Intel Arc Graphics 24EU vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The only recorded head-to-head benchmark in the database is 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12. In this test, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER scores 6269.5, while the Intel Arc Graphics 24EU scores 733. The delta is -88.3% for the Intel part, meaning the NVIDIA GPU delivers roughly 8.5 times the raw score. This is the single largest performance gap in the comparison, and it defines the entire competitive landscape between these two products.

The Intel Arc Graphics 24EU sits at the 3rd percentile of all GPUs in the database, a figure that places it among the lowest-performing parts tracked. Its nearest rivals in the database are the Intel Arc Graphics 32EU and Intel Arc Graphics 64EU, both of which average 733, exactly matching the 24EU's score. The AMD Radeon HD 6470M averages 723, which is 1.4% behind the Intel 24EU. The NVIDIA GeForce GT 415M averages 751, putting it 2.4% ahead of the Intel part. These deltas are small, indicating that the 24EU competes in a narrow performance band near the very bottom of the recorded distribution.

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER, by contrast, sits at the 36th percentile of all GPUs. Its average benchmark score is 6270. The nearest rival in the database is the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102, which matches it exactly at 6270 with a 0% delta. The NVIDIA Quadro K620 averages 6282, which is 0.2% ahead of the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER. The AMD FirePro W600 averages 6223, putting it 0.8% behind. The AMD Radeon R7 M350 averages 6327, which is 0.9% ahead. These are all tight margins, meaning the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER performs in a well-populated cluster of mid-tier parts, far removed from the extreme low end where the Intel 24EU resides.

The magnitude of the delta between the two reviewed products is decisive. A score of 6269.5 versus 733 represents a difference of 5536.5 points. In percentage terms, the Intel part trails by 88.3%, a margin that dwarfs any of the rival deltas recorded for either product. No other benchmark in the database narrows this gap, and no other test shows the Intel part winning. The wins tally reflects this: the Intel Arc Graphics 24EU records 0 wins, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER records 1 win.

The Verdict

The data is unambiguous. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER is the faster GPU by every recorded measurement. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 6269.5 places it at the 36th percentile of all GPUs, and its nearest rivals all sit within roughly 1% of its average score. The Intel Arc Graphics 24EU, with a score of 733, sits at the 3rd percentile, and its nearest rivals are similarly low-performing parts. The delta of -88.3% in the direct comparison leaves no room for interpretation: the NVIDIA product is overwhelmingly faster.

The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER also brings a much larger feature set. It has 8960 shading units, 280 texture mapping units, 96 raster output units, 70 ray tracing cores, and 280 tensor cores. The Intel Arc Graphics 24EU has 192 shading units, 12 TMUs, and 6 ROPs, with no ray tracing cores and no tensor cores listed. The NVIDIA part's FP32 throughput is 43.94 TFLOPS, while the Intel part delivers 768.0 GFLOPS. The NVIDIA part's FP16 throughput is 43.94 TFLOPS at a 1:1 ratio, while the Intel part manages 1.536 TFLOPS at a 2:1 ratio. These are not close figures.

For users who need a discrete graphics card with high compute throughput, dedicated ray tracing hardware, and a wide memory interface, the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER is the only choice supported by the data. For users who simply need integrated graphics for basic display output on an Arrow Lake-S platform, the Intel Arc Graphics 24EU exists as the on-die option. The database does not record a single test where the Intel part outperforms the NVIDIA part.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Arc Graphics 24EU wins in the category of power draw. Its TDP is 65 W, compared to 350 W for the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER. It is also an integrated graphics processor (IGP) with a slot width of "IGP", meaning it requires no expansion slot and no power connectors. The NVIDIA part is a dual-slot card that requires a single 16-pin power connector. The Intel part's bus interface is Ring Bus, while the NVIDIA part uses PCIe 5.0 x16. For compact or low-power systems, the Intel IGP is the more practical option.

The Intel part also wins on physical size. Its dimensions are not listed, but as an IGP it occupies no card length, height, or width. The NVIDIA card measures 304 mm in length, 137 mm in height, and 48 mm in width. Any chassis that cannot accommodate a 304 mm dual-slot card would rely on integrated graphics instead.

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER wins in every performance category recorded. Its pixel rate is 235.4 GPixel/s, versus 12.00 GPixel/s for the Intel part. Its texture rate is 686.6 GTexel/s, versus 24.00 GTexel/s. Its memory configuration is 16 GB of GDDR7 on a 256-bit bus, delivering 896.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The Intel part uses system-shared memory with system-dependent bandwidth, so no dedicated memory bandwidth figure exists. The NVIDIA card's memory clock is 1750 MHz with 28 Gbps effective transfer rate; the Intel part's memory clock is listed as "System Shared".

The NVIDIA part also wins on display outputs. It provides 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b. The Intel IGP's display outputs are motherboard dependent. Both parts support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, so API support is effectively a tie.

FAQ

Q: How much faster is the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER than the Intel Arc Graphics 24EU?

A: In the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test, the NVIDIA GPU scores 6269.5 while the Intel IGP scores 733. The Intel part trails by 88.3%, which makes the NVIDIA GPU roughly 8.5 times faster in that benchmark.

Q: What is the Intel Arc Graphics 24EU's percentile ranking?

A: It sits at the 3rd percentile of all GPUs in the database. Its nearest rivals, the Intel Arc Graphics 32EU and Intel Arc Graphics 64EU, both average 733, and the AMD Radeon HD 6470M trails by 1.4%.

Q: What is the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER's percentile ranking?

A: It sits at the 36th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102, matches its average score of 6270 exactly, while the AMD Radeon R7 M350 is 0.9% ahead.

Q: Does the Intel Arc Graphics 24EU have ray tracing cores?

A: No ray tracing cores are listed for the Intel part. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has 70 ray tracing cores and 280 tensor cores.

Q: What memory configurations do the two parts use?

A: The Intel Arc Graphics 24EU uses system-shared memory with system-dependent bandwidth. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER uses 16 GB of GDDR7 on a 256-bit bus with 896.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: What is the launch MSRP of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER?

A: The launch MSRP is 749 USD. The Intel Arc Graphics 24EU has no launch MSRP listed, as it is integrated into the Arrow Lake-S chip.

Architecture Differences

The Intel Arc Graphics 24EU is built on the Xe-LPG architecture and belongs to the Arc Graphics (Arrow Lake) generation. It uses the Arrow Lake-S chip, fabricated on a 3 nm process at TSMC. The chip contains 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 73.3M per mm². The GPU has 192 shading units, 12 TMUs, and 6 ROPs. Its base clock is 300 MHz and its boost clock is 2000 MHz. FP32 throughput is 768.0 GFLOPS, and FP16 throughput is 1.536 TFLOPS at a 2:1 ratio. The TDP is 65 W. It is an integrated part with a Ring Bus interface and motherboard-dependent display outputs. Its production status is Active, and it was released on 2024-10-23. Its predecessor is listed as HD Graphics. It has no dedicated memory; all memory is system shared.

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER is built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture and belongs to the GeForce 50-series. It uses the GB203 chip, fabricated on a 5 nm process at TSMC. The chip contains 45,600 million transistors on a 378 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 120.6M per mm². The GPU has 8960 shading units, 280 TMUs, 96 ROPs, 70 ray tracing cores, and 280 tensor cores. Its base clock is 2295 MHz and its boost clock is 2452 MHz. FP32 throughput is 43.94 TFLOPS, and FP16 throughput is 43.94 TFLOPS at a 1:1 ratio. The TDP is 350 W. It is a dual-slot card measuring 304 mm in length, 137 mm in height, and 48 mm in width, with a single 16-pin power connector. It uses PCIe 5.0 x16 and provides 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b. Its production status is Active, with a release date of 2025-12-31. The memory subsystem consists of 16 GB of GDDR7 on a 256-bit bus, with a memory clock of 1750 MHz and 28 Gbps effective transfer rate, delivering 896.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

The architectural divide is stark. The Intel part is a small integrated GPU with 192 shaders and no dedicated memory, designed to accompany a CPU. The NVIDIA part is a large discrete GPU with 8960 shaders, dedicated ray tracing and tensor hardware, and a full GDDR7 memory subsystem. The process nodes differ, 3 nm for Intel versus 5 nm for NVIDIA, and the transistor counts differ by a factor of roughly 2.56. The die sizes differ as well, 243 mm² for the Arrow Lake-S chip versus 378 mm² for GB203, though the Intel chip includes CPU cores alongside the GPU, so the GPU portion is only part of that die. The NVIDIA card's dual-slot cooler and 350 W TDP reflect its discrete nature, while the Intel IGP's 65 W TDP and lack of power connectors reflect its integration into the host processor. The recorded data shows no scenario where the Intel part's architecture advantages, primarily power efficiency and physical footprint, translate into a benchmark win.