Intel Arc G3 vs Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data shows no direct head-to-head benchmark results between the Intel Arc G3 and the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100. The database lists zero comparative measurements, and both parts hold identical percentile positions at 50.0 among all GPUs. Without empirical scores, the comparison must rest entirely on the hardware specifications recorded for each part.

The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 delivers 24.58 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, which is exactly 4.0 times the 6.144 TFLOPS offered by the Intel Arc G3. That ratio repeats across other throughput figures: the LX 7G100 reaches 49.15 TFLOPS FP16 versus 12.29 TFLOPS for the Arc G3, again a 4.0x advantage. Pixel throughput tells the same story, with the LX 7G100 recording 192.0 GPixel/s against 48.00 GPixel/s for the Arc G3, and texture rate at 384.0 GTexel/s versus 96.00 GTexel/s.

The memory subsystem separates the two parts even further. The Arc G3 uses system-shared memory with a bus width and bandwidth marked as system dependent. The LX 7G100 carries 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit interface, delivering 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The Arc G3 has no dedicated memory, so its bandwidth is determined entirely by the host platform. The LX 7G100 also operates its memory at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective speed, a figure the Arc G3 cannot match because it shares system memory.

Shading resources show a similar gap. The LX 7G100 contains 6144 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 96 render output units. The Arc G3 has 1280 shading units, 40 TMUs, and 20 ROPs. The LX 7G100 thus has 4.8 times the shading units, 4.8 times the TMUs, and 4.8 times the ROPs. The Arc G3 does include 10 ray tracing cores, while the LX 7G100 lists no RT core count in the database.

Power and physical design point in opposite directions. The Intel Arc G3 is an integrated graphics processor with a 25 W TDP, an IGP slot width, no power connectors, and a portable-device-dependent display output. The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 is a dual-slot discrete card with a 225 W TDP, a single 8-pin power connector, a suggested 550 W power supply, and a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface. The LX 7G100 measures 294 mm by 120 mm by 49 mm, while the Arc G3 has no recorded dimensions.

Process technology and foundry also differ. The Arc G3 uses a 3 nm node from Intel, while the LX 7G100 uses a 6 nm node from TSMC. The LX 7G100 is built around the 7G106 chip under the TrueGPU architecture, and the Arc G3 uses the Panther Lake chip with Xe3-LPG architecture. The Arc G3 belongs to the Arc Graphics-M (Panther Lake) generation, and the LX 7G100 belongs to the 7G100 generation.

API support overlaps in part. Both parts support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. The Arc G3 supports Vulkan 1.4, while the LX 7G100 supports Vulkan 1.3. The LX 7G100 provides 4x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs, and the Arc G3 leaves display outputs dependent on the portable device.

The Verdict

The data indicates that the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 is the stronger part by every recorded compute and memory metric. Its 24.58 TFLOPS FP32 output, 432.0 GB/s dedicated memory bandwidth, and 6144 shading units place it in a different performance class than the Intel Arc G3. The LX 7G100 also offers a 12 GB GDDR6 frame buffer, which the Arc G3 lacks entirely.

The Intel Arc G3 counters with a 3 nm process node, which is two generations ahead of the LX 7G100's 6 nm node in the recorded lithography. The Arc G3 also runs at a 25 W TDP, making it suitable for integrated use in portable devices. Its 10 ray tracing cores give it a feature the LX 7G100 does not list in the database.

Users who need maximum compute throughput, dedicated video memory, and a discrete expansion card should choose the LX 7G100 based on the recorded specifications. Users who require an integrated GPU with low power consumption and ray tracing support should choose the Arc G3.

The LX 7G100 is the clear winner in raw performance potential. The Arc G3 wins on efficiency and integration but loses on every absolute performance figure.

Where Each One Wins

The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 wins in scenarios that demand high throughput. Its FP32 and FP16 compute rates are 4.0 times higher than the Arc G3, which matters for rendering, simulation, and compute-heavy workloads. Its 432.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 12 GB GDDR6 capacity support large textures and datasets that would exceed system-shared memory limits. The 192-bit bus width and 96 ROPs also provide high pixel fill rates for high-resolution output.

The Intel Arc G3 wins in power-constrained and integrated environments. Its 25 W TDP allows deployment in portable devices without external power connectors. The 3 nm process node from Intel indicates a newer manufacturing technology than the 6 nm TSMC node used by the LX 7G100. The Arc G3 also includes 10 ray tracing cores, which the LX 7G100 does not list, giving it a potential advantage in ray-traced workloads if the software supports them.

The LX 7G100 provides a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, while the Arc G3 uses an IGP bus interface with no expansion slot. The LX 7G100 also offers 4x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs for multi-monitor setups, whereas the Arc G3's display outputs depend on the host device.

The Arc G3 supports Vulkan 1.4, while the LX 7G100 supports Vulkan 1.3. That version difference could matter for applications using newer Vulkan extensions.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has higher FP32 compute performance?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 records 24.58 TFLOPS FP32, which is exactly 4.0 times the 6.144 TFLOPS of the Intel Arc G3.

Q: Does the Intel Arc G3 have dedicated video memory?

A: No. The Arc G3 uses system-shared memory with a system-dependent bus width and bandwidth. The LX 7G100 has 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus delivering 432.0 GB/s.

Q: What are the power requirements for each GPU?

A: The Arc G3 has a 25 W TDP with no power connectors. The LX 7G100 has a 225 W TDP with one 8-pin power connector and a suggested 550 W power supply.

Q: Which GPU supports a newer Vulkan version?

A: The Intel Arc G3 supports Vulkan 1.4, while the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 supports Vulkan 1.3.

Q: Do both GPUs support DirectX 12 Ultimate?

A: Yes. Both the Arc G3 and the LX 7G100 record DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) support, along with OpenGL 4.6.

Q: Which GPU has more shading units?

A: The LX 7G100 has 6144 shading units, which is 4.8 times the 1280 shading units in the Arc G3.

Architecture Differences

The Intel Arc G3 uses the Xe3-LPG architecture built on the Panther Lake chip, manufactured on a 3 nm process at Intel. The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 uses the TrueGPU architecture built on the 7G106 chip, manufactured on a 6 nm process at TSMC. The Arc G3 belongs to the Arc Graphics-M (Panther Lake) generation, and the LX 7G100 belongs to the 7G100 generation.

The Arc G3 integrates 10 ray tracing cores, a feature not listed for the LX 7G100. The LX 7G100 relies on 6144 shading units without any RT core count in the database. Both parts support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6, but Vulkan support differs: the Arc G3 supports version 1.4 and the LX 7G100 supports version 1.3.

Memory architecture diverges completely. The Arc G3 shares system memory with no dedicated VRAM, while the LX 7G100 uses 12 GB of GDDR6 at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective speed on a 192-bit interface. The LX 7G100 delivers 432.0 GB/s bandwidth, while the Arc G3's bandwidth depends entirely on the host system.

The LX 7G100 includes 192 TMUs and 96 ROPs, producing 384.0 GTexel/s texture fill and 192.0 GPixel/s pixel fill. The Arc G3 includes 40 TMUs and 20 ROPs, producing 96.00 GTexel/s and 48.00 GPixel/s respectively.

The Arc G3 is an integrated processor with an IGP bus interface and no expansion slot, while the LX 7G100 uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface. The LX 7G100 provides 4x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs, and the Arc G3's display outputs are portable device dependent.

Specification Differences

The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 differs from the Intel Arc G3 in every major specification except API support and production status.

Process node: 3 nm for the Arc G3, 6 nm for the LX 7G100. Foundry: Intel for the Arc G3, TSMC for the LX 7G100.

Clocks: The Arc G3 has a base clock of 300 MHz and a boost clock of 2400 MHz. The LX 7G100 has no recorded base or boost clock, only a memory clock of 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective speed.

Memory: The Arc G3 uses system-shared memory with no size, type, bus width, or bandwidth figures. The LX 7G100 has 12 GB GDDR6, a 192-bit bus, and 432.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Compute units: The Arc G3 has 1280 shading units, 40 TMUs, 20 ROPs, and 10 RT cores. The LX 7G100 has 6144 shading units, 192 TMUs, 96 ROPs, and no listed RT cores.

Throughput: The Arc G3 records 48.00 GPixel/s, 96.00 GTexel/s, 6.144 TFLOPS FP32, and 12.29 TFLOPS FP16. The LX 7G100 records 192.0 GPixel/s, 384.0 GTexel/s, 24.58 TFLOPS FP32, and 49.15 TFLOPS FP16.

Power: The Arc G3 has a 25 W TDP, IGP slot width, and no power connectors. The LX 7G100 has a 225 W TDP, dual-slot width, one 8-pin connector, and a suggested 550 W power supply.

Interface: The Arc G3 uses an IGP bus interface. The LX 7G100 uses PCIe 4.0 x16.

Display outputs: The Arc G3 is portable device dependent. The LX 7G100 has 4x DisplayPort 1.4a.

Dimensions: The Arc G3 has no recorded dimensions. The LX 7G100 measures 294 mm by 120 mm by 49 mm.

Release dates: The Arc G3 released on 2026-05-31, and the LX 7G100 released on 2026-06-17. Both are listed as Active in production status.