Intel Arc Graphics 2 Xe Mobile vs Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data contains no direct head-to-head benchmark results for the Intel Arc Graphics 2 Xe Mobile and the Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA. Both products have an average benchmark score of 0 and an identical percentile ranking of 50th among all GPUs in the database. The absence of measured scores means no frame rate comparisons, compute throughput tests, or synthetic workload results are available to establish a performance hierarchy between these two devices. What the database does provide, however, is a complete set of architectural and specification data that allows for a structural comparison of their respective capabilities.

The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA holds a decisive advantage in raw compute resources. Its shading unit count of 6144 is 24 times higher than the 256 shading units found on the Intel Arc Graphics 2 Xe Mobile. This disparity extends to texture mapping units, where the LX ULTRA has 192 TMUs against the Intel part's 16, and to raster output units, where the LX ULTRA's 96 ROPs dwarf the Intel part's 8. The FP32 throughput figures reflect this gap: the LX ULTRA delivers 24.58 TFLOPS, which is approximately 19.2 times the 1,280.0 GFLOPS of the Intel Arc Graphics 2 Xe Mobile. FP16 performance follows the same pattern, with the LX ULTRA offering 49.15 TFLOPS compared to the Intel part's 2.560 TFLOPS.

The pixel and texture fill rates tell the same story. The LX ULTRA produces 192.0 GPixel/s, exactly 9.6 times the 20.00 GPixel/s of the Intel chip. Its texture rate of 384.0 GTexel/s is also 9.6 times the Intel part's 40.00 GTexel/s. These are structural limits derived from clock speeds and unit counts, not measured game results, but they establish the upper bound of what each GPU can output per second.

Memory bandwidth is another area of complete separation. The LX ULTRA uses 24 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, producing 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The Intel part uses system shared memory with a bus width and bandwidth that are both system dependent. The database does not record a fixed bandwidth figure for the Intel part because its performance varies with the host platform's memory configuration.

The Intel Arc Graphics 2 Xe Mobile does hold one advantage in the recorded data: the technology generation of its API support. Both parts support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6, but the Intel part supports Vulkan 1.4 while the Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA supports Vulkan 1.3. This indicates a newer Vulkan feature set on the Intel part, though the database does not quantify the performance impact of this difference.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has more shading units?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA has 6144 shading units, while the Intel Arc Graphics 2 Xe Mobile has 256 shading units.

Q: What is the memory configuration of each GPU?

A: The Intel Arc Graphics 2 Xe Mobile uses system shared memory with a system dependent bandwidth. The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA has 24 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus with 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: How do the FP32 performance figures compare?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA delivers 24.58 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, while the Intel Arc Graphics 2 Xe Mobile delivers 1,280.0 GFLOPS.

Q: What are the power requirements of each GPU?

A: The Intel Arc Graphics 2 Xe Mobile has a TDP of 25 W and uses no power connectors. The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA has a TDP of 225 W, uses one 16-pin power connector, and requires a suggested PSU of 550 W.

Q: What process nodes are used?

A: The Intel Arc Graphics 2 Xe Mobile uses a 3 nm process from Intel's foundry. The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA uses a 6 nm process from TSMC.

Q: What are the physical dimensions of the Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA measures 268 mm in length, 112 mm in height, and 40 mm in width, and occupies a dual-slot profile.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs come from entirely different design lineages. The Intel Arc Graphics 2 Xe Mobile uses the Wildcat Lake chip built on the Xe3-LPG architecture, part of the Arc Graphics-M generation. It is fabricated on a 3 nm process at Intel's own foundry. The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA uses the 7G105 chip built on the TrueGPU architecture, part of the 7G100 generation, and is fabricated on a 6 nm process at TSMC. The process node difference gives the Intel part a manufacturing geometry advantage, though the database does not provide transistor counts or die sizes for either chip.

The Intel part is an integrated graphics processor, as indicated by its IGP slot width and IGP bus interface. It has no power connectors and a 25 W TDP. The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA is a discrete, dual-slot card with a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, a single 16-pin power connector, and a 225 W TDP. The LX ULTRA also lists a suggested PSU of 550 W, a figure that the Intel part does not require due to its integrated nature.

Ray tracing support differs in implementation. The Intel Arc Graphics 2 Xe Mobile includes 2 dedicated ray tracing cores. The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA does not list any ray tracing cores in the database. Both parts support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), which includes ray tracing features, but only the Intel part has dedicated hardware listed for this workload.

Display output capabilities also separate the two. The Intel part uses portable device dependent display outputs, meaning its video connections depend on the host laptop or portable device. The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA provides 4x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs as fixed physical connectors.

The memory architecture is fundamentally different. The Intel part relies on system shared memory, with its bandwidth determined by the host system. The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA has dedicated 24 GB of GDDR6 memory clocked at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective speed on a 192-bit bus. The LX ULTRA's 432.0 GB/s bandwidth is a fixed figure, while the Intel part's bandwidth is listed as system dependent.

Specification Differences

The Intel Arc Graphics 2 Xe Mobile and Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA differ across nearly every recorded specification field. The Intel part operates at a 300 MHz base clock and 2500 MHz boost clock, while the LX ULTRA has no recorded base or boost clocks. The LX ULTRA's memory clock is 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective speed, while the Intel part's memory clock is listed as system shared.

Shading units: 256 for Intel, 6144 for Lisuan Tech. Texture mapping units: 16 for Intel, 192 for Lisuan Tech. Raster output units: 8 for Intel, 96 for Lisuan Tech. Ray tracing cores: 2 for Intel, none listed for Lisuan Tech. The Intel part has no tensor cores listed, and neither does the Lisuan Tech part.

Pixel rate: 20.00 GPixel/s for Intel, 192.0 GPixel/s for Lisuan Tech. Texture rate: 40.00 GTexel/s for Intel, 384.0 GTexel/s for Lisuan Tech. FP32: 1,280.0 GFLOPS for Intel, 24.58 TFLOPS for Lisuan Tech. FP16: 2.560 TFLOPS for Intel, 49.15 TFLOPS for Lisuan Tech.

TDP: 25 W for Intel, 225 W for Lisuan Tech. Slot width: IGP for Intel, dual-slot for Lisuan Tech. Power connectors: none for Intel, 1x 16-pin for Lisuan Tech. Suggested PSU: not listed for Intel, 550 W for Lisuan Tech. Bus interface: IGP for Intel, PCIe 4.0 x16 for Lisuan Tech.

Display outputs: portable device dependent for Intel, 4x DisplayPort 1.4a for Lisuan Tech. Vulkan support: 1.4 for Intel, 1.3 for Lisuan Tech. Process node: 3 nm for Intel, 6 nm for Lisuan Tech. Foundry: Intel for the Arc part, TSMC for the Lisuan Tech part.

The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA has recorded physical dimensions of 268 mm length, 112 mm height, and 40 mm width. The Intel part has no dimensions recorded, consistent with its integrated design. Release dates differ by one month, with the Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA released on 2026-03-16 and the Intel Arc Graphics 2 Xe Mobile released on 2026-04-15.

Where Each One Wins

The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA wins decisively in every raw compute category recorded in the database. Its 24.58 TFLOPS FP32 throughput, 384.0 GTexel/s texture rate, and 192.0 GPixel/s pixel rate place it in a different performance class entirely from the Intel part. The 432.0 GB/s of dedicated memory bandwidth and 24 GB of GDDR6 capacity give it a substantial advantage in workloads that demand large datasets and high memory throughput. The 6144 shading units and 192 texture mapping units provide the hardware resources necessary for high-resolution rendering and compute-heavy tasks.

The Intel Arc Graphics 2 Xe Mobile wins in efficiency and integration. Its 25 W TDP is 200 W lower than the Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA's 225 W TDP. It requires no power connectors and no suggested PSU, while the LX ULTRA requires a 550 W PSU. The Intel part's 3 nm process node represents a more advanced manufacturing geometry than the 6 nm node of the LX ULTRA. Its IGP form factor means it is built into a portable device with no additional card slot or physical space required.

The Intel part also holds the Vulkan API advantage, supporting version 1.4 versus the LX ULTRA's 1.3. The Intel part includes 2 ray tracing cores, a feature the LX ULTRA does not list. The Intel part's base clock of 300 MHz and boost clock of 2500 MHz provide a clock speed profile that the LX ULTRA does not have recorded.

The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA wins on dedicated hardware features: 24 GB of GDDR6 memory, a 192-bit bus, 4x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs, and a PCIe 4.0 x16 host interface. The Intel part relies on system dependent memory and display outputs, making its real-world performance contingent on the host platform.

The Verdict

The data supports a clear separation of use cases. The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA is the only option for workloads that require high compute throughput, large dedicated memory pools, and fixed high-bandwidth memory access. Its 24.58 TFLOPS FP32 output, 432.0 GB/s bandwidth, and 24 GB GDDR6 capacity position it for demanding rendering and compute tasks. Its 225 W TDP and 550 W suggested PSU indicate a desktop-oriented, high-power design.

The Intel Arc Graphics 2 Xe Mobile is the appropriate choice for portable, low-power systems where the 25 W TDP and integrated form factor are decisive advantages. Its 3 nm process node and Vulkan 1.4 support provide modern feature support within a power envelope that the LX ULTRA cannot approach. The 2 ray tracing cores add dedicated hardware capability that the LX ULTRA does not list.

Database records show both parts at the 50th percentile among all GPUs, with no benchmark scores to refine that ranking. The structural data, however, suggests that the Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA is built for maximum throughput while the Intel Arc Graphics 2 Xe Mobile is built for integration efficiency. There is no overlap in their target design constraints: one draws 225 W and occupies a dual-slot card, the other draws 25 W and occupies no expansion slot at all.

Users requiring a discrete, high-bandwidth GPU with 4x DisplayPort outputs should select the Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA. Users requiring integrated graphics within a portable device should select the Intel Arc Graphics 2 Xe Mobile. The two products do not compete for the same physical or electrical envelope, and the recorded data confirms that their strengths are mutually exclusive.