Intel Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile vs Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 Comparison

The Verdict

The data in the database presents two fundamentally different products that share no common use case. The Intel Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile is an integrated graphics processor (IGP) built on a 3 nm process for the Wildcat Lake chip, designed for portable, low-power devices with a 25 W TDP. The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 is a discrete, dual-slot graphics card on the 7G106 chip, using a 6 nm TSMC process, consuming 225 W, and requiring a 550 W suggested power supply and a single 8-pin connector.

Based strictly on the recorded specifications, the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 is the overwhelmingly faster part. It delivers 24.58 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, which is roughly 41.7 times the 588.8 GFLOPS of the Intel Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile. Its pixel rate of 192.0 GPixel/s is about 20.9 times higher than the 9.200 GPixel/s of the Intel part, and its texture rate of 384.0 GTexel/s is roughly 20.9 times higher than 18.40 GTexel/s. The LX 7G100 also has 6144 shading units versus 128, 192 texture mapping units versus 8, and 96 render output units versus 4.

The Intel part wins on architecture modernity, process node, and power efficiency. It uses the Xe3-LPG architecture, while the LX 7G100 uses the TrueGPU architecture. Intel's part is on a 3 nm node, while Lisuan's is on 6 nm. The Intel IGP has no power connectors and is an integrated part, whereas the LX 7G100 is a dual-slot card with a 1x 8-pin power connector and a 294 mm length. The choice is simple: the LX 7G100 is for high-performance desktop workloads, while the Intel Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile is for compact, power-constrained mobile systems.

Where Each One Wins

The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 wins every raw performance category recorded in the database. Its FP32 throughput of 24.58 TFLOPS dwarfs the 588.8 GFLOPS of the Intel Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile. The FP16 figures show a similar gap: 49.15 TFLOPS versus 1,177.6 GFLOPS. Memory bandwidth is also a decisive win for the discrete card, with 432.0 GB/s from 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus, while the Intel IGP uses system shared memory with system dependent bandwidth.

The LX 7G100 also has significant advantages in memory capacity and interface. It has 12 GB of dedicated VRAM, whereas the Intel part shares system memory. The Lisuan card uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 bus interface, while the Intel IGP uses an IGP bus interface. Display outputs favor the discrete card as well, offering 4x DisplayPort 1.4a, while the Intel IGP's outputs are described as portable device dependent.

The Intel Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile wins in power consumption and physical footprint. Its 25 W TDP is dramatically lower than the 225 W TDP of the LX 7G100. The Intel part is an IGP, meaning it requires no slot width and no power connectors. The Lisuan card is dual-slot, 294 mm long, 120 mm high, and 49 mm wide. The Intel part is also built on a smaller 3 nm process versus the 6 nm process of the Lisuan chip, indicating a more advanced manufacturing technology.

In API support, the two parts are nearly matched. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. The Intel part supports Vulkan 1.4, while the Lisuan card supports Vulkan 1.3, a small but notable software advantage for Intel.

Architecture Differences

The architectural divide between these two products is substantial. The Intel Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile uses the Xe3-LPG architecture, which is part of the Arc Graphics-M generation for the Wildcat Lake chip. It is manufactured on a 3 nm process at Intel's foundry. The design uses 128 shading units, 8 TMUs, and 4 ROPs, with a single ray tracing core. Its base clock is 300 MHz and boost clock is 2300 MHz. The pixel rate is 9.200 GPixel/s, texture rate is 18.40 GTexel/s, and FP32 compute is 588.8 GFLOPS. FP16 performance is 1,177.6 GFLOPS with a 2:1 ratio. The memory interface is entirely system shared, with no dedicated VRAM, bus width, or bandwidth figures other than system dependent.

The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 uses the TrueGPU architecture on the 7G106 chip, fabricated by TSMC on a 6 nm process. It features 6144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs. The database does not list a base or boost clock for this part, but it does specify a memory clock of 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective. The memory subsystem is 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus, yielding 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The pixel rate is 192.0 GPixel/s, texture rate is 384.0 GTexel/s, FP32 is 24.58 TFLOPS, and FP16 is 49.15 TFLOPS with a 2:1 ratio. The card does not list ray tracing cores in the database.

The two parts also differ in their physical and electrical requirements. The Intel IGP has no slot width, no power connectors, and no suggested PSU. The Lisuan card is dual-slot, requires a 1x 8-pin power connector, and lists a 550 W suggested PSU. The Lisuan card's dimensions are 294 mm in length, 120 mm in height, and 49 mm in width. The Intel part's dimensions are not recorded, consistent with its integrated nature.

Release timing also differs. The Intel Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile was released on April 15, 2026, while the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 was released on June 17, 2026. Both are listed as Active in production status. The Intel part's predecessor is HD Graphics-M, and it has no successor listed. The Lisuan part has no predecessor or successor listed.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has higher raw compute performance?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100. Its FP32 performance is 24.58 TFLOPS, compared to 588.8 GFLOPS for the Intel Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile, a difference of roughly 41.7 times.

Q: What are the memory configurations of these two GPUs?

A: The Intel Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile uses system shared memory with system dependent bandwidth. The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 has 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth and a memory clock of 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective).

Q: How do their power requirements compare?

A: The Intel Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile has a 25 W TDP, no power connectors, and no suggested PSU. The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 has a 225 W TDP, requires a 1x 8-pin power connector, and lists a 550 W suggested PSU.

Q: Which GPU supports more advanced graphics APIs?

A: Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. The Intel Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile supports Vulkan 1.4, while the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 supports Vulkan 1.3.

Q: What are the physical differences between the two cards?

A: The Intel Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile is an IGP with no slot width, no power connectors, and portable device dependent display outputs. The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 is a dual-slot card measuring 294 mm in length, 120 mm in height, and 49 mm in width, with 4x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs and a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface.

Q: When were these products released?

A: The Intel Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile was released on April 15, 2026. The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 was released on June 17, 2026. Both are currently listed as Active.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database records no direct head-to-head benchmark results for these two parts, and both have an average benchmark score of zero. However, the raw specification data provides a clear basis for comparison across multiple performance metrics.

The largest computational gap is in FP32 throughput. The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 delivers 24.58 TFLOPS, which is 41.7 times the 588.8 GFLOPS of the Intel Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile. This is the dominant single-number indicator of raw shader performance. In FP16, the discrete card achieves 49.15 TFLOPS versus 1,177.6 GFLOPS, a ratio of 41.7 times as well, given both use a 2:1 FP16 to FP32 ratio.

Pixel throughput shows the same pattern. The LX 7G100 renders at 192.0 GPixel/s, while the Intel IGP renders at 9.200 GPixel/s. This is a 20.9 times advantage for the Lisuan card, which directly impacts fill-rate bound workloads. Texture rate follows suit: 384.0 GTexel/s for the LX 7G100 versus 18.40 GTexel/s for the Intel part, again a 20.9 times difference.

Memory bandwidth is another decisive victory for the discrete card. The LX 7G100 has 432.0 GB/s of dedicated GDDR6 bandwidth on a 192-bit bus, while the Intel Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile relies on system shared memory with bandwidth described only as system dependent. The 12 GB VRAM capacity of the Lisuan card also stands in contrast to the Intel part's shared memory approach, which has no dedicated capacity figure.

The shading unit count reinforces the compute gap. The Lisuan card has 6144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs. The Intel IGP has 128 shading units, 8 TMUs, and 4 ROPs. The LX 7G100 has 48 times more shading units, 24 times more TMUs, and 24 times more ROPs.

The Lisuan card also wins on memory clock specifications, listing 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective. The Intel part lists no dedicated memory clock, only system shared memory. The Intel IGP does have a recorded base clock of 300 MHz and boost clock of 2300 MHz, while the Lisuan card has no clock speeds listed for its core.

The Intel part wins on process node, using 3 nm versus the 6 nm of the Lisuan chip, and on Vulkan API version, supporting 1.4 versus 1.3. The Intel IGP also has a significantly lower TDP at 25 W versus 225 W, and it requires no power connectors or slot width. The Lisuan card requires a dual-slot footprint, a 1x 8-pin connector, a 550 W suggested PSU, and measures 294 mm by 120 mm by 49 mm.

Both parts support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6, so those API levels are identical. The Intel part is listed with one ray tracing core, while the Lisuan card has no ray tracing core count recorded. The Intel part is manufactured at Intel's foundry, while the Lisuan chip is fabricated by TSMC. Both parts are marked as Active in production, with the Intel part released on April 15, 2026 and the Lisuan part on June 17, 2026.