Intel Arc Graphics 48EU Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER Comparison
Intel Arc Graphics 48EU Mobile
GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER
PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS
Analysis: Intel Arc Graphics 48EU Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER
The Intel Arc Graphics 48EU Mobile and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER occupy opposite ends of the graphics spectrum. The data in the database shows two products with fundamentally different purposes, architectures, and performance envelopes. The Intel part is an integrated solution for portable devices, while the NVIDIA part is a discrete, dual-slot expansion card. The recorded benchmark data, the specification sheets, and the architectural details provide a clear picture of how these two compare.
Head-to-Head Benchmarks
The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark results between the Intel Arc Graphics 48EU Mobile and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER. The Intel product has no recorded benchmark scores, with an average benchmark score of zero, while the NVIDIA product has a single recorded result. This absence of overlapping test data means any comparison relies on the specification disparities and the NVIDIA card's position relative to its nearest rivals.
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER was tested using the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 benchmark, scoring 6269.5. Its average benchmark score across all recorded tests is 6270. This places it in the 36th percentile of all GPUs in the database. The Intel Arc Graphics 48EU Mobile sits at the 50th percentile, but that percentile is based on no actual benchmark results, so it reflects its categorization as an integrated graphics processor rather than any measured performance.
The nearest rivals to the NVIDIA card in the database provide context for its score. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 has an average score of 6270, a delta of 0 percent, meaning the two are effectively tied in the recorded data. The AMD FirePro W600 scores 6223, which is a delta of 0.8 percent, indicating the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER holds a slight lead over it. The NVIDIA Quadro K620 scores 6282, a delta of -0.2 percent, meaning the K620 edges out the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER by a narrow margin. The AMD Radeon R7 M350 scores 6327, a delta of -0.9 percent, showing that the R7 M350 outperforms the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER by nearly a full percentage point in this dataset. These deltas are small, so the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER sits in a cluster of GPUs with similar benchmark outcomes, none of which are the Intel integrated part.
The absence of a benchmark score for the Intel Arc Graphics 48EU Mobile means the database records zero wins for it and zero wins for the NVIDIA card in direct comparisons. The implication is clear: the Intel part was not subjected to the same 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 testing, likely due to its integrated nature and target market.
Where Each One Wins
The Intel Arc Graphics 48EU Mobile wins in the domain of power consumption and physical integration. Its thermal design power is 28 watts, a figure that allows it to operate within the thermal envelope of a portable device without dedicated cooling. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER, by contrast, has a thermal design power of 350 watts. This 322-watt difference is the single largest gap between the two. The Intel part also requires no power connectors, as it draws from the system's shared resources, while the NVIDIA card requires a single 16-pin connector.
The Intel product is an integrated graphics processor, or IGP, meaning it slots into the motherboard or system-on-chip design of a laptop or portable device. Its bus interface is a Ring Bus, and its display outputs are dependent on the portable device. This makes it suitable for systems where space and power are constrained. The NVIDIA card is a dual-slot, 304 mm long, 137 mm high, and 48 mm wide expansion card that requires a PCIe 5.0 x16 slot. It is designed for desktop systems with room for large cooling solutions and a robust power supply.
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER wins decisively in raw compute and memory performance. It delivers 43.94 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, while the Intel part delivers 1,382.4 GFLOPS, which equals approximately 1.38 TFLOPS. The NVIDIA card is roughly 31.8 times faster in this metric. In FP16, the NVIDIA card achieves 43.94 TFLOPS with a 1:1 ratio, while the Intel part reaches 2.765 TFLOPS with a 2:1 ratio. The NVIDIA card also has dedicated ray tracing cores, 70 of them, and 280 tensor cores, while the Intel part has none of either.
Memory is another decisive area. The NVIDIA card has 16 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 896.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The Intel part uses system shared memory, with its bandwidth described as system dependent. The NVIDIA card's memory operates at 1750 MHz, which is 28 Gbps effective, while the Intel part relies on whatever system memory is available.
FAQ
Q: Which GPU has a higher FP32 compute performance?
A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER delivers 43.94 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, while the Intel Arc Graphics 48EU Mobile delivers 1,382.4 GFLOPS, which is approximately 1.38 TFLOPS. The NVIDIA card is significantly ahead in this metric.
Q: What is the thermal design power difference between the two?
A: The Intel Arc Graphics 48EU Mobile has a thermal design power of 28 watts. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has a thermal design power of 350 watts.
Q: Does the Intel integrated GPU support hardware ray tracing?
A: The database lists no ray tracing cores for the Intel Arc Graphics 48EU Mobile. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER includes 70 ray tracing cores.
Q: How much memory does each GPU have?
A: The Intel Arc Graphics 48EU Mobile uses system shared memory with no dedicated size, type, or bus width specified. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has 16 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 256-bit bus.
Q: What is the average benchmark score for the NVIDIA card?
A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has an average benchmark score of 6270, based on a single 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test that scored 6269.5.
Q: How does the NVIDIA card compare to its nearest rival, the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102?
A: The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER and the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 both have an average score of 6270, a delta of 0 percent, indicating they perform identically in the recorded data.
Specification Differences
The two GPUs differ in nearly every measurable specification. The Intel Arc Graphics 48EU Mobile has a base clock of 300 MHz and a boost clock of 1800 MHz. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has a base clock of 2295 MHz and a boost clock of 2452 MHz. The Intel part's memory clock is listed as system shared, while the NVIDIA card's memory clock is 1750 MHz with 28 Gbps effective speed.
The shading units differ substantially: the Intel part has 384, while the NVIDIA card has 8960. Texture mapping units are 24 for Intel and 280 for NVIDIA. Render output units are 8 for Intel and 96 for NVIDIA. The pixel rate for the Intel part is 14.40 GPixel/s, while the NVIDIA card achieves 235.4 GPixel/s. The texture rate is 43.20 GTexel/s for Intel and 686.6 GTexel/s for NVIDIA.
The Intel part uses a 10 nm process node from Intel's foundry, while the NVIDIA card uses a 5 nm process node from TSMC. The NVIDIA card has 45,600 million transistors on a 378 mm² die, with a transistor density of 120.6 million per mm². The Intel part has no transistor count, die size, or density data in the database.
The NVIDIA card is a dual-slot expansion card measuring 304 mm in length, 137 mm in height, and 48 mm in width. The Intel part is an IGP with no dimensions recorded. The NVIDIA card uses a PCIe 5.0 x16 bus interface, while the Intel part uses a Ring Bus. The NVIDIA card outputs to 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b, while the Intel part's outputs are portable device dependent.
The NVIDIA card has a launch MSRP of 749 USD. The Intel part has no launch MSRP recorded.
Architecture Differences
The Intel Arc Graphics 48EU Mobile is built on the Xe-LPG architecture, part of the Meteor Lake chip. It belongs to the Arc Graphics-M generation for Meteor Lake. The process node is 10 nm, fabricated by Intel. Its memory architecture is entirely system shared, meaning it has no dedicated VRAM. The Intel part supports DirectX 12 (12_1), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. It has no ray tracing cores and no tensor cores. Its FP16 performance is 2.765 TFLOPS with a 2:1 ratio, indicating it executes half-precision at half the rate of full precision.
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER is built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture, using the GB203 chip. It is part of the GeForce 50-series and the GeForce 50 generation. The process node is 5 nm, fabricated by TSMC. The NVIDIA card has 70 ray tracing cores and 280 tensor cores, enabling hardware-accelerated ray tracing and AI workloads. Its FP16 performance is 43.94 TFLOPS with a 1:1 ratio, meaning it processes half-precision at the same rate as full precision. The NVIDIA card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The DirectX 12 Ultimate support and the 12_2 feature level indicate support for advanced rendering features.
The transistor counts and die sizes also differ architecturally. The NVIDIA card uses 45,600 million transistors on a 378 mm² die, with a density of 120.6 million per mm². The Intel part has no such data. The memory type is GDDR7 for NVIDIA, while Intel uses system shared memory. The NVIDIA card's power delivery requires a 16-pin connector, while the Intel part has no power connectors.
The production status for both is active. The Intel part was released on December 13, 2023, and has a predecessor named HD Graphics-M. The NVIDIA card was released on December 31, 2025, and has no predecessor listed. The Intel part's slot width is listed as IGP, which means it occupies no expansion slot, while the NVIDIA card is dual-slot.
The Verdict
The data indicates two products with no meaningful overlap in use cases. The Intel Arc Graphics 48EU Mobile is an integrated solution with 28 watts of power draw, system shared memory, and no dedicated VRAM. Its compute capabilities are limited to 1,382.4 GFLOPS of FP32 and 2.765 TFLOPS of FP16, which suits basic display output and light workloads in portable devices. The database records no benchmark scores for it, so its performance relative to other GPUs cannot be quantified.
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER is a discrete, high-power graphics card with 350 watts of power draw, 16 GB of GDDR7 memory, and 896.0 GB/s of bandwidth. It delivers 43.94 TFLOPS of FP32 and FP16 performance, has 70 ray tracing cores, and 280 tensor cores. Its single benchmark score of 6269.5 places it at the 36th percentile of all GPUs, with its nearest rivals clustered within a 1 percent delta. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 matches its score exactly, while the AMD Radeon R7 M350 leads it by 0.9 percent.
For systems requiring integrated graphics with minimal power consumption and no expansion slot, the Intel Arc Graphics 48EU Mobile is the only option of the two. For systems requiring high-end discrete performance, ray tracing, tensor cores, and substantial memory bandwidth, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER is the clear choice. The specification sheet shows a 31.8 times gap in FP32 throughput, a 16 GB vs. system shared memory gap, and a 322 watt power draw gap. The benchmark data, where it exists, confirms the NVIDIA card performs in the mid-range cluster of the database, while the Intel part has no measured performance to compare. The choice between them is not a matter of preference but of platform and workload.