while the Intel Arc Graphics 48EU Mobile supports DirectX 12 (12_1). The LX PRO's 12_2 support includes the full Ultimate feature set.

Q: What are the TDP ratings for each GPU?

A: The Intel Arc Graphics 48EU Mobile has a TDP of 28 W, while the Lisuan Tech LX PRO has a TDP of 225 W. The LX PRO also requires a 550 W suggested PSU and uses a 1x 16-pin power connector.

Q: Which GPU uses a smaller manufacturing process?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX PRO is built on a 6 nm process at TSMC, while the Intel Arc Graphics 48EU Mobile uses a 10 nm process at Intel. The LX PRO's process is smaller.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs come from fundamentally different architectural lineages. The Intel Arc Graphics 48EU Mobile is based on the Meteor Lake chip with an Xe-LPG architecture, part of the Arc Graphics-M generation for Meteor Lake. It is built on a 10 nm process at Intel's own foundry. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO uses the 7G105 chip with an architecture called TrueGPU, belonging to the 7G100 generation, and is fabricated on a 6 nm process at TSMC. The process node difference, 10 nm versus 6 nm, gives the LX PRO a denser transistor layout, although the transistor count and die size for both are either not recorded or listed as unknown.

The Intel part is an integrated graphics processor, occupying an IGP slot width and using a Ring Bus interface. It has 384 shading units, 24 texture mapping units, and 8 raster output units. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO is a discrete dual-slot card with a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, featuring 6144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs. That is 16 times more shading units, 8 times more TMUs, and 12 times more ROPs on the LX PRO. Neither part lists dedicated ray tracing cores or tensor cores, so those features are absent from both specifications.

Memory architecture differs sharply. The Intel IGP shares system memory with no dedicated VRAM, with memory size, type, and bus width all listed as system shared. The LX PRO has 24 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth. The LX PRO's memory clock is explicitly 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective, while the Intel part's memory clock is system shared. The LX PRO also lists four DisplayPort 1.4a outputs, whereas the Intel IGP's display outputs are portable device dependent, reflecting its mobile integrated nature.

Power delivery separates them further. The Intel Arc Graphics 48EU Mobile has a 28 W TDP with no power connectors listed, suitable for integration into a laptop or compact device. The LX PRO has a 225 W TDP, a 1x 16-pin power connector, and a 550 W suggested PSU. Its physical dimensions are 248 mm in length, 118 mm in height, and 48 mm in width. The Intel part has no dimensions recorded, consistent with an IGP that is soldered onto a motherboard.

API support shows a partial overlap. Both support OpenGL 4.6. The Intel IGP supports DirectX 12 (12_1) and Vulkan 1.4, while the LX PRO supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and Vulkan 1.3. The LX PRO's DirectX 12 Ultimate support means it includes features like variable rate shading and mesh shaders, while the Intel part's 12_1 support is a subset. Vulkan 1.4 on the Intel side is newer than the LX PRO's 1.3, indicating a more recent driver-level API implementation on the integrated part.

The Verdict

The data shows two products that are not competitors in any practical sense. The Intel Arc Graphics 48EU Mobile is an integrated GPU with 384 shading units, 1,382.4 GFLOPS of FP32 performance, and system-shared memory. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO is a discrete graphics card with 6144 shading units, 24.58 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, and 24 GB of dedicated GDDR6 memory. Every measurable compute metric favors the LX PRO by a wide margin, ranging from 8.9 times in texture rate to 17.8 times in FP32 and FP16 throughput.

The Intel part's 28 W TDP indicates it is designed for power-constrained mobile devices where energy efficiency matters more than absolute performance. The LX PRO's 225 W TDP, dual-slot form factor, and 550 W suggested PSU indicate it is intended for a desktop workstation or high-performance computing scenario where power draw is secondary to throughput. The Intel IGP's system-shared memory means its performance scales with the host system's RAM speed and capacity, while the LX PRO's 432.0 GB/s dedicated bandwidth provides consistent, predictable memory performance.

For users whose workloads fit within an integrated GPU's capabilities, such as basic display output, office applications, or light media playback, the Intel Arc Graphics 48EU Mobile is the appropriate choice. For workloads requiring high FP32 throughput, large memory pools, or rapid texture processing, the LX PRO is the only viable option between the two. The absence of benchmark scores in the database means no measured frame rate or compute test data exists, but the specification gap is so large that measured results would almost certainly confirm the LX PRO's dominance in every GPU-bound task.

The percentile ranking of 50 for both parts against all GPUs is coincidental, as the ranking does not reflect head-to-head performance. The LX PRO's release date of 2026-03-16 places it after the Intel part's release date of 2023-12-13, and the LX PRO's 6 nm TSMC process is newer than Intel's 10 nm node. The LX PRO's TrueGPU architecture and 7G100 generation indicate a different design philosophy from Intel's Xe-LPG, with the LX PRO clearly targeting high-throughput compute rather than integrated efficiency.

Specification Differences

The following fields differ between the two products:

• Chip: Intel Arc Graphics 48EU Mobile uses Meteor Lake; Lisuan Tech LX PRO uses 7G105.
• Architecture: Intel uses Xe-LPG; Lisuan Tech uses TrueGPU.
• Generation: Intel is Arc Graphics-M (Meteor Lake); Lisuan Tech is 7G100.
• Process Node: Intel is 10 nm; Lisuan Tech is 6 nm.
• Foundry: Intel uses Intel; Lisuan Tech uses TSMC.
• Base Clock: Intel is 300 MHz; Lisuan Tech is not listed.
• Boost Clock: Intel is 1800 MHz; Lisuan Tech is not listed.
• Memory Clock: Intel is system shared; Lisuan Tech is 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective.
• Memory Size: Intel is system shared; Lisuan Tech is 24 GB.
• Memory Type: Intel is system shared; Lisuan Tech is GDDR6.
• Memory Bus Width: Intel is system shared; Lisuan Tech is 192 bit.
• Memory Bandwidth: Intel is system dependent; Lisuan Tech is 432.0 GB/s.
• Shading Units: Intel is 384; Lisuan Tech is 6144.
• TMUs: Intel is 24; Lisuan Tech is 192.
• ROPs: Intel is 8; Lisuan Tech is 96.
• Pixel Rate: Intel is 14.40 GPixel/s; Lisuan Tech is 192.0 GPixel/s.
• Texture Rate: Intel is 43.20 GTexel/s; Lisuan Tech is 384.0 GTexel/s.
• FP32: Intel is 1,382.4 GFLOPS; Lisuan Tech is 24.58 TFLOPS.
• FP16: Intel is 2.765 TFLOPS (2:1); Lisuan Tech is 49.15 TFLOPS (2:1).
• TDP: Intel is 28 W; Lisuan Tech is 225 W.
• Slot Width: Intel is IGP; Lisuan Tech is dual-slot.
• Power Connectors: Intel has none listed; Lisuan Tech has 1x 16-pin.
• Suggested PSU: Intel has none listed; Lisuan Tech is 550 W.
• Bus Interface: Intel is Ring Bus; Lisuan Tech is PCIe 4.0 x16.
• Display Outputs: Intel is portable device dependent; Lisuan Tech is 4x DisplayPort 1.4a.
• DirectX: Intel is 12 (12_1); Lisuan Tech is 12 Ultimate (12_2).
• Vulkan: Intel is 1.4; Lisuan Tech is 1.3.
• Dimensions: Intel has none listed; Lisuan Tech is 248 mm length, 118 mm height, 48 mm width.
• Release Date: Intel is 2023-12-13; Lisuan Tech is 2026-03-16.
• Predecessor: Intel is HD Graphics-M; Lisuan Tech has none listed.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Arc Graphics 48EU Mobile wins in energy efficiency. Its 28 W TDP is a fraction of the LX PRO's 225 W TDP, making it suitable for battery-powered mobile devices where power draw is a primary constraint. It also holds a Vulkan API advantage with version 1.4 versus the LX PRO's 1.3, which may matter for applications that specifically target the newest Vulkan features. The Intel part's Ring Bus interface reflects its integration into the host processor's interconnect, eliminating the need for a separate PCIe slot and reducing system complexity. Its release date of 2023-12-13 makes it an earlier product, and its predecessor, HD Graphics-M, indicates a lineage of integrated graphics.

The Lisuan Tech LX PRO wins in every category of raw performance. Its 24.58 TFLOPS FP32 compute is 17.8 times higher than the Intel part. Its 24 GB of GDDR6 memory with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth provides a dedicated memory pool that the Intel IGP cannot match. The LX PRO's 6144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs enable substantially higher geometric and texture throughput. Its DirectX 12 Ultimate support includes the full 12_2 feature set, while the Intel part only reaches 12_1. The LX PRO's PCIe 4.0 x16 interface provides a high-bandwidth connection to the host system, and its four DisplayPort 1.4a outputs support multi-monitor desktop configurations. The LX PRO's 6 nm process at TSMC is more advanced than Intel's 10 nm node, and its 2026-03-16 release date makes it a newer product.

For use cases such as gaming, 3D rendering, machine learning inference, or any GPU-accelerated compute workload, the LX PRO's specifications place it in a different performance class entirely. For use cases such as ultraportable laptops, fanless designs, or systems with strict power budgets, the Intel Arc Graphics 48EU Mobile's integrated nature and low TDP make it the only feasible option. The data does not support any scenario where the Intel IGP outperforms the LX PRO in raw throughput, but the Intel part's power efficiency and system integration give it a clear niche.