Intel Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile vs Intel Arc Pro B60 Comparison

Where Each One Wins

The recorded data splits these two Intel parts into completely separate performance classes. Intel Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile has no benchmark entries in the database, so it cannot claim a single recorded win. Intel Arc Pro B60 holds all eight recorded benchmark results, giving it a clean sweep in any direct comparison.

The Arc Pro B60's strongest recorded result is in Passmark G3D with a score of 14580, which measures general 3D graphics performance. Its Passmark GPU Compute score of 7029 shows strong compute throughput. The DirectX legacy tests tell a different story: Passmark DirectX 9 scores 179, DirectX 11 scores 122, DirectX 12 scores 76, and DirectX 10 scores 61. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 result of 2646 provides a modern API workload measurement.

The Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile, by contrast, has no recorded benchmark scores. Its percentile ranking of 50 places it at the midpoint of all GPUs in the database, while the Arc Pro B60 sits at the 20th percentile. The database records no wins for the mobile part because there is no data to compare.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs come from different Intel design lineages. The Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile uses the Wildcat Lake chip built on the Xe3-LPG architecture, fabricated on Intel's 3 nm process. The Arc Pro B60 uses the BMG-G21 chip built on Xe2-HPG architecture, fabricated on TSMC's 5 nm process.

The transistor counts differ enormously. The Arc Pro B60 packs 19,600 million transistors on a 272 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 72.1M per mm². The Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile has unknown transistor and die size figures in the database.

Compute resources show the scale gap. The Arc Pro B60 has 2560 shading units, 160 texture mapping units, 80 ROPs, and 20 ray tracing cores. The Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile has 128 shading units, 8 TMUs, 4 ROPs, and 1 ray tracing core. That is a 20x difference in shading units, a 20x difference in ray tracing cores, and a 20x difference in ROPs.

Clock behavior also differs. The Arc Pro B60 has a base clock of 2000 MHz and a boost of 2400 MHz. The Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile has a base of 300 MHz and a boost of 2300 MHz. The mobile part's much lower base clock suggests power management priorities, while the Pro card runs at near-maximum continuously.

Memory architecture is fundamentally different. The Arc Pro B60 uses 24 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus with 456.0 GB/s bandwidth and memory clocks of 2375 MHz (19 Gbps effective). The Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile shares system memory, with bus width, type, and capacity all listed as "System Shared" and bandwidth described as "System Dependent."

Power and physical design diverge completely. The Arc Pro B60 has a 200 W TDP, dual-slot cooling, one 8-pin power connector, a suggested 550 W PSU, and a PCIe 5.0 x8 interface. It measures 167 mm by 69 mm by 40 mm. The Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile has a 25 W TDP, is an integrated graphics processor with no power connectors, and uses an IGP bus interface.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has more shading units?

A: The Intel Arc Pro B60 has 2560 shading units, while the Intel Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile has 128.

Q: What is the memory configuration of each card?

A: The Arc Pro B60 uses 24 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus with 456.0 GB/s bandwidth. The Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile uses system shared memory with system dependent bandwidth.

Q: How do their boost clocks compare?

A: The Arc Pro B60 boosts to 2400 MHz, while the Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile boosts to 2300 MHz, a difference of 100 MHz.

Q: What are the recorded benchmark scores for the Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile?

A: The database lists no benchmark entries for the Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile. Its average benchmark score is recorded as 0.

Q: What is the Arc Pro B60's best Passmark result?

A: The highest Passmark score for the Arc Pro B60 is 14580 in the G3D test, followed by 7029 in GPU Compute.

Q: Which GPU has a higher pixel rate?

A: The Arc Pro B60 has a pixel rate of 192.0 GPixel/s. The Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile has a pixel rate of 9.200 GPixel/s.

Specification Differences

| Field | Intel Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile | Intel Arc Pro B60 |

|---|---|---|

| Chip | Wildcat Lake | BMG-G21 |

| Architecture | Xe3-LPG | Xe2-HPG |

| Process Node | 3 nm | 5 nm |

| Foundry | Intel | TSMC |

| Transistors | unknown | 19,600 million |

| Die Size | unknown | 272 mm² |

| Transistor Density | null | 72.1M / mm² |

| Base Clock | 300 MHz | 2000 MHz |

| Boost Clock | 2300 MHz | 2400 MHz |

| Memory Size | System Shared | 24 GB |

| Memory Type | System Shared | GDDR6 |

| Memory Bus | System Shared | 192 bit |

| Memory Bandwidth | System Dependent | 456.0 GB/s |

| Shading Units | 128 | 2560 |

| TMUs | 8 | 160 |

| ROPs | 4 | 80 |

| RT Cores | 1 | 20 |

| Pixel Rate | 9.200 GPixel/s | 192.0 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 18.40 GTexel/s | 384.0 GTexel/s |

| FP32 | 588.8 GFLOPS | 12.29 TFLOPS |

| FP16 | 1,177.6 GFLOPS (2:1) | 24.58 TFLOPS (2:1) |

| TDP | 25 W | 200 W |

| Slot Width | IGP | Dual-slot |

| Power Connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |

| Suggested PSU | null | 550 W |

| Bus Interface | IGP | PCIe 5.0 x8 |

| Display Outputs | Portable Device Dependent | 4x mini-DisplayPort 2.1 |

| Release Date | 2026-04-15 | 2025-09-04 |

| Launch MSRP | null | 499 USD |

Both GPUs share DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4 support.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no head-to-head benchmark entries comparing these two GPUs directly. The only recorded benchmark data belongs to the Arc Pro B60, so the comparison relies on its individual test scores and the architectural figures for both parts.

The Arc Pro B60's Passmark G3D score of 14580 stands as its flagship result. Its nearest rival in the database is the NVIDIA Quadro P1000 with an average score of 3163, which the Arc Pro B60 beats by 0.6 percent. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER sits close behind with an average score of 3075, trailing the Arc Pro B60 by 3.5 percent. The NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 scores 3210, putting it 0.9 percent ahead of the Arc Pro B60. The NVIDIA GeForce 920M scores 3287, leading by 3.2 percent.

The Passmark DirectX 9 score of 179 and DirectX 11 score of 122 indicate older API workloads are handled with relative ease compared to the DirectX 10 score of 61 and DirectX 12 score of 76. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2646 provides a modern reference point.

The compute side shows substantial throughput. The Passmark GPU Compute score of 7029 is roughly half the G3D score, indicating balanced compute and graphics capabilities. The FP32 rating of 12.29 TFLOPS and FP16 rating of 24.58 TFLOPS (2:1) confirm this split.

The Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile has no benchmark scores to place against these results. Its FP32 rating of 588.8 GFLOPS is roughly 20.9 times lower than the Arc Pro B60's 12.29 TFLOPS. Its texture rate of 18.40 GTexel/s is about 20.9 times lower than 384.0 GTexel/s. Its pixel rate of 9.200 GPixel/s is about 20.9 times lower than 192.0 GPixel/s. The pattern holds across every compute metric: the mobile part delivers roughly one-twentieth the throughput of the Pro card.

The Verdict

The data presents a straightforward separation. The Intel Arc Pro B60 is a dedicated, dual-slot workstation card with 24 GB of GDDR6 memory, 2560 shading units, and a 200 W TDP. It targets systems that need sustained rendering and compute work. Its recorded benchmark scores, while modest relative to the broader database (20th percentile), show functional capability across both legacy DirectX tests and modern DX12 workloads.

The Intel Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile is an integrated GPU with 128 shading units, a 25 W TDP, and system shared memory. It has no recorded benchmark scores and an average benchmark score of 0 in the database. Its 50th percentile ranking suggests it sits near the middle of all GPUs, but no measured performance data exists to support a quantitative conclusion.

Users who need a discrete card with measurable performance in the database should look at the Arc Pro B60. The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2646, the Passmark G3D score of 14580, and the GPU Compute score of 7029 all come from this part. Users who need an integrated solution for portable devices, with the lowest power draw and no external power connectors, should look at the Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile. The two parts occupy different product categories entirely, and their specifications confirm that distinction at every level of the hierarchy.