Intel Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile vs Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA Comparison

Where Each One Wins

The recorded data shows two graphics products with fundamentally different roles. The Intel Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile is an integrated graphics solution built into a processor, while the Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA is a standalone dual-slot expansion card. Their benchmark win distribution is even at zero wins each, as no head-to-head benchmark entries exist in the database. However, the specification data provides a clear split in intended use cases.

The Intel Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile wins in the integrated and low-power segment. It operates as an IGP with no power connectors, draws 25 W, and uses system shared memory. This makes it suitable for portable devices where space and power are constrained. Its 128 shading units, 8 texture mapping units, and 4 render output units represent a modest compute configuration. The device outputs to a portable device dependent display, confirming its role inside laptops or compact systems.

The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA wins in the discrete, high-performance segment. It is a dual-slot card with a 268 mm length, 112 mm height, and 40 mm width. It requires a 16-pin power connector and a 550 W suggested power supply. The card carries 24 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth. Its 6144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs deliver far higher pixel and texture rates. Four DisplayPort 1.4a outputs allow multi-monitor setups.

The use-case split is straightforward. The Intel part serves systems where a separate graphics card is impractical. The Lisuan part serves workstations or desktops where maximum throughput matters more than power efficiency. Neither product currently has recorded benchmark scores in the database, so the win counts remain zero for both.

FAQ

Q: Which product has a higher pixel fill rate?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA delivers 192.0 GPixel/s, which is 20.9 times the 9.200 GPixel/s of the Intel Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile.

Q: What memory configurations do the two products use?

A: The Intel Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile uses system shared memory with bandwidth described as system dependent. The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA has 24 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: Are both products currently in production?

A: Yes, the database lists both the Intel Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile and the Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA as having an Active production status.

Q: What API support do they share?

A: Both products support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. The Intel part supports Vulkan 1.4, while the Lisuan part supports Vulkan 1.3.

Q: How do their power requirements compare?

A: The Intel Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile has a 25 W TDP with no power connectors. The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA has a 225 W TDP, requires one 16-pin connector, and needs a 550 W suggested power supply.

Q: Which product has more shading units?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA has 6144 shading units, which is 48 times the 128 shading units found in the Intel Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no recorded head-to-head benchmark entries for these two products. The winsA and winsB fields are both zero. Without direct benchmark comparisons, the analysis relies entirely on the specification sheets.

The largest numerical advantage belongs to the Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA in raw throughput metrics. Its FP32 compute of 24.58 TFLOPS is roughly 41.7 times the 588.8 GFLOPS of the Intel part. FP16 performance shows a similar ratio: 49.15 TFLOPS versus 1,177.6 GFLOPS, which is about 41.7 times higher. Texture rate stands at 384.0 GTexel/s versus 18.40 GTexel/s, a 20.9 times difference. Pixel rate matches that ratio at 192.0 GPixel/s versus 9.200 GPixel/s.

The Intel Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile does hold advantages in certain areas. Its 3 nm process node is smaller than the 6 nm node used by the Lisuan part. The Intel chip also has a higher boost clock at 2300 MHz, while the Lisuan card lists no base or boost clock values. The Intel part supports Vulkan 1.4, one minor revision ahead of the Lisuan card's Vulkan 1.3. However, these advantages do not translate into performance wins without benchmark data.

The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA also offers a substantial memory advantage. Its 24 GB GDDR6 pool with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth dwarfs the system shared configuration of the Intel part. The 192-bit bus width provides a dedicated memory path, whereas the Intel solution shares system memory and depends on the host platform.

The shading unit count difference is the most extreme. At 6144 versus 128, the Lisuan card has 48 times more shading units. TMU and ROP counts follow suit: 192 versus 8 TMUs (24 times more) and 96 versus 4 ROPs (24 times more). These ratios indicate the Lisuan card is designed for workloads that scale with parallel execution units, while the Intel part targets basic graphics and media tasks.

Specification Differences

The two products differ across nearly every measurable specification field.

Clock speeds: The Intel Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile has a base clock of 300 MHz and a boost clock of 2300 MHz. The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA lists no base or boost clock values, but its memory clock is 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective speed.

Memory: The Intel part uses system shared memory with no dedicated capacity, type, bus width, or bandwidth figures. The Lisuan card has 24 GB GDDR6, a 192-bit bus, and 432.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Compute units: The Intel part has 128 shading units, 8 TMUs, and 4 ROPs. The Lisuan card has 6144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs. The Intel part includes 1 ray tracing core; the Lisuan card lists no RT core count.

Rates: The Intel part produces 9.200 GPixel/s and 18.40 GTexel/s. The Lisuan card produces 192.0 GPixel/s and 384.0 GTexel/s.

Power and cooling: The Intel part is an IGP with 25 W TDP and no power connectors. The Lisuan card is dual-slot, 225 W TDP, with one 16-pin connector and a 550 W suggested power supply.

Physical attributes: The Intel part has no listed dimensions and uses a portable device dependent display output. The Lisuan card measures 268 mm by 112 mm by 40 mm and has four DisplayPort 1.4a outputs.

Bus interface: The Intel part uses IGP. The Lisuan card uses PCIe 4.0 x16.

Process and foundry: The Intel part uses a 3 nm node at Intel. The Lisuan card uses a 6 nm node at TSMC.

API versions: Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. The Intel part supports Vulkan 1.4; the Lisuan card supports Vulkan 1.3.

Release timing: The Intel part released on 2026-04-15. The Lisuan card released on 2026-03-16, roughly one month earlier.

Architecture Differences

The Intel Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile is built on the Wildcat Lake chip using the Xe3-LPG architecture. It belongs to the Arc Graphics-M (Wildcat Lake) generation. Its predecessor is HD Graphics-M. The architecture uses a 3 nm process fabricated by Intel. The chip includes 128 shading units arranged with 8 TMUs and 4 ROPs, plus a single ray tracing core. The FP32 throughput of 588.8 GFLOPS and FP16 throughput of 1,177.6 GFLOPS (2:1 ratio) reflect a compact execution engine. The integrated nature of this part means memory is system shared and bandwidth is system dependent.

The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA uses the 7G105 chip with the TrueGPU architecture. It belongs to the 7G100 generation. The architecture is fabricated on a 6 nm process at TSMC. This design employs 6144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs, but no listed ray tracing cores. The FP32 throughput reaches 24.58 TFLOPS with FP16 at 49.15 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio). The TrueGPU architecture pairs with 24 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, achieving 432.0 GB/s bandwidth. The card connects via PCIe 4.0 x16 and provides four DisplayPort 1.4a outputs.

The architectural gap is notable in execution unit count and memory design. The Intel Xe3-LPG architecture is optimized for low-power integrated operation, with a 25 W TDP and no external power requirement. The Lisuan TrueGPU architecture is optimized for throughput, with a 225 W TDP and a dedicated memory subsystem. The Intel part includes ray tracing support, while the Lisuan part does not list RT cores. The Intel part also supports Vulkan 1.4, while the Lisuan part stops at Vulkan 1.3. Both architectures support DirectX 12 Ultimate and OpenGL 4.6, indicating parity in modern graphics API coverage.

The process node difference favors Intel at 3 nm versus 6 nm, but the Lisuan part compensates with a far larger execution footprint. The transistor counts and die sizes are listed as unknown for both products, so no density comparison is possible from the data.

The Verdict

The data indicates two products for different audiences. The Intel Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile serves portable and integrated systems. Its 25 W TDP, IGP bus interface, and system shared memory make it a low-power option. The architecture supports ray tracing, Vulkan 1.4, and a 2300 MHz boost clock. Its 588.8 GFLOPS FP32 throughput is sufficient for basic graphics workloads in compact devices.

The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA serves desktop systems requiring maximum compute. Its 24.58 TFLOPS FP32 performance, 24 GB GDDR6 memory, and 432.0 GB/s bandwidth place it in a different performance class. The 6144 shading units and 192 TMUs indicate heavy parallel workload capability. The dual-slot design, 16-pin power connector, and 550 W suggested power supply confirm this is a high-power discrete component.

For integrated graphics needs, the Intel Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile is the appropriate choice. For discrete expansion card needs, the Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA is the appropriate choice. The release dates are close, with the Lisuan card arriving on 2026-03-16 and the Intel part on 2026-04-15. Both remain in active production.

The absence of benchmark scores and head-to-head results means the verdict rests on specification analysis. The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA leads in every raw performance metric by factors ranging from 20.9 to 48. The Intel Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile leads in process efficiency, boost clock, and Vulkan API version. Users with power constraints should select the Intel part. Users with performance requirements should select the Lisuan part.